Micro-inuencers and advertising. Transparency and ethics in content creationMicro-inuencers y publicidad. Transparencia y ética en la creación de contenido doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 203-220 | 203January-June of 2025ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: Fernández-Gómez, E. and Quintas-Froufe, N. (2025). Micro-inuencers and advertising. Transparency and ethics in content creation. Doxa Comunicación, 40, pp. 203-220.https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n40a2175Erika Fernández-Gómez. Ph.D. in Communication, in addition to a Bachelor’s Degree in Advertising from the Universidad de Vigo. She is also the academic coordinator of the Advertising Degree on the Faculty of Business and Communication at UNIR. Professor Fernández-Gómez also serves as lead researcher on the R+D+i project entitled, ADKIDS MOBILE, which is funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of the Government of Spain. She has also carried out two six-year research periods, accredited by CNEAI. Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (UNIR), Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0002-7088-1814Natalia Quintas-Froufe. Professor on the Faculty of Communication at Universidade da Coruña, before which she also worked as a professor at the Universidad de Alicante. She holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Advertising and Public Relations from the Universidad de Vigo, and a Ph.D. from the same university as well. Professor Quintas-Froufe’s current line of research is audience participation in the new media ecosystem, in addition to the adaptation of advertising strategies to this environment, which has led to her articles being published in several national and international journals.Universidade da Coruña, Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0001-7597-6516is content is published under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. International License CC BY-NC 4.0Received: 13/12/2023 - Accepted: 14/06/2024 - Early access: 16/07/2024 - Published: 01/01/2025Recibido: 13/12/2023 - Aceptado: 14/06/2024 - En edición: 16/07/2024 - Published: 01/01/2025Abstract: Due to the emergence of the inuencer as a profession in which commercial content is created to the benet of brands, and faced with the controversy of not always disclosing this collaboration to the public, the concern regarding the transparency and ethics of inuencer activity has been addressed in this paper from the viewpoint of these prescribers. Resumen: Atendiendo al auge de la profesión de inuencer en la que se crean contenidos comerciales para marcas y ante el debate sobre cuya co-laboración no es identicada ante los públicos, se abordan desde la perspectiva de este colectivo sus inquietudes en cuanto a transpa-rencia y ética de su actividad. Para ello se ha preguntado a 290 mi-

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


204 | nº 40, pp. 203-220 | January-June of 2025Micro-inuencers and advertising. Transparency and ethics in content creationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación1. Introduction1.1. Inuencer marketingAs opposed to more traditional advertising techniques used by conventional media, many brands have started to include inuencers as key players in their advertising strategy in the online environment, giving rise to inuencer marketing. is activity can be broadly dened as digital marketing in which opinion leaders, commonly known as inuencers, identify themselves with brands and become part of a company’s sales communication on social media platforms (Bakker, 2018). As such, in order for this technique to work, inuencers must identify with a brand and be well-dened, and through their content on social networks, they are able to inuence the opinion of their followers (Brito et al., 2021).Initially, social media inuencers were considered those who had built a large network of followers, and who were trend setters in one or more niches (De Veirman et al., 2017).However, this concept has become more rened, and categories have now been developed that are usually related to the number of followers they have, or to the social network with which they are involved, as outlined in the following section. It bears mentioning that although the authors cited above classify inuencers in this way, it is not a closed ranking system, and the numbers are exible. Following digital prescribers on social networks is continuously growing, especially among younger proles.Currently, 51% of social network users follow inuencers, with Instagram as the main network on which these followings take place (IAB Spain, 2023). Consequently, a lot of research on inuencers focuses on this social network (Romero-Cantero et al., 2022; Casaló, et al., 2020; Sarmiento-Guede and Rodríguez-Terceño, 2020; Pérez-Curiel and Sanz-Marcos, 2019; Padilla-Castillo and Oliver-González, 2018; Segarra and Hidalgo, 2018).For this purpose, 290 micro-inuencers, who are those with less than 100,000 followers, were surveyed. eir selection was based on the fact that despite not working exclusively in this profession, they have a higher level of engagement than inuencer groups. According to these prescribers, their followers know the brands they work with, and their fans are aware that they are given these products as gifts free of charge. As such, they accept the advertising content oered. However, the inuencers do not always divulge this commercial partnership openly, but rather clandestinely, such as by mentioning the brand rather than using a clear advertising label, the latter of which is a practice that is included in standard regulations. e inuencers also complain of unethical practices by companies due to the lack of monetization of their activity, as well as the lack of training in transparency.Keywords: Micro-inuencer; advertising; digital content; transparency; ethics.cro-inuencers, inuencers de menos de 100.000 seguidores que sin dedicarse profesionalmente a esta actividad, registran mayor nivel de engagement. Según este prescriptor digital, los seguidores cono-cen las marcas con las que trabajan, son conscientes de que les ob-sequian con sus productos y aceptan los contenidos comerciales. Sin embargo, para identicar las colaboraciones recurren en mayor me-dida a fórmulas más ambiguas como mencionar a la marca frente a incorporar una etiqueta identicativa de publicidad, método reco-gido en las principales normativas. Denuncian asimismo prácticas poco éticas por parte de la industria ante la falta de monetización de su actividad, así como la ausencia de formación en materia de transparencia. Palabras clave: Micro-inuencer; publicidad; contenido digital; transparencia; ética.
