Connected screens: the crisis in TVE and its repercussions for the Spanish lm industry (1990-1996) Pantallas conectadas: la crisis de TVE y su inuencia en el cine nacional (1990-1996) doxa.comunicación | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | 245July-December of 2022ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: Gil Gascón, F. and Chicharro, M. (2022). Connected screens: the crisis in TVE and its repercussions for the Spanish lm industry (1990-1996). Doxa Comunicación, 35, pp. 245-260. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n35a1622Fátima Gil Gascón. Full Professor in the Communication degree, Department of History & Communication at the University of Burgos. Her main areas of research are lm and television, as well as the representation of women in the media, principally during the Spanish Civil War and Francoism. She has published numerous papers concerning these matters, in several Spanish and foreign journals. University of Burgos, Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0002-7920-2144Mar Chicharro. PhD in Sociology and Full Professor of Audio-visual Communication at the University of Burgos. Her research is focused on the study of the televisual medium, its messages and audiences; she also works on gender and the media. She is a lead researcher and project assessor and has published papers in domestic and foreign journals.University of Burgos, Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0001-7510-1373Abstract: is article aims to analyse Spanish television’s lm policy and its relationship with the crisis in the Spanish lm industry between 1990 and 1996. To do this, we examine TVE’s participation in the nancing of domestic productions and its cinematographic scheduling. Our research aims to corroborate two hypotheses. Firstly, that the need to secure the loyalty of an audience that, for the rst time, could choose what it watched, forced public television to nd new strategies. is aected all scheduling, especially domestic lms broadcast on both Resumen: Este artículo tiene como objetivo estudiar la política cinematográca de televisión española y su relación con la crisis de la industria fílmica en-tre 1990 y 1996. Para ello se estudiará la programación cinematográca y la participación del Ente público en la nanciación de producciones nacionales. La investigación pretende corroborar dos hipótesis. Por un lado, cómo la televisión pública tuvo que buscar nuevas estrategias para delizar a unos espectadores que por primera vez podía elegir lo que veía. Esto condicionó al cine nacional emitido en ambas cadenas. Sus Received: 15/02/2022 - Accepted: 25/05/2022 - Early access: 06/06/2022 - Published: 01/07/2022Recibido: 15/02/2022 - Aceptado: 25/05/2022 - En edición: 06/06/2022 - Publicado: 01/07/2022

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


246 | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Connected screens: the crisis in TVE and its repercussions for the Spanish lm industry (1990-1996)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación1. Introduction e rst private TV channels appeared in Spain in 1990 thus breaking a near fty-year monopoly. is Neo television, caused a radical change in the concept, function and consumption of the small screen. e new paradigm, characterised by the modication of reality, hypervisibility, increased choice or more showbiz-like content not only transformed the televisual medium (Eco, 1986), it also had an impact on the country’s lm industry. e audio-visual sector is currently going through a revolution. Limitations on mobility and leisure spaces have accelerated the process initiated by the popularity of digital platforms. Although alternatives such as Filmin or Rakuten already existed, these were limited to being little more than containers of audio-visual material. e arrival of Netix in 2015, of HBO one year later and of Amazon Prime, Disney and Apple in 2020 represented a radical transformation. In just a few years, these new platforms have attracted millions of subscribers, while conventional television has lost viewers swiftly and inexorably. is scenario calls for a re-think of the idea of television, and of those formats typical of the medium, as well as the relationship established between the viewer and the channel and with other audio-visuals industries such as cinema. Video streaming platforms allow the user to create their own televisual ow (Heredia, Quirós-Ramírez & Quinceno Castañeda, 2021). us, audience loyalty and therefore, nance, dene the nature of the formats broadcast and permit investment with reasonable certainty in products suited to their tastes (Berejano, 2020).e almost simultaneous opening of lms such as Roma (Cuarón, 2018) or e Irishman (Scorsesse, 2019) in cinemas and via streaming oers a new business model which provokes a vital debate for this collective (Moreno, 2020, pp. 198-199). Moreover, the conversion of these platforms into producers has created lms conditioned by the screens where they are going to be shown. ey have been created in many cases in line with the circumstances of this new television. e internationalisation of lms allows for greater projection, but also certain uniformity (Chalaby, 2016) which has a bearing on narrative, visual, sound and even creative approaches (León, 2021). channels. Low viewership gures made this product unprotable, and, consequently, it was not properly scheduled on the small screen. Secondly, we attempt to show that the entity’s nancial diculties had a profound eect on the Spanish lm industry’s crisis. A lack of capital aected cooperation in nance and production between the two media, further weakening the fragile domestic lm industry. is lack of support for cinema not only had a negative eect on production, but also had consequences for its promotion and society’s recognition and acceptance of it.Keywords: Spanish television; lms; lm industry; Spanish television crisis; lm scheduling; Spanish lm crisis.bajos índices de audiencia hicieron que este producto no resultara rent-able y, por consiguiente, que no fuera convenientemente programado en la pequeña pantalla. Por otro, se intentará demostrar que los problemas económicos del Ente incidieron en la crisis de la industria cinematográ-ca española. La escasez de capital modicó las formas de producción y de colaboración económica entre ambos medios debilitando aún más la frágil industria cinematográca nacional. La falta de apoyo al cine no solo tuvo un efecto negativo en la producción. También repercutió en su promoción y en su reconocimiento y aceptación por parte de la sociedad.Palabras clave: Televisión española; películas; industria cinematográca; crisis tele-visión española; política cinematográca; crisis cine español.
