Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutionsFactores de riesgo en el uso del teléfono móvil y de las redes sociales en los estudiantes universitarios doxa.comunicación | nº 38, pp.19-39 | 19 January-June of 2024ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: Sánchez-Sánchez, A. M.; Sánchez-Sánchez, F. J. and Ruiz-Muñoz, D. (2024). Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutions. Doxa Comunicación, 38, pp. 19-39.https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n38a1959Ana María Sánchez-Sánchez. Full-time lecturer in the Department of Economics, Quantitative Methods and Economic History at the Universidad Pablo Olavide (Seville, Spain). She holds a PhD in Business Administration and Management from the same university. Her research interests revolve around model analysis, especially through Multivariate Analysis and DEA methodology. As a result of this research, she has authored articles in scientic journals indexed in JCR and SJR on dierent areas of Social Sciences such as tourism, employment, communication and sexuality. Moreover, she has spoken at several national and international conferences.Universidad Pablo Olavide, Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0002-6591-954XFrancisca Jesús Sánchez-Sánchez. Professor in the department of Economics, Quantitative methods and Economic History at Pablo de Olavide University (Seville, Spain). I have a PhD in Business Administration and Management from the Pablo de Olavide University.Universidad Pablo Olavide, Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0001-5325-3667David Ruiz-Muñoz. Internal Auditor at Junta de Andalucía. He was a Lecturer in Statistics and Managerial Accounting at the Universidad Pablo Olavide. He holds a PhD in Business Administration and Management from the same university. His research interests include Multidisciplinary Statistical and Demoscopic studies and the study of business management control systems. As a consequence of this investigation, he has authored multiple papers featured in recognized scientic publications (JCR and SJR), covering diverse Social Science elds such as accounting, communication, tourism, and sexuality.Junta of Andalucía, Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0003-4538-7774is content is published under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. International License CC BY-NC 4.0

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


20 | nº 38, pp.19-39 | January-June of 2024Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutionsISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónReceived: 24/04/2023 - Accepted: 30/10/2023 - Early access: 14/11/2023 - Published: 01/01/2024Recibido: 24/04/2023 - Aceptado: 30/10/2023 - En edición: 14/11/2023 - Publicado: 01/01/2024Abstract:Mobile phones have become indispensable devices for young people, transforming traditional socializing spaces into virtual ones. Excessive use of mobile phones can lead to problematic or addictive behavior. is study analyzes the dependence of university students on new technologies, specically mobile phones and social networks. It aims to identify correlations between various variables that inuence this dependence and associate them with parameters characterizing other types of addiction, such as substance use. e study employed the “Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale” questionnaire along with a questionnaire developed by the researchers to collect data on socio-demographic, psychosocial, and social network variables. A total of 371 students from Pablo Olavide University in Seville participated in the study. e results showed that 53.4% of the participants considered themselves dependent on mobile phones, while 35.1% reported dependence on social networks. Interestingly, the age of the students did not appear to inuence problematic mobile phone use, but there was a notable gender dierence, with women being more likely to misuse mobile phones than men.Keywords: University students; mobile phones; dependence; social networks; addiction.Resumen:El teléfono móvil se ha convertido en un objeto indispensable para los jóvenes, transformando los espacios de socialización tradicionales en otros virtuales. Su utilización excesiva genera un uso problemático o adictivo. Nuestro estudio analiza la dependencia de los universitarios a las nuevas tecnologías (teléfono móvil y redes sociales), identicando correlaciones entre variables que condicionen esa dependencia, y asociándolos con parámetros que caracterizan a otras adicciones relacionadas con el consumo de sustancias. Aplicamos el cuestionario «Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale», y otro de elaboración propia para las variables socio-demográcas, psicosociales y de redes sociales. Participaron 371 estudiantes de la Universidad Pablo Olavide (Sevilla). El 53.4% y el 35.1% se consideraron dependientes al teléfono móvil y a las redes sociales respectivamente. La edad de los estudiantes no inuye en el uso problemático de los móviles. La probabilidad de efectuar un mal uso de los móviles es mayor en las mujeres que en los hombres.Palabras clave: Universitarios; teléfonos móviles; dependencia; redes sociales; adicción.1. IntroductionAddiction has various denitions. According to Griths (2010), it encompasses behaviors meeting six criteria: salience, mood swings, tolerance, withdrawal, conict, and relapse. On the other hand, Koob and Volkow (2010) describe addiction as a chronic process characterized by: Compulsive search and consumption behavior. Loss of control. Rapid need for reduction of a negative or dysphoric emotional state (anxiety, irritability), resulting in a withdrawal syndrome only alleviated by substance use. It’s essential to dierentiate between use, abuse, and actual addictive behavior. e DSM-4 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) initially recognized addictions with substances under the label “Substance Abuse Disorders.” It’s crucial to distinguish between abuse and dependence. In the DSM-4, abuse was dened as a maladaptive pattern of use that led to signicant and recurrent adverse consequences related to repeated substance use, with no identied dependence, tolerance, or compulsive use pattern. Conversely, addiction, classied under “Substance Use Disorders,” encompasses concepts like dependence, tolerance, and withdrawal.
