Journalism, gender, and television: the image of women journalists in US series (1988-2022)1Periodismo, género y televisión: la imagen de las mujeres periodistas en las series estadounidenses (1988-2022)1 is article is the result of work carried out by the UCM Research Group entitled, “Memoria y medios de Comunicación” (Ref. 71685). doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 229-246 | 229 July-December of 2024ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: Coronado Ruiz, C. (2024). Journalism, gender, and television: the image of women journalists in US series (1988-2022). Doxa Comunicación, 39, pp. 229-246.https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n39a2126Carlota Coronado Ruiz. In addition to her role as professor at Complutense University of Madrid, her main lines of research focus on the study of social portrayals related to gender, identity, history, and historical memory from an interdisciplinary point of view, mainly directed at the audio-visual media of lm and television. As a result of her research, a number of articles have been published in scientic journals of international prestige.Complutense University of Madrid, Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0001-6997-0206is content is published under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. International License CC BY-NC 4.0Received: 29/10/2023 - Accepted: 12/01/2024 - Early access: 26/02/2024 - Published: 01/07/2024Recibido: 29/10/2023 - Aceptado: 12/01/2024 - En edición 26/02/2024 - Publicado: 01/07/2024Abstract:Over the decades, the lm industry has perpetuated certain narrative paradigms and stereotypes about female journalists. Some of these have been transferred to television ction, where such portrayals have been updated with new archetypes. e aim of this research is to determine the way female journalists are portrayed in US ctional series. To this end, an analysis has been carried out regarding eight series broadcast between 1988 and 2022, which focus on journalism, featuring women as the protagonists who work in the profession. A diachronic perspective has been taken, which allows us to see the evolution of these stereotypes over more than three decades. In this way, it is possible to observe changes in archetypes as well those that persist, and to show evidence of social progress related to the diverse portrayals of women journalists.Keywords: Female journalist; television; United States; television ction; journalism.Resumen:El cine ha perpetuado a lo largo de décadas unos paradigmas narrati-vos y estereotipos sobre las mujeres periodistas. Algunos de ellos se han trasladado a la cción televisiva, pero ésta ha actualizado estas repre-sentaciones con nuevos modelos. La presente investigación trata de de-terminar cuál es la imagen que las series de cción estadounidenses han proyectado sobre las profesionales del periodismo, a través del análisis de ocho series emitidas entre 1988 y 2022, tanto centradas en el perio-dismo como con protagonistas femeninas que ejercen esta profesión. Se aplica una perspectiva diacrónica que permite ver la evolución de estos estereotipos a lo largo de más de tres décadas. De esta manera, se pue-den observar los cambios en los modelos, así como las continuidades, y hacer evidente el progreso social y las diferentes representaciones de las mujeres periodistas.Palabras clave: Mujeres periodistas; televisión; Estados Unidos; cción televisiva; periodismo.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


230 | nº 39, pp. 229-246 | July-December of 2024Journalism, gender, and television: the image of women journalists in US series (1988-2022)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación1. IntroductionJournalism has been the subject of numerous lms since the early days of cinema. In these audio-visual stories set in press newsrooms, or in radio or television studios, portrayals of journalists have alternated between the image of a hero in search of the truth, while at the service of democracy, and the antithesis of the unscrupulous and unethical villain who is greedy for power and capable of lying, bribing or distorting reality to achieve their own ends (Ehrlich, 2004; Ehrlich and Saltzman, 2015). It is rare to nd a lm title in which journalism is approached in a way that is balanced and neutral (González, 2003: 77). From the drunken, foul-mouthed journalist who twists the truth to create a scandal, a shift has occurred toward the myth of the self-made journalist who ghts for justice. Moreover, as pointed out by Mera (2008: 519), “What is portrayed are aspects that are uncommon in the profession, because features are exaggerated and nuances are reduced”. Authors such as Laviana (1996), Langman (1998), Ghiglione and Saltzman (2005), and McNair (2010) have reected on these stereotypical visions of journalists oered by ction and have proposed the most recurring typologies: the reporter as a bloodhound on the hunt for news (Langman, 1998: 2); the human journalist with emotions and internal conicts; the anonymous reporter, always in the midst of a mass of microphones and cameras; the scandalmonger, or gossip columnist; the grumpy editor who chain-smokes, but has a nose for a good story; and the media owner, who is always looking out for their own self-interest (Ghiglione and Saltzman, 2005: 14-21). McNair (2010) adds other categories: the journalist as a watchdog of political power; the writer or artist as part of the mythology of journalism; the rst-hand witness to events; and the villains of the profession.Of all these journalistic categories, only one refers to women: the so-called sob sisters. is derogatory term refers to “female news reporters who appeal to readers’ sympathy with their accounts of heart-wrenching events” (Saltzman, 2003: 2). According to journalist Ishbel Ross, it was rst used in 1907. However, the term did not become popular until it started to appear in lms. Related to this stereotype of the “sentimental news” journalist was the so-called news hen, who had to face a hostile and uncooperative work environment, which sometimes led to her feeling forced to leave to devote herself to the family (Langman, 1998: 3).is stereotype had already been present in A Female Reporter (1909), which was the rst short lm produced in Hollywood starring a female journalist. Reecting reality, these lms showed the tearful, human, and social issues in which women were involved. In order to prove their worth, many had to become “one of the boys” (Saltzman, 2003: 3), which gave rise to a process of masculinisation that the big screen highlighted in the 1930s and 40s with characters such as Hildy Johnson in New Moon (Howard Hawks, 1940), who was an intelligent and ambitious journalist, capable of speaking on equal terms with her male colleagues, and characterised by her masculine dress and strong personality.Alongside these two stereotypes, in late 20th century American cinema, other categories of women journalists can be observed: the ambitious, cold, and implacable woman who moves in a male environment and whose professional practices are unorthodox; the frivolous and seductive journalist, supercial and fame-hungry, with no scruples whatsoever; the updated sob sister who feels like an outsider in a man’s world to which she has to adapt; the housewife journalist whose main