doxa.comunicación | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Fátima Gil Gascón and Mar ChicharroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978247In this labyrinth, where the audio-visual industries face a paradigm shift, it is particularly interesting to observe the ways and means in which an analogous problem was approached thirty years ago. e study of the introduction of certain scheduling policies will allow us to understand the consequences that these may have for viewers’ knowledge and recognition of a given product and the implications for other cultural sectors. 2. Objectives & methodology is paper’s object of study is the cinematographic policy of TVE between 1990 and 1996. e text strives to corroborate two hypotheses. Firstly, we will try to demonstrate that the loss of its television monopoly and the need to foster audience loyalty dened the way in which Spanish cinema was programmed on both of TVE’s channels. Secondly, we will intend to discover how the entity’s economic diculties aected the crisis in the Spanish lm industry. e general objective of the research is, therefore, to study the changes occasioned in the public entity’s lm scheduling policy in the early-90s. e special circumstances that gave rise to these modications and their consequences for the latticework of the industry structure a series of specic objectives: O1: Identify and understand the patterns of lm scheduling, especially of Spanish lms, during the period under consideration. O2: Establish the relationship between the changes in lm scheduling and public television’s economic and business crisis. O3: Analyse any possible relationship between the Spanish lm industry’s problems and the lack of support from TVE. O4: Outline some consequences, for both the industry and the public, of the scarcity of broadcasts of domestic lms on public television. is paper places itself chronologically between 1990, with the commencement of broadcasts by commercial television, and 1996, the year in which the electoral victory of the People’s Party (PP) saw the socialist party (PSOE) leave oce after fourteen years, with the corresponding changes in TVE’s senior management. Apart from the changes in the organisation’s management, 1996 was also the rst year in which the sum of the private channels’ audiences exceeded those of the public ones, thus beginning the slow but progressive deterioration of public television (Vaca Berdayes, 1997, p. 411). It was also the year that saw the beginning of a certain recuperation in the lm sector due to increased production and the success of titles such as Two Much (Trueba, 1996), e day of the beast (De la Iglesia, 1996) or Libertarias (Aranda, 1996). e study of one medium –cinema– broadcast in another –television– calls for a double analysis, as a broadcast product and, therefore, subject to the trends of TV scheduling, and as a format foreign to the medium and regulated by both national law and by those of its own industry. In order to learn how the format was scheduled, a data base has been created compiling the lms broadcast on the two channels over four weeks of the year. 28 days per season over 6 years have been analysed, for a total of 168 days. For a broader understanding of the channels’ lm scheduling policy over the whole of a season, two months have been selected –March and September– when there were no events that could distort the broadcasting of these pieces, and another two with specic characteristics, such as the summer (July) and Christmas (December). e resulting data base is made up of 2064 items.
248 | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Connected screens: the crisis in TVE and its repercussions for the Spanish lm industry (1990-1996)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicacióne quantitative analysis has been complemented by a qualitative study. As well as the time slot, data has been compiled on nationality, year of production, its inclusion or not in a specic themed series or the lm’s genre. ese questions –a lm’s scheduling in line with the public’s tastes or loyalty through a recognisable brand or time slot– allow us to pinpoint the importance granted by a channel to the lm being broadcast and the medium’s trends in the topic we are studying. For the study of the relationship between television and cinema we have turned to both the academic literature on the matter and the publications of the two media during the period. On one hand, the annuals published by Televisión Española. ese detail the channel’s circumstances and its eorts to adapt to the new situation. On the other hand, the journal Academia, the periodical publication of the Spanish Film Academy. Here one nds both the consequences of television’s lm policies and the consternation these caused in the movie industry. 3. e relationship between television and cinema in SpainIn 1956, the year of the rst television transmissions in Spain, cinema was one of the most popular media with a national star system that was both recognised and highly-regarded socially (García Fernández, 2009, p. 30). Despite this, television’s arrival caused a degree of concern in the movie industry, principally due to how lms were shown in cinemas. is was by using the lucrative formula of extending the life of lms over several years by their projection in cinemas of dierent categories. Given this situation, television was seen as a competitor able to take on those older lms destined for the minor local cinema screens in city neighbourhoods and / or villages. e country’s political and economic characteristics meant that both media were dominated and nanced by the state. One, the cinematographic, through a complex system of subsidies intended to control lm content and which hindered the development of private initiative. e other, the televisual, chiey thanks to advertising, absolutely crucial for its launch and consolidation (Montero & Antona, 2019, p. 27). e 70s brought major novelties to Spain. Social, political and economic changes brought new forms of entertainment. Cinema started to lose customers and the number of movie theatres also declined. While, in 1968, cinemas had a total of 773 million movie-goers, by 1987 the number had fallen to only 86 million (Gámir, 2001, pp. 223-253). Television became the most popular mass media (Prado, 2001, pp. 161-170). is not only had repercussions for the economy of the sector, but also for its social standing. e consolidation of television as the place for making new viewers (Cerdán & Pena, 2007, p. 20), the progressive disappearance of lm magazines (Llinas, 1987, p.153), the absence of eective and attractive advertising to win over the public (Academia, 1994a, p. 25) or the growth in domestic VCRs (Calvo, 2011, p.16) were some of the causes of the big screen’s loss of inuence. At the beginning of the 90s, the cinema industry was in serious trouble. e poor box oce results of the productions of those years did not encourage investment by lm companies, which could not, nor wished to, assume the nancial risk inherent in producing a Spanish lm. Despite the search for new creative formulas to aid the development of lm with a national Identity, the box oce take showed a lack of synchrony with the public. As put by the Director General of Cinematography, Juan Miguel Lamet, it was quality cinema, but it left the public indierent. (Academia, 1992, p.12).