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 203-220 January-June of 2025Erika Fernández-Gómez and Natalia Quintas-FroufeISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 205e involvement of inuencers in current advertising strategies has been widely studied in the academic eld from dierent perspectives, which have addressed both the characteristics of their proles and their role as advertising content creators regarding the following aspects: credibility (Silva and Mendes-Filho, 2023; Brito et al., 2021); advertising eectiveness (Clemente-Ricolfe and Atienza-Sancho, 2019; Iniesta-Alemán, 2019); regulation and self-management (Ramos-Gutiérrez and Fernández-Blanco, 2021; Sixto-García and Álvarez-Vázquez, 2020; Vilajoana-Alejandre, Rom-Rodríguez and Miotto, 2019); and engagement (Ao et al., 2023; Oneto-González et al., 2019).ere are more than 50 million content creators in the world, and more than 2 million of these have made it their livelihood in Spain. Specically, there are more than 134,000 creators with more than 1,000 followers on some of their social network accounts (ICmedia, 2021). Moreover, despite the fact that being an inuencer is now a full-time profession for some, consumers often view them as relatively unqualied (Bratu, 2019; Cooley and Parks-Yancy, 2019), due to factors such as a lack of formal education.1.2. Ethical implications of inuencers as content creatorsInuencers are social media users who have built a sizeable network of followers by posting text and visual narratives of their daily lives, and who have inuenced a group of viewers. As individuals, they become their own brands by presenting their ideas, images, and expertise, in addition to sponsoring products as well (Taillon et al., 2020).us, they have the ability to inuence the behaviour of people (Gómez-Nieto, 2018) by projecting their personality and personal brand in their messages (Fernández-Gómez et al., 2018). Like inuencers, brands also have to be responsible for the sponsorships and collaborations they undertake in order to avoid clandestine advertising and encourage best practice in content creation (Feijoo and Fernández-Gómez, 2021; ICMedia, 2021).As Núñez-Cansado et al. (2021) point out, the professional connections that occur in inuencer marketing usually take two forms. e rst is when the advertiser oers the promoted product or service as a gift to the inuencer for including it in their content. e second is a service in which money is paid to the content creator to use dierent advertising techniques such as testimonials, events, sponsorships, etc.As such, inuencers often submit paid posts as opinion pieces or use carefully crafted photographs to capture a product in use. ese strategies allow them to convince their followers to purchase a certain product by using what appears to be organic content. Moreover, in spite of regulations suggesting that sponsored content in the form of ad tags or collaborations should be identied, many digital prescribers still do not comply with the guidelines (Taillon et al., 2020). e IAB Spain Social Media Study (2023) shows that only 16% of users state that they enjoy advertising on social networks, compared to 51% who say it bothers them a lot, or quite a lot. However, 20% of the users surveyed in this research enjoy advertising tailored to their interests. e youngest (12-17 and 18-24 years of age), along with women, are the ones who spend the most time following inuencers. A total of 34% of social network users believe that publications created by prescribers are of an advertising nature.Young audiences take a much more demanding approach toward digital advertising formats than other generations. is has created a huge dilemma, as the audience itself is the group demanding specic formats, which has blurred the boundaries
