Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex de la Iglesia (1993-2022)Subversión de la ética periodística y mediática en el cine español: sensacionalismo y TV Trash en la lmografía de Álex de la Iglesia (1993-2022) doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | 311 July-December of 2024ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: Tello Díaz, L. (2024). Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex de la Iglesia (1993-2022). Doxa Comunicación, 39, pp. 311-333.https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n39a2087Lucía Tello Díaz. PhD in Information Sciences from the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM). She is the coordinator of the MA in Advanced Film Studies at the International University of La Rioja (UNIR) and Lecturer in Audiovisual Communication and teaches courses in scriptwriting for television and lms at the MA in Scriptwriting (UNIR). She is Professor of Film History at the School of Cinematography and Audiovisual of the Community of Madrid (ECAM). She collaborates in national and international television channels as an expert in cinematography and lmmaking. She is a director and a scriptwriter of documentary and feature lm and has premiered her lm Endless Cinema (2019) at the International Film Festival of Valladolid (SEMINCI), and at the Buenos Aires International Film Festival (2020). She is a lm critic at TodoEsCine since 2006 and columnist on cinematography at the El Hu Post since 2016. She coordinates the research group MediaArt: Communicational, Audiovisual and Artistical Narratives in the digital society and is author and co-author of more than fty books, chapters and scholarly articles published in international high-impact journals (JCR, SCOPUS y Arts & Humanities). International University of La Rioja (UNIR), Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0002-8343-0078 is content is published under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. International License CC BY-NC 4.0Received: 29/09/2023 - Accepted: 22/11/2023 - Early access: 16/01/2024 - Published: 01/07/2024Recibido: 29/09/2023 - Aceptado: 22/11/2023 - En edición: 16/01/2024 - Publicado: 01/07/2024Abstract:Álex de la Iglesia is one of the Spanish lmmakers whose lmography has most forcefully portrayed the media universe, with a particular taste for constructing a depiction of the profession of journalism with a total absence of professional ethics. is study analyses the ethical dimension of journalists and the media in Álex de la Iglesia's lms, looking particularly at the way in which the director and screenwriter approaches the media from its most grotesque, essentially televisual, aspect, which he represents emphasizing its sleaziness and sensationalism. rough the study of his ction lmography, made Resumen:Álex de la Iglesia es uno de los cineastas españoles que más contunden-temente ha retratado el universo mediático en su cine, con especial que-rencia por la construcción del retrato de la profesión periodística, pese a su total ausencia de deontología profesional. En esta investigación se analiza la dimensión ética de los medios y los reporteros del cine de Álex de la Iglesia, al ahondar en el modo en que el director y guionista se aproxima a los medios desde su vertiente más grotesca, esencialmente televisiva, a la cual representa enfatizando la sordidez y el sensaciona-lismo. A través del estudio de su lmografía de cción, comprendida

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


312 | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | July-December of 2024Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación1. IntroductionCinema is one of the forms of cultural expression with the most prominent public resonance. Its ability to connect with diverse audiences, along with its tremendous visual potency, has helped to outline representations of the world as we know it (Martínez Luna, 2015: 5). Cinema ction, by employing intellectual and emotional resources, not only contributes to the acquisition of knowledge, but also appeals to the expression of emotions (Rodríguez Mateos & Montero, 2005: 31). is calls for a critical outlook and an understanding of the limits of visual portrayals (Ruiz Berrio in Guereña, 2007: 416), and of their ability to inuence. e image that cinema projects of a certain group or profession is not only a reection of reality, but also involves interpretation. Being a cultural instrument that “functions as a powerful mediator of the collective imagination when building the cultural identity of a community” (Trenzado, 2000: 54), it is important to analyse how high-prole professional groups are portrayed.ere have been numerous studies of the portrayal of professions in lm, such as medicine (García Sánchez, 2021), politics (Madriz-Sojo; Sáenz, 2018), lawyers and the judiciary (Galeano, 2017) and journalism (Tello Díaz, 2007, 2010, 2016) which give an idea of their weight in society. Analysis of the cinematographic representation of journalism and the media is extensive, with fundamental contributions from pioneers such as omas Zynda, who in 1979 published “e Hollywood Version: Movie Portrayals of the Press”, and Howard Good with his book Outcasts: e Image of Journalists in Contemporary Film (1989). Matthew Ehrlich’s Journalism in the Movies (2004) is also essential reading, as indeed is all his subsequent research.However, all of them analyse English-speaking lmography of journalism-media, especially American, there being a total absence of specic studies in Spanish cinema until 2011, which saw the publication of e image and ethics of journalism in Spanish cinema 1896-2010 (Tello Díaz, 2011) and later e prole of journalists in Spanish cinema (San José de la Rosa, 2018). Journalism is shown in these studies to be a professional eld of interest to Spanish cinema, given the extensive lmography dedicated to the portrayal and analysis of the profession.e number of lm representations of the media world in Spanish cinema is considerable. Since cinema arrived in Spain in 1896, up to the end of 2010 over 800 lms have portrayed the world of journalism, 645 of which have incorporated the gure of a journalist in their plots (Tello Díaz, 2016-A:29).is interest is oered not only in Spanish cinema as cinematography in general, but in the oeuvre of directors and screenwriters who approach journalistic reality with both depth and regularity. Such is the case with Álex de la Iglesia (Bilbao, 1963), a director who has portrayed some aspect of journalism in all his lms, especially in the ethical approach with which between 1993 and 2022, a denition is sought of Álex de la Iglesia's idea of journalists and communicators, as well as the characteristics and ethical principles of the media characters created by this paradigmatic director of Spanish cinema.Keywords: Álex de la Iglesia; journalism; cinema; journalistic ethics; trash TV.hasta el momento entre 1993 y 2022, se deslinda en qué consiste la cons-trucción ccional del periodista y del comunicador cinematográco de Álex de la Iglesia, así como se analizan las características y los principios éticos que poseen los personajes mediáticos de este director paradigmá-tico del cine español.Palabras clave: Álex de la Iglesia; periodismo; cine; ética periodística; televisión basura.
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 July-December of 2024Lucía Tello DíazISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 313 he outlines the media environment. If, as Jiménez Marín and Elías Zambrano maintain, the mass media act as mediating institutions between reality and its environment (2012: 166), Álex de la Iglesia’s cinema also dissects journalistic and social truth to contrast them on the screen. By means of a grotesque conguration, the director oers up his work to analyse ethics in the media through cinema. Given that “lmic images are exceptional in facilitating the understanding of messages” (Ortí & García, 2012: 71), this study delineates the ethical meaning of media portrayal in cinema.2. Methode methodology of our research is essentially qualitative, based on a content analysis of the lmography under consideration. In this regard, the complete universe of Álex de la Iglesia’s feature lm production is presented, encompassing his seventeen ction lms, all of them released between 1993 and 2022: Acción Mutante (1993), e Day of the Beast (1995), Perdita Durango (1997), Dying of Laughter (1999), Common Wealth (2000), Eight Hundred Bullets (2002), Ferpect Crime (2004), e Baby’s Room (2006), e Oxford Murders (2008), e Last Circus (A Sad Trumpet Ballad) (2010), As Luck Would Have It (2011), Witching and Bitching (2013), My Big Night (2015 ), e Bar (2017), Perfect Strangers (2017), Veneciafrenia (2021) and Four’s a Crowd (2022). His television series, short lms and documentaries are excluded, despite many of them giving notable presence to the media.Not only are journalists analysed as news communicators, but the ethics of the media universe as a whole have also been considered, this includes television presenters and professionals from all elds of entertainment, even show business, not exclusively informative. us, we seek to analyse the contemporary media environment in Álex de la Iglesia’s lms, including communicators utilising new online technologies, present in the director’s latest lms.To gauge the scope of his portrayal of the media, the lmic message is analysed on both narrative and visual levels, by examining the resources used by the director to transmit his message in terms of audiovisual language. is approach emphasizes the narrative scope, essentially with the content and tone of the dialogues, and also mentions the mise-en-scène (staging, acting, situations). All of this will congure an atmosphere conducive to the design of media gures in Álex de la Iglesia’s lmography.To take a deeper look into the ethical dimension, content analysis of the feature lms has been carried out in accordance with the ethical principles stated in the study “Codes of journalistic deontology: a comparative analysis” by Porrio Barroso. ese principles are applied to the genres of news and entertainment, both in conventional and online media, given that all of them have a public dimension and are based on a code of best practices applicable to all aspects of the media (to inform, educate, and entertain). ere are ten deontological keys that are based on this decalogue (Barroso, 2011: 168-169):1. Truth, objectivity, accuracy.2. Duty to maintain professional secrecy.3. Safeguard freedom and independence, with dignity and integrity.4. Duty to prevent slander, accusation, defamation, insults, and plagiarism.5. Duty to rectify incorrect information.6. Respect for people’s privacy.