doxa.comunicación | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Fátima Gil Gascón and Mar ChicharroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978249e idea of a national lm industry in crisis started to gain weight and entered the national consciousness. e 1992 Goya awards, the Spanish Oscars, demonstrated both the diculties of and the unease in the sector. e continual allusions to the need for major investment or requests to movie-goers to go to see Spanish lms made some talk of the ceremony as a “weep-fest” (Academia, 1992, p. 21). is image conrmed the weakness of Spanish cinema. As an industry and as a cultural good. Televisión Española closed 1988-1989 having consolidated its position as the media group with the largest audience in Spanish history (TVE, 1989, p. 41). One year later, not only had the number of viewers fallen by a third, but it was immersed in one of the most complex and convulsive periods of its existence. May 3, 1988, saw the passing of the private television law which conceded three licences, two for free-to-air channels –Telecinco and Antena 3– and one for a subscription channel (Canal Plus). e legislation ended public television’s monopoly and completely altered the nation’s audio-visual panorama. e crisis in Televisión Española was due to several causes. Disastrous management of its resources united to the recession that aected all the audio-visual sector in the early 90s. Added to this, the arrival of the commercial channels, Telecinco and Antena 3, smashed a system that depended excessively on advertisers. Public television received mixed nancing, part coming from the State and the rest from advertising and the sale of products. From 1984 on there was a progressive withdrawal of public subsidies to television (Palacios & Ciller, 2018, p. 579). 1988 was the rst year in which RTVE did not receive money from the General Budget of the State, having to rely on its own resources to nance its operations (TVE, 1989, p. 22). Advertising turnover for 1990 was 153,313 million pesetas. 178 times greater than the income for program sales, the second source of revenue (EFE, 1990). Six years later it had lost 42% of its advertising income (Tijeras, 2012). e fall in the number of advertisers represented, as can be seen, a terrible blow to the medium’s nances. Especially as it was so swift and so massive.Without government money and at the mercy of a market it no longer controlled, the public organisation had to adopt a series of measures such as the creation of a marketing department that modied the image of the group’s channels, a drastic reduction in headcount and, more than anything, a radical control of spending. 4. Films broadcast by TVEState television utilised lm dierently on its two channels. TVE1 tended towards modern, North American lms. eir number increased at the weekend and over holiday periods, when, moreover, movies appropriate to the season were common, adventure lms and lms for teens in the summer, with Christmas-themed movies in December.
250 | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Connected screens: the crisis in TVE and its repercussions for the Spanish lm industry (1990-1996)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónGraph 1. Films broadcast by TVE1 Source: created by the authors The idiosyncrasy of TVE2 meant the broadcasting of older films from a wider range of nationalities. A large part of its schedules were films, even doubling the number shown on TVE1. Apart from abundance, there were differences in the genres and time slots. Compared to the other free-to-air channels, most of their movies were shown on weekdays. The channel also showed classic films under umbrellas such as Cine club or The star is…, films in black and white, mostly of renowned quality, and largely, though not exclusively, from Hollywood. Graph 2. Films broadcast by TVE2 Source: created by the authors The time slots were commercially driven. Firstly, successful films - mainly due to their topicality and popularity - were broadcast in prime-time though these became less frequent as other formats more suited to the medium became available, such as TV series. During the period under study, TVE broadcast, at least, three prime-time films per week, usually on Mondays, Tuesdays and/or Thursdays and, at the weekend, on Saturdays on 05101520253035401990199119921993199419951996JanuaryMarchJulyDecember0510152025301990199119921993199419951996JanuaryMarchJulyDecemberSource: created by the authorse idiosyncrasy of TVE2 meant the broadcasting of older lms from a wider range of nationalities. A large part of its schedules were lms, even doubling the number shown on TVE1. Apart from abundance, there were dierences in the genres and time slots. Compared to the other free-to-air channels, most of their movies were shown on weekdays. e channel also showed classic lms under umbrellas such as Cine club or e star is…, lms in black and white, mostly of renowned quality, and largely, though not exclusively, from Hollywood. Graph 2. Films broadcast by TVE2 Source: created by the authors The idiosyncrasy of TVE2 meant the broadcasting of older films from a wider range of nationalities. A large part of its schedules were films, even doubling the number shown on TVE1. Apart from abundance, there were differences in the genres and time slots. Compared to the other free-to-air channels, most of their movies were shown on weekdays. The channel also showed classic films under umbrellas such as Cine club or The star is…, films in black and white, mostly of renowned quality, and largely, though not exclusively, from Hollywood. Graph 2. Films broadcast by TVE2 Source: created by the authors The time slots were commercially driven. Firstly, successful films - mainly due to their topicality and popularity - were broadcast in prime-time though these became less frequent as other formats more suited to the medium became available, such as TV series. During the period under study, TVE broadcast, at least, three prime-time films per week, usually on Mondays, Tuesdays and/or Thursdays and, at the weekend, on Saturdays on 05101520253035401990199119921993199419951996JanuaryMarchJulyDecember0510152025301990199119921993199419951996JanuaryMarchJulyDecemberSource: created by the authors