doxa.comunicación | nº 38, pp.19-39 January-June of 2024Ana María Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca Jesús Sánchez-Sánchez and David Ruiz-MuñozISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 211.1. Addiction without SubstanceAddictive behaviors aren’t limited to substances; they can include any pleasurable activity that, for some individuals, turns into an addiction. A core element of this disorder is losing control over the chosen activity, even if it leads to adverse consequences. e DSM-5 classies pathological gambling, previously an “Impulse Control Disorder” in the DSM-4, as a form of addiction known as “Non-substance addiction.” Non-substance addiction involves repetitive behaviors that provide pleasure and stress relief, particularly in their initial phases, leading to a loss of control and negatively aecting an individual’s life in various domains –family, work, or social. It shares characteristics such as withdrawal syndrome, tolerance, and loss of control with “Substance-Related Disorders and Addictive Disorders.”1.2. Abuse or Addiction to Mobile Phones and Social NetworksExcessive mobile phone use has been widely discussed in the media, sparking debates on whether it should be considered an addiction (Caro, 2018). Many people exhibit problematic use patterns, especially adolescents and young adults, leading to extensive studies on mobile phone addiction. While the DSM-5 doesn’t explicitly categorize excessive mobile phone use as a behavioral disorder, it shares signicant similarities with other addictive behaviors, like substance dependence. Several studies suggest that technology use can produce symptoms akin to other addictions. e term “addiction to new technologies” hasn’t been ocially recognized by organizations like the American Psychiatric Association (APA) or the World Health Organization, but it’s considered part of social or behavioral addictions in the specialized literature. (Prieto and Moreno, 2015).While there is no specic category in the DSM-5 that includes excessive mobile phone usage as a behavioural disorder, it is apparent that there are traits that exhibit signicant resemblances with other disorders, like substance dependence. However, a number of studies suggest that the use of technology may lead to symptoms similar to those seen in other addictions (Echeburúa and de Corral, 2010; Labrador and Villadangos, 2010). e concept of addiction or dependence to mobile phones or the internet has been proposed to explain the harmful use and lack of control over technology, which can result in behavioural, emotional, and social issues (Shi et al., 2023). However, the term ‘addiction to new technologies’ has not yet been ocially recognised by organisations such as the American Psychiatric Association (APA) or the World Health Organisation. Nevertheless, specialised literature regards it as a social or behavioural addiction analogous to other types of already established addictions (García del Castillo, 2013; Marciales and Cabra, 2010; Young, 2005).One potential denition of mobile phone addiction, or an individual who is addicted to using a mobile phone, is someone who experiences a fear of not being able to utilise their device (Kara et al., 2021). is form of addiction could result in signicant maladaptive reactions in the addicted individual (Anshari et al., 2019; Zwilling, 2022), including anxiety, depressive states, emotional imbalances, or disruptions to sleep and eating patterns (Elhai et al., 2017; Jahrami et al., 2021).e issue does not stem from reliance on devices, but rather from the factors that lead to their misuse (Ahmed et al., 2011; Buchinger et al., 2011). Individuals prioritise social interaction through various online platforms, such as social networks, over more traditional forms of communication (Chóliz, 2010, 2012; Echeburúa et al., 2009; Ontiveros, 2015). Dependence on social networks is characterized by excessive usage leading to loss of control, withdrawal symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and irritability when unable to access the network temporarily, tolerance for increased online time, and negative impacts on daily
22 | nº 38, pp.19-39 | January-June of 2024Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutionsISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónlife (Sharma et al., 2023). While instruments have been developed to assess the addictive potential of these platforms, there is a lack of conclusive evidence (Chi et al., 2022).1.3. Young People’s Vulnerability to Mobile Phone and Social Media AbuseNot all individuals become addicted to substances or behaviors, even if they engage in abusive behaviors. People are exposed to rewarding environments and stimuli, and not all cases lead to addictions, as each individual has a certain degree of vulnerability, which determines addictive behaviors. Vulnerability is inuenced by dierent personality characteristics, such as impulsivity, sensitivity to immediate reinforcement, which conditions the inability to postpone (Hogarth, 2011), the need for seeking sensations or experiences, especially during adolescence (Zuckerman et al., 1993), low self-esteem, intolerance to frustration, the absence or diculty of coping with daily challenges, as well as specic emotional variables, including a tendency to dysphoric moods, lack of aection, and poor social or family relationships (Echeburúa et al., 2009).e rapid progress of new technologies and their easy accessibility has led young people to develop an intense relationship with the Internet and mobile telephony. is has made them the rst generations in which changes in customs, habits, and attitudes are evident (Figueredo and Ramírez, 2008).New technologies are integral to people’s socialization process, inuencing their way of life, attitudes, behaviors, customs, and more (Castellana et al., 2007). is is facilitated by the characteristics of the Internet itself, such as anonymity and exibility, which encourage interaction. ese features are particularly advantageous for communication among introverted individuals (Williams and Merten, 2008). Young people’s virtual communication is inuenced by their own perception, self-esteem, and the social benets they derive from it (Bianchi and Phillips, 2005).Numerous studies analyze the relationship between young people and new technologies, focusing on attitudes toward these technologies, their most common uses, the associated risks, and resulting addictions, as well as security systems (Vidales-Bolaños and Sádaba-Chalezquer, 2017), and dierent types of parental control (Wang et al., 2023).e use of mobile phones in the eld of learning is currently on the rise (Lepp et al., 2015), with young university students using them as tools to nd information about their studies, organize, and communicate with their peers (Deribigbe et al., 2022; Zogheib and Daniela, 2022). is trend highlights potential dierences in usage based on gender, age, or the eld of study among university students. Adolescents and university students are considered the most at risk regarding new technologies. University students are an interesting population for studying technology dependence, especially since this university period represents a transition, often involving independence from the family and the start of new friendships and relationships, which can lead to changes in technology use habits (Fernández-Villa et al., 2015).Regarding the analysis of social networks by young people, two main issues are addressed: the frequency of use and motivations for using them (Zheng and Cheok, 2011). Young people increasingly express themselves via mobile phones using virtual communication systems and social networks (Aguado and Martínez, 2006). Psychological motivations for their use are also being explored (Zheng et al., 2009), with a social approach seeking to analyze concepts like social capital and social well-being (Vidales-Bolaños and Sádaba-Chalezquer, 2017; Appel et al., 2014).