206 | nº 40, pp. 203-220 | January-June of 2025Micro-inuencers and advertising. Transparency and ethics in content creationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónbetween advertising, entertainment, and information (Fernández-Gómez et al., 2021). eir way of creating content involves a combination of entertainment and persuasion (branded content), whose sales purpose is not always obvious; social networks tend to hybridize content by using formats and techniques that make it increasingly dicult to distinguish between advertising and entertainment (Feijoo and Fernández-Gómez, 2021). e very same sector has demanded more eective regulations that will allow users to distinguish between commercial content and the rest (IAB Spain, 2019).According to a study by the Association of Communication Users [la Asociación de Usuarios de Comunicación] (AUC) and the National Commission of Markets and Competition [La Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia] (CNMC), 84.6% of advertising and promotional videos published by inuencers are sales messages in disguise (UTECA, 2022). Consequently, although in 2020 the Spanish Association of Advertisers [La Asociación Española de Anunciantes] (AEA), as well as the Association for the Self-Regulation of Commercial Communications [La Asociación para la Autorregulación de la Comunicación Comercial] (Autocontrol), published the Code of Conduct for the use of inuencers in advertising, the measure does not go far enough, as it only aects the inuencers if they follow the rules of the Code. Furthermore, despite a proposal to use tags to identify content as advertising, as in the case of #ads, such content is highly persuasive, which makes it dicult for the most vulnerable audiences to discern whether it is advertising or not (Núñez-Cansado et al., 2021; Tur-Viñes et al., 2019).In Spain, the regulation known as Law 13/2022, of July 7, General Law on Audio-visual Communication [Ley 13/2022, de 7 de Julio, General de Comunicación Audiovisual], encompasses only prominent inuencers in this audio-visual directive. us, prescribers must comply with basic requirements regarding the general principles of audio-visual communication, the protection of minors, consumer protection, and their registration in the State Public Registry of Audio-visual Communication Service Providers [Registro Público Estatal de Prestadores de Servicios de Comunicación Audiovisual]. In addition, they must comply with another regulation known as Law 34/1988, of November 11, 1988, General Advertising Law [Ley 34/1988, de 11 de noviembre, General de Publicidad], as well as Law 34/2002, of July 11, 2002, on Information Society Services and Electronic Commerce [Servicios de la sociedad de la información y de comercio electrónico]Another study conducted by De Frutos-Torres and Pastor-Rodríguez (2020), and addressed later by Martín-García (2021), aimed to determine the level of trust among university students toward inuencers and their content, among other issues,Some of the most insightful results indicate that university students appreciate and accept sales messages, as long as they coincide with their own interests, yet they reject inuencers who publish advertising content without any personal consistency, or that they consider contrary to their own values. However, excessive advertising leads to mental fatigue and eventually the abandonment of certain inuencers. In this regard, Sarmiento-Guede and Rodríguez-Terceño (2020) also assert that the persuasive impact exerted by micro-inuencers is stronger when their personality coincides with that of their followers, which is essential and decisive. Inuencers are followed and watched by multitudes of people all over the world. ey amuse, entertain, give opinions, and make comments, yet their followers know little about the inner workings of the business itself (e New York Times Editorial Sta, 2020). is lack of transparency in content is aggravated when the audience is vulnerable, as they are less able to dierentiate between persuasive content and that which is not (Núñez-Cansado et al., 2021).