doxa.comunicación | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Fátima Gil Gascón and Mar ChicharroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978251e time slots were commercially driven. Firstly, successful lms - mainly due to their topicality and popularity - were broadcast in prime-time though these became less frequent as other formats more suited to the medium became available, such as TV series. During the period under study, TVE broadcast, at least, three prime-time lms per week, usually on Mondays, Tuesdays and/or ursdays and, at the weekend, on Saturdays on TVE2 and Sundays on TVE1. Films were highly popular with the public which made them a great draw for viewers (TVE, 1989, p. 44). Secondly, television lms dominated the afternoons in the mid-90s on TVE1, substituting soap operas. Finally, lms of lesser commercial value shown in the small hours or in the morning. Particularly on TVE2 which had two themed formats –Films for Everyone and e Morning Movie- showing a daily lm. In both cases, the norm was family lms, adventures, North American and Spanish, over thirty years old and B-lms. In 1992, amidst the celebration of the ve hundredth anniversary of the Discovery of the Americas, there were quite a number of Latin American lms such as Historia de una noche (Saslavsky 1941) or ¡Viva el amor! (De la Serna, 1958). e few morning lms on TVE1 were mainly broadcast in 1991/1992 and 1994/1995. ese time slots indicated little care for or interest in the product. In fact, in 1993, the estimated viewing time in the slot was 18 minutes in the after-midnight slot and 22 minutes mid-morning. is is only half of the time in other slots and less than a third than in prime-time (Palacio, 2008, p. 168). As the director Antonio Mercero said, the important thing was not how much lm was broadcast but when and what (SGAE, 2000, p. 335). Putting lms on at a time when there is going to be little audience or with a very specic target, as well as choosing old lms and ones of slight interest, shows, more than anything, a wish to cut costs using lower quality stock to occupy an unpopular time slot. e public channels always maintained a consistent number of lms. Excepting periods such as 1991/ 1992, the toughest in the organisation’s crisis, when the number of lms almost doubled. Most were part of the existing stock in the channel’s library, old lms, some of poor quality and little suited to the tastes of prime-time viewers. A special themed season was created, Cine 92, with one lm per night. e number of lms can be seen to increase again in late 1996. e March elections had handed power to the People’s Party. When the new director general, Mónica Ridruejo, took up her position, there was no budget left for acquisitions that year or the next (Munsó, 2001, p. 327). e policy of cost control she wanted to introduce and especially the limited room for manoeuvre called for an optimization of existing resources through the use of the library. is was particularly true at Christmas, a time for family and movies. e early 90s saw greater repetition of lms, in 1991 TVE tripled the number of repeats compared to previous years, a tendency “likely to become a fundamental resource to maximize the investment in external production”. (TVE, 1991, p. 183). is approach, that sought not only to make the most of a lm but also avoided scheduling others, was highly eective with popular titles such as Pretty Woman (Marshall, 1990). is lm was broadcast three times by TVE during the period under study – twice in 1994 and once in 1996- achieving a large audience on each occasion (Palmero, 2015). North American commercial cinema attracted viewers and, in consequence, advertisers, therefore TVE clearly turned to it. In October 1992, it signed a contract with Warner which committed the entity to purchasing broadcasting rights from the studio to a value of 100 million dollars over the 93, 94 and 95 seasons (Tijeras, 2012). is outlay set the nationality of the movies to be shown over the following years. e channels bought bundles of lms from the majors. Licences were oered for a specied period
252 | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Connected screens: the crisis in TVE and its repercussions for the Spanish lm industry (1990-1996)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónand bound together famous titles and others of less renown or made-for-TV. is meant that along with the acquisition of major feature lms, the channel accepted a commitment to broadcast the other tapes it had been obliged to buy. e most famous movies were shown under several umbrellas. One of the most popular was ursday Movie which showed action and adventure lms such as Jumanji (Johnston, 1995), e Last Boy Scout (Scott, 1991) or e Film of the Week. is space, which mixed Hollywood productions with made-for-TV pieces and Spanish lms, struggled to consolidate itself as leader in its time slot until it switched to almost exclusively showing Hollywood lms made in the 90s. Until the 1991-1992 season, domestic titles used to gure in the top 25 most watched. e statistics for later seasons reected a shift in viewers’ preferences towards stories made in the Mecca of cinema. Nineteen of the top twenty lms in terms of audience in the 1995/1996 season were American (GECA, 1997, p. 80). Spanish productions barely gured in this televisual scenario, maintaining a share, with little variation, of 12% over the years under consideration. ese productions used to be shown in the mid-morning or late-night slots, mainly on TVE2, the channel where, in the early years of the decade, some lms were broadcast in the mid-afternoon slot on weekdays. ere were hardly any Spanish feature lms shown outside of these slots. In general, the domestic lms shown corresponded to two very specic periods. One, late-Francoism, stories from which were very popular. Indeed, between 1991 and 1993, the only Spanish lms scheduled at popular times were comedies such as Cateto a Babor (Fernández, 1970) or Objetivo bikini (Ozores, 1968).e other period was the 90s productions in which the public television entity had participated. ough few in number, from 1994 some of these feature lms could be seen -for example, Tender Summer of Lust on the Rooftops (Chávarri, 1993) or Anything for Bread (Urbizu, 1991)- at weekday prime-time. e public’s response was variable. While the Francoist movies gained high audience shares, the contemporary output had a varied following. From 1995 on there was an increase in the number of Spanish lms on TVE2 thanks to the creation of themed programs such as Nuestro cine and Cine de Barrio which swiftly, due to its popularity, switched over to TVE1. e structure of these programs implied a certain care for the product as it bundled together, in a common framework, lms with similar characteristics. is allowed for their identication by the public, and thus created a certain anity. 5. Causes of the lack of Spanish movies on the screense public channel’s nancial struggles and the need to gain the loyalty of the public so as to attract advertisers, created a cinematographic policy focused on the protability of the products broadcast. 1992 was one of the seasons in which TVE broadcast most Spanish features. It was also the year in which the crisis engulng Spanish cinema became most evident. During this time, the public channel relied on titles in its archive, and therefore did not renew or invest in lms (TVE, 1992, p. 233). In the case of Spanish products, old lms were shown for two reasons. e rst was nancial. Domestic productions, like foreign ones, were purchased in bundles. is dened both the channel’s library, which contained previous purchases, and the titles that had to be shown at some point. e gures were high. An example would be the nearly eight hundred movies acquired by TVE between 1995 and 1997 for three billion pesetas. Among these are