doxa.comunicación | nº 38, pp.19-39 January-June of 2024Ana María Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca Jesús Sánchez-Sánchez and David Ruiz-MuñozISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 23A signicant portion of these studies involve university students as they are considered the most at-risk population (Polo et al., 2017). Based on these theoretical contributions and previous research, this study established various objectives. It aims to assess the degree of addiction to smartphones and social networks among university students at Pablo de la Olavide University and determine the sociodemographic and psychosocial factors favoring inappropriate use of smartphones and social networks. In accordance with the results of other studies (Álvarez & Moral,2020; Haro et al.,2022), the following research questions were formulated: Does student gender inuence possible addictive use of mobile phones? Does the age of the student inuence a possible addictive use of mobile phones? Does problematic mobile phone use lead to dependence on social media?e study is conducted among students who evaluate their dependence on mobile phones using a questionnaire, a method employed in similar studies (Fekih-Romdhane et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023). is approach will help in developing proles of university students’ dependence on mobile phones and social networks, identifying potential correlations between various variables that may inuence their use. It also contributes to the ongoing debate about whether excessive technology use should be considered as addictions.2. Sample Design and MethodologyA quantitative methodology was employed to describe the observed reality (Hernández et al., 2016). Internationally standardized scales were used as data collection instruments to quantify addiction to mobile phones and social networks as the primary variables of analysis.e questionnaire used is divided into three blocks that collect information on: Self-generated socio-demographic variables that gather information on population characteristics such as age, gender, self-assessment of socio-economic level, family situation, family independence, area of residence, smoking habits, and alcohol consumption. Variables analyzing mobile phone use based on the Spanish adaptation of the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale (MPPUSA) (López-Fernández et al., 2012). e components that make up the questions on mobile phone use include: 1) frequency of use, 2) time of use, 3) purpose of use, 4) impact on other activities, 5) relationships and friendships, 6) emotional state, 7) habit, and 8) costs. Self-generated variables that analyze the use of social networks. Information is collected on the social networks used, frequency of publication of news or photos, the importance of the number of followers, and self-assessment of dependence on social networks, with the aim of assessing the possible consideration of problematic use of mobile phones and social networks as an addiction.e last two blocks of questions provide certain items that facilitate the analysis for the possible consideration of problematic use of mobile phones and social networks as an addiction.
24 | nº 38, pp.19-39 | January-June of 2024Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutionsISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicacióne study population comprises the students of Pablo Olavide University (UPO) in Seville, Spain.For the collection of research data, ethical guidelines were adhered to. Research participants were made aware of the entire process and were informed about the research objectives, the type of participation required, or expected, and the use that will be made of the results obtained (Abad, 2016). Independent of the data collection function, accountability was addressed to the group of students who responded to the questionnaires, with the aim of informing them through classroom comments based on the results and the existence of a previous report. Among the ethical principles considered, informed consent was ensured, guaranteeing the autonomy and the right to privacy of the informant’s data. Participants were made aware of the benets and consequences that could arise during their participation in the research (Vargas et al., 2007). Data collection through questionnaires was conducted during April and May 2022.e sampling design used is simple random sampling at a condence level of 95%. e maximum sample error considered is 5%. e sample size consists of 371 students from dierent degree programs, including Business Administration and Management, Double Degree in Business Administration and Management and Law, Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Environmental Sciences, and Labour Relations and Human Resources. e participating degree programs were randomly selected. e application was carried out in the classroom, with a member of the research team present to explain the study’s aim, the privacy of the data collected, and to invite students to participate voluntarily. ey were also provided with an explanation of the concept of dependence on mobile phones and social networks to assess their usage properly.For data analysis, a descriptive study of the variables was conducted. e Chi-Square (Chi2) test of independence was used to examine the dependence between variables, complemented by Yule’s Q coecient to measure the association between dichotomous nominal variables.Once the variables that show a relationship were identied, binary discrete choice models were applied to explain this relationship and quantify it. ese models reect an individual’s choice between various possible alternatives. In our study, as there are only two alternatives, we used binary choice models, specically the Probit model. is model helps identify the characteristics or factors that inuence an individual’s behavior in response to a specic decision process.e Probit model is a non-linear binary choice model based on the Normal distribution function. It provides a measure of the probability of choosing the alternative under study. In our case, we quantify the probability of self-rated dependence on mobile phones and the probability of dependence on social networks.IBM SPSS Statistics v27.0.0.0 and Econometrics E-views 9.5 were used for the statistical processing of the data.3. Resultse results can be divided into two parts: descriptive analysis of the variables and analysis of the dependence between variables.