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 229-246 July-December of 2024Carlota Coronado RuizISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 231motivation is not work, but love; the action lm heroine, incorporated into the male professional world for the development of the romantic plot (Osorio, 2009); the clumsy young woman with few journalistic skills; the female editor-in-chief who keeps the inexperienced women reporters at bay and is portrayed as embittered and tyrannical; and nally, the myth of the columnist with an unrealistic lifestyle, writing one piece a month with hundreds of fans.Television ction from the late 20th to the rst part of the 21st century has not abandoned these portrayals: although more than half of the students in journalism schools are female, and the majority of the people working is the profession are women, female journalists in ction continue to navigate through a man’s world trying not to be seen as sex objects, nor use their femininity to achieve success. Television has perpetuated clichés about women journalists for decades, but some positive images have been oered as well. In fact, as pointed out by Saltzman (2003), the two most positive references to journalists in popular culture are women: Mary Richards (Mary Tyler Moore) in e Mary Tyler Moore Show (CBS, 1970-1977), and Murphy Brown (Candice Bergen) in Murphy Brown (CBS, 1988-1998).Television series have become one of the most popular cultural phenomena of the 21st century. From the 1990s to the present day, there has been a greater presence of women in television ction, not only quantitatively, but qualitatively as well. e hegemonic androcentrism of Hollywood has given way to new narratives in which female characters have more inuence, or in which the problems experienced by women are highlighted. Social changes and the so-called Fourth Wave of feminism have permeated television narratives. e evolution in the portrayal of women in US television series is closely linked to series about professionals (Marek, 1997) and, in particular, about journalists. e evolution of the female journalist in American series from the 1980s until well into the 2000s is quintessential. Some of the key series that have led to changes in the female archetypes have focused on women journalists (Press, 2018). From Murphy Brown in the 1980s, to Sex and the City in the 1990s, and Good Girls Revolt in the new millennium. e aim of the present study is to determine whether stereotypes present in lm depictions of women journalists have been perpetuated in American television series over the last three decades. Are there new narrative paradigms in the portrayal of these characters, and has there been an evolution in the dierent archetypes of women journalists over the last thirty years? To answer these questions, and in order to give as complete a picture as possible of how US television ction has portrayed women journalists, an analysis was carried out of eight American series broadcast between 1988 and 2022, all of which focus on journalism with female journalists as the main characters in the profession.e study is limited to the USA for several reasons. e rst has to do with a methodological issue with regard to quantitatively dening the corpus under analysis, as the object of study is not only limited in time (1988-2022), but also geographically. Naturally, there are television productions from other countries that focus on journalism within this time frame as well, such as the Spanish series Periodistas (Telecinco, 1998-2002); the British series e Hour (BBC, 2011) Press (BBC, 2018); the Danish series Borgen (DR and Netix, 2010-2022); Sweden’s Blinded (Misolm, 2019); and South Korea’s Argon (TVN, 2017), among others. However, the decision was made to focus the research on the US television industry because if other countries had been included, the research would have been unmanageable. e second reason for delimiting the study was to see the evolution of
232 | nº 39, pp. 229-246 | July-December of 2024Journalism, gender, and television: the image of women journalists in US series (1988-2022)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónfemale characters over several decades, rather than conducting a comparative study with other countries. Moreover, the focus was placed on the United States due to its status as the benchmark of international television.e lm portrayal of journalism has been the subject of numerous research articles and books from the 1970s to the present day, including those of the following authors: Barris (1976); Good (1985 and 1998), Ehrlich (2006); Laviana (1996); Ness (1997); Bezunartea et al. (2007); Requeijo (2013); and Bunyol, (2017). Nevertheless, neither television ction nor the portrayal of women journalists have been recurring themes in these studies. In the Anglo-Saxon world, among the rst works on journalism and television, the book by Douglass K. Daniel (1996) stands out, which focuses on the series Lou Grant. e author also devotes a chapter to journalistic drama as a genre of television, in which he makes a historical review of series produced between 1947 and 1977. In the decades that followed, there was an increase in the number of series that focused on the work environment of journalism, yet this interest by television networks, and later by platforms, has not generated much academic interest. Over the last decade, however, which coincides with the ird Golden Age of American television ction (Cascajosa Virino, 2009: 12-13; Wayne, 2016: 41), research on series has multiplied, yet there are still few studies that analyse the image depicted of this profession, especially in Spain. Most of them focus on case studies, such as the work by Gómez Morales (2014), who examines the portrayal of journalists in prime time animated comedy series, or Novoa Jaso (2017), who tries to identify the stereotypes of journalists in current television ction by analysing the series known as e Newsroom (HBO, 2012) and Argon (TVN, 2017). In the Anglo-Saxon world, the comparative work by McNair (2014) on the transfer of old stereotypes of the journalist from lm to television stands out.Research on the image of female journalists in series is also scarce. Saltzman (2003) was one of the rst authors to address this issue, pointing out the constant repetition of the archetype that popular culture has conveyed of female journalists. Other studies have examined series about journalism with female protagonists, including the following: Good Girls Revolt (Painter and Ferrucci, 2019); characters who work in journalism in series such as How I Met Your Mother (Rizwan, 2013); and case studies to identify the portrayal that a given series oers of female journalists (Painter and Ferrucci, 2012 and 2015; De Wulf Helskens et al, 2023). One of the most deeply explored series is House of Cards (Cvetkovic and Oostman, 2018; Painter and Ferrucci, 2017), especially regarding the sexualisation and lack of professionalism of women journalists portrayed in the series.e present research agrees with the idea that the image of female journalists oered by 21st century series are still simplistic and stereotypical: from the “dumb blonde” to the “bitter boss”, and to the masculine female journalist who is successful but has sacriced her personal life for professional success. ese ideas come from various case studies that allow us to make a specic in-depth analysis of a series produced at a given moment. However, it is useful to take a diachronic perspective, which enables the evolution of these stereotypes to be observed by associating the image oered by each series to the production context. In this regard, the present study tries to cover a broad timeframe (1988-2022) in order to identify changes in archetypes, as well as the continuing stereotypes, and to reveal not only social progress, but the dierent portrayals of women journalists as well.