doxa.comunicación | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Fátima Gil Gascón and Mar ChicharroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978253popular lms such as La tonta del bote (Orduña, 1970) or No desearás al vecino del quinto (Fernández, 1970) and many others of little renown which, by contractual obligation, also had to be shown (TVE compra 700...,1997). Modern Spanish lms could not, by law, be broadcast less than two years after their big-screen premiere, which meant a nancial outlay which could not be recuperated for at least two years (Academia, 1995, p. 96-97).Furthermore, there was the audience share. e domestic lms with the highest TV audience – and therefore the most popular among the general public- were comedies from the 60s and/or 70s. Films from that period were very popular, even twenty years later. eir success, combined with that of domestic series, reects the average viewer’s interest in formats related to local and national culture as opposed to more universal and homogenous products (Waisbord, 2004, p. 359-383). e audience gures obtained by these lms were also fruit of the nostalgia for lost idiosyncrasy, both general and particular (Armbruster, 2016, p. 23). A certain longing for a country that, though living under a dictatorial regime, had felt cheerful, carefree and undogmatic, with a clearly dened character. And, of course, for a time when the typical viewer of these pieces had been young and had their whole life before them. Moreover, the need to maintain audience gures meant that certain broadcasting norms were systematically ignored, which had negative repercussions for the industry. ese norms stated that 40% of commercial lms broadcast should be productions from the European Community and, within that percentage, at least half had to be Spanish (Cuevas, 1994: 119). José Antonio Suárez, legal advisor to the Confederation of Spanish Audio-visual Producers (FAPAE), pointed to compliance with the legally established European-produced percentage as one of the key measures for the reactivation of Spanish production (Academia, 1993, p. 13). e solution, he thought, was evident, there should be investment in contemporary cinema and not in foreign material or lms produced in the past (Academia 1993, p. 10). One should not forget that the broadcasting of old lms, although they were domestic productions, not only failed to build the industry, but also failed to consolidate the new roster of stars.Despite these considerations, Televisión Española’s pressing nancial needs led it to give priority to trends in the television market as opposed to public interest. Competition with the private channels had two fundamental consequences. Firstly, viewers began to see themselves as potential clients (Mateos-Pérez, 2014, p. 71). Secondly, there was a homogenisation of formats, degrading and putting cultural demands to one side (Gubern, 2006, p. 370).6. TVE’s participation in the nancing of domestic cinema TVE’s nancial crisis had a direct impact on its support of Spanish lm-making. According to data from the Spanish Film Academy, a third of the nance provided to Spanish lms in the 90s came from the sale of broadcast rights to TV channels (Academia, 1997b, p. 15). Agreements with these bodies could mean a dierence of between 70 and 80 million pesetas, for lms with a budget of little more than one hundred million (Academia, 1997a, p. 26). e public entity started to participate actively in lm nancing in the 80s thanks to the signing of agreements with the Confederation of Spanish Audio-visual Producers which set a share of 20% and regulated broadcast rights and associated productions (Gómez-Escalonilla, 1998, p. 60). ese were corroborated by the norms proposed by Pilar Miró – who during the 80s
254 | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Connected screens: the crisis in TVE and its repercussions for the Spanish lm industry (1990-1996)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónheld the highest positions in the Directorate General of Cinematography and in RTVE – which permitted the direct production of lms and series in exchange for exclusive broadcast rights (Mateos-Pérez & Cabeza, 2015, pp. 76-92). Despite the producers’ change of attitude and the channel’s initial good-will, most of the agreements were not honoured. In 1990 the agreement signed a year earlier between e Instituto de la Cinematografía y de las Artes Audiovisuales (ICAA) was extended with a commitment to invest 2 billion pesetas in lm and 10 billion in other types of audio-visual products. A year later, TVE declared its inability to fulll the agreement, with the Ministry of Culture assuming the cost. In 1992, TVE’s tendency to participate in the nancing of Spanish lm through associated and nanced production was modied (Academia, 1994b, p. IX), this being the rst year in which no feature lms were produced. Although it did not acquire any broadcasting rights (Academia, 1994a, p. 9), from that moment on, the public channel was to bet on this format. e norm was to negotiate lming beforehand, and the agreements were for three years (Bello, 2012). Prices were low and were set following the channel’s criteria. at is to say, the estimated audience, time slot or broadcast region were considered, instead of the movie’s production costs. Graph 3. Broadcast rights acquired by TVE during the years under study Despite the producers change of attitude and the channel’s initial good-will, most of the agreements were not honoured. In 1990 the agreement signed a year earlier between The Instituto de la Cinematografía y de las Artes Audiovisuales (ICAA) was extended with a commitment to invest 2 billion pesetas in film and 10 billion in