314 | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | July-December of 2024Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación7. Right to freedom of information and expression.8. Prioritize service to the common good, social well-being, and public interest.9. Do not commit any discrimination.10. Use means that are fair, dignied, honest and reasonable.Four antithetical principles are distinguished from these ethical elements, that is, negative qualities that every journalist and reporter should avoid (Tello Díaz, 2011):11. Manipulation of information.12. Sensationalism.13. Excesses when reporting crime and suicide.14. Failure to separate private and professional life. Conicts of interestese four elements have also been taken into account when analysing media ethics in the lmography under consideration, given their invariable presence in the lms studied.3. Álex de la Iglesia’s cinema: media inuenceÁlex de la Iglesia›s audiovisual background is not limited to ction in cinema but includes his television experience. He began in the 80s as artistic director of the program Detrás de Sirimiri on ETB and then, in the nineties, he directed Inocente, Inocente on national public television; he returned to television in the 21st century with Film Lessons (2005) on Canal Plus, while directing lms and series such as Pluto BRB (La 2) or 30 Coins (HBO). is television experience has been important to his knowledge of the media universe, an environment that he systematically criticises in his productions and that has given rise to a lmography marked by the absence of professional deontology in the media. us, the director oers a hugely critical portrayal of journalism, through a lmography that is as personal as it is scathing.3.1. Criticism of the mediaRegardless of the subject matter dealt with in each lm, all seventeen feature lms that De la Iglesia directed between 1993 and 2022 featured journalism and/or the media as an essential element. In all of them, the media environment features or mediates reality in order to modify it signicantly. Of the dierent media, television is the most frequent in his plots due to its hypnotic power (García Ureña, 2017: 208), showing television that strives insidiously to oer “repetitive and eeting information that fosters uncritical attitudes and eliminates any chance of interaction” (Fabbrocino, 2020: 161). Although television occasionally becomes a vehicle of communication that favours the decoding of the object presented in the lm (Cerdán, 2004: 254), the truth is that De la Iglesia shows it in all its crudeness: “television imposes its own perversions on other media. Firstly, fascination with images. […] What is not visible and does not have an image is not televisable, therefore, it does not exist” (Ramonet, 2002:193). us, the director:
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 July-December of 2024Lucía Tello DíazISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 315 rises up against the emptiness of cathodic culture and the political instrumentalization of the small screen, activating strategies of parodic distortion, which aim to reveal the medium’s mechanisms of manipulation and alienation of minds (Bracco, 2014: 407).De la Iglesia’s style consists of mixing the intellectual and the popular (Fraile, 2014:112) and emphasises the role of television as a catalyst for everything consumed by society. It is also true that, in the nineties, De la Iglesia criticised the television model that marked the future of private television in Spain (Buse & Willis, 2007: 74), especially in e Day of the Beast, but he would later nuance this criticism towards the whole spectrum of television. e director himself points out the radical importance that the cathode tube device had in his formative years:Television was the aperture through which we saw the universe during those years. A strange lens that converged things that were impossible to unite. at is the root of this kind of eclecticism or mental confusion we have lived in since then (De la Iglesia in Angulo, 2012: 109).e importance of the television set as a disruptive element, but also as something lethargy-inducing and analgesic, is essential in Álex de la Iglesia’s lms. Not as regards its inuence as the fourth estate, but as an everyday instrument, a household appliance, and even as a trivial topic for some of his dialogues (Vascónez, 2023: 131). His characters often live in a violent, chaotic world from which they can escape through television, something that is apparent in social criticism of the sensationalism of the medium itself (Pérez Franco, 2010: 51). us, De la Iglesia shows television:intimately linked to violence, as one of the factors of the urban apocalypse set before our eyes, an instrument endowed with a deforming force capable of alienating both reality and our minds. A symbol of the fascination of mass media culture and show business, it absorbs all those who see it, it parasitises image bands and soundtracks: screens are omnipresent in homes, bars, and shop windows. (Bracco, 2014: 406).is has been so since his rst works, including the short lm Mirindas Assassinas (1991), in which a customer “becomes mesmerised in front of a television in a bar, right next to the waiter’s corpse, hopping channels until he nds the broadcast of a bullght” (García Ureña, 2017: 208). is excess, taken to the extreme in Dying of Laughter or As Luck Would Have It is dened by a central feature of his cinema: the grotesque.3.2. e grotesque tone as an ethical position Álex de la Iglesia›s cinema has a distorting tone which makes it especially attractive for social criticism. e director deliberately manoeuvres with the script and the mise-en-scène (staging, acting, space, atmosphere) to oer the spectator a grotesque experience. As the director himself states: “in the grotesque we nd that distance required to see ourselves as a whole, grossly sketched so as to separate us from our background, clearly and distinctly” (Álex de la Iglesia, 2015:17). e media serve as ampliers of excess and pathos, especially in the case of television:Television is non-existent as a mirror of reality, it would be a kind of distorting mirror, a grotesque mirror that disgures truth. It is when it does not directly refer to reality that it starts to get interesting. Sensationalism, tabloid journalism, or gossip, that is pure television [...] Television in its purest form would generate a ctitious reality (De la Iglesia in Tello Díaz, 2016-B: 38).
316 | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | July-December of 2024Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónis deforming mirror intentionally draws on the tradition of the grotesque, which leads him to include in his lms “multiple echoes and traces that belong to the most traditional, most quintessentially Spanish universe” (Heredero, 1999, p.195). e bizarre, therefore, is a tool that he uses to elaborate his particular criticism of the absence of ethics, which he seasons with a “counterpoint between violence, triviality of language and dark humour.” (García Ureña, 2017: 203). e director states the need to develop discourse through comedy, as a nemesis of seriousness used as a weapon of control:Laughter detaches us from things and allows us to judge them from a distance. anks to laughter we can observe what happens from an eccentric point of view, obtaining an overview that ‘serious reality’, immersed in the system, is unable to oer us. Laughter as a method of knowledge, humour as a hermeneutical discipline (Álex de la Iglesia, 2015:17).Although De la Iglesia usually criticises traditional media, in recent years he has extended that criticism to include social networks (Vascónez, 2023: 125), for which he uses the same tone of excess displayed in the pro-lmic of all his movies. at same tone is what he conveys to his characters, all of them characterised by rudeness and animosity. is trait is palpable in journalists, reporters, or presenters, who aunt a striking lack of decorum. e director somehow congures “an unbalanced and disorientating space, amplied by a frontier-land mentality and that manifests in the characters’ extreme behaviour” (Mancebo & Sánchez, 2022: 143). e Basque author’s creations tend to be mists who confront the consumer society that trivialises reality and represses its citizens, leading to authentic explosions of extreme violence (García Ureña, 2017: 203). is converges in an “amoral narrative way of thinking”, in which neither protagonists nor antagonists display a minimum of ethical behaviour to place viewers on the moral spectrum (Jiménez González, 2023: 54). is paradox between behaviour and expectation (Borio, 2022: 135) is evident in the journalists, who nd themselves surrounded by ambiguity and violence as “a hallmark of a profession in which everything is inextricable, and of characters whose recklessness makes them live dangerously” (Tello Díaz, 2010: 12).4. ResultsÁlex de la Iglesia shows the journalistic-media reality throughout his lmography. Although traditional media (press, television, radio) do not appear in Perfect Strangers or Four’s a Crowd, their informative function is assumed by mobile devices, tablets or even laptops. is means that all 17 of the ction lms he has made contain informative-journalistic elements and 15 of them (88.23%) explicitly address news reporting.Furthermore, media gures appear in 15 lms (88.23%): in leading roles in 4 movies (23.5%) and in supporting roles in another 4 (23.5%). Such gures have walk-on parts in another 7 lms (41.17%). e two remaining lms (11.76%) use the media (television, newspaper pages, online press) directly to exemplify media activity.Several news formats are combined in each lm, not employing a single medium for each lm. Numerous formats are employed to reinforce the idea of overabundance in media coverage. However, television programs are the most frequent format, appearing in 14 lms (82.35%), ahead of the press (periodicals, newspapers, headlines) and the Internet (streaming news shows and news portals) present in 4 lms respectively (23.5 %). is data is signicant, since the use of the Internet as a resource in De la Iglesia’s cinema did not arrive until 2011 with As Luck Would Have It but has achieved in only twelve years
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 July-December of 2024Lucía Tello DíazISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 317 the same representativeness as the traditional press, which has been appearing in his lmography since 1993. Radio is the medium with the least representation, present in only one lm (5.88%).Despite such frequency and variety of formats, it is the representation of media practices that is most complex in Álex de la Iglesia’s lms, some titles displaying a notable absence of professional ethics. Hence, it is essential to analyse how journalistic ethics are fullled in his lms and observe whether the practices of news professionals are represented at their best in light of citizens’ right to be informed.To this end, compliance with ethical codes is used as a measurement criterion, as it is one of the most eective self-regulation tools used by the media, along with “press councils, style books, or the gure of the ombudsman” (Díaz-Campo & Chaparro-Domínguez, 2019: 16). e codes are made up of a series of ethical criteria agreed upon by the profession as essential for the exercise of its functions (Díaz-Campo, 2016), serving to guide professional actions. Only ve of the fourteen ethical principles selected to analyse the ethics of journalism in Álex de la Iglesia’s lms are systematically repeated, acquiring true prominence in his lms: “Truth, objectivity, accuracy” (17 lms, 100%); “Sensationalism and respect for privacy” (15 lms, 88.23%); “No manipulation” (12 lms, 70.58%); “Information about crimes and suicides” (12 lms, 70.58%) and “Separate professional life from personal life” (9 lms, 52.94%).5. Discussion of resultse following is a detailed discussion of each ethical principle as shown in the lms in which they appear, in accordance with the importance of each principle to media reality.5.1. Truth, objectivity, accuracyTruth is fundamental in the media. “Without the truth there is no information” (Brajnovic, 1979: 59) was stated decades ago and, without a doubt, there is no journalism without truth. If the truth is behind every communication act, objectivity is, in Desantes’ terms, the foundation on which correct decision-making is based (2004: 100). e news professional who does not seek the truth, who allows themselves to be vitiated by subjectivity, is not performing his/her job correctly.e Day of the Beast (1995) is the paradigm of the setting out of media truth, criticising the “recourse to falsehood in mass communication” and revealing “the resources utilised by the media to manipulate their audience” (Tello Díaz, 2013: 18). is lm not only shows a medium that tends towards the most vacuous, violence-based spectacle (Moreiras, 2002: 276), but also shows how trash television desensitises the audience, rendering them incapable of critical thinking (Rivero, 2015: 371). All this is conveyed through an esoteric programme called e Dark Zone, presented by Professor Cavan (Armando de Razza), who teams up with a priest and professor of theology (Álex Angulo), to unravel on his programme the truth of the birth of the antichrist. e pro-lmic is employed on the programme to highlight the lugubrious nature of the universe they are entering, with props that include a fortune-teller’s hand, inside which an eye can be seen, the epitome of esoteric symbology of observing the great beyond. is staging undoubtedly implies that e Dark Zone boldly seeks hidden truths.