doxa.comunicación | nº 38, pp.19-39 January-June of 2024Ana María Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca Jesús Sánchez-Sánchez and David Ruiz-MuñozISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 253.1. Descriptive analysis of the variables e following tables show the percentage of positive responses to the items analyzing variables referring to mobile phone use.Table 1. Mobile phone usageFrequency of usePercentage (%)Mainly on working days3Mainly at weekends 1.3Every day95.7Time of usePercentage (%)Less than 30 minutes a day.830 minutes to 1 hour per day 6.51 to 2 hours per day21.82 to 3 hours per day22.4More than 3 hours a day48.5Purpose of usePercentage (%)Calls14.5WhatsApp33.3SMS.1Entertainment with gaming applications6Social media32.1Surng the internet14Source: own elaboration
26 | nº 38, pp.19-39 | January-June of 2024Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutionsISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTable 2. Psychosocial aspects of mobile phone useImpact on other activitiesPercentage (%)YesNoStops activities (study or work) 32.667.4Spending time on your mobile phone when you should be doing other things and this is causing you problems36.163.9Mobile phone use has taken away hours of sleep48.851.2When he is on the phone and doing something else, he gets carried away with the conversation and I don’t pay attention to what he is doing.55.344.7Decrease in performance17.582.5Discomfort associated with mobile phones5.994.1Preference of mobile phone use over other more pressing issues13.786.3Arriving late when you are hooked on your mobile and you shouldn’t be4.395.7In a hurry because the mobile phone has rung in class, cinema or theatre.31.868.2Relationships and friendshipsPercentage (%)YesNoHiding time spent on mobile phones from others4.395.7Friends and family complain about mobile phone use27.872.2If I didn’t have a mobile phone, it would be dicult for friends to get in touch.77.622.4Friends don’t like it when my mobile phone is switched o.32.167.9Emotional statePercentage (%)YesNoAble to bear not having a mobile phone62.337.7Feels impatient and annoyed when not holding a mobile phone14.385.7Keeping your mobile in mind even when you’re not using it1090Diculty concentrating in class while working or doing homework27.872.2When he has felt bad he has used his mobile phone to feel better.32.367.7When you are not reachable on your mobile phone, it makes you nervous.21.878.2
doxa.comunicación | nº 38, pp.19-39 January-June of 2024Ana María Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca Jesús Sánchez-Sánchez and David Ruiz-MuñozISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 27Using the mobile phone to talk when feeling lonely or isolated6634Nervousness when not checking the mobile phone for a long time22.477.6Dreaming of mobile phones.899.2Bad mood when you switch o your mobile phone 3.896.2Feeling lost without a mobile phone25.974.1Impatience for the latest technology in mobile devices18.981.1HabitPercentage (%)YesNoNever enough time for the mobile phone18.381.7Time spent on mobile phones has increased in the last 12 months.28.871.2Tries to spend less time on mobile phones but is unable to do so12.187.9He nds it dicult to switch o his mobile phone29.170.9You nd yourself hooked to your mobile phone more than you would like to be37.562.5He has been told that he spends too much time on his mobile phone.31.568.5CostsPercentage (%)YesNoYou have spent more on mobile than you should or could aord to pay for.8.691.4Self-assessment of the unitPercentage (%)YesNoTo mobile phone 46.653.4To social networks34.765.3Source: own elaborationSelf-assessment of Dependence: 46.6% of university students self-assess themselves as dependent on mobile phones, while the percentage drops to 34.7% in the case of dependence on social networks.Social Networks: In the analysis of social network usage, 35.1% of university students acknowledge excessive use of them, with 91.4% of students using social networks. Among those who use them, 30.9% say they use Instagram, 26.2% use Facebook, 24.9% use Youtube, 12.6% use Twitter, 1.1% use LinkedIn, and 4.2% say they use other social networks. 60.8% post news or photos
28 | nº 38, pp.19-39 | January-June of 2024Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutionsISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónon social networks from time to time or when they have time, 18% post news or photos 2 or 3 times a week, 13.9% mostly on weekends, 5.9% every day, and 1.5% several times a day. 89.1% do not attach any importance to the number of followers they have on social networks, compared to 10.9% who do.3.2. Analysis of the Dependence Between VariablesWe investigated the relationship between university students’ self-assessment of their dependence on mobile phones and social networks with respect to socio-demographic variables. For this analysis, the Chi2 test of independence was applied, and the results are presented in Tables 3 and 4.e Chi2 statistic and the signicance level indicate that the dependence of university students on mobile phones is associated with the variables of gender and social network dependence. e results reveal a strong positive relationship between mobile phone dependence and social network dependence, implying that problematic mobile phone use leads to social network dependence. On the other hand, the association between mobile phone dependence and gender is negative, indicating a greater dependence on mobile phones in women than in men.Table 3. Analysis of independence with respect to the assessment of mobile phone dependenceVariablesChi2Signicance levelQ YuleAge8.289.082-Gender10.381.001*-.3262Socio-economic level2.478.290-Family situation5.882.117-Family independence.036.850-Area of residence.019.890-Alcoholic beverages1.099.294-Smoker2.537.111-Dependence on social networks146.637.000*.9315 *p<.01 Source: own elaboratione relationship between university students’ assessment of dependence on social networks and socio-demographic variables was studied. e results indicate the existence of an association between age and dependence on social networks, as well as between gender and dependence on social networks (see Table 4). e association between age and social network dependence
doxa.comunicación | nº 38, pp.19-39 January-June of 2024Ana María Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca Jesús Sánchez-Sánchez and David Ruiz-MuñozISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 29is weak, while the relationship between social network dependence and gender is moderate and negative, indicating that women are more dependent on social networks than men.Table 4. Analysis of independence with respect to dependence on social networksVariablesChi2Signicance levelQ for YuleAge9.612.047*-Gender25.144.000**-.5097Socio-economic level3.441.179-Family situation2.939.401-Family independence.090.764-Area of residence.495.482-Alcoholic beverages.276.599-Smoker.973.324- *p<.05. **p<.01 Source: own elaboratione analysis now focuses exclusively on those variables that exhibit statistically signicant dependence. ese variables determine and quantify the categories between which this relationship is established, and dierent Probit models are proposed and estimated. e rst of these has the dependent variable as the assessment of dependence on the mobile phone, with gender as the independent variable (Model I).Table 5 provides the estimated coecients of Model I, which are used to construct the Probit model equation. e estimation of the model provides the probability that a student is dened as mobile phone dependent. It also includes the test statistics (Z-statistic) and the signicance level to evaluate the hypothesis of statistical signicance associated with each variable. e gender variable is statistically signicant in explaining the mobile phone dependence variable. It can be concluded that the model constructed is globally signicant (LR level of signicance).e coecients estimated by Model I indicate that the probability of a student considering themselves dependent on a mobile phone is higher for females than for males.