other types of audio-visual products. A year later, TVE declared its inability to fulfill the agreement, with the Ministry of Culture assuming the cost. In 1992, TVE’s tendency to participate in the financing of Spanish film through associated and financed production was modified (Academia, 1994b, p. IX), this being the first year in which no feature films were produced. Although it did not acquire any broadcasting rights (Academia, 1994a, p. 9), from that moment on, the public channel was to bet on this format. The norm was to negotiate filming beforehand, and the agreements were for three years (Bello, 2012). Prices were low and were set following the channel’s criteria. That is to say, the estimated audience, time slot or broadcast region were considered, instead of the movie’s production costs. Graph 3. Broadcast rights acquired by TVE during the years under study Source: created by the authors from data compiled by the journal Academia Thanks to the agreement signed by TVE and the Instituto de Crédito Oficial (ICO) in 1994, which established a 2 billion peseta annual line of credit for the purchase of broadcast rights over the following three years, the organization was able to keep up its investments. Although the terms had changed, the return of TVE to the world of financing Spanish cinema had positive repercussions for the industry. In fact, as pointed out by Agustín Almodóvar, Pedro Almodóvar’s brother and producer of El Deseo S.A., it was television that really brought profits for films (Academia, 1996a, p. 98). Nevertheless, and despite the change in tendency, domestic cinema’s market share remained firmly below 11% (EGEDA, 2001, p. 11). 7. Consequences of TVE’s cinematographic policy for the Spanish cinema industry. During the 80s, a major cultural shift could be observed in Spain, fruit of the enormous changes taking place following the death of Franco. The consolidation of Spanish democracy, entrance into the EEC or the improved international standing of the country following numerous events in 1992 saw Spain open up to the world. The younger population found themselves torn between two trends, immersed in globalization but still 0510152025199019911992199319941995Broadcasting rights acquiredSource: created by the authors from data compiled by the journal Academiaanks to the agreement signed by TVE and the Instituto de Crédito Ocial (ICO) in 1994, which established a 2 billion peseta annual line of credit for the purchase of broadcast rights over the following three years, the organization was able to keep up its investments. Although the terms had changed, the return of TVE to the world of nancing Spanish cinema had positive repercussions for the industry. In fact, as pointed out by Agustín Almodóvar, Pedro Almodóvar’s brother and producer of El Deseo S.A., it was television that really brought prots for lms (Academia, 1996a, p. 98). Nevertheless, and despite the change in tendency, domestic cinema’s market share remained rmly below 11% (EGEDA, 2001, p. 11).
doxa.comunicación | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Fátima Gil Gascón and Mar ChicharroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-39782557. Consequences of TVE’s cinematographic policy for the Spanish cinema industry.During the 80s, a major cultural shift could be observed in Spain, fruit of the enormous changes taking place following the death of Franco. e consolidation of Spanish democracy, entrance into the EEC or the improved international standing of the country following numerous events in 1992 saw Spain open up to the world. e younger population found themselves torn between two trends, immersed in globalization but still tied to local tradition (Henseller, 2011, p. 16). is was not truly taken on by lms, with themes and ideas diering greatly from those of their viewers. ey were more tuned to imitating, with little success, stories from abroad, than addressing national problems, resulting in low audience levels both on the big screen and on the small. e lack of support from public television did no more than worsen the situation. In fact, the small screen was one of the media that had most inuence on mass audiences, which thanks to it, assumed tastes and fashions and learnt what books to read, which records to listen to and what movies to see. (Postman, 1991, p. 83). is had a negative eect on the media education of a society which lacked educational policies designed to study audio-visual culture (Medina, Briones & Hernández, 1997, p. 50). is contributed to a lack of awareness about domestic productions. In this competitive system, public taste and the trends in the medium set both the nature and the format of the productions of the time. Products were no longer only created for darkened movie theatres but for brightly-lit living rooms. is meant that audio and visual elements such as the size of shots, depth, sound or photography (Academia, 1997b, p. 39) were aected by and adapted to new forms of consumption. is was manifest in the more technical tasks, where the professionals had to approach their work thinking of a substantially smaller screen. A good example of this is the modications introduced in the eld of lighting. As the Director of Photography Toe Trenas put it, in the 90s nobody dared to illuminate taking full advantage of the latitude and underexposure of cinematographic material, as they had just a decade before, as it was impossible to transfer the atmosphere and quality of an image to television (Academia, 1998, p. 27) e development of televisual elements as opposed to the cinematographic also changed the narrative structure of stories. Language, rhythm, or staging were all altered when writing scripts (Rimbau & Torreiro, 1999, p. 38), in many cases adapting to the type of movie the organisation was backing, a quality product, mainly comedy, with sucient budget to permit it to be well-made and which would gain certain prestige (Academia, 1996a, p. 100). Television’s subjugation in televisual, nancial, aesthetic and even sociological terms produced a certain uniformity of format (Cerdán & Pena, 2007, pp. 18-19). It became a “generic” product that covered certain general and uncontroversial subjects from a conservative standpoint. In fact, as Manuel Gutiérrez Aragón said, “from the moment that I became aware that lms were going to be on television (…) I have lmed more specically, bringing the camera in closer without realising I’m doing it... At rst, that doesn’t matter, but at the end of the day, that’s one of the reasons why lms, unfortunately, look more and more like each other” (Monterde & Casas, 1986, p. 140).