318 | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | July-December of 2024Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónImage 1. Stills from e Day of the Beastsobre crímenes y suicidios” (12 películas, 70.58%) y “No confundir vida profesional con personal” (9 películas, 52.94%). 5. Discusión de resultados A continuación, se propone la discusión pormenorizada de cada principio ético con arreglo a las películas en las que destacan, según la importancia de cada principio para con la realidad mediática. 5.1. Verdad, objetividad, exactitud La verdad es fundamental en los medios de comunicación. “Sin la verdad no hay información” (Brajnovic, 1979: 59) llegó a enunciarse hace décadas y, sin duda, no existe periodismo sin verdad. Si la verdad está detrás de todo ejercicio comunicacional, la objetividad es, en términos de Desantes, el basamento sobre el que se sostiene la correcta toma de decisiones (2004: 100). El informador que no busca la verdad, sin dejarse viciar por la subjetividad, no ejerce correctamente su profesión. El día de la bestia (1995) es el paradigma de la puesta en solfa de la verdad mediática, al realizar una crítica al “recurso a la falsedad en la comunicación de masas” y poner de manifiesto “los resortes de los que se valen los medios para manipular a la audiencia” (Tello Díaz, 2013: 18). En esta película no solo se muestra un medio tendente a la más vacua espectacularidad basada en la violencia (Moreiras, 2002: 276), sino que patentiza cómo la televisión basura insensibiliza a la audiencia, lo que la incapacita para el pensamiento crítico (Rivero, 2015: 371). Y todo ello lo vehicula mediante un programa esotérico presentado por el profesor Cavan (Armando de Razza), quien se alía con un sacerdote y catedrático en Teología (Álex Angulo), para desentrañar la verdad del nacimiento del anticristo en su programa La Zona Oscura. En este programa, el profílmico es utilizado para subrayar lo tétrico del universo en el que se adentran, con un atrezzo que incluye una mano de cartomante, en cuyo interior se observa un ojo, epítome de la simbología esotérica de observar más allá. Esa puesta en escena indica indudablemente que La zona oscura busca con denuedo la verdad oculta. Imagen 1. Fotogramas de El día de la bestia Fuente: elaboración propia Source: created by the authorDespite this, the entire plot highlights the lack of rigor in the quest for truth, when it does not directly highlight manipulation and falsehood. As Cavan says: “Don’t you realize this is all just a farce for assholes? For assholes, who’re the ones who watch my show and buy my book. at’s the truth”. Maintaining his contemptuous tone, Cavan insists: “is book is a piece of crap, a fraud. Tell your wife.” e outburst comes during the Christmas Eve broadcast of a programme about evil. Although the head of the channel celebrates his decision (“You’re a genius, Cavan, tonight we’ll swallow the rest of the networks whole. Everyone singing Christmas carols while we’ve got the devil! We’ll have to repeat the show several days on the trot”), Cavan explains his true intention. Shown in medium shot, Cavan states:is is a warning to the ten million fucking assholes watching this show. e end of the world is tonight […] While you’re enjoying the warmth of your home and happily dining while watching TV, outside, in the street, the reign of the antichrist is beginning.e same search for truth is reected in Eight Hundred Bullets (2002). When the lead’s (Carmen Maura) daughter-in-law buys some land that was once a movie set, the actors mutiny. At that moment, De la Iglesia once again highlights the eect in the pro-lmic: a television screen shows cartoons in which the sign “start screaming” appears, signposting the coming disaster. A timely channel hop jumps suddenly to a news channel where a journalist, Georgina Cisquella, reports: “We’re getting news from Almería that could very well be from a western, although this time the outcome could be dramatic.” Another journalist in situ in Tabernas reports: “there’s a lot of confusion about what is really happening, but they have just conrmed that there have been at least twenty serious injuries.” e pro-lmic in Eight Hundred Bullets focuses on the grotesque, showing an authentic
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 July-December of 2024Lucía Tello DíazISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 319 pitched battle, far more than a mere brawl. Its disproportion is resonant of a battleeld, and the journalist looks like a war correspondent. Once again, the mise-en-scène highlights the grotesque in order to startle the viewer.e truth is also boldly pursued in e Oxford Murders (2008), a lm that begins with a master class by Arthur Sheldon (John Hurt), who asks a single question: “can we really know the truth? later arguing that “all the great thinkers of history have searched for a single certainty, something that no one could deny, like two and two make four.” De la Iglesia continues with his emphasis on truth: “ere is no truth outside the world of mathematics, there is no way to nd a single absolute certainty, no irrefutable argument that helps us answer the questions of humanity”. As happened in e Day of the Beast, the director insists on his particular opinion regarding the media: “Everything the newspapers say is a lie, didn’t you know that?” e protagonist himself (Elijah Wood) admits dejectedly: “the truth is not mathematical, as I thought, it’s absurd, confusing, casual, disordered and deeply unpleasant.”Image 2. Stills from e Oxford MurdersImagen 2. Fotogramas de Los crímenes de Oxford Fuente: elaboración propia En Las brujas de Zugarramundi (2013) se muestran los medios como testimonio, como mediadores y como recurso. Nada sucede que no sea recogido por un medio de comunicación. En este caso, la aparatosa persecución por la Puerta del Sol es retransmitida por un televisor ubicado en pleno pasillo de urgencias. Como en 800 balas, De la Iglesia despliega un profílmico hiperbolizado, con una persecución policial similar a desplegada en la zona cero de un atentado terrorista. Tras ello, uno de sus protagonistas (Hugo Silva), ante una noticia publicada en Cosmopolitan, señala: “Eso es mentira. Manejan las estadísticas como quieren”. Cuando arriban a Zugarramurdi, la dueña de un bar (Terele Pávez) repone cintas en VHS del programa ‘Noche de fiesta’ de José Luis Moreno. Cuando le cuestionan por la antigüedad de la emisión, ella explica: “da igual, estos no se enteran de nada. Ven lo que les pongas”, en una corrosiva reflexión acerca de la mirada acrítica de los espectadores. En Perfectos desconocidos (2017), aunque esta cinta carece de medios de comunicación per se, las funciones que normalmente asumen estos en su cine (léase informar, alertar, mantener al tanto de una situación o hacer avanzar la trama) la sustituye por la omnipresente figura de los móviles, cuyo acceso a internet y la masificación que suponen sus redes sociales cumplen con creces esta funcionalidad. Aparte de la superabundancia de mensajes compartidos por los protagonistas, el ambiente asfixiante y caótico en que deviene la reunión (de nuevo, un profílmico desmesurado en cuanto a grotesco y claustrofóbico, así como marcado por unas interpretaciones desmedidas en gravedad), es reseñable que Perfectos desconocidos incida en la idea de verdad como algo oculto e inaprehensible. La verdad en el cine de Álex de la Iglesia, en definitiva, se presenta como constructo, como ficción, y ello no solo en la intimidad de las relaciones personales, sino en el mundo mediático. 5.2. Sensacionalismo mediático La tendencia a lo sensacional resulta una perversión del concepto de verdad. En los medios, todo lo espectacular es reivindicado como fenómeno informativo, no por su cualidad intrínseca, sino por su capacidad visual. Esta realidad muestra su primera gran puesta en escena en Muertos de risa (1999), en la que la todos los elementos se orientan hacia el shock del espectador, incluido un plano cenital y su espectacular premisa, a saber, morir y matar en directo: “Vamos a salir por esa puerta y vamos a grabar el mejor programa de Nochevieja de todos los tiempos. Vamos a matarlos de risa”. En esta película se inicia una tendencia frecuente en el cine de Álex de la Iglesia consistente en mostrar imágenes macabras frente al público y que este las considere ficción. En un intento por mostrar lo narcotizada que está la sociedad, el director lleva al extremo el esperpento con auténticos crímenes tomados como parte del simulacro Source: created by the authorIn Witching and Bitching (2013) the media are shown as testimony, as mediators and as a resource. Nothing happens that is not covered by a media outlet. e spectacular chase through the Puerta del Sol in Madrid is broadcast on a television set in a corridor in the emergency ward. As in Eight Hundred Bullets, De la Iglesia deploys a hyperbolised pro-lmic, with a car chase akin to that at ground zero of a terrorist attack. After that, one of its protagonists (Hugo Silva), in response to a news article published in Cosmopolitan, says: “at’s a lie. ey twist statistics to suit themselves.” When they arrive in Zugarramundi, the owner of a bar (Terele Pávez) plays VHS tapes of the entertainment show ‘Noche de esta’ by José Luis Moreno. When they ask her how old the tape is, she explains: “it doesn’t matter, they don’t take anything in. ey watch whatever you put in front of them”, in a corrosive reection on the uncritical gaze of the spectators.In Perfect Strangers (2017), although this lm does not portray any media per se, the functions that the media normally perform in his lms (to inform, warn, keep abreast of a situation or move the plot forward) are replaced by the omnipresent gure of mobile phones, whose access to the internet and the massication that social networks represent more than full this functionality. Apart from the overabundance of messages shared by the protagonists, the suocating, chaotic atmosphere in which the encounter takes place (once again, an overwhelming pro-lmic, excessive in terms of being grotesque and claustrophobic, whilst also being marked by overly serious performances by the cast), it is notable that Perfect Strangers