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 229-246 July-December of 2024Carlota Coronado RuizISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 2332. Methodologye rst methodological issue was to establish a chronological framework, which was crucial for the design and size of the sample. e aim of providing a broad overview of the image of women journalists in US television series required the selection of a broad time period. Firstly, the idea of focusing on the ird Golden Age of Television, which would have covered ction produced from the late 1990s to the present day was considered. is chronological framework left out the pioneer of journalistic series and a benchmark in the portrayal of women journalists, Murphy Brown (CBS, 1988-1998), which is why the time period was extended to the last 34 years (1988-2022).Such a broad period of analysis meant working with an excessively large corpus of documents, so the sample was further delimited by taking dierent issues into account. Firstly, the authors dened the type of series that would comprise part of the study. e rise of the so-called workplace TV series, or professional series, whose main feature is “an approach to reality both in the issues and in the characters’ construction” (Galán, 2007: 41), led to the inclusion of professional series focused on journalism as part of the sample, which reects the work dynamics of a newsroom, as well as the processes of coverage, creation and news dissemination. However, not all of them were of interest due to the under-representation of women or the limited narrative weight of the women journalists2. erefore, it was reduced to professional series with female protagonists. e selection of a specic genre, such as professional series about journalism, left out other categories such as sitcoms, as well as comedy or drama series with a female journalist as the main character. erefore, the criterion of narrative weight within the story that was used to select the sample was the following: series with female protagonists3 in the journalistic profession.In order to dene a sample of analysis with the maximum possible representation, the channels or platforms on which the selected series were broadcast were taken into account. During this period, cable television developed greatly in the United States, which led to a proliferation of channels and television oerings. Although this variety has been addressed in the sample, as the number of series had to be limited, the decision was made to use the following sources: two major networks (CBS and NBC); the platforms with the largest number of subscribers (Netix and Amazon); and the cable television channel that had changed the US television scene (HBO), which became “the standard-bearer of quality television” (Cascajosa, 2006: 25).Another important consideration when compiling the sample was authorship. As pointed out by Saltzman (2003: 4), male scriptwriters have safeguarded a patriarchal paradigm in their portrayal of the sob sisters by avoiding their depiction as overly independent and feisty, and ensuring that these women ultimately gave in to love. In the ird Golden Age, American television has maintained a cultural, androcentric attitude that is hegemonic; as highlighted by Press (2018: 98), this type of series had always been led by men.2 Series focused on the professional eld of journalism with an under-representation of women have been excluded from the corpus of analysis, but this low narrative weight in itself becomes a way of representing women journalists. 3 In order to determine the degree of prominence of a character and to include the series in the sample, two issues were taken into account: rstly, a quantitative factor was considered, or in other words, the character had to be present in more than one season and a qualitative one, that the character had the functions of the main roles, that is, that it guided the narrative, focused the action, and had individual objectives.
234 | nº 39, pp. 229-246 | July-December of 2024Journalism, gender, and television: the image of women journalists in US series (1988-2022)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónWomen were secondary gures in these male psychodramas, and female directors wishing to create less sexist dramas were faced with nearly impossible obstacles. Almost by denition, ‘serious’ television oered few opportunities for women both in front of and behind the camera (Press, 2018: 98).However, the rise of women showrunners in American series since 2000, such as Amy Sherman-Palladino, Shonda Rhimes, and Jenji Kohan has meant the introduction of new topics and a greater role for women. In this regard, the inclusion of series created by women has been taken into account when drawing up the analysis sample, which has allowed a comparison between the male gaze of some series and the more feminist perspective found especially in series written and directed by women. us, the nal documentary corpus consists of the following series: Murphy Brown (CBS, 1988-1998), Sex and the City (HBO, 1998-2004), e West Wing (NBC, 1999-2006); How I Met Your Mother (CBS, 2005-2013), e Newsroom (HBO, 2012-2014), Good Girls Revolt (Amazon, 2016); House of Cards (Netix, 2013-2018) and Inventing Anna (Netix, 2022). Overall, these eight series cover the time period analysed, three of which have a female showrunner, and all with at least one female protagonist who is involved in journalism. Yet they also oer a diversity of characters, dierent types of journalism (television, political, quality magazines, etc.) and in dierent periods (from the 1970s to the present day).Although the sample was narrowed down so that it was not too large, the documentary corpus is broad, so the methodology applied to work with the television ction was qualitative analysis focused on the female characters and the issues dealt with in each series. By viewing all the seasons, it was possible to see the evolution and narrative trajectory of the female characters over the life of each series and to establish the plots to which they were related. However, an in-depth content and character analysis of each episode was unfeasible given the number of hours that would have been necessary.For an in-depth analysis of the main characters, a selection of seasons was made, including the rst season in all cases, which is the key to presenting characters, plots and environments. In this regard, the rst and last seasons of some of the longest-running series with the largest number of episodes (Murphy Brown, Sex and the City, e West Wing, and How I Met Our Mother) have been selected for analysis. In the case of House of Cards, the analysis focused on the rst two seasons, where journalism is given more weight in the plot. e Newsroom, Good Girls Revolt and Inventing Anna have been analysed completely, as they have fewer episodes.Special attention has been paid to the analysis of the main characters, taking into account the following dierent points of view: narrative, roles played, relationships with other characters, physical and psychological characteristics, and behaviour. e categories established in previous studies (Galán, 2006) have also been taken into account, based on the theoretical foundations of audio-visual narratives, analysing the female characters from a three-dimensional perspective, including narrative, psychological, and relational. e portrayal of female characters has also been addressed from the viewpoint of gender studies, as well as criticism and theory of feminist lms. In this way, variables have been applied that connect the theories of narratology with those of gender, relating aspects such as the situation and position of women compared to that of men, the roles of the characters in terms of the domestic/public dichotomy, the presence or absence of “normative femininity”, relations of rivalry or friendships between women, and others (Menéndez and Zurián, 2014: 65). e bibliography on these series has also been used to complete the analysis. In this way, it has been possible to determine the female archetypes that
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 229-246 July-December of 2024Carlota Coronado RuizISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 235are most often portrayed, in which contexts they tend to appear, and their narrative weight in each of the series throughout the various decades.3. Results3.1. Series that led the way: from Murphy Brown to e West Winge chronological journey through the selected series, which allows us to see the evolution of the stereotypes associated with women journalists in US television ction in recent decades, begins with a pioneering series that was a benchmark for later television portrayals of journalism. e series referred to is Murphy Brown (CBS, 1988-1998), a sitcom created by Diane English. e series focuses on the life of a successful journalist who is a news magazine anchorwoman, and the strategies she uses to prove herself and her journalistic skills on a daily basis. As previously mentioned, according to Joe Saltzman (2003), the character of Murphy Brown is one of the two most positive images of journalism in popular culture, and the other is the character of Mary Richards on e Mary Tyler Moore Show (CBS, 1970-1977).As the direct and up-to-date heir to the Mary Tyler Moore show, Murphy Brown represents a woman of the late twentieth century. She is a serious, strong, and independent journalist; far from the stereotype of a sob sister, and closer to that of the journalist who drinks a lot and always has a cigarette in his mouth. One of the most striking aspects of the protagonist of the series created by Diane English is her age. As opposed to the demand for youth and attractiveness, which is characteristic of US television anchors, Murphy Brown reects the seriousness and professionalism of a journalist in her forties. As pointed out by Fung (1988), by the 1980s it was already obvious that TV broadcasting positions were going to young women and experienced men. is trend has become widespread in most countries, and continues to this day4. In the United States, the traditional pair of an older anchorman and younger female journalist has traditionally been maintained. He represents seniority, seriousness, professionalism, and credibility, while she reects beauty, attractiveness, and a lack of experience.However, the character of Murphy Brown is no longer the young and attractive “TV girl”, but instead is a TV woman. A woman who no longer asks permission, but gives permission. She is “an adult woman, a recognised professional, brilliant, and admired; but also a polydrug addict, irascible, and single” (Güimil, 2017). She is a character with many shades of meaning who grows throughout the various seasons, both personally and professionally, addressing current social and political issues, as well as questions that entered the national debate when the character became a single mother. Brown became the rst female journalist in US ction who was able to balance career and family without having to sacrice either.Murphy Brown entered the living rooms of American homes on a weekly basis, as if she were a real journalist, conducting interviews with actual public gures such as politicians, and even journalistic luminaries Walter Cronkite and Katie Couric, and many others.4 In Spain, for example, in 2023 there were four generalist television news anchors over the age of 60, and no female anchors. e average age of female news anchors in Spain is 41, while the average age of male news anchors is 54 (Vázquez-Miraz, 2019).