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 203-220 January-June of 2025Erika Fernández-Gómez and Natalia Quintas-FroufeISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 207In short, there has been a need in recent years to regulate the activity of inuencers due to the lack of transparency in their selling activity. Transparency implies clearly indicating when advertising and self-promotion techniques are used by digital inuencers in their publications and, eventually, showing the presence of a contractual relationship between the brands promoted and the prescribers.1.3. e micro-inuencerAs mentioned above, inuencers can be placed in dierent categories according, for example, to the number of followers they accumulate. Conde and Casais (2023) dierentiate between mega-inuencers (> 1,000,000 followers), macro-inuencers (100,000 - 1,000,000 followers), and micro-inuencers (1,000 - 100,000 followers), each of which are associated with a set of characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages. Mega-inuencers are famous worldwide. eir status is similar to that of mainstream celebrities. As such, they are able to reach the masses, yet they charge higher fees and have less engagement. Macro-inuencers have a large number of loyal followers, with more reach in specic markets, but their rates of engagement are lower than the last category, which are the micros. Finally, micro-inuencers are ordinary people with a strong presence in the community. ey have a loyal audience and higher levels of trust and engagement, but less reach and visibility, and it is more dicult to measure their return on investment. However, this category is growing in the online environment (Gupta and Mahajan, 2019).us, a micro-inuencer has up to 100,000 followers. e originality and uniqueness of their posts are key factors in the eectiveness of their content marketing (Silalahi, 2021). Another advantage is that they have a “genuine” two-way relationship with the audience.e fact that followers identify with micro-inuencers means that they take their advice (Rios-Marques, Casais and Camilleri, 2020). us, micro-inuencers lead smaller virtual communities, yet with higher levels of interaction and identication (Sarmiento-Guede and Rodríguez-Terceño, 2020).From an academic perspective, there is a lack of research into micro-inuencers, with the exception of studies that have focused on specic sectors, such as tourism (Hernández-Méndez & Nisamar Baute-Díaz, 2024; Peres and Silva, 2021), the fashion industry (Sinha and Fung, 2021; Shen, 2021; Gupta and Mahajan, 2019), the eld of health (Pérez-Ordóñez and Castro-Martínez, 2023), and even local brands in Indonesia, which was addressed by Silalahi (2021). On the other hand, prescribers with more than 100,000 followers have been considerably studied, an example of which is research conducted by Martínez-Sanz et al. (2023), who examined pharmaceutical inuencers.Peres and Silva (2021) have identied micro-inuencers as mostly women with postgraduate studies who have other jobs, and who do not collaborate with inuencer agencies. is highlights the lack of professionalism in this activity, which makes it important to study this group in Spain.
208 | nº 40, pp. 203-220 | January-June of 2025Micro-inuencers and advertising. Transparency and ethics in content creationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación2. Objectives and methodologyUntil now, both academic and professional research has focussed on understanding the relationship between inuencers, brands, and consumers from the viewpoint of audience reception. As explained in the theoretical framework, there are a large number of studies that focus on the content analysis of social media posts, in order to see whether advertising content is clearly displayed, as well as consumer interviews. Likewise, other studies have focussed on advertising agencies (Sanz-Marcos et al., 2019), yet there is a lack of research on the inuencer as the subject of the advertising message.e White Paper on Responsible Inuence [El Libro Blanco de la Inuencia Responsible] (iCmedia, 2021) surveyed industry audiences by conducting 40 in-depth interviews. It provided a roadmap for improving this type of communication, yet the main considerations were approached from the viewpoint of followers. For this reason, the authors decided to carry out a study from the perspective of the issuer, which would focus on the phenomenon that has hardly been addressed in the academic literature until now: the micro-inuencer.erefore, the overall objective of the present study is to identify the ethical concerns regarding the activity of micro-inuencers, and to reect on the specic need to regulate and encourage self-management of inuencer marketing activity in order to ensure the protection of consumers and/or audiences.To achieve the overall objective, the following specic objectives are set forth:1. Discover whether or not consumers identify and accept the content created by micro-inuencers, based on the opinions of the digital prescribers themselves.2. Determine the role played by the advertising industry in promoting transparency in the content disseminated by micro-inuencers, again based on the views of the digital prescribers.3. Reveal the motivations of these content creators in working with a brand4. Understand how micro-inuencers