320 | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | July-December of 2024Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónstresses the idea of truth as something hidden and dicult to pin down. e truth in Álex de la Iglesia’s cinema, in short, is presented as a construct, as ction, not only in the intimacy of personal relationships, but in the media world.5 .2. Media sensationalisme tendency towards the sensational is a perversion of the concept of truth. e media claims everything spectacular as a news phenomenon, not because of its intrinsic interest, but because of its visual quality. is reality shows its rst major staging in Dying of Laughter (1999), in which all the elements are deployed to shock the viewer, including a bird’s-eye shot, and its spectacular premise, namely, real-time death and killing: “We’re going to walk out that door and we’re going to record the best New Year’s Eve show ever. “We’re going to kill them with laughter.”e movie marks the beginning of a frequent trend in Álex de la Iglesia’s cinema, consisting of showing the audience macabre images, and for the viewers to think of them as ction. In an attempt to show how narcotised society is, the director takes the grotesque to the extreme with real crimes taken as part of media subterfuge. Grotesque laughter, televised death and aberrant angles reinforce this reality from the pro-lmic point of view. In this case, Bruno (Santiago Segura) and Nino (Great Wyoming) shoot each other in front of hundreds of people, who cannot stop laughing as they take it to be part of the show.Image 3. Still from Dying of Laughtermediático. Las risas grotescas, la muerte televisada y las angulaciones aberrantes refuerzan desde el profílmico esta realidad. En este caso, Bruno (Santiago Segura) y Nino (el Gran Wyoming) se disparan el uno al otro ante centenares de personas, quienes no cesan de reír al tomarlo como parte del espectáculo. Imagen 3. Fotograma de Muertos de risa Fuente: elaboración propia También en Muertos de risa, el director incorpora el concepto de fama, punto que más tarde desarrollará a lo largo de su filmografía. Los personajes de De la Iglesia pugnan por huir de la mediocridad: “Mira a esta gente, son gente normal, sus vidas son grises, aburridas. Y nosotros, aunque cueste reconocerlo, somos iguales que ellos, no somos diferentes. No va a venir un hada madrina a darnos una oportunidad”. A través de innumerables fragmentos reales de televisión (“Directísimo” de José María Íñigo; el golpe de estado de Tejero; el motín en Carabanchel; las Olimpiadas de Barcelona 92) se configuran una serie de imágenes sensacionales que remarcan la necesidad de espectacularidad en las vidas de la gente corriente. Esta tendencia se continúa en Crimen ferpecto (2004), en la que son los enlaces matrimoniales la realidad televisada. En ella, Rafael (Willy Toledo) reflexiona ante su futura familia política respecto a la situación planteada: Ͳ Pobre hombre. Ͳ Pobre hombre ¿por qué? Ͳ No sé, llegar así, con las cámaras… Ͳ A mi hija le encanta este programa. Y a mí también. Ͳ Sí, sí; si seguro que está muy bien. Pero es que casarse así, de repente, sin tiempo para pensar las cosas. El propio Rafael será víctima del programa de enlaces al final de la cinta. El presentador es explícito respecto a sus intenciones: “Rafael, tómate tu tiempo; pero no demasiado, seis millones de personas nos están viendo en estos momentos y no queremos que cambien de canal”. Todo ello enfatizado por un profílmico asfixiante, en el que decenas Source: created by the author
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 July-December of 2024Lucía Tello DíazISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 321 Also in Dying of Laughter, the director incorporates the concept of fame, an issue that he has gone on to develop throughout his lmography. De la Iglesia’s characters strive to escape mediocrity: “Look at these people, they’re just ordinary punters, their lives are grey, boring. And we, though it’s tough to admit, are just the same as them, we’re no dierent. ere’s no fairy godmother who’s going to come and give us a chance.” rough countless real television fragments (“Directísimo” by José María Íñigo; the 1981 Tejero coup; the riot in Carabanchel prison; the Barcelona 92 Olympics) a series of sensational images are shown that highlight the need for spectacularity in the lives of ordinary people.is trend continues in Ferpect Crime (2004), in which marriages are the televised reality. Rafael (Willy Toledo) reects on the situation to his future in-laws: Poor man. Poor man, why? I don’t know, arriving like this, with the cameras... My daughter loves this program. And so do I. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I’m sure it’s very good. But getting married like that, suddenly, without time to think things through.Rafael himself will be a victim of the marriage program at the end of the lm. e presenter is explicit about his intentions: “Rafael, take your time; but not too much, six million people are watching us right now and we don’t want them to change channels.” All of this is emphasized by a suocating mise-en-scène, in which dozens of monitors follow Rafa’s actions and the image, distorted by lenses that deform the faces of his ancée and the presenter, seem to subsume Rafael in an existential chaos.Likewise, another of the most relevant aspects of the movie is the signalling of the media as creators of stereotypes, whose spectacularity and beauty mark the future of less attractive people. us, Rafa will argue to his future wife that hating her is inevitable because of the consumer society: “It’s this world we’re stuck in that makes me hate you: people, magazines, television […] we’re brought up this way, whether we like it or not”.Image 4. Stills from Ferpect Crimede monitores siguen el accionar de Rafa y la imagen, desvirtuada por unas lentes que deforman los rostros de su prometida y del presentador, parecen subsumir a Rafael en un caos vital. Asimismo, otro de los aspectos más relevantes de este título es la señalización de los medios como creadores de estereotipos, los cuales marcan con su espectacularidad y belleza el devenir de las personas menos agraciadas. Así Rafa argüirá ante su futura mujer que odiarla es inevitable por culpa de la sociedad de consumo: “Es este mundo en el que vivimos el que me hace odiarte: la gente, las revistas, la televisión […] estamos educados así, nos guste o no”. Imagen 4. Fotogramas de Crimen ferpecto Fuente: elaboración propia No obstante, si una película marca un antes y un después en términos de sensacionalismo es La chispa de la vida (2011). Roberto (José Mota), publicista en paro, cae en una zanja en la que una barra de hierro le atraviesa el cráneo. El profílmico en este título es el más explícito de todos, al mostrar la soledad del hombre anclado a la vida por una barra de hierro que le atraviesa la cabeza, mientras todos observan cómo se apaga. Esta lenta agonía, sorprendentemente, pretende rentabilizarla la propia víctima: “Mira la atención que estoy generando, podemos convertir este accidente en el negocio de nuestra vida”. Tales son sus ansias de cosechar dinero, que incluso contrata a un representante (Fernando Tejero) que gestione su aparición en los medios: “Esta es una gran oportunidad” le dirá a su mujer Luisa (Salma Hayek), ante lo que ella responde: “No puedes convertir esto en una feria”. Cuando el médico que atiende a Roberto indique que puede morir en segundos, su representante inquirirá: “Ya y… No le haría daño hacer una entrevista para televisión ¿no?”. A pesar de todo, Roberto no se inmuta, al revés, agradece la fama y anima a un guardajurado a mover un biombo para que la prensa le vea mejor. “Voy a ser una estrella de la televisión”, le dice, a lo que el guardajurado apostilla: “Le diré, amigo Roberto, que ha elegido una dura manera de ganarse la vida”. Quizá la frase que resume mejor el sensacionalismo al que la sociedad parece abocada es: “Estás enganchado a la tele y no la puedes apagar. ¿Por qué? Porque hay un tipo que se muere en directo y quieres verlo. Porque eres un morboso”. Esta idea queda reforzada con otro guardajurado, quien ofrece a un cámara de televisión cualquier otro vídeo con tal de ser famoso: “Si les interesa, también tengo una paliza a un pobre grabada con el móvil”. Finalmente, Álvaro Aguirre (Juanjo Puigcorbé), director del canal Antena 5, líder de audiencia por su programa ‘Rumore, rumore’, es capaz de ofrecer dos millones de euros al representante de la víctima si le garantiza la emisión de su muerte en directo. El directivo llega a exhortarle a Luisa: “entiendo su dolor; pero tiene usted que comprender que la desgracia de su marido ha trascendido el ámbito estrictamente familiar. Y nuestra obligación moral, la suya y la mía, es darle a la gente lo que quiere”. Solo una periodista, Pilar Álvarez (Carolina Bang), será capaz de ofrecer respeto en lugar de sensacionalismo al ayudar a la familia cuando los demás solo desean beneficiarse del luctuoso suceso. Source: created by the authorHowever, if there is one lm which marks a before and after in terms of sensationalism, it is As Luck Would Have It (2011). Roberto (José Mota), an unemployed publicist, falls into a ditch where an iron bar goes through his head. e pro-lmic in this lm is the most explicit of all, showing the loneliness of a man moored to life by an iron bar through his head, while everyone watches him fading away. Surprisingly, the victim strives to make a prot from his slow agony: “Look at the attention I’m getting, we can turn this accident into the deal of our lives.” His desire to make money is such that he even hires an agent