236 | nº 39, pp. 229-246 | July-December of 2024Journalism, gender, and television: the image of women journalists in US series (1988-2022)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónis parade of media professionals, whom Murphy greeted as her peers, blurred the line between fact and ction. e character of Murphy Brown took on a life of her own as a successful and professional journalist who become a role model for the following generations. e character created by Diane English paved the way for the great female characters who lled the television screen in later years.e next series to break the mould in terms of the depiction of female roles was Sex and the City (HBO, 1998-2004). However, it was more disruptive in terms of taboos surrounding female sexuality than for the stereotypes of the female journalist. e main character is Carrie Bradshaw, who is the alter ego of Candance Bushnell. e latter is the author of the book by the same name that inspired the series created by Darren Star. Bradshaw works as a freelance columnist for the ctional newspaper, e New York Star. e character, played by Sarah Jessica Parker, is both the narrator and central gure in the series. Each episode revolves around the articles in Carrie’s column regarding her experiences, hobbies, and sex life. rough this narrative, the series makes signicant commentaries on the moralistic discourse of female sexuality and lifestyle choices (McHugh, 2001: 195-196).Bradshaw is an independent and nancially stable woman with career aspirations, who does not allow her life be inuenced by the desires or needs of men. Unlike other female characters who portrayed the stereotypical sob sisters, and who ultimately chose love over career, for Carrie and her friends, marriage and motherhood are not the goal of every woman, nor are they the epitome of happiness. In fact, the series presents work as a source of personal fullment and not as a place of conict.Despite the fact that the series breaches social gender roles, the image of these young, white, attractive, and professionally successful women is unrealistic. As pointed out by journalist Simon Paget (2013), in a blog post entitled “Carrie Bradshaw vs. Reality”, a freelance journalist needs to write various articles every week in order to pay the bills.e exact opposite of light journalism is the political communication professional portrayed in e West Wing (NBC, 1999-2006). After depicting the work of sports journalists in Sport Night (1998-2000), the creator of e West Wing, Aaron Sorkin, displays his interest in journalism through the character of C.J. Cregg, who is the ctional reection of Dee Myers, the rst woman to hold the position of Press Secretary for the US government. Having the advice of the person who held this position for the nal two years of the Clinton administration surely gave the character more realism, as well as depth. Although an impeccable professional, highly valued by the president and her colleagues, she has to confront sexism in numerous situations. In expressing his admiration for C.J., ctional US President Bartlet refers to her as “a 1950s movie star, capable, loving, and energetic” (Sorkin, 1999) which, as pointed out by Garret (2005: 87), makes her seem more like a “cuddly pet” rather than a political journalist. is female character, who rises to positions of power, rst as press secretary and later as chief of sta, not only faces the diculties of her job and position, but other issues related to her gender as well, such as doubts regarding her capabilities and decision-making competence. At times, it is clear that she suers unfair treatment, such as when her opinion is not given much consideration. Nevertheless, Sorkin’s depiction of the character conveys an image of seriousness and professionalism. C.J. Cregg’s sexuality is not explored, not even in the way she dresses, which is austere, yet not masculine. She is a woman who has come to power and lives in an environment where she is sometimes made to feel like a sh out of water, yet she clearly shows that a woman does not have to act like a man to reach a position of power, but that it is necessary to prove one’s worth and let
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 229-246 July-December of 2024Carlota Coronado RuizISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 237one’s work speak for itself. is multifaceted character contrasts with others employed by Sorkin to generate sexual tension, which limits their depth. As pointed out by Garrett (2005: 189-190), women in the series such as C.J. Cregg, or rst lady Abbey Bartlet, are strong and capable, while others come across as “neurotic or naive”. Even so, Dee Myers’ impact on the series is evident, as her advice for the scripts highlights the sexism faced by women who work in the White House.3.2. Journalists of the new century: from How I Met Your Mother to Inventing AnnaAt the beginning of the 21st century, US television ction reached a high level of quality. e thematic diversity, the originality, and the technical quality of premium pay channels such as HBO, Showtime, and later Netix launched the phenomenon of television series at the international level, and consolidated what has subsequently been called the ird Golden Age of American television. During this period of thematic and formal renewal, the sitcom How I Met Your Mother appeared (CBS, 2005-2014). Created by Carter Bays and Craig omas, the series features Robin Scherbatsky as a reporter for Metro News 1, who is tired of being labelled as a young, attractive journalist only dedicated to trivial and cheesy stories. She is ambitious and wants to be taken seriously as a professional, so she must continually prove her skills. Even so, Robin does not portray a stereotypical sob sister, because she struggles to avoid being labelled a “naive journalist”, and she hates the kind of news she covers. However, her desire to succeed does not make her an avid reporter who steals stories or sabotages the careers of her colleagues. She is energetic, but not opportunistic or aggressive, so she is far from the stereotype of the masculinised female journalist who pursues success by being aggressive, self-reliant, and arrogant. As noted by Rizwan (2013: 16), Robin has the ability to balance the qualities traditionally associated with masculinity and femininity, making her a unique character within the portrayal of female journalists in popular culture.Robin’s character also does not use her sexuality or physical appearance to advance her career. She aspires to become the new Katie Couric or Barbara Walters, yet the tyranny of beauty weighs upon her, as it does on most female news anchors. According to Chambers et al. (2004), the physical appearance of female hosts continues to be the target of audience comments. Robin Scherbatski experiences this reality, as well as other diculties faced by US television reporters today, creating a realistic picture of the modern journalist who is both strong and vulnerable at the same time. It breaches the traditional image of the ruthless anchorwoman or journalist who has achieved fame, but feels the bitterness of having no romantic life, as Robin does not sacrice personal relationships or professional ethics to achieve success. In 2012, screenwriter Aaron Sorkin returned to journalistic television ction with e Newsroom (HBO), with plots located in the frenetic newsroom of a breaking news programme that explores issues of the profession such as superciality in news coverage, the battle for audience share, journalistic ethics, and the importance of verifying sources.When the series premiered, television critic Alberto Rey (2012) wrote the following:What oense have women committed against Mr. Aaron to deserve having all the female characters of e Newsroom portrayed as basically hysterical, incompetent girls? And yet, without them, there would be nothing, because their cognitive and sentimental inoperativeness hides a genius that in fact doesn’t make much sense. Isn’t that the ultimate male chauvinism, to say that “the one in charge at home is my wife, who on the other hand is an idiot”? Isn’t it the degrading epithet, and the most extreme ridicule? Why are Mackenzie McHale, Maggie Jordan and Sloan Sabbith so unhinged? Is it necessary? Does it provide any insight?