feel about the work they carry out in collaboration with brands.In considering the exploratory nature of this study, the following research questions are posed:1. From the micro-inuencer’s point of view, is there a negative reaction from the audience toward inserting advertising in the content they produce?2. From the viewpoint of micro-inuencers, are followers able to identify advertising in the posted content?3. Do brands ask micro-inuencers not to indicate when content has an advertising purpose?4. What motivates micro-inuencers to collaborate with a brand?5. What is the opinion of micro-inuencers regarding their own activity as digital content creators for a brand?e authors believe the use of a survey aimed at micro-inuencers will provide answers to the research questions regarding their commitment to the audience in their role as content creators. A quantitative methodology was used, which was computer-based and self-administered. According to Sierra-Bravo (2001: 305), the basic instrument of observation by survey is the questionnaire, and in this case a simple questionnaire was chosen or, in other words, a list of standardised questions that allowed the responses to be gathered and compared. Moreover, it is considered the most suitable method in this phase
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 203-220 January-June of 2025Erika Fernández-Gómez and Natalia Quintas-FroufeISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 209of research due to its capability of covering a wide range of issues in one single study, in addition to its appropriateness for obtaining diverse information from a wide range of individuals.A survey was sent to users of a Spanish platform, which joins together inuencers and brands, and which automates advertising campaign management: https://fuelyourbrands.com/. A total of 290 micro-inuencers responded to the questionnaire between December 2022 and February 2023. A 95% condence level and 6% margin of error was achieved. e survey received a positive assessment of ethical appropriateness from the Research Ethics Committee of Universidad Internacional de la Rioja (UNIR). In order to reveal the ethical implications of the inuencer activity carried out, the study measured the following four blocks:1) Familiarity of the followers with the work of the inuencer. e following ve statements were made: ey know the work I do because I explain the process used to create content; ey know I work with platforms or agencies because I show this in my prole; ey know the brands I work with because I give them this information; ey know I receive gifts of products or services from the brands for which I create content; ey accept and appreciate the advertising content. Next, the participants were asked to rate their level of agreement with these statements using a Likert scale (strongly disagree; disagree; neither agree nor disagree; agree; and completely agree).2) Identifying content as advertising in the posts produced for the brand. As in the rst block of variables, ve statements were made, after which the participants had to rate their level of agreement, also using a Likert scale. e ve statements were are follows: I always add a hashtag indicating a collaboration or advertisement (example: #collaboration#advertising); I always mention the brand in the post; (example: @brandname); If there is an indication that the post is an advertisement, it is not well received by the audience in terms of interaction; e platforms or agencies I work with inform me of the need to indicate when posts are based on partnerships with brands; e brands I work with remind me of the need to indicate when posts are advertisements.3) Motivation for collaborating with brands. e following were the response options: e product or service I receive; e values of the brand; Brieng requirements; Re-launching the campaign for a client; Other (open-ended response).4) Opinions regarding content creation for brands; open-ended question.It bears recalling that due to its exploratory nature, the sample is comprised of micro-inuencers who wanted to respond to the survey regarding their activity without any dierentiation according to gender, age, or sector, as the objectives of this research are not related to the segmentation of these variables. However, the survey did include questions related to socio-demographic aspects of gender, age, the main sector in which they carry out their activity, and the social network used most by the prescribers, with the aim of discovering the socio-demographic characteristics of the micro-inuencer prole. e sample consists of 81% women and 18% men, with the remaining 1% being binary. A total of 38% of the micro-inuencers surveyed are aged 25-34; 36% are aged 35-44; 14% are 45-55; and 12% are aged 18-24. A clear majority of 85% of the participants are active on Instagram and belong to sectors such as lifestyle (63.8%), beauty (48.6%), food (37.6%), and fashion (36.2%).Finally, the questionnaire was designed based on benchmark micro-inuencer studies carried out by researchers such as Peres and Silva (2021), Villegas-Simón et al., (2022), Kay et al., Parkinson (2020), and Britt et al. (2020), as well as research on inuencer disclosure of content as advertising (Núñez-Cansado et al., 2021; Feijoo and Fernández-Gómez, 2021; Fernández-Gómez et al., 2021).