322 | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | July-December of 2024Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación(Fernando Tejero) to manage his media appearances: “is is a golden opportunity,” he tells his wife Luisa (Salma Hayek), to which she responds: “You can’t turn this into a circus.” When the doctor treating Roberto indicates that he could pass away in seconds, his agent asks: “Right, but... It wouldn’t hurt to do a tv interview, would it?” Despite everything, Roberto does not inch, on the contrary, he is grateful for the fame, encouraging a security guard to move a screen so that the press can see him better. “I’m going to be a tv star,” he tells him, to which the guard adds: “I tell you something, my friend, you’ve chosen a hard way to make a living.”Perhaps the phrase that best summarises the sensationalism which society seems destined for is: “You’re hooked on TV, and you can’t turn it o. Why? Because there’s a guy dying live, and you want to see it. Because you’re morbid.” is idea is reinforced by another security guard, who oers a television cameraman another video in the hope of becoming famous: “If you’re interested, I also have a recording on my mobile of a poor guy getting a kicking.” Finally, Álvaro Aguirre (Juanjo Puigcorbé), director of the Antena 5 TV channel, which leads the ratings with their programme ‘Rumore, rumore’, is able to oer two million euros to the victim’s agent if he can guarantee the live broadcast of his death. e TV executive even exhorts Luisa: “I understand your pain; but you have to understand that your husband’s misfortune has transcended the strictly family sphere. And our moral obligation, yours and mine, is to give the people what they want.” Only one journalist, Pilar Álvarez (Carolina Bang), is able to oer respect instead of sensationalism by helping the family when others only want to prot from the tragic event.Finally, in Four’s a Crowd (2022) signicant technological progress is once again observed regarding the media. e Internet acts as the omnipotent axis of live news, the lm accepts the social networks have assumed the function that other media previously fullled in the lms (television and press). us, when the protagonist (Alberto Sanjuán) suers an altercation, an exaggerated and grotesque scue at a petrol station, the culprit of the event (Ernesto Alterio) uploads the video to his Instagram stories, getting countless views in a matter of minutes: It’s amazing how much people get o on seeing this kind of stu. It’s got three thousand views in just ve minutes. Have you uploaded it to the Internet? Nope... It’s on stories. But people share. But with what right? It was me that recorded it. But it’s me who’s getting hit!A twist to media sensationalism transferred to the new social networks.5.3. Information about crimes and suicidesMedia praxis implies social responsibility (Hutchins, 1947), which suggests a quest for the common good without harming or being detrimental to society, by internalising “community values to turn them into practical criteria in their professional conduct, as if they were working as guardians of morality” (Suárez Villegas, 2013: 311). Such pulchritude implies respect and diligence when informing the public, especially in highly sensitive cases, such as news about deaths, crimes, or suicides. In the
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 July-December of 2024Lucía Tello DíazISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 323 case of Álex de la Iglesia, coverage of this type of events is a constant. In fact, excepting Four’s a Crowd (2022), all of his lms feature the death of one or more characters, including the leading roles, which paves the way for a media response to any event.His rst lm, Acción Mutante (1993), begins with the program ‘Sucesos’ on the JQK Television channel, as a true declaration of intentions. In it, the bizarre presenter (Jaime Blanch) is reporting on the violent death of a man, while pointing out that it may be due to the terrorist gang “Mutant Action”, whose members he describes as “a gang of disabled people with the lowest coecient in the entire world”. ey also share images of a shooting involving the terrorists on the programme “Fitness with Susana”, where the set is grotesque, full of beaten bodies and blood-smeared walls. Behind him, in a cacophonous mix of news, the presenter of ‘Social Echoes’ reports on the imminent wedding of the heiress of a well-known tycoon. e media is involved in almost all of Acción Mutante, while reporting on the terrorists’ crimes, especially concerning the young heiress they kidnap.Image 5. Stills from Acción Mutante Imagen 5. Fotogramas de Acción mutante Fuente: elaboración propia En Perdita Durango (1997), la presencia de los medios de comunicación es imperturbable. Cuando sobreviene la muerte del protagonista (Javier Bardem), son numerosos los cámaras, fotógrafos y reporteros que se entremezclan con la policía para dar testimonio de lo sucedido. Incluso el padre de la joven secuestrada ve La chica de la tele mientras ejercita sus músculos con su Ab Shaper (un producto de teletienda). Finalmente, la expresión de Perdita (Rosie Pérez) ante la tragedia contrasta con la imagen enajenada de centenares de asistentes a un local en Las Vegas, quienes observan por las pantallas a la ganadora del gran premio del casino. En La comunidad (2000), se evidencia la imbricación de los medios y la muerte. En ella, un hombre fallece al ver la televisión, una elección de guion de por sí elocuente. Cuando la policía accede al domicilio, repleto de basura por doquier (de nuevo, una intervención en el profílmico para reincidir en el concepto de ‘telebasura’) encuentran su cadáver frente al televisor: “aquí está nuestro amigo, viendo la televisión”. Esto se subraya mediante una edición de EL PAÍS, en la que se recoge la noticia: “Muere un anciano mientras veía la televisión”, al tiempo que remarca que el aparato “se encontraba encendido” cuando la policía halló su cuerpo. En ese espacio, de nuevo De la Iglesia remarca una atmósfera enfermiza, con un cadáver frente a un televisor encendido, todo ello rodeado por inmundicia y hedor. A continuación, un periódico informa de la macabra pugna entre los vecinos por conseguir el botín: “Un grupo de vecinos se mata entre sí por un dinero que no existe”. Este uso de la prensa y de la televisión “proporciona al espectador indicios narrativos que le permiten anticipar la acción por venir y aclara la verdadera naturaleza de los individuos” (Bracco, 2012: 407-408). Esto sucede en otro momento culminante, cuando la protagonista (Carmen Maura) le propone un ‘golpe de suerte’ a su marido, mientras en televisión emiten un anuncio: “La droga más fuerte no es la velocidad, es el dinero”, un artefacto narrativo-visual para anticipar los acontecimientos y definir la pulsión de la protagonista. Source: created by the authore presence of the media is imperturbable in Perdita Durango (1997). When the death of the protagonist (Javier Bardem) occurs, there are numerous cameramen, photographers and reporters who mix with the police to bear witness to what happened. Even the kidnapped young woman’s father watches e Girl on TV while exercising his muscles with his Ab Shaper (a teleshopping product). Finally, Perdita’s (Rosie Pérez) expression when faced with the tragedy contrasts with the alienated image of hundreds of attendees at a venue in Las Vegas, who watch the winner of the casino’s grand prize on the screens.In Common Wealth (2000), the intertwining of the media and death is evident. A man dies while watching television, an eloquent script choice in itself. When the police enter the house, with rubbish everywhere (again, an intervention in the pro-lmic to repeat the concept of ‘trash television’) they nd his body in front of the television: “here’s our pal, watching television.” is is underlined by an edition of the newspaper EL PAÍS, which includes the headline: “An elderly man dies while watching television,” while noting that the device “was on” when the police found his body. De la Iglesia here again highlights an insalubrious atmosphere, with a corpse in front of a turned-on television, all surrounded by lth and stench.
324 | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | July-December of 2024Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónNext, a newspaper reports the macabre struggle between neighbours to get the loot: “A group of neighbours kill each other for money that does not exist.” is use of the press and television “provides the viewer with narrative clues that allow him to anticipate the action to come and makes the true nature of the individuals clear” (Bracco, 2012: 407-408).is happens in another climactic moment, when the protagonist (Carmen Maura) speaks to her husband of a ‘stroke of luck’, while an advertisement is broadcast on television: “e strongest drug isn’t speed, it’s money”, a narrative-visual device intended to anticipate events and dene what drives the character.Image 6. Stills from Common Wealth Imagen 6. Fotogramas de La comunidad Fuente: elaboración propia El hecho de que Carmen Maura toque la pantalla del televisor guarda concomitancias con 800 balas (2002), en la que Terele Pávez limpia la suya. En ella, el ensimismamiento ante la sucesión de imágenes que ofrecen los medios aparece de forma inexcusable. Además del pormenorizado seguimiento del levantamiento de los actores de Tabernas, con la persecución, destrucción y muerte hiperbólica que esto supone, se hace hincapié en la propia programación, al mostrar la oferta televisiva de forma constante. Imagen 7. Fotogramas de 800 balas Fuente: elaboración propia Este recurso se recuperará en Balada triste de trompeta (2010). En ella, se pueden observar diversos titulares de periódicos como Diario de Burgos (“¡La guerra ha concluido!”), y de la prensa internacional: “Berlin et Rome poussent France a entrer dans Madrid1”. “À la frontière des Pyrénees L’Armee Catalane et cependant le flot des refugiés diminue. Les combats continuent devant Figueras qu’ecrase le bombardement”2. Adicionalmente, el director bilbaíno incluye fragmentos del NODO como testimonio visual del fin de la guerra civil y del nuevo estado de cosas. Este recurso evolucionará hacia imágenes televisivas, adaptado el universo informativo al avance audiovisual del momento. En el pasillo de un hospital (espacio profílmico que ya empleó en Los crímenes de Oxford y que volverá a emplear en Las brujas de 1 “Berlín y Roma empujan a Francia a entrar en Madrid”. 2 “En la frontera de los Pirineos el Ejército catalán y, aun así, el flujo de refugiados va disminuyendo. Los combates continúan frente a Figueres, que es aplastada por los bombardeos”. Source: created by the authore fact that Carmen Maura touches the television screen has similarities with Eight Hundred Bullets (2002), in which Terele Pávez cleans hers. e self-absorption reected on her face as she sees the succession of images oered by the media appears undeniable. In addition to following in great detail the uprising of the actors in Tabernas, with all the persecution, destruction and hyperbolic death that this entails, emphasis is placed on the programming itself, by constantly showing what the tv is oering.