238 | nº 39, pp. 229-246 | July-December of 2024Journalism, gender, and television: the image of women journalists in US series (1988-2022)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónese issues highlight the controversy regarding female characters of the renowned US screenwriter, who has been accused of having problems in designing female characters who “are not all from the same mould of the mist, primordial, and mad woman” (Rey, 2012). In e Newsroom, only Sloan Sabbith’s character is portrayed as a woman who is professional and educated, yet with poor social skills. On the contrary, Mackenzie McHale, producer of News Night in the series, and Margaret Jordan, associate producer, are portrayed as compulsively melodramatic, and who focus strongly on personal issues. Although McHale is a determined, experienced and professional woman who was in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars covering the news, she suers from repeated panic attacks, and her character is permanently intertwined with the protagonist, who is the news anchor and her ex-boyfriend as well. Margaret Jordan is a mix between the stereotype of a rookie journalist and a sob sister: her continual clumsiness leads her to make mistakes, which sometimes allows her to obtain an exclusive merely by chance. roughout the series she gains experience and condence as a journalist, yet her character has more narrative impact in the sentimental plots than on the professional ones.Despite the stereotypical female portrayal in both cases, it is worth noting that Mackenzie McHale’s character depicts the pursuit of truth by promoting rigorous journalism. She makes this clear in the rst episode of the series when she declares her goals as the new executive producer of News Night:Defend the fourth estate. Reclaim journalism as an honourable profession. A nightly news programme that delivers a debate worthy of a great nation. Civic-mindedness, respect, and a return to what is important. e death of vulgarity, gossip, and voyeurism. Tell the truth, even to the fools (Sorkin, 2012).e opposite of these values associated with journalism can be found in the series House of Cards (Netix, 2013-2018), through the character of the ambitious Zoe Barnes. She portrays a professional who is without ethics, easily manipulated, self-centred, and eager to climb the career ladder using any weapon at her disposal, including sex. As opposed to political journalism based on documentation, cross-checking of sources, and contextualisation of data, the journalism that Zoe Barnes epitomises has no ethical guidelines (Painter and Ferrucci, 2017). Moreover, she uses irtation and sexual advances to obtain information. is only serves to consolidate a negative stereotype of the female journalist as someone without professional merit whose success depends on who she sleeps with.As pointed out by Cvetkovic and Oostman (2018), women’s sexuality as part of the journalistic routine in the series is quietly accepted in the profession. is is specically stated by the character of Janine Skorsky, the White House correspondent for the ctional newspaper, e Washington Herald, when she confesses that she, like other journalists, “sucked, wanked, and fucked for a good story” (Cleveland and Willimon, 2013). Both Skorsky and the rest of the editorial sta assume that the important information obtained by Zoe Barnes is not the result of an exhaustive and substantiated investigation, but rather due to an information leak obtained through the use of her body. e consequence is a lack of professional consideration for women journalists. Because once the word got out, Skorsky explains in a dialogue, “It was like I hit a wall, and no one took me seriously” (Cleveland and Willimon, 2013). Nevertheless, Zoe Barnes represents not only the journalist who takes the easy way out, but also the ambitious young woman who breaks the rules and routines of a newsroom in order to achieve fame. She dees the conventional model of journalism by representing the millennial journalist who places more emphasis on the impact of the rumour than on the veracity of the
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 229-246 July-December of 2024Carlota Coronado RuizISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 239information. e contrast can be seen between the values of the veteran editor of e Washington Herald, who is a bastion of rigorous, quality journalism, and those of Barnes who, along with Carly, her young editor-in-chief at the new online media outlet Slugline, are more interested in the audience and viralising the news than in accuracy.is dierence highlights the seriousness and quality of the information of the former, and the superciality and lack of social responsibility of the latter. Barnes, moreover, represents a model of journalism closely linked to the generation of social networks, where impact and followers are sought, regardless of the quality and rigour of the information.e diculties encountered by women journalists and the lack of consideration for their work is a common feature in most of the series analysed. In the case of Good Girls Revolt (2016), created by Dana Calvo for Amazon and inspired by real events, the show recreates the struggle carried out in 1969 by the so-called researchers (fact-checkers) at Newsweek magazine which, in the series, is known as News of the Week. On the editorial sta of Newsweek, women were not allowed to write stories. ey could only be secretaries, assistants, or research clerks, but they could not sign their names to articles. “We were told very explicitly, ‘If you want to write, go somewhere else’. Women don’t write for Newsweek,” recalled Povich, author of the book on which the series is based, and one of the women who sued the magazine in the 1970s (Sottile, 2016).e three main characters of the series rebel against the magazine’s mandate, which prevented women from moving up the career ladder. Led by an activist and lawyer of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Eleanor Holmes Norton, a real-life gure, they mobilised the women workers to take joint action against the magazine for discrimination in the workplace5. e series reects these women’s awareness of the daily discrimination that takes place at the magazine, as well as the sexual and sexist harassment they experienced in the oce.e series allows for presentism to be interpreted in the story it tells, as the setting is a place where many professionals in the media and the world of entertainment were starting to publicly denounce sexist behaviour, as well as situations of sexual harassment, which later gave rise to the #MeToo movement in 2017. Also, the obstacles faced by women journalists in this ctional series, such as the lack of visibility, the wage gap, and restricted access to certain jobs are perceived in the 21st century as problems that still have not been resolved (Robertson et al., 2021).erefore, in Good Girls Revolt, the feminist perspective is evident in the approach to the workplace and personal situation of the protagonists, as well as in the intention to create female archetypes who achieve empowerment within journalism, as in the case of Nora Ephron (Grace Gummer in the show). In the series, this character becomes the catalyst of the protest after resigning from her job, which resulted from her being prohibited from publishing an article that she had written6. e women’s solidarity and the absence of rivalry between them also highlights the feminist perspective from which the series is approached, not to mention the choice of a theme that puts women’s struggle for their labour rights in the spotlight: after the 5 In 1964, the Civil Rights Act was passed, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race or gender. 6 Ephron worked at Newsweek in the 1960s, but left to join e New York Post. In the series she appears to be the spark that ignites the protest, but in fact, the awareness-raising that led to the mobilisation were the meetings of women workers in which they shared their personal and work-related problems, a strategy that was widely used in the feminist movement of those years.