30 | nº 38, pp.19-39 | January-June of 2024Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutionsISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTable 5. Summary of Model IVariablesEstimated coecientsZ-statisticSignicance levelConstant.13491.4277.1534Gender-.4231-3.2190.0013*Statistician LR10.4243Signicance level (LR).0012* *p<.01 Source: own elaboratione marginal eect of each variable is quantied by the product of the value of the Normal density function at a given point (the mean will be taken as the reference point) and the corresponding parameter. In our study, the average marginal eect of gender on the probability of mobile phone dependence is -16.70%, indicating that the average probability of mobile phone dependence is 16.70% higher for females than for males.In Model II, dependence on social networks is proposed as a dependent variable, with gender and dependence on mobile phones as independent variables. Age has not been included as an independent variable in the Probit model, despite showing dependence on social networks in the Chi2 test analysis. is is because including it in the model indicates that it is not statistically signicant, and the results derived from its inclusion would be erroneous. erefore, it has been excluded from the analysis.Table 6. Summary of Model II VariablesEstimated coecientsZ-statisticSignicance levelConstant-1.2056-7.5928.0000*Gender-.5744-3.5110.0004*Self-assessment of mobile phone dependence1.917011.1381.0000*Statistician LR176.6049Signicance level (LR).0000* *p<.01 Source: own elaboration
doxa.comunicación | nº 38, pp.19-39 January-June of 2024Ana María Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca Jesús Sánchez-Sánchez and David Ruiz-MuñozISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 31e coecients estimated by the model indicate that the probability of considering oneself as dependent on social networks is higher for women than for men, and that the probability of dependence on social networks is higher for those with mobile phone dependence. Gender and mobile phone dependence are statistically signicant, conrming the validity of the model (see Table 6).e analysis of the average marginal eect that gender has on the probability of dependence on social networks is -14.17%, indicating that the average probability of dependence on social networks is 14.17% higher for women than for men.e study of the average marginal eect of mobile phone dependence on the probability of social network dependence is 58.22%, with the average probability of social network dependence being 58.22% higher for students with mobile phone dependence.4. DiscussionIn relation to our rst research proposal, which aims to determine both personal and psychosocial variables related to dependence on mobile phones and social networks among university students, we can highlight the high percentage of students who recognize that they are dependent on mobile phones (46.6%). is nding suggests that when young people have access to this technology, it is challenging for them to do without it, leading to prolonged usage hours and increased vulnerability to excessive and addictive use (Ertemel et al., 2023). Approximately 30% of them reported diculties in switching o their handsets, indicating that they have recognized the signicant increase in mobile phone use over the past year and have received comments from their peers and environment regarding their excessive mobile phone usage.e coexistence of smartphone addiction and depressive symptoms among university students is notable, as these aspects are highly correlated (Shi et al., 2023). is is consistent with the results of our study, as mobile phone use is linked to emotional states. For instance, students reported using mobile phones to cope with loneliness (66%) or when feeling down (32.3%). ese ndings align with previous studies (Romero and Aznar, 2019; Echeburúa, 2012; Pourafshari et al., 2022; Wei et al., 2023).It’s important to note that percentages of mobile phone dependence in the literature vary widely, with gures ranging from 2.8% to 26.1% for dierent studies, making direct comparisons challenging due to dierences in the basic concept of dependence. In our study, the primary uses of mobile phones are connecting to the internet, particularly through WhatsApp (33.3%), social networks (32.1%), and general internet browsing (14%). Traditional phone calls appear to be a lower priority, with only 14.5% of students using their phones for this purpose.Problematic internet use rates also vary across studies, with percentages between 3.7% (Estévez et al., 2009), 6.1% (Carbonell et al., 2012) and 9.9% (Muñoz-Rivas et al., 2010). In our analysis, the percentages of social network use are very high, with 91.4% of students using them, and 35.1% of these students consider themselves dependent on social networks. e most frequently used social networks include Instagram (30.9%), Facebook (26.2%), Youtube (24.9%), Twitter (12.6%), LinkedIn (1.1%), and other social networks (4.2%).e results of our study indicate a strong relationship between dependence on mobile phones and social networks, suggesting that university Students dependent on mobile phones are more likely to be dependent on social networks (58.8%).
32 | nº 38, pp.19-39 | January-June of 2024Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutionsISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónIn terms of socio-demographic variables, we did nd statistically signicant dierences between men and women with regard to the use of mobile phones and social networks. Specically, women are 16.7% more likely to engage in problematic mobile phone use than men, and 14.17% more likely to exhibit social network dependence (Tu et al., 2022). While a mild correlation between social network dependence and age is observed, this relationship does not attain statistical signicance in the regression model that explains this association, which diers from Labrador and Villadangos (2010).Other socio-demographic variables, such as socio-economic level, family situation, family independence, area of residence, and alcohol and tobacco consumption, do not appear to be determinants of dependence on mobile phones and social networks in our results. is contrasts with the ndings of Sánchez-Martínez and Otero (2009), which highlighted the role of certain socio-demographic variables in determining intensive mobile phone use. Consequently, we conclude that only gender is a predisposing factor for dependence on mobile phones and social networks.Based on our results, university students who admit to problematic mobile phone use and dependence on social networks are aware of their excessive or addictive use of new technologies. Approximately half of the students acknowledge dependence on mobile phones, and more than a third admit dependence on social networks. is emotional connection plays a crucial role, and there is a strong correlation between dependence on mobile phones and social networks (Moral and Suárez, 2016).University students who recognize problematic mobile phone use are nearly 60% more likely to engage in excessive use of social networks. Additionally, women are more likely to be dependent on either of the two technologies analyzed.In terms of considering the abusive use of these technologies as a potential addiction, the questionnaire we used introduced parameters to identify addictive behaviors, such as salience, mood changes, tolerance, withdrawal, conict, and relapse (Griths, 2010). Our results align with these parameters as they identify certain psychosocial aspects related to salience. More than 30% of respondents acknowledged that they spend excessive time on their mobile phones when they should be engaging in other activities like studying, working, or physical activities (Huang et al., 2022). is behavior led to problems such as sleep deprivation (48.8%) (Brautsch et al., 2023) or neglect of other, more urgent matters (13.7%) (Aydın and Aydin, 2022). Other aspects analyzed are linked to the withdrawal syndrome. For instance, 37.7% of university students do not believe they can go without their mobile phones, 14.3% become impatient or irritable when not holding their phones, and 22.4% experience nervousness when not checking their mobile phones for some time (Wong et al., 2022). Additionally, 3.8% experience irritability or moodiness when switching o their phones. Aspects associated with conict were also explored. Approximately 27.8% of respondents reported that their friends and family have complained about their excessive mobile phone use, and 4.3% admitted that they hide the time spent on their mobile phones from others. ese ndings align with other studies indicating an inverse relationship between social skills and social network addiction (Vásquez et al., 2020).ese results demonstrate signicant similarities between problematic use of these technologies and what is traditionally termed substance-related addictions.