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


210 | nº 40, pp. 203-220 | January-June of 2025Micro-inuencers and advertising. Transparency and ethics in content creationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicacióne survey’s design also relied on industry studies focussed on agencies conducted by Carpenter et al. (2018) in the United States, and by Sanz-Marcos et al. (2019) and Smolak and López (2020) in Spain. Lastly, with regard to Spain, the authors have also taken into account the White Paper on Responsible Inuence [El Libro Blanco de la Inuencia Responsable] (IcMedia, 2021), the Code of Conduct on the Use of Inuencers in Advertising [El Código de Conducta sobre el uso de inuencers en la publicidad] (AEA and Autocontrol, 2020), and the guidelines included in the following publications by the European Advertising Standards Alliance for the EU: EASA Digital Marketing Communications Best Practice Recommendation (2015); and the EASA Inuencer Marketing Best Practice Recommendation (2023).3. Results3.1. Identifying and accepting advertising contentAs seen in Table 1, the inuencers analysed have the impression that their followers dierentiate and accept commercial content. us, micro-inuencers believe that the following is true: eir followers know the brands they work with because the prescribers report this information (86%); their online community understand that brands oer gifts to the inuencers in the form of products (81%); Finally, their followers accept and appreciate advertising content (73%). Furthermore, 49% state that their community know they work with platforms and agencies because the inuencers indicate this on their social media proles. However, prescribers are not sure if their followers are familiar with the work they do as content creators, with 34% neither agreeing nor disagreeing.Table 1. Micro-inuencers’ level of agreement regarding their followers’ knowledge of their workStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeither agree nor disagreeAgreeCompletely agreeThey know the work I do because I explain the process I use to create content.10%22%34%25%9%They know I work with platforms and agencies because I show this on my account.8%17%26%35%14%They know the brands I work with because I give them this information.3%2%9%49%37%They know that brands give me free products or services when I create content for them.1%2%16%50%31%They accept and appreciate the advertising content.1%4%22%46%27%Source: prepared by the authors
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 203-220 January-June of 2025Erika Fernández-Gómez and Natalia Quintas-FroufeISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 211In short, the prescribers suggest that they signpost content that has an advertising purpose so that their followers can recognise the brands. ey also visibly indicate the fact that they work for an advertiser, and they believe their followers are aware of this and accept it. However, it is unclear whether the followers understand how this content is created and the work that goes into it.3.2. Transparency in publishing advertising contentAs seen in Table 2, 65% of the micro-inuencers who took part in this study insert a label indicating collaboration or advertisement in the publications they post for a brand, so that their followers can see that this content is paid for by an advertiser. It also bears mentioning that 20% did not respond to this statement with a clear answer, saying they neither agree nor disagree with the assertion. Moreover, 15% of the content creators do not use this technique to identify commercial partnerships.Another way that inuencers give visibility to the brands they work for is by mentioning them in the publication. us, 97% of those surveyed said they always mention the brand using the label @brandname. In fact, this feature is used most often by prescribers to indicate commercial content.When asked whether they fail to achieve strong engagement when they indicate that content is for advertising purposes, 38% agree with this assertion. However, 39% seem reluctant to conrm this statement, as they neither agree nor disagree, and 23% disagree with the assumption.Table 2. Micro-inuencers’ level of agreement on indicating commercial content in brand publicationsStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeither agree nor disagreeAgreeCompletely agreeI always add a hashtag indicating that the content is either a collaboration or an advertisement (Example: #collaboration#advertising).6%9%20%24%41%I always mention the brand in the publication (Example: @brandname).0%1%2%17%80%If it is clearly shown that the post is an advertisement, it is not well received by the target audience and there is less interaction.6%17%39%21%17%The platforms or agencies I work with inform us of the need to indicate that a publication is based on a collaboration with brands.3%5%25%39%28%The brands I work with remind me of the need to indicate which content is advertising.6%15%24%30%25%Source: prepared by the authorsRegarding whether the agencies or platforms they work for ask them to indicate advertising content, 67% of the micro-inuencers say this is the case, and they are in favour of this commitment by the advertising industry. However, 25% do not
212 | nº 40, pp. 203-220 | January-June of 2025Micro-inuencers and advertising. Transparency and ethics in content creationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónhave a clear opinion, neither agreeing nor disagreeing. Such transparency decreases in the case of advertisers, with 55% of inuencers agreeing that brands remind them of the need to point out advertising publications, 15% disagreeing, and 24% taking no position. is indicates that advertising agencies and platforms are more engaged than advertisers in terms of transparency with followers.3.3. Incentives for creating advertising contentTo understand micro-inuencers’ relationship with brands and how this aects their transparency with followers, they were asked about their main reasons for creating advertising content. As shown in Figure 1, 52% of the respondents highlighted the free products or services they receive as an incentive for generating content for advertisers. It also bears mentioning that 22% stated that the second motivation for producing commercial content is because they believe in the values of the brand.When asked what other factors motivate them to collaborate with brands, they stated that when a company matches their personal prole, they feel motivated to work with that brand, and they also mentioned that they choose products that oer real benets to their followers.As such, the commitment they make to their community is expressed through the type of collaborations they undertake, while considering the values they communicate as well.Graph 1. Motivations of micro-inuencers to collaborate with brandsSource: prepared by the authorsMotivation resulting from the requirements set by the client through the brieng, or the fact that the inuencers already know the brand’s way of working and can easily re-launch a campaign, account for 10% of the participants. e brieng is a document containing the initial information for carrying out an advertising campaign. In the open response, the inuencers specically indicated the conditions of the campaign or the freedom oered by the brands as another motivating factor.