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 July-December of 2024Lucía Tello DíazISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 325 Image 7. Stills from Eight Hundred Bullets Imagen 6. Fotogramas de La comunidad Fuente: elaboración propia El hecho de que Carmen Maura toque la pantalla del televisor guarda concomitancias con 800 balas (2002), en la que Terele Pávez limpia la suya. En ella, el ensimismamiento ante la sucesión de imágenes que ofrecen los medios aparece de forma inexcusable. Además del pormenorizado seguimiento del levantamiento de los actores de Tabernas, con la persecución, destrucción y muerte hiperbólica que esto supone, se hace hincapié en la propia programación, al mostrar la oferta televisiva de forma constante. Imagen 7. Fotogramas de 800 balas Fuente: elaboración propia Este recurso se recuperará en Balada triste de trompeta (2010). En ella, se pueden observar diversos titulares de periódicos como Diario de Burgos (“¡La guerra ha concluido!”), y de la prensa internacional: “Berlin et Rome poussent France a entrer dans Madrid1”. “À la frontière des Pyrénees L’Armee Catalane et cependant le flot des refugiés diminue. Les combats continuent devant Figueras qu’ecrase le bombardement”2. Adicionalmente, el director bilbaíno incluye fragmentos del NODO como testimonio visual del fin de la guerra civil y del nuevo estado de cosas. Este recurso evolucionará hacia imágenes televisivas, adaptado el universo informativo al avance audiovisual del momento. En el pasillo de un hospital (espacio profílmico que ya empleó en Los crímenes de Oxford y que volverá a emplear en Las brujas de 1 “Berlín y Roma empujan a Francia a entrar en Madrid”. 2 “En la frontera de los Pirineos el Ejército catalán y, aun así, el flujo de refugiados va disminuyendo. Los combates continúan frente a Figueres, que es aplastada por los bombardeos”. Source: created by the authoris resource is turned to again in e Last Circus (2010). Here one sees several headlines from newspapers such as Diario de Burgos (“e war is over!”), and from the international press: “Berlin et Rome poussent France a entrer dans Madrid1.” “À la frontière des Pyrénees L’Armee Catalane et cependant le ot des refugiés diminue. Les combats continuent devant Figueras qu’ecrase le bombardement”2. Moreover, the Basque director includes fragments of NODO news reels as visual testimony of the end of the civil war and the new state of things.is resource evolves towards television images, adapting the news universe to the audiovisual progress of the time. In a hospital corridor (a pro-lmic space that he already used in e Oxford Murders and will turn to again in Witching and Bitching), a television set reports on the beginning of the trial of a criminal, while some dialogues relate the crimes of society: “As if we didn’t have enough with El Lute, now a loony dressed as a clown has the entire country in check. Javier Granados, baptized by the press as the ‘Sad Clown’, managed to escape from the police with the help of circus workers. He is accused of at least three murders.” e death of Carrero Blanco is another of the events that the lm points to through the broadcast of a fragment of NODO, which illustrates the director’s inclination to portray death through the media.1 “Berlin and Rome push France to enter Madrid.”2 “e Catalan Army on the Pyrenees border, and yet, the ow of refugees is decreasing. Fighting goes on near Figueres, which is being levelled by the bombing.”
326 | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | July-December of 2024Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónImage 8. Stills from Witching and BitchingZugarramurdi), un televisor informa del comienzo del juicio a un criminal, mientras algunos diálogos rinden cuenta de los crímenes de la sociedad: “Por si no tuviéramos suficiente con El Lute, ahora un loco vestido de payaso tiene en jaque a todo el país. Javier Granados, bautizado por la prensa como el ‘Payaso triste’ consiguió huir de la policía con la ayuda de los trabajadores del circo. Se le imputan, al menos, tres asesinatos”. La muerte de Carrero Blanco es otro de los sucesos que señala la película mediante la emisión de un fragmento de NODO, lo que ilustra la inclinación del director a retratar la muerte a través de los medios. Imagen 7. Fotogramas de Las brujas de Zugarramurdi Fuente: elaboración propia Por último, en Veneciafrenia (2021) se observa nuevamente la mediación de la televisión para hacer avanzar la trama. Convertidos en auténtica avanzadilla de la realidad, los medios y sus informantes aparecen periódicamente para mostrar las acciones del grupo de venecianos “Fuori”, que actúan del modo en que lo hacía “acción mutante” dos décadas antes. A pesar de que emplea los mass media como fuente de información, en este caso se hace hincapié en Internet como medio de difusión de contenido terrorista y violento. Es más, ningún canal se observa a través de un televisor, sino por medio de portátiles, teléfonos móviles y tabletas. Resulta curioso, finalmente, que en Veneciafrenia se reincida en la idea de mezcla de ficción y realidad ante la muerte. Al igual que sucedía en Muertos de risa y 800 balas, también se atribuye a la ficción lo que real: “Es acojonante el mundo del cine, parece tan real”. Esta frase, enunciada por turistas, muestra los asesinatos tomados como parte del espectáculo, con uno de los profílmicos más hiperbólicos de toda su filmografía. Las risas caricaturescas, las interpretaciones desmesuradas y la escenografía carnavalesca conducen hacia lo grotesco. 5.4. Manipulación informativa Dentro del contexto actual, ha surgido el término “posverdad” para definir una realidad consistente en pervertir el concepto de verdad y encuadrarlo en un marco de desinformación e incertidumbre (Mayoral, Parratt y Morata, 2019: 396). Uno de los rasgos definitorios de la posverdad es algo tan conocido como la manipulación informativa, entendida como práctica comunicativa, multimodal e interaccional que domina de manera abusiva e ilegítima mediante el uso del discurso (Van Dijk, 2006: 51). Se trata, por tanto, de una práctica intencional destinada a lograr una ventaja o beneficio mediante la manipulación de la audiencia. Uno de los más claros ejemplos de crítica hacia este tipo de abusos mediáticos está presente en El bar (2017). En ella, los clientes de un local son encerrados por haber estado en contacto con un militar afectado por una enfermedad contagiosa y letal. Cuando, para evitar la propagación del virus, los cuerpos de seguridad del estado intentan ejecutarlos, los medios de comunicación difunden la noticia de un incendio, desviando la atención del verdadero suceso: - Si no hay ningún incendio, ¡eso es una puta mentira! Source: created by the authorFinally, in Veneciafrenia (2021) the mediation of television is again observed to move the plot forward. Turned into a true vanguard for reality, the media and their reporters appear periodically to show the actions of the “Fuori” group of Venetians who act in the same way that “Mutant Action” had done two decades before. Although the mass media is utilised as a news source, in this case emphasis is placed on the Internet as a means of disseminating terrorism and violent content. Furthermore, the TV channels are not watched on a television set, but rather using laptops, mobile phones and tablets. It is interesting, nally, that in Veneciafrenia the idea of mixing ction and reality in the face of death is reiterated. As happened in Dying of Laughter and Eight Hundred Bullets, what is real is also attributed to ction: “e world of cinema is frightening, it seems so real.” is phrase, uttered by tourists, shows the murders taken as part of a show, with one of the most hyperbolic mise-en-scène of his entire lmography. e cartoonish laughter, the overacting and the carnivalesque scenery tend towards the grotesque.5.4. Information manipulatione term “post-truth” has emerged to dene a reality consisting of perverting the concept of truth and setting it in a framework of misinformation and uncertainty (Mayoral, Parratt & Morata, 2019: 396). One of the dening features of post-truth is something as familiar as news manipulation, understood as a communicative, multimodal, and interactional practice that dominates in an abusive and illegitimate manner through the use of discourse (Van Dijk, 2006: 51). It is, therefore, an intentional practice aimed at achieving some advantage or benet by manipulating the audience. One of the clearest examples of criticism of this type of media abuse is to be found in e Bar (2017). e customers of a tavern are locked up for having been in contact with a soldier aected by a contagious and lethal disease. When, to prevent the spread of the virus, the state security forces try to execute them, the media spread news of a re, distracting attention from the real event: ere’s no re, that’s a fucking lie! at’s what the tyres are for, so the TV can tape it from the helicopter. ey’re just brazenly making up a re. It’s a cover up, they’re covering up the murders. But why? What don’t they want people to know? […]
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 July-December of 2024Lucía Tello DíazISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 327 Because it’s the kind of publicity no one is interested in. at’s why they thought up the re!It is also no coincidence that, while the bar users’ lives are in danger, they are watching an Extreme Makeover program on television with an expression of total lethargy. e scriptwriters once again introduce an element of reality as an anticipatory element. As someone says in the program: “I’m afraid, nothing is safe in this house. Everything seems normal and, in a second, we could all die.” “‘ey fooled us, I don’t trust anyone anymore.” “Everything is one big lie.” is idea of a lie is reinforced with the following televised information, in which the presenter falsies the data regarding the news: “e causes of the re that has been raging in downtown Madrid for the last few hours are unknown at the moment.”Despite everything the bar’s clientele insist that the media must nd out and make public the truth behind the news: “We have to call a radio station, a newspaper, to let people know about this.” Despite the importance of the events, the media keep the fact quiet: Two people have just been killed in the centre of Madrid, and no one says anything!? Maybe we have to wait for the evening news. What do you expect them to say, don’t you see that they haven’t caught it yet? ey can’t say anything. If they say that there’s a terrorist shooting in the centre of Madrid, instead of leaving, people’re so dumb that they’d come to watch, as if this were engineering work on the metro.Once again, one nds the element of sensationalism embedded in manipulation and post-truth, and reinforced with a mise-en-scène that distorts any naturality, by emphasizing the morbidity aroused by seeing a terrorist or a robbery live.5.5. Separation of professional and personal lifee last ethical principle that frequently appears in the proposed lmography is not related to any communication practice, but to the relationship that the journalist establishes between the private and public spheres. Films such as My Big Night, e Baby’s Room or Dying of Laughter emphasise the need to avoid reporters’ being subject to conicts of interest, to separate one’s professional life from private life. e journalists portrayed by De la Iglesia are not those whose “work is a form of social commitment that must face numerous threats, sometimes from the very newspaper they work for, others –the majority– coming from a callous and corrupt political and/or judicial background” (Pastor, 2010:193), for they ignore their obligations, choosing instead to settle personal accounts.at is what happens in one of his least well-known lms, the made-for-tv movie e Baby’s Room (2006), part of the ‘Films to keep you awake’ series. e protagonist Juan (Javier Gutiérrez) is a journalist whose wife, Sonia (Leonor Watling), and their newborn baby move to a large house which needs doing up. e problem arises when the baby’s camera-monitor begins to show images of spirits watching the child sleep, to the despair and terror of his parents. Juan tries to nd an explanation for what, at rst, he considers mere folly. When he tells Fernández (Antonio Dechent), his editor-in-chief, the editor’s reaction means it reaches the ears of Domingo (Sancho Gracia), a reporter of paranormal events:
328 | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | July-December of 2024Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación I’m going to publish it, it’s great fun. Not Domingo, you can’t. But he’s the best. Domingo is the one who knows the most about this nonsense. So that I can be on the front page with the Loch Ness Monster, or the lady raped by aliens? No, look, no way. If I’d known, I wouldn’t have told you.Image 9. Frames from e Baby’s Roomcuando el escuchador-cámara del bebé empieza a ofrecer imágenes de espíritus que vigilan el sueño del pequeño, para desesperación y terror de sus progenitores. Así las cosas, Juan trata de buscar una explicación a lo que, en principio, considera una insensatez. Cuando se lo confiesa a Fernández (Antonio Dechent), el redactor jefe, su reacción implica pasarle la noticia a Domingo (Sancho Gracia), periodista de sucesos paranormales: - Lo voy a publicar, es muy divertido. - Domingo, no. - Pero si es el mejor. Domingo es el que más sabe de estas chorradas. - ¿Para que me saque en la primera página con el Monstruo del Lago Ness o la señora esta que violaron los extraterrestres? No, mira, paso. Si lo sé, no te lo cuento. Imagen 8. Fotogramas de La habitación del niño Fuente: elaboración propia A pesar de la impresión a la que están sometidos, en un momento dado llegan a señalar: “Imagínate tragarte ahora uno de esos programas con todo el mundo chillando. En cambio, nosotros… Toma, una peli de nuestro hijo y de prota total”. Cuando pierda su trabajo y la cordura a causa de los sucesos paranormales, no le quedará más remedio que hablar con Domingo, periodista al que había evitado a toda costa (y cuyo diálogo recuerda sobremanera a los de El día de la bestia): - ¿Es posible que una cámara grabe imágenes que no pueden verse a simple vista? - ¿Qué imágenes? - Personas, cosas… - ¿Psicoimágenes? - ¿Se llaman así? - En los años sesenta sí, pero eran todas falsas. Trucos de cámara. A las revistas les encantan. Si tienes algo de eso, le podemos sacar un buen partido. Sé a quién vendérselas, ¿qué son, fantasmas?... ¿Lloran, gimen, se arrastran? - Es un asesinato. Un hombre mata a su mujer y a su hijo en la cuna. - […] Eso se llama inmanencia. En Mi gran noche (2015), la acción se desarrolla en el interior de un plató de televisión en el que se graba el programa especial de Nochevieja (de nuevo, como en Muertos de risa y El día de la bestia, la época navideña como precipitadora del conflicto). En este caso también se deja entrever la falsedad que rodea la televisión, empleando la hipérbole interpretativa y la risa como elemento esencial de la farsa mediática. Cuando llega un actor para actuar como figurante, el regidor (Luis Callejo) le indica: “No mires a la cámara, no hables con la gente, no te bebas lo que hay en los vasos, la comida es falsa […] y sonríe, sonríe todo el rato, que se supone que esto es una fiesta”. Source: created by the authorDespite the situation they nd themselves in, at one point they even say: “Imagine having to watch one of those programs with everyone screaming. Whereas us... there you go, a movie with our son in the lead role.” When he loses his job and his reason due to the paranormal events, he is left with no choice but to talk to Domingo, a journalist he had avoided at all costs (and whose discourse is highly reminiscent of that in e Day of the Beast): How can a camera record images the naked eye can’t see? What images? People, things... –Psycho-images? Is that the name? It was in the sixties, but they were all false. Camera tricks. Magazines love them. If you have some of that, we can make good use of it. I know who to sell them to, what are they, ghosts?... Do they cry, moan, crawl? It’s a murder. A man kills his wife and child in the crib. […] at’s called immanence.e action in My Big Night (2015) takes place in a television studio where a New Year’s Eve special program is being recorded (again, as in Dying of Laughter and e Day of the Beast, Christmastime as precipitator of conict). Here again the falsehood that surrounds television is made patent, using hyperbolic acting and laughter as essential elements of the farce that is the media. When an actor arrives to act as an extra, the oor manager (Luis Callejo) tells him: “Don’t look at the camera, don’t talk to anyone, don’t drink what’s in the glasses, the food is fake […] and smile, keep smiling all the time, this is supposed to be a party.”
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 July-December of 2024Lucía Tello DíazISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 329 Image 10. Frames from My Big NightImagen 9. Fotogramas de Mi gran noche Fuente: elaboración propia Cuando una huelga de trabajadores (grotesca y desmesurada hasta límites de conflicto armado) amenaza con entrar, los profesionales de la televisión no dudan en intentar parar la grabación, contra la oposición de la cadena: - Eso qué es ¿una película? - No, Benítez, eso está pasando ahora ahí afuera. Hay que cortar la grabación. - Vamos, ni de coña, antes me corto yo las venas. - ¿Te das cuenta de lo que puede pasar si esa gente entra en el plató? - Para eso está la policía, ¿no? En Mi gran noche, De la Iglesia no solo sitúa el conflicto de la acción en dos presentadores televisivos divorciados y arribistas (Carolina Bang y Hugo Silva respectivamente), sino incluso en la violencia que genera el fracaso de las relaciones personales en el entorno periodístico. Sus diálogos son agresivos de manera constante, evidenciando, además, la desigualdad en la profesión televisiva: ¿Tengo que parecer subnormal todo el rato? […] Coño, yo no sé nada. Me lo tiene que explicar todo él y, encima, remata todos los chistes […] ¡Claro que sí! Dilo tú todo, que no pasa nada. Eres el tío de puta madre que hace las gracias y yo la gilipollas que enseña las tetas. El crescendo de su ira se enconará hasta el paroxismo: - ¿Crees que soy imbécil, qué no sé lo que estás haciendo? […] Tú quieres presentar Supervivientes. Eso es lo que pasa. Sé que tu representante ha Source: created by the authorWhen a workers’ strike (grotesque and disproportionate to the point of becoming an armed conict) threatens to break out, the television professionals do not hesitate to try to stop the recording, against the opposition of the network: What’s that, a movie? No, Benítez, that’s happening out there now. You have to stop lming. Come on, no way, I’d slash my wrists rst. Do you realize what could happen if those people come on set? at’s what the police are for, right?In My Big Night, De la Iglesia not only shows us the conict between two divorced, unscrupulous television presenters (Carolina Bang and Hugo Silva respectively), but also the violence arising from the failure of personal relationships in journalistic spheres. eir dialogues are incessantly aggressive, and shine a light on inequality in careers in television:
330 | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | July-December of 2024Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación Do I have to look gormless all the time? […] Damn it, I don’t know. He has to explain everything to me and, on top of that, he gets all the punchlines […] yeah, right! You say it all, no problem. You’re the cool guy, the funny one, and I’m the asshole who ashes her tits.Her anger grows to the point of paroxysm: Do you think I’m an idiot, that I don’t know what you’re doing? […] You want to present Supervivientes. at’s what’s happe-ning here. I know your agent has spoken to the network, that you’re slagging me o behind my back. You’ve been sending videos of my cock-ups upstairs for the last three days. at’s not true. ey’ve forwarded them to me! e two journalists end up trying to murder each other on stage, as happened in Dying of Laughter, while the audience laughs at a show that they take as ction, though it is pathetically real.6. ConclusionsAfter exhaustive review of Álex de la Iglesia’s lmography, it is evident that journalists’ labours, and particularly their social eects, are of great concern to the director. Not for nothing is he the screenwriter of all his lms, together with Jorge Guerricaechevarría, which suggests that the topics he deals with in his lms are intimately related to his personal interests.Despite this, Álex de la Iglesia’s lmography is not focused on journalistic praxis per se, since it is not interested in analysing specic aspects of the profession such as professional secrecy, freedom of the press, journalistic integrity, defamation, libel, or plagiarism, nor yet freedom of speech, as can be seen from the analysis of the ethical principles that he chooses not to address in his lms. However, his plots do highlight those elements that determine the ethics of the means utilised (manipulation, respect for privacy) or the result obtained (sensationalism, morbid fascination, falsehood). It has also become clear that he is concerned about the harmful eect that media practices, especially those of television, can have on making the audience lethargic. Frequent scenes of massacres being ignored by citizens while watching television, make manifest, grotesquely and hyperbolically, De la Iglesia’s fear of the analgesic eect of media entertainment on public morality.In this sense, it can be said that ethical issues do not matter to him in themselves, but in their social dimension, in the inuence they have; hence the importance given to staging, performances and atmosphere, by underlining the grotesqueness of the population. e conguration of dialogues is also key here, constantly full of coarse and foul-sounding expressions, with insults and outbursts that further accentuate the sensation of violence and grotesqueness. Foul language is employed as a deforming, grotesque, and subversive element. It can be said that Álex de la Iglesia is not interested in journalism in itself, but rather in its antithetical portrayal, represented by the vices and perversions of journalists. In this sense, De la Iglesia shows a total subversion of journalistic ethics through sensationalism and constant criticism of trash television.A clear development of the means used can be perceived, reecting how technology has advanced, not so much because of any notion of societal change, but rather because of changes to the technological paradigm itself, especially considering the period analysed (1993-2022).