256 | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Connected screens: the crisis in TVE and its repercussions for the Spanish lm industry (1990-1996)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación8. ConclusionsIn the early 90s, TVE struggled with serious structural and nancial diculties. After decades of control of both public and advertisers, the end of its monopoly obliged it to ght hard to keep its audience without greatly increasing spending. Films had an important role to play in this context. ey were still a major draw for the public, and the broadcasting of library lms allowed for the lling of broadcast hours, amortising material without the need to acquire new products. Analysis of TVE’s lm scheduling over the period under study corroborates our initial hypothesis. It can be said that the lack of capital and, especially, the need to compete for the public’s favour, dened the public channels’ lm policy. e priority given to broadcasting foreign, usually Hollywood, lms, the emission of Spanish lms in uncompetitive time slots or the systematic non-compliance with the broadcast quota were some of the actions that had a negative eect on the way domestic lm was scheduled. Since TVE was, still, the leading channel, this trend became a constant over the decade, and dened, by imitation, the private channels’ approach to broadcasting and investment. is question conrms that Spanish television’s nancial problems were one of the factors that sharpened the national cinematographic sector’s crisis. A sector that, alienated from its public, nancially dependent on budgets that grew smaller and smaller every year, and almost totally lacking self-criticism, could not understand or connect with the new society of the 90s. is, at least, is what the poor results of contemporary Spanish lms on the big screen seem to demonstrate. at is why, above and beyond questions such as a lm being in the channel’s archive, or its price, the most important criterion for the broadcasting of a Spanish movie was its box oce results. e paradigm shift when choosing to give nancial backing to Spanish productions had a bearing on two questions. For one part, during the period of study, the number of pieces lmed fell considerably. Moreover, stories lost certain creative freedom in adapting to the thematic, visual and narrative tastes of the channels. Similarly, a lack of promotion and the scarcity of contemporary domestic products did little to drive the star system that could strengthen the recognition and following of certain actors and actresses. is is especially relevant given the social importance of the medium in Spain (Smith, 2006). At a time when television, as cinema had been before, became the school of the audio-visual, the absence of modern references supposes a lack of adhesion and habit in the consumption of Spanish lms produced in the 90s. e pass from Paleo-television to Neo-television had negative repercussions for the Spanish lm industry. In 1996, a TVE advert in the journal Academia, indicated that the public tv body designed its programming for those lms the viewers wanted to see (Academia, 1996b). e option to choose granted the public the power to decide the success or failure of a format. is turned them into an active subject able to inuence the channel’s future investment, by their choice of certain stories, with very specic themes and visual solutions.e new televisual paradigm not only made manifest the clear inter-relation between audio-visual media in Spain, but it also revealed the industrial weaknesses of a sector, that of cinema, still highly dependent on external nancing.
doxa.comunicación | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Fátima Gil Gascón and Mar ChicharroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-39782579. AcknowledgementsOur thanks to Brian O’Halloran for the translation of this paper.is paper forms part of the research initiated by the authors within the framework of the project “History of TV programmes and scheduling in Spain (State channels): from deregulation to the analogue shutdown (1990-2010)” (HISPROTEL) nanced by the Ministry of Economics & Competitivity.10. Specic contributions from each authorName and SurnameConception & design of the research Fátima Gil and Mar ChicharroMethodologyFátima Gil and Mar ChicharroCompilation & analysis of the dataFátima Gil and Mar ChicharroDiscussion & conclusionsFátima Gil and Mar ChicharroWriting, layout, review & approval of the versionsFátima Gil and Mar Chicharro11. Bibliographic referencesAcademia de las artes y de las ciencias cinematográcas de España. (1992). Academia. Revista del cine español. 2, mayo. Madrid. AACCE.Academia de las artes y de las ciencias cinematográcas de España. (1993). Academia. Revista del cine español. 4, octubre. Madrid. AACCE.Academia de las artes y de las ciencias cinematográcas de España. (1994a). Academia. Revista del cine español. 6, abril. Madrid. AACCE.Academia de las artes y de las ciencias cinematográcas de España. (1994b). Academia. Revista del cine español. 8, octubre. Madrid. AACCE.Academia de las artes y de las ciencias cinematográcas de España. (1995). Academia. Revista del cine español. 10, abril. Madrid. AACCE.Academia de las artes y de las ciencias cinematográcas de España. (1996a). Academia. Revista del cine español. 13, enero. Madrid. AACCE.Academia de las artes y de las ciencias cinematográcas de España. (1996b). Academia. Revista del cine español. 15, julio. Madrid. AACCE.Academia de las artes y de las ciencias cinematográcas de España. (1997a). Academia. Revista del cine español. 18, marzo. Madrid. AACCE.