240 | nº 39, pp. 229-246 | July-December of 2024Journalism, gender, and television: the image of women journalists in US series (1988-2022)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónlawsuit against Newsweek in 1970, this was followed by similar lawsuits against employment discrimination at other magazines such as Life and Time, among others.Also inspired by real events and characters, Inventing Anna (Netix, 2022) portrays the journalistic work carried out by Jessica Pressler7 (Vivian Kent in the show) related to the case of Anna Delvey (Anna Sorokin in the series), a young woman who scammed hotels, companies and New York high society by posing as a wealthy German heiress in order to maintain her luxurious lifestyle.e series’ creator, successful showrunner and producer Shonda Rhimes, enlisted Pressler’s help in adapting the story, which allowed for a portrayal of the journalist from the point of view of a professional reporter. is brings not only humanity to the character, but reality as well. e hard work of documentation, fact-checking, interviews and, above all, the eort to convince the magazine’s editor that the story was worthwhile, is perfectly reected in the series. Other details drawn from the life of the real journalist include the fact that she was pregnant and gave birth shortly after publishing the story, and the controversy in which she was involved when she wrote a report about a young man who gave false testimony.e character Vivian Kent is a tireless professional, nearly obsessed with cross-checking data in order to avoid the mistakes of the past that have lowered her credibility and inuence inside and outside the newsroom. She carries out meticulous investigative work in order to gain the trust of her editor, and to demonstrate that sound journalism and good stories require data to be studied, along with verication of sources. Compared to other archetypes of ctional journalists, such as some of those mentioned above, Vivian does not break the rules, does not resort to illegal or unethical means to obtain information, respects her sources, and shows that the facts are what count.4. DiscussionOver the years, lms have perpetuated narrative paradigms and stereotypes about women journalists. One of the questions this research has attempted to answer is whether these portrayals of the work of women journalists have changed, and to what extent new archetypes exist. By analysing eight selected television series, an attempt has been made to answer these questions.Firstly, similar to lms, we also nd in series the dilemma that women journalists have to face, which is the incorporation of masculine traits into their behaviour as something indispensable for success. To prove their worth, sometimes they have to be arrogant, self-reliant, and aggressive, but without forgetting what society demands of them as women, or in other words, to be caring, compassionate and empathetic (Saltzman, 2003, 1-3).is dichotomy reects a reality experienced by women journalists who, as pointed out by Chambers et al. (2004: 104), face a dilemma: If they do not want to be seen as “too soft” or “feminine”, they are forced to “beat the boys at their own game” by being more assertive and aggressive, but never overly arrogant nor “excessively masculine”.7 e article about Anna Sorokin’s story entitled “How Anna Delvey Tricked New York’s Party People”, was published in 2018 in New York Magazine.
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 229-246 July-December of 2024Carlota Coronado RuizISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 241In the case of women journalists, ambition is perceived as something negative, either because it leads them to pursue promotion at any cost, even if it means engaging in unethical behaviour, or because ambition forces them adopt negative stereotypical male traits such as aggressiveness, individualism, and competitiveness (Lacalle and Hidalgo: 2017, 477). According to Osorio (2009), these characters are cold and implacable women who reject conventional female roles. In general, the professionals portrayed in the series analysed are women who are constantly proving their worth as journalists, and therefore have to ght against the social surroundings, sexist attitudes, and invisible barriers such as gender stereotypes and prejudice. In their day-to-day work, they have to face situations in which their skills or leadership abilities are called into question. In this sense, the portrayal coincides with the diculties many journalists encounter in the real world.In contrast to the authenticity of some characters, especially those of series created by female scriptwriters, there are traditional stereotypes that link female journalists to the emotional and personal domains. ese women are the ones who struggle between family and work life, and even in some series, their presence is narratively justied in order to generate romantic interest or sexual tension between them and the male protagonists. Many of them, as pointed out by Painter and Ferrucci (2015), are portrayed according to the female stereotype that identies women with the emotional realm, and sometimes with a lack of professionalism, or inexperienced and clumsy.ere are also negative portrayals that cause the public to associate women journalists with unethical practices such as using sex to get information and advance their careers, or to become famous. ese are usually young, ambitious women who break the rules in order to achieve success quickly. In this regard, female ambition has a negative connotation and often leads the character to a traumatic end. e archetype of the ambitious young woman is placed on the screen next to that of the clumsy and inexperienced young female, the latter of whom continuously makes mistakes, yet she is essential from a narrative point of view in order to create romantic plots. Nevertheless, she sometimes overcomes this awkwardness and proves to be a good professional.e image of women journalists portrayed in series is capable of distorting the reality of this profession and normalising certain unethical behaviour, which could have a negative impact on society’s perception of journalism in general, and on female reporters in particular. According to Ehrlich and Saltzman (2015), depictions of journalists in popular culture shape public perceptions of journalism as a profession.ese portrayals of certain groups or professions in television ction can trigger culturally shared racial and gender stereotypes, which have a negative inuence on these groups, as they start to perceive themselves in a way that is inuenced by the bias created in the media (Murphy 1998). ese cultural restraints aect women’s career choices (Honer, Levine and Toohey 2008), and may be related to the low number of women in high positions (Painter and Ferrucci, 2016: 11-12). e way women journalists are portrayed on screen inuences society’s perception of them. Without rst-hand knowledge of media work routines or newsrooms, the audience develops its idea of journalism through what it sees in these types of ctional shows. is can perpetuate stereotypes such as that of the drunken, chain-smoking journalist, or the seductive journalist who will sleep with sources for a good story. It is interesting to note that these gender stereotypes are not interchangeable: it is rare to see a female journalist addicted to alcohol and tobacco, just like seeing a male character use his body to get an exclusive is also anomalous, and it is also nearly non-existent for a man to have to choose between family life and work. e loneliness and