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 July-December of 2024Lucía Tello DíazISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 331 Regarding themes, although there have been signicant changes since the early days of his career, it remains apparent that there is a persistent chronicle of crimes and the sordidness of society, although some constant tropes have been maintained such as television programmes, live depiction of death, news coverage, Christmas programming (both Christmas Eve and New Year’s Eve) and the presence of television sets in hospital waiting rooms, packed with images of crime, the epitome of sensationalism’s absurdity.Finally, it should be said that, despite the clear deformation his characters are subjected to, the mise-en-scène and the situations, Álex de la Iglesia’s portrait of the media universe is completely necessary, since it makes the media accountable for their social function and fosters attractive and undeniably democratic public debate.7. Acknowledgementse author is grateful to Brian O’Halloran for having translated the original version of this paper into English.e author received nancial support for the translation of this paper by the e International University of La Rioja (UNIR) –Grant for Scientical Papers Translation and Public Access–, 2023/2024.is research has been carried out into the research group MediaART: Communicational, Audiovisual and Artistical Narratives in the digital society.8. Conict of intereste author declares that there is no conict of interest contained in this article. 9. Bibliographic referencesAngulo, J. y Santamarina, A. (2012). Álex de la Iglesia. La pasión de rodar. San Sebastián: Filmoteca Vasca.Barroso, Porrio (2011). Códigos de deontología periodística: análisis comparativo. UPS-Ecuador, 15, julio-diciembre, pp. 141-176.Borio, Álex (2022). Efectos transculturales de las estrategias de doblaje y subtitulación para las películas de terror y de humor. Artifara 22.2, pp. 129-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.13135/1594-378X/7096 Bracco, Diane (2014). Las entrañas de Madrid: la radiografía de Álex de la Iglesia. Pandora, 12, pp. 399-417.Brajnovic, Luka (1979). El ámbito cientíco de la Información. Pamplona: EunsaBuse, P., Triana, N. y Willys, A. (2007). e cinema of Álex de la Iglesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Campos. C. (2012). Álex de la Iglesia: «No creo en el estilo, creo en la enfermedad». Jotdown, 26 de junio. https://bitly.ws/39pzZ De la Iglesia, Álex (2016). Álex de la Iglesia: Pertinencia de la comedia excéntrica. Festival de cine de San Sebastián. Academia. Revista de la Academia de Cine, 215, septiembre.Desantes, J.M. (2004): Derecho a la información. Materiales para un sistema de la comunicación. Madrid: Fundación COSO.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


332 | nº 39, pp. 311-333 | July-December of 2024Subversion of media & journalistic ethics in Spanish cinema: sensationalism and trash TV in the lmography of Álex...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónDíaz-Campo, Jesús y Chaparro-Domínguez, Marian (2020). Periodismo computacional y ética: Análisis de los códigos deontológicos de América Latina, Icono 14, 18 (1), 10-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v18i1.1488 Díaz-Campo, Jesús (2016). Consideraciones éticas sobre el contenido generado por el usuario en el periodismo digital. Suárez Villegas, J.C.; Cruz Álvarez, j. (eds.). Desafíos éticos en el periodismo digital. Madrid: Dykinson.Fabbrocino, Michela (2020). El arte visual como herramienta de investigación para analizar la imaginación de los niños. Tercio Creciente (Monográco extraordinario II) octubre 2020 pp. 155-174, https://dx.doi.org/10.17561/rtc.extra2.5790Fraile, Teresa (2014). Nostalgia, revival y músicas populares en el último cine español. Quaderns de cine, 9, pp. 107-114.Galeano, María Adelaida (2017). Estudios de derecho y cine: entramados de una historia que ya se está rodando. Revista CES Derecho, (8), 2, 298-321.Gámez-Ceruelo, V., Sáez, I. (2017). La imagen como documento gráco visual en la enseñanza de la historia en educación primaria en perspectiva comparada. Análisis y propuesta didáctica. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 20(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop/20.2.284781 García Ureña, P. (2017). ¿Me da una Mirinda? Constantes en el cine de Álex de la Iglesia. Área Abierta, 17 (2), 199-212. https://doi.org/10.5209/ARAB.52042 García Sánchez, Enrique (2021). Revista de Medicina y Cine: origen y evolución. Revista De Medicina y Cine, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.14201/rmc2021173175177Guereña, J. L. (ed.) (2007). Image et transmission des Savoirs dans les Mondes Hispaniques et Hispano‐Américains. Tours: CIREMIA.Heredero, C. (1999). Veinte nuevos directores del cine español. Madrid: Alianza.Jiménez Marín, Gloria; Elías, Rodrigo (2012). El cine como instrumento para la formación en la universidad. Aularia: revista digital de comunicación, 1(2), 163-169.Jiménez González, Marcos (2022). Acción mutante (1993), de Álex de la Iglesia, en el marco del género distópico: análisis contextual y estético de una rareza en la industria cinematográca española. Distopía y Sociedad: Revista de Estudios Culturales, 2, pp. 62-77.Jiménez González, Marcos (2023). Álex de la Iglesia y las escenas de alturas. Simbología del espacio desde la narrativa. Volumen 13 (1), pp. 53-60.Madriz-Sojo, Gabriel; Sáenz, Ronald (2018). Ciencia política y cine: un enfoque para el análisis político desde la Teoría del Discurso. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 63 (233), 141-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2018.233.59076Mancebo, Juan Agustín; Sánchez, Mónica (2022). La adaptación de Perdita Durango: de Barry Giord a Álex de la Iglesia. Trasvases entre la literatura y el cine, 4, pp. 137-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/Trasvasestlc.vi4.13669 Martínez Luna, Sergio (2015). Cultura Visual y Educación de la Mirada: Imágenes y Alfabetización. Revista Digital do LAV - Santa Maria, 7 (3): 003, pp. 3-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1983734816201Mayoral, Javier; Parratt, Sonia; Morata, Monserrat (2019). Desinformación, manipulación y credibilidad periodísticas: una perspectiva histórica. Historia de la comunicación social. 24 (2), pp. 395-409. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/hics.66267

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 311-333 July-December of 2024Lucía Tello DíazISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 333 Ortí, Roberto; García, María Ángeles (2012). La mezcla de géneros en el cine actual. Una propuesta didáctica: La comunidad de Álex de la Iglesia (2000). Las lenguas en la educación: cine, literatura, redes sociales y nuevas tecnologías. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, pp. 71-80.Pastor, María Ángeles (2020). Quiero ser periodista: tras las motivaciones de la profesión periodística. Comunicar. Revista cientíca de educomunicación, 34, XVII, pp. 191-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C34-2010-03-19Pérez Franco, Neftalí (2010). La intertextualidad en el cine de Álex de la Iglesia: el caso del cómic. FOTOCINEMA. Revista Cientíca de Cine y Fotografía 1 (2010), pp. 39-73.Ramonet, Ignacio (2002). La tiranía de la comunicación. Madrid: Debate.Rivero, Marta (2015). El esperpento en el cine de Álex de la Iglesia. Fonseca, Journal of Communication, 10, enero- junio, pp. 360-392. https://bitly.ws/39pxy Rodríguez Mateos, Araceli; Montero Díaz, Julio (2005) El cine cambia la historia. Madrid: Rialp.Tello Díaz, Lucía (2016-A). Diccionario del periodista en el cine español (1896-2010). Madrid: Notorious.Tello Díaz, Lucía (2016-B). Hablemos de cine. 20 cineastas españoles conversan sobre el cuarto poder. Zaragoza: PUZ.Tello Díaz, Lucía (2013). Periodismo y cine: la práctica y la ética mediática según los cineastas vascos (1910-2010). Ikusgaiak. 8, pp. 5-34.Tello Díaz, Lucía (2010). Cuarto poder vs. séptimo arte: el periodista en el cine español. Academia. Revista de cine español, nº 169 julio/agosto; pp. 12-13.Tello Díaz, Lucía (2007). La enseñanza de la ética periodística a través del cine. Madrid: EAE.Trenzado, M. (2000). El cine desde la perspectiva de la Ciencia Política. Reis. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, 92, 45-70. Van Dijk, Teun (2006). Discurso y manipulación: Discusión teórica y algunas aplicaciones. Revista Signos, 39 (60), pp. 49-74.Vásconez, G., Carpio A y Carpio N. (2023). Categorías representacionales de la comedia negra en tres películas de Álex de la Iglesia. Comunicación. Revista Internacional de Comunicación Audiovisual, Publicidad y Estudios Culturales, 21 (1), pp. 115-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/Comunicacion.2023.v21.i01.07115Suárez Villegas, JC (2013). La actitud ética de los periodistas andaluces ante cuestiones de especial sensibilidad social. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 68 pp. 309-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2013-979

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]