258 | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Connected screens: the crisis in TVE and its repercussions for the Spanish lm industry (1990-1996)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónAcademia de las artes y de las ciencias cinematográcas de España. (1997b). Academia. Revista del cine español. 20, octubre. Madrid. AACCE.Academia de las artes y de las ciencias cinematográcas de España. (1998). Academia. Revista del cine español. 23, julio. Madrid. AACCE.Armbruster, S. (2016). Watching nostalgia. And analysis of nostalgic television ction and its reception. Bieled. Transcript verlag.Bello, J. A. (2012). Hacer cine en España. Cuadernos de comunicación multimedia. 23, 140-159. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CDMU/article/view/41130/39342 Berejano, P. (2020). Cinco años de Netix: el impacto en la producción audiovisual española. El País. 18 octubre. https://elpais.com/retina/2020/10/16/innovacion/1602843710_314589.html Calvo Herrera, C. (2011). Explotación de películas. Jaen. Zumaque.Cerdán, J. y Pena, J. (2007). Variaciones sobre la incertidumbre (1984-1999). Madrid. Liceus.Chalaby, J. (2016). Television and Globalization: e TV Content Global Value Chain. Journal of Communication. 66 (1), 35-59. doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12203Cuevas, A. (1994). Las relaciones entre el cinema y la televisión en España y otros países. Madrid. Consejería de Educación y Cultural.Eco, U. (1986). La estrategia de la ilusión. Barcelona. LumenEFE. (1990). El presupuesto de RTVE para el próximo año ascenderá a 208.000 millones de pesetas. El país. 1 agosto, https://elpais.com/diario/1990/08/01/radiotv/649461602_850215.html EGEDA (2001). Panorama Audiovisual. Madrid. EGEDA.GECA (1997). Un año de Televisión 1995/1996. Madrid. Gabinete de estudios de la comunicación audiovisualGámir, A. (2001). Del cine multipantalla al megaplex. Transformaciones recientes en la industria de la exhibición cinematográca en España. Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense. 21, 223-253. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/AGUC/article/view/AGUC0101110223A García Fernández, E. (2009). La gura del productor en la industria cinematográca española. En: Javier Marzal y Francisco Javier Gómez Tarin (ed.), El productor y la producción en la industria cinematográca (21-46). Madrid. UCM.Gómez-Escalonilla, G. (1998). La programación televisiva en España. Madrid. Universidad Complutense. https://www.cervantesvirtual.com/obra/la-programacion-televisiva-en-espana-estudio-de-las-parrillas-de-programacion-televisiva-espanola-desde-1956-a-1996--0/ Gubern, R. (2006). En la encrucijada. V.V.A.A, Tendencias `06. Medios de comunicación. El año de la televisión (369-373). Madrid. Fundación Telefónica. Henseler, C. (2011). Spanish ction in the digital age. Generation X remired. New York. Palgrave Mcmillan.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Fátima Gil Gascón and Mar ChicharroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978259Heredia-Ruiz, V., Quirós-Ramírez, A. C., y Quiceno-Castañeda, B. E. (2021). Netix: catálogo de contenido y ujo televisivo en tiempos de Big data. Revista de Comunicación. 20 (1), 117-136. doi.org/10.26441/rc20.1-2021-a7 León, I. (2020). La revolución de Netix en el cine y la televisión. Lima. Universidad de Lima.Llinas, F. (1987). 4 años de cine español. Madrid. ImagcMateos-Pérez, J. y Cabeza, J. (2015). El cine durante la primera competencia televisiva española (1990-1994). Signo y pensamiento. 67, 76-92. doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.syp34-67.cdfs Mateos-Pérez, J. (2014). La Aportación de la Televisión a la Construcción del imaginario español. Comunicación y medios. nº 29, 64-75. doi.org/10.5354/0719-1529.2014.30142 Medina, F., Briones, J. A. y Hernández, E. (2017). Educación en medios y competencia mediática en la educación secundaria en España. Icono 14. 15 (1), 42-65. doi.org/ 10.7195/ri14v.15i1.1001Monterde, J. E. y Casas, Q. (1986). Entrevista con Manuel Gutiérrez Aragón. Dirigido por. 140. Montero, J. y Antona, T. (2018). Programación y estrategias de programación en la televisión franquista. En: Julio Montero (ed.), Una televisión con dos cadenas. La programación en España (1956-1990) (21-34). Madrid. Cátedra.Moreno Suárez, F. (2020). Entrevista con Gastón Pavlovich, productor de El irlandés. Revista Iberoamericana de Comunicación. 39, 194-200Munsó, J. (2001). La otra cara de la televisión. 45 años de historia y política audiovisual. Madrid. Flor del viento.Palacio, M. (2008). Historia de la televisión en España. Barcelona. Gedisa.Palacio, M. y Ciller, C. (2018). La programación y la estrategia de programación televisiva durante la era socialista. En: Julio Montero (ed.), Una televisión con dos cadenas. La programación en España (1956-1990) (567-584). Madrid. Cátedra.Palmero, M. (2015). Vuelve Pretty Woman, la película que se ha emitido 157 veces en España. El Condencial. 18 de abril. https://www.elconfidencial.com/television/2015-04-18/pretty-woman-vuelve-a-telecinco-la-pelicula-que-se-ha-emitido-157-veces-en-espana_762087/ Postman, N. (1991). Divertirse hasta morir: el discurso público en la era del “show business”. Barcelona. Ediciones de la Tempestad.Prado, J. (2001). Hacia un nuevo concepto de alfabetización. El lenguaje de los medios. Comunicar. 16, 161-170. http://rabida.uhu.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10272/957/b1521767x.pdf?sequence Rimbau, E. y Torreiro, C. (1999). Historias, palabras e imágenes. Entrevistas con guionistas del cine español. Madrid. Fondo de cultura económica.Smith, P. J. (2006). Television in Spain. From Franco to Almodóvar. London. Tamesis.SGAE. (2000). Informe anual 1999. Madrid. Sociedad general de autores españoles.Tijeras, R (2012). La quiebra socialista de RTVE. Comunicación 21, revista cientíca de estudios sobre comunicación y medios. 2, 1-12. http://www.comunicacion21.com/la-quiebra-socialista-de-radio-television-espanola/ TVE. (1989). Anuario 1988. Madrid. RTVE.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


260 | nº 35, pp. 245-260 | July-December of 2022Connected screens: the crisis in TVE and its repercussions for the Spanish lm industry (1990-1996)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTVE. (1990). Anuario 1989. Madrid. RTVE.TVE. (1991). Anuario 1990. Madrid. RTVE.TVE. (1992). Anuario 1991. Madrid. RTVE.TVE (1997). TVE compra 700 película a Enrique Cerezo por más de 3000 millones. El país. 11 de febrero. https://elpais.com/diario/1997/02/11/sociedad/855615621_850215.html Vaca Berdayes, R. (1997). Quien manda en el mano. Comportamiento de los españoles frente a la televisión. Madrid. Visor.Waisbord, S. (2004). McTv. Understanding the global popularity of televisión formats. Television and new media. 5, 4, 359-383. doi.org/10.1177/1527476404268922

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]