242 | nº 39, pp. 229-246 | July-December of 2024Journalism, gender, and television: the image of women journalists in US series (1988-2022)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónbitterness with which some women are portrayed, especially if they are female executives who have sacriced their personal lives for the professional realm, is not seen in the same types of characters when they are men.Despite the variety of female journalistic archetypes in the series analysed, there is one consistent aspect: these professionals are portrayed as white women, mostly young, with standard bodies, and heterosexual. Although some, such as Murphy Brown, break the dress codes of female news anchors, most comply with certain standards in terms of beauty, size, age and sexual orientation. Unfortunately, there is a lack of diversity that could allow for the visibility and normalisation of characters from racial minorities, or from other groups such as LGTBIQ+, within the journalism profession.5. ConclusionsOne of the leading female journalists in television ction is Murphy Brown, a character created by Diane English, the latter of whom was one of the rst female showrunners in American television. When English met with CBS executives to present her project, they suggested changes to the script, including having a leading lady who was 30-something rather than a woman in her 40s, and who was attractive, or in other words, “30-ish and hot”. Nevertheless, the showrunner ended up imposing her criteria because she knew that Brown’s character was complex and required an older actress to play her in order to show her experience as a journalist. In the end, the strategy succeeded, but it was due to the creator’s determination to maintain her concept of the character.In this regard, one of the questions posed by this study is whether there are notable dierences in the way female journalists have been portrayed depending on the gender of the scriptwriter. Although the sample is not large enough to draw general conclusions, the three series created by female showrunners present the most positive and empowering archetypes. Murphy Brown (Diane English), Good Girls Revolt (Dana Calvo), and Inventing Anna (Shonda Rhimes), move away from the most common stereotypes about women journalists in the audio-visual sector. ere are no clumsy young women nor seductive journalists, but professionals who try to perform quality journalism in a way that is ethical, and who defend their rights. A feminist perspective permeates the scripts and the construction of the characters, especially in the two 21st century series. is contrasts sharply with the images of female journalists designed by creators such as Aaron Sorkin (e West Wing and e Newsroom) and Beau Willimon (House of Cards), as the women are portrayed as hysterical, unprofessional, sexualised, and overly ambitious.With this situation in mind, a new question must be asked: Are women scriptwriters and female producers of series helping to change gender stereotypes and portrayals? ere is no established line of research that combines the study of the television industry with content analysis to determine whether there is a relationship between the gender of scriptwriters and the portrayals of gender in their series. Until now, most research has focused on gender stereotypes in case studies, yet it might be benecial to carry out comparative analyses between dierent television series by taking into account these gender variables, as well as other factors related to the social, political, and cultural contexts of the countries where the productions take place.In this study, although the gures are not overly representative (8 series, of which 5 were created by men, and 3 by women), dierences can be seen, as previously pointed out. In addition to a higher degree of sexualisation, series created by male showrunners tend to use more conservative stereotypes and associate women more with emotional aspects. In the case of
doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 229-246 July-December of 2024Carlota Coronado RuizISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 243female creators, new archetypes can be seen, as well as stronger solidarity among the women characters, and less rivalry between them on romantic issues. eir characters also break down more barriers, and even social taboos: the main character of Murphy Brown is a single mother in her 40s; the female reporters of the Good Girls Revolt join together to ght for their rights; and Vivian Kent of Inventing Anna is shown as a tireless and thorough professional. As such, it can be concluded that the female creators of the series analysed tend to reduce the androcentric approach with a more respectful and realistic approach to female characters. erefore, the participation of women in the creation of television series implies the emergence of new trends in audio-visual culture, as they are capable of becoming a driving force for change regarding social portrayals in audio-visual media by giving greater prominence, complexity, and dramatic richness to female characters.6. Acknowledgementsis article has been translated into English by Charles E. Arthur to whom we are grateful for his meticulous work.Funding sources: e UCM Research Group entitled, “Memoria y medios de Comunicación” (Ref. 71685).7. Conict of intereste author declares that there is no conict of interest regarding any of the content in this article.8. Bibliographical referencesBarris, A. (1976). Stop the presses! e Newspaper in American Films. Barnes & Co.Bezunartea Valencia, O., Cantalapiedra, M. J., Coca García, C., Genaut Arratibel, A., Peña Fernández, S., y Pérez Dasilva, J. A. (2008). ...So What? She’s A Newspaperman and She’s Pretty. Women Journalists in the Cinema. Zer: Revista De Estudios De Comunicacion13(25), 221-242. https://bit.ly/49CECIvBunyol, J. M. (2017). Historias de portada, 50 películas esenciales sobre periodismo. Editorial UOC.Cascajosa Virino, C. (2006). No es televisión, es HBO: la búsqueda de la diferencia como indicador de calidad en los dramas del canal HBO, Zer- Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 21, 23-33. https://bit.ly/493l2EJCascajosa Virino, C. (2009). La nueva edad dorada de la televisión norteamericana, Secuencias. Revista de Historia del Cine, 26, 7-31. https://bit.ly/48FJnkiChambers, D., Steiner, L., y Fleming, C. (2004). Women and journalism. Psychology Press.Cleveland, R. (Guionista) y Willimon, B. (Productor y guionista). (18 de abril de 2013). Chapter 9 (Temporada 1, Episodio 9) [Serie de Televisión]. En Willimon, B. (Productor ejecutivo). House of Cards. Netix. Cvetkovic, I., y Oostman, K. R. (2018). Sexualization of the Journalism Profession: TV Representation of Female Journalists’ Intellect, Labor, and Bodies. IAFOR Journal of Media, Communication & Film5(1), 90-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/ijmcf.5.1.06

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