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 203-220 January-June of 2025Erika Fernández-Gómez and Natalia Quintas-FroufeISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 2133.4. Creating advertising content and the ethical implications thereinDespite the fact that micro-inuencers see themselves as people who are not professionally engaged in this activity full time, when asked how they feel about their work of creating sales content, several participants referred to the need to make this activity a real profession. Only three respondents indicated that they do it as a hobby.us, on the one hand, the prescribers claim that the work of inuencers with less than 100,000 followers should start making money from their activity, due to the fact that the creation of content involves work that is not suciently compensated by the brand’s gifts alone. In other words, one of their demands is that they should be compensated with money. As advertising platforms and agencies charge brands to nd prescribers to create sales content for these companies, the inuencers feel that they should receive monetary compensation as well. On the other hand, they point out that the industry is not yet fully aware of the power of micro-inuencers in connecting brands to consumers, due to the fact that their community of followers is much smaller, yet they are much more loyal and take the advice of the inuencers. For this reason, they are starting to reect on the altruistic work they carry out for brands without being paid, and instead receive only a few gifts from the companies involved, while being obliged to work under the directives set forth by the advertisers. Moreover, regarding transparency, some respondents say it is not benecial to indicate that inuencers have obtained these products free of charge instead of buying them, as they believe that by displaying “paid collaboration” in the content, this reduces their credibility.ey also made it clear that the agencies themselves often request the removal of indications that the content is an advertisement. Finally, other comments mentioned the lack of training regarding how to advertise responsibly, as well as a shortage of information about content creators’ rights.4. Discussion and Conclusionsis research addresses one of the least studied groups of inuencers from an academic and professional point of view, yet this group displays higher levels of engagement with their followers, and even higher levels of eectiveness (Park et al., 2021). Given the concern nowadays regarding the growing importance of this profession, in which advertising content is created for brands, and that these commercial partnerships are often not indicted to the audience, we have addressed this issue from the perspective of micro-inuencers and their unease regarding the transparency and ethics of their activity.us, we rst asked the inuencers whether they believe the audience accepts and clearly recognises advertising in the content created by the prescribers, and whether the audience is aware that the inuencers obtain free products in exchange for promoting brands. All three values obtained high scores, with 86% of the inuencers believing that consumers are aware of the existence of certain brands due to the reports made by prescribers; 81% believe that their followers know that brands give the inuencers gifts in the form of products. To a lesser extent, though still considerable, is the fact that 73% believe their followers accept and appreciate advertising content. Despite these strong indicators, with regard to the open question about their work as creators of sales content, it is clear that some respondents do not agree with this practice. Some believe that if they admit to a follower that the product is a gift that was not purchased and, for that reason, they have used labels such as
214 | nº 40, pp. 203-220 | January-June of 2025Micro-inuencers and advertising. Transparency and ethics in content creationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación“paid advertisement”, this will reduce their credibility. However, if they do not divulge this information, they will breach the Code of Conduct on the Advertising Use of Inuencers. Accepting certain advertising formats would require, on the one hand, a commitment from micro-inuencers to carry out their advertising activity with transparency. On the other hand, it would require sucient advertising literacy on the part of audiences, especially minors, who tend to take an active role in the advertising they consume (Fernández-Gómez et al., 2023).Secondly, regarding the transparency of content disseminated by micro-inuencers, 95% claim they mention the brand in their posts, yet only 65% include the tags “advertisement” or “collaboration”. is suggests that the rst practice is more related to giving visibility to the brand than to being transparent with the audience. In fact, 39% do not know, or do not give an answer, to the statement as to whether pointing out that certain content is advertising lowers their credibility. However, we