doxa.comunicación | nº 38, pp.19-39 January-June of 2024Ana María Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca Jesús Sánchez-Sánchez and David Ruiz-MuñozISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 335. Conclusionse results of this study underscore the importance of focusing on the education of young people to promote controlled and responsible technology use. Preventing and educating about attitudes towards technology is fundamental and should commence from an early age. With the increasing access to mobile devices at younger ages, it is imperative to develop prevention and treatment programs that provide comprehensive interventions, such as psychosocial support, self-control techniques, psychoeducation, stress management, and emotional re-education. ese interventions can foster adaptive technology use, particularly among vulnerable populations like adolescents.Regarding the potential classication of problematic mobile phone and social network use as an addiction, it’s important to acknowledge that this remains a topic of debate within the scientic community. As technology continuously evolves, users adapt, and distinguishing between transient disruptions inherent to any evolutionary process and those that may constitute a behavioral addiction becomes challenging. Currently, no behaviors resulting from technology use are considered addictive diseases. However, the introduction of “non-substance related addictions” in DSM-5 is a signicant step toward incorporating behavioral addictions into diagnostic classications. As these behaviors evolve, their inclusion in mental health categories will elevate their importance and spur the development of multidisciplinary techniques and resources for diagnosis and comprehensive treatment.e primary limitation of this study is its limited scope, given that the sample consists of students from a single university. is limitation reduces the generalizability of the ndings and introduces the possibility of bias. Future research could build upon these ndings by expanding the study to include students from other regional, national, or international universities.Further investigations could delve into the types of social relationships that university students maintain through mobile phones and social networks, exploring how these relationships can be positive without rendering the mobile phone indispensable. Additionally, it would be benecial to examine the habits and activities of university students who are less dependent on new technologies, such as participation in sports, social or cultural activities, or involvement in associations. is analysis could provide insights into whether promoting these alternative activities among students with problematic mobile device use might reduce their level of dependence.6. Acknowledgmentse English version of this article has been reviewed by Marvellous Adebayo to whom we are grateful for his work.
34 | nº 38, pp.19-39 | January-June of 2024Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutionsISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación7. Specic contributions from each autorName and SurnameConception and design of the workAna M. Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca J. Sánchez-Sánchez, David Ruiz-MuñozMethodologyAna M. Sánchez-Sánchez y Francisca J. Sánchez-Sánchez, David Ruiz-MuñozData collection and analysisAna M. Sánchez-Sánchez y Francisca J. Sánchez-SánchezDiscussion and conclusionsAna M. Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca J. Sánchez-Sánchez, David Ruiz-MuñozDrafting, formatting, version review and approvalDavid Ruiz-Muñoz, Ana M. Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca J. Sánchez- Sánchez8. Conict of intereste authors declare that there is no conict of interest contained in this article. 9. Bibliographic referencesAbad, M. (2016). Investigación social cualitativa y dilemas éticos: de la ética vacía a la ética situada. Empiria, revista de metodología de las ciencias sociales, 34, 101-119. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.34.2016.16524Aguado, J.M., & Martínez, I.J. (2006). El proceso de mediatización de la telefonía móvil: de la interacción al consumo cultural. Estudios de Comunicación (ZER), 11, 319-343. Ahmed, I., Qazi, T.F., & Perji, K. (2011). Mobile phone to youngsters: Necessity or addiction. African Journal of Business Management, 5, 12512 -12519. https://doi.org/ 10.5897/AJBM11.626Álvarez, M., & Moral, M.D. (2020). Phubbing, uso problemático de teléfonos móviles y de redes sociales en adolescentes y décits en autocontrol. Health and Addictions, 20(1), 113-125.Anshari, M., Alas, Y. & Sulaiman, E. (2019). Smartphone addictions and nomophobia among youth. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 14(3), 242-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2019.1614709APA. (2013). Guía de consulta de los criterios diagnósticos de DSM-5. Washington. DC: American Psychiatric Association.Appel, L., Dadlani, P., Dwyer, M., Hampton, K., Kitzie, V., Matni, Z.A., Moore, P., & Teodoro, R. (2014). Testing the Validity of Social Capital Measures in the Study of Information and Communication Technologies. Information. Communication & Society, 17(4), 398-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.884612

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 38, pp.19-39 January-June of 2024Ana María Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca Jesús Sánchez-Sánchez and David Ruiz-MuñozISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 35Aydın, Y., & Aydın, G. (2022). Predictors of Procrastination in a Moderated Mediation Analysis: e Roles of Problematic Smartphone Use, Psychological Flexibility, and Gender. Psychological Reports, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221119404Brautsch, L.A., Lund, L., Andersen, M.M., Jennum, P.J., Folker, A.P., & Andersen, S. (2023). Digital media use and sleep in late adolescence and young adulthood: A systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2022.101742Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J.G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8, 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.39.Buchinger, S., Kriglstein, S., Brandt, S., & Hlavacs, H. (2011). A survey on user studies and technical aspects of mobile multimedia applications. Entertainment Computing, 2 (3), 175-190. Carbonell, X., Chamarro, A., Beranuy, M., Griths, M., Oberst, U., Cladellas, R., & Talarn, A. (2012). Problematic Internet and cell phone use in Spanish teenagers and young students. Anales de Psicología, 28(3), 789-796. Caro, M.M. (2018). Adicciones tecnológicas: ¿Enfermedad o conducta adaptativa?. Medisur, 15(2). Disponible en: http://www.medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/3279 Castellana, M., Sánchez-Carbonell, X., Graner, C., & Beranuy, M. (2007). El adolescente ante las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación: Internet. móvil y videojuegos. Papeles del Psicólogo, 28 (3), 196-204. Chi, L. , Tang, T., & Tang, E. (2022). e phubbing phenomenon: A cross-sectional study on the relationships among social media addiction, fear of missing out, personality traits, and phubbing behavior. Current Psychology, 41(2), 1112-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02468-yChóliz. M. (2012). Mobile-phone addiction in adolescence: e Test of Mobile Phone Dependence (TMD). Progress in Health Sciences, 2, 33-44. Chóliz. M. (2010). Mobile phone addiction: a point of issue. Addiction, 105, 373-374. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02854.xDeribigbe, S.A., Hamdi, W.B., Alzouebi, K., Frick, W., & Companioni, A.A. (2022). Understanding student perceptions of social computing and online tools to enhance learning. PLoS ONE, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276490Echeburúa, E. (2012). Factores de riesgo y factores de protección en la adicción a las nuevas tecnologías y redes sociales en jóvenes y adolescentes. Revista española de drogodependencia, 37(4), 435-447. Echeburúa, E., & de Corral, P. (2010). Adicción a las nuevas tecnologías y a las redes sociales en jóvenes: un nuevo reto. Adicciones, 22 (2), 91-95. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=289122889001Echeburúa, E., Labrador, F.J., & Becona, E. (2009). Adicción a las Nuevas Tecnologías. Madrid. España: Pirámide.Elhai, J.D., Dvorak, R.D., Levine, J.C. & Hall, B.J. (2017). Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. Journal of Aective Disorders, 207, 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030Ertemel, A.V., Menekse, A., & Camgoz Akdag, H. (2023). Smartphone addiction assessment using pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC-TOPSIS. Sustainability, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15053955

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


36 | nº 38, pp.19-39 | January-June of 2024Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutionsISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónEstévez, L., Bayón, C., de la Cruz, J., & Fernández-Liria, A. (2009). Uso y abuso de Internet en adolescentes. En E. Echeburúa. F.J. Labrador y E. Becoña (eds.). Adicción a las nuevas tecnologías en adolescentes y jóvenes (pp. 101-128). Madrid: Pirámide.Fekih-Romdhane, F., Jahrami, H., Away, R., Trabelsi, K., Pandi-Perumal, S.R., Seeman, M.V., & Cheour, M. (2023). e relationship between technology addictions and schizotypal traits: Mediating roles of depression, anxiety, and stress. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04563-9Fernández-Villa, T., Alguacil, J., Almaraz, A., Cancela, J.M., Delgado-Rodríguez, M., García-Martín, M., Jiménez-Mejías, E., Llorca, J., Molina, A.J., Ortíz, R., Valero-Juan, L., & Martín, V. (2015). Uso problemático de internet en estudiantes universitarios: factores asociados y diferencias de género. Adicciones, 27, 265-275. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.751Figueredo, C., & Ramírez, C. (2008) Jóvenes y nuevas tecnologías. estado de la cuestión. Ensayos: Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 23(11), 315-325. García del Castillo, J.A. (2013). Adicciones tecnológicas: el auge de las redes sociales. Health and Addictions, 13(1), 5-14. Griths, M.D. (2010). e role of context in online gaming excess and addiction: Some case study evidence. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8(1), 119-25.Haro, B., Beranuy, M., Vega, M.A., Calvo, F., & Carbonell, X. (2022). Uso problemático del móvil y diferencias de género en formación profesional. Educación XX1, 25(2), 271-290. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.31492Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2016). Metodología de la investigación (6ª edición). México: McGraw-Hill – Interamericana de México. Hogarth, L. (2011). e role of impulsivity in the aetiology of drug dependence: reward sensivity versus automaticity. Psychopharmacology, 215, 567-580.Huang, P., Chen, J., Potenza, M.N., Griths, M.D., Pakpour, A.H., Chen, J., & Lin, C. (2022). Temporal associations between physical activity and three types of problematic use of the internet: A six-month longitudinal study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 11(4), 1055-1067. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2022.00084Jahrami, H., Abdelaziz, A., Binsanad, L., Alhaj, O.A., Buheji, M., Bragazzi, N.L., Saif, Z., BaHammam, A.S. & Vitiello, M.V. (2021). e association between symptoms of nomophobia, insomnia and food addiction among young adults: Findings of an exploratory cross-sectional survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020711Kara, M., Baytemir, K. & Inceman, K. (2021). Duration of daily smartphone usage as an antecedent of nomophobia: Exploring multiple mediation of loneliness and anxiety. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1673485Koob, G.F. & Volkow, N.D. (2010). Neurocircuitry of Addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews, 35, 217-238.Labrador, F., & Villadangos, S. (2010). Menores y nuevas tecnologías: Conductas indicadoras de posible problema de adicción. Psicothema, 22, 180-188.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 38, pp.19-39 January-June of 2024Ana María Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca Jesús Sánchez-Sánchez and David Ruiz-MuñozISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 37Lepp, A., Barkley, J.E., & Karpinski, A.C. (2015). e relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of US college students. SAGE Open, 5, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015573169Li, D., Wang, S., Zhang, D., Yang, R., Hu, J., Xue, Y., & Zhang, S. (2023). Gender dierence in the associations between health literacy and problematic mobile phone use in chinese middle school students. BMC Public Health, 23(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15049-4López-Fernández, O., Honrubia-Serrano, M.L., & Freixa-Blanxart, M. (2012). Adaptación española del “Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale” para población adolescente. Adicciones, 24(2), 123-130. Marciales, G.P., & Cabra, F. (2010). Internet y pánico moral: revisión de la investigación sobre la interacción de niños y jóvenes con los nuevos medios. Universitas Psychológic, 10(3), 855-865.Moral, M.V., & Suárez. C. (2016). Factores de riesgo en el uso problemático de Internet y del teléfono móvil en adolescentes españoles. Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud, 7(2), 69-78.Muñoz-Rivas, M.J., Fernández, L., & Gámez-Guadix, M. (2010). Analysis of the indicators of pathological Internet use in Spanish university students. e Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(2), 697-707. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600002365Ontiveros, E. (2015). Treinta años después. Evidencias e interrogantes. Telos: Cuadernos de Comunicación e Innovación, 10, 34-38.Polo, M.I., Mendo, S., León, B., & Castaño, E.F. (2017). Abuso del móvil en estudiantes universitarios y perles de victimización y agresión. Adicciones, 29(4), 245-255.Pourafshari, R., Rezapour, T., Rafei, P., & Hatami, J. (2022). e role of depression, anxiety, and stress in problematic smartphone use among a large sample of iranian population. Journal of Aective Disorders Reports, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2022.100436Prieto, J.J., & Moreno, A. (2015). Las redes sociales de internet ¿una nueva adicción?. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 24(11), 149-155. Romero, J.M., & Aznar, I. (2019). Análisis de la adicción al smartphone en estudiantes universitarios: Factores inuyentes y correlación con la autoestima. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 19(60). https://doi.org/10.6018/red/60/08Sánchez-Martínez, M., & Otero, A. (2009). Factors associated with cell phone use in adolescents in the community of Madrid (Spain). Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 12(2), 131-137. https://doi.org/ 10.1089/cpb.2008.0164Sharma, M., Kaushal, D., & Joshi, S. (2023). Adverse eect of social media on generation Z user’s behavior: Government information support as a moderating variable. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103256Shi, X., Wang, A., & Zhu, Y. (2023). Longitudinal associations among smartphone addiction, loneliness, and depressive symptoms in college students: Disentangling between– and within–person associations. Addictive Behaviors, 142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107676

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


38 | nº 38, pp.19-39 | January-June of 2024Risk factors for using mobile phones and social media among students in higher education institutionsISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTu, W., Jiang, H., & Liu, Q. (2022). Peer victimization and adolescent mobile social addiction: Mediation of social anxiety and gender dierences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710978Vargas, L., Flisser, A., Kawa, S. (2007). Consentimiento informado. En: Perez Tamayo, R., Lisker, R., Tapia, R. (eds.). La construction de la bioetica (pp. 119–34). Mexico: FCE.Vásquez, A.E.D., Mayaute, L.M.E., Pisco, M.C., Constantino, J., Tarazona, R.E.R., & Cuzcano, A. (2020). Las habilidades sociales y el uso de redes sociales virtuales en estudiantes de quinto grado de secundaria de instituciones educativas estatales y no estatales de Lima Metropolitana. Persona. Revista de la Facultad de Psicología, (23), 21-43.Vidales-Bolaños, M.J., & Sádaba-Chalezquer, C. (2017). Adolescentes conectados: La medición del impacto del móvil en las relaciones sociales desde el capital social. [Connected Teens: Measuring the Impact of Mobile Phones on Social Relationships through Social Capital]. Comunicar. 53 (XXV). 19-28. https://doi.org/10.3916/C53-2017-02Wang, J., Li, M., Geng, J., Wang, H., Nie, J., & Lei, L. (2023). Meaning in life and self-control mediate the potential contribution of harsh parenting to adolescents’ problematic smartphone use: Longitudinal multi-group analyses. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 38(1-2), NP2159-NP2181. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605221099495Wei, X., An, F., Liu, C., Li, K., Wu, L., Ren, L., & Liu, X. (2023). Escaping negative moods and concentration problems play bridge roles in the symptom network of problematic smartphone use and depression. Frontiers in Public Health, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.981136Williams, A.L., & Merten, M.J. (2008). A review of online social networking proles by adolescents; implications for future research and intervention. Adolescence, 43(170), 253-274.Wong, S.M., Chen, E.Y., Wong, C.S., Suen, Y.N., Chan, D.L., Tsang, S.H., . . . Hui, C. L. (2022). Impact of smartphone overuse on 1-year severe depressive symptoms and momentary negative aect: Longitudinal and experience sampling ndings from a representative epidemiological youth sample in hong kong. Psychiatry Research, 318 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114939Young, K. (2005). Clasicación de los subtipos. consecuencias y causas de la adicción a internet. Psicología Conductual, 13(3), 463-480.Zheng, R., & Cheok, A. (2011). Singaporean Adolescents´ Perceptions of On-line Social Communication: An Exploratory Factor Analysis. Journal Educational Computing Research, 45(2), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.45.2.eZheng, R., Flygare, J., & Dahl, L. (2009). Style matching or ability building? An empirical stydy on FD learners’ learning in well-structuree and ill-structured asynchronous online learning evironments. Journal Educational Computing Research, 41(2), 195-226.Zogheib, B., & Daniela, L. (2022). Students’ perception of cell phones eect on their academic performance: A latvian and a middle eastern university cases. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(4), 1115-1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09515-4

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 38, pp.19-39 January-June of 2024Ana María Sánchez-Sánchez, Francisca Jesús Sánchez-Sánchez and David Ruiz-MuñozISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 39Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of the three structural models for personality: the big three, the big ve, and the alternative ve. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 747-768.Zwilling, M. (2022). e impact of nomophobia, stress, and loneliness on smartphone addiction among young adults during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: An israeli case analysis. Sustainability, 14(6), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063229

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]