244 | nº 39, pp. 229-246 | July-December of 2024Journalism, gender, and television: the image of women journalists in US series (1988-2022)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónDaniel, D. K. (1996). Lou Grant: the making of TV’s top newspaper drama. Syracuse University Press.De Wulf Helskens, M., Dhaenens, F. y Van Leuven, S. (2023). Repackaged sob sisters and outsiders within: reading the female and minority journalists on e Bold Type and e Morning ShowFeminist Media Studies https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2197565Ehrlich, M. C. (2004). Journalism in the movies. University of Illinois Press. Ehrlich, M. C. (2006). Facts, truth, and bad journalists in the movies. Journalism, 7(4), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884906068364Ehrlich, M. C. y Saltzman, J. (2015). Heroes and Scoundrels: e Image of the Journalist in Popular Culture. University of Illinois Press.Fung, V. (1988). Sexism at the Networks: Anchor Jobs Go to Young Women and Experienced Men. Washington Journalism Review, 10(8), 20-24.Galán, E. (2006). Personajes, estereotipos y representaciones sociales. Una propuesta de estudio y análisis de la cción televisiva. ECO-PÓS, 9(1), 58-81. https://bit.ly/48pnBR6Galán, E. (2007). La imagen social de la mujer en las series de cción. Universidad de Extremadura.Garrett, L. K. (2005). Women of e West Wing: Gender stereotypes in the political ction. En T. Fahy (Ed.), Considering Aaron Sorkin: Essays on the Politics, Poetics and Sleight of Hand in the Films and Television Series (pp. 179-192). McFarland.Ghiglione, L., y Saltzman, J. (2005). Fact or Fiction: Hollywood looks at the News. e Image of the Journalist in Popular Culture, 1-26. https://bit.ly/3S8WUd3Good, H. (1985). e journalist in Fiction, 1890–1930. Journalism Quarterly62(2), 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908506200219Good, H. (1998). Girl Reporter: Gender, Journalism, and the Movies. Scarecrow Press.Gómez Morales, B. M. (2014). La imagen del periodista y el sensacionalismo en la cción televisiva. El caso de las comedias animadas de prime time. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 20(2), 719-734. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ESMP.2014.v20.n2.47030González Suárez, L. (2003). Al lo de la noticia: la imagen del periodista en el cine. Universidad Ponticia de Salamanca.Güimil, E. (9 de mayo de 2017). “Murphy Brown”, la madre soltera que enfureció a los conservadores. Vanity Fair. https://bit.ly/3STYSj7Lacalle, C. e Hidalgo-Marí, T. (2016). La evolución de la familia en la cción televisiva española, Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 71, 470-483. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1105Langman, L. (1998). e Media in the Movies. A Catalog of American Journalism Films (1900-1996). McFarland & Company.Laviana, J. C. (1996). Los chicos de la prensa. Nickel Odeon.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 39, pp. 229-246 July-December of 2024Carlota Coronado RuizISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 245Marek, J. G. (1999). e Practice and Ally McBeal: a new image for women lawyers on television?, e Journal of American Culture, 22(1), 77-84. https://bit.ly/3Og5SUZMcHugh, K. A. (2001). “Sounds that creep inside you”: Female narration and voiceover in the lms of Jane Campion, Style, 35, 193-218. https://bit.ly/3OfZFrMMcNair, B. (2010). Journalist in lms: Heroes and villains. Edinburgh University. Press Ltd.McNair, B. (2014). From cinema to TV: Still the same old stories about journalism. Journalism Practice, 8(2), 242-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.889270Menéndez Menéndez, M. I., & Zurian Hernández, F. A. (2014). Mujeres y hombres en la cción televisiva norteamericana hoy. Anagramas-Rumbos y sentidos de la comunicación-13(25), 55-71. https://bit.ly/3uuY235Mera, M. (2008). Periodistas de película. La imagen de la profesión periodística a través del cine. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 14, 505-525. https://bit.ly/3uvbhRjMurphy, S.T. (1998). e Impact of Factual Versus Fictional Media Portrayals on Cultural Stereotypes, e ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 560:1, 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716298560001013Ness, R. (1997). From headline hunter to superman: a journalism lmography. Scarecrow Press.Osorio, O. (2009). La imagen de la periodista profesional en el cine de cción de 1990 a 1999. [Tesis de doctorado, Universidade da Coruña]. Biblioteca de la Universidade da Coruña.Paget, S. (12 de julio de 2013). Carrie Bradshaw vs Reality. https://skinnydip.ca/carrie-bradshaw-vs-realityPainter C. y Ferrucci, P. (2012). Unprofessional, Ineective, and Weak: A Textual Analysis of the Portrayal of Female Journalists on Sports NightJournal of Mass Media Ethics, 27(4), 248-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900523.2012.746107Painter, C. y Ferrucci, P. (2015). ‘His Women Problem’: An Analysis of Gender on ‘e Newsroom’”, Communication Faculty Publications, 28, 1-30. https://bit.ly/49A9wBiPainter, C., y Ferrucci, P. (2017). Gender games: e portrayal of female journalists on House of CardsJournalism Practice, 11(4), 493-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1133251Painter, C. y Ferrucci, P. (2019). Taking the White Gloves O: e Portrayal of Female Journalists on Good Girls RevoltJournal of Magazine Media, 19(2), 50-71. https://doi.org/10.1353/jmm.2019.0014Press, J. (2018). Dueñas del show, las mujeres que están revolucionando las series de televisión. Alpha Decay.Requeijo, P. (2013). El profesional de los medios en el cine de los últimos años. Vivat Academia, 15(122), 54-79. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2013.122.54-79Rey, A. (22 de septiembre de 2012). A favor y en contra de e Newsroom. El Mundo. https://bit.ly/3SvDQHxRizwan, F. (2013). Gender confusion and the female journalist: TV journalist Robin Scherbatsky of how i met your mother [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California]. University of Southern California ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


246 | nº 39, pp. 229-246 | July-December of 2024Journalism, gender, and television: the image of women journalists in US series (1988-2022)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónRobertson, C. T., Selva, M. y Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Women and leadership in the news media 2021: evidence from 12 markets, FactSheet, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-k9c6-de85Saltzman, J. (2003). Sob sisters: e image of the female journalist in popular culture. e Image of the Journalist in Popular Culture (IJPC). https://bit.ly/4bQ3w9xSottile, A. (3 de noviembre de 2016). ‘Good Girls Revolt’: Inside Landmark Lawsuit Behind New Feminist Series. Rolling Stone. https://bit.ly/3U7s9YISorkin, A. (Productor y guionista). (11 de septiembre de 2012). We Just Decided To. Temporada 1, Episodio 1) [Serie de Televisión]. En Sorkin, A., Rudin, S. y Poul, A. (Productores ejecutivos). (2012-2014). e Newsroom. HBO. Sorkin, A. (Productor y guionista). (20 de octubre de1999). e Crackpots and ese Women. Temporada 1, Episodio 5) [Serie de Televisión]. En Sorkin, A. (Productor ejecutivos). (1999-2006). El ala oeste de la Casa Blanca. NBC. Vázquez-Miraz, P. (2019). El temprano retiro de las presentadoras de telediarios en Colombia y España: El repudio a la vejez femenina. Estudios Sobre el Mensaje Periodistico, 25(2), 1171-1189. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.64832Wayne, M. (2016). Cultural class analysis and audience reception in American television’s third “golden age”, Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 7(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc.7.1.41_1

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]