have already seen in the open question that some micro-inuencers say this is the case, and 38% agree with the statement that if the publication is clearly signposted as an advertisement, it is not well received by the audience in terms of less interaction. Finally, the respondents believe there is more ethical involvement from advertising platforms and agencies than from the advertising brands themselves, as 67% stated that the former organisations ask them to indicate when a certain piece of content is an advertisement, compared to 55% who say that the brands make this request.It should be noted that the Code of Conduct on the use of inuencers in advertising recommends using clear generic indications such as “advertising”, “advert”, “collaboration”, “in collaboration with”, or “sponsored by”. Or, as an alternative, descriptive indications according to the specic collaboration in question, such as “Ambassador of [X brand]”, “anks to [X brand]”, “A gift from [X brand]”, “Sponsored trip”, etc. However, this code is voluntary, especially in the case of micro-inuencers. us, the code states that it links all members of the AEA and AUTOCONTROL, and any other company in the sector, such as advertisers, agencies, representatives, and the media, as well as inuencers who voluntarily comply with the guidelines.irdly, regarding the motivations of these content creators for working with a brand, 52% state that the free products or services they receive is the reason why they create sales content for companies. is makes perfect sense, considering that this type of inuencer does not receive money as a result of not working full time in the sector. Instead, their collaboration is compensated with gifts of the brand’s goods or discounts on purchases. As such, it would be useful to look more closely at the type of products or services they promote, and whether this might aect transparency. After all, the brieng provided by the brand or re-launching a campaign was stated as an incentive for collaboration by only 10% of the participants, among all the reasons for working with a brand.Finally, the aim of this study is to understand how micro-inuencers feel about the work they carry out with brands. is open-ended question resulted in several interesting comments, including the lack of monetary compensation for their activity, as well as the need for the industry to act ethically and responsibly not only toward consumers, but also toward the micro-inuencers themselves. ese responses coincide with a study conducted by Villegas Villegas-Simón et al. (2022), who also conrmed that nearly half the publications created by the micro-inuencers analysed are not monetised, meaning that their hard work is not compensated. Platforms and agencies act as a link between inuencers and brands. Content creators usually do the work according to the instructions provided by advertisers, but in many cases, the time and eort they spend on these publications is not compensated with goods or services. Furthermore, a lack of training in transparency has been observed,
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 203-220 January-June of 2025Erika Fernández-Gómez and Natalia Quintas-FroufeISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 215as well as a shortage of responsible content. is could be remedied though training courses, which is the case in nearby countries such as France, who are pioneers in approving regulations governing the advertising activity of these individuals. In fact, inuencers in France receive a certicate of Responsible Inuence after passing a training course. Although most of the micro-inuencers in the sample are not associated with elds such as medicine or nance, it would be highly useful for certain sectors to require a minimum level of training in order for prescribers to create responsible content for the public.As usual, this study has certain limitations, one of which is the sample and methodology used. In spite of this, we believe the research provides an initial insight into this phenomenon, and once again points out the need to continue promoting transparency in commercial content in order to avoid advertising practices that do not guarantee consumer protection. is is especially important due to the fact that anyone can become an inuencer, and this natural sincerity is exactly what brands are looking for. is raises the need to supplement this research with in-depth interviews in which micro-inuencers can elaborate on the statements of this survey and freely address their work as content creators for brands.Regarding the sample, one aspect should be kept in mind. As this is an exploratory study in which the nature of this type of inuencer is unknown, due to the prole having not been segmented by gender or age, the purpose of the survey is to collect as many opinions as possible. Future research will be able to improve the representativeness of the selected sample. One nding of this study, like that of Peres and Silva (2021), is that micro-inuencers are mostly women.e authors believe it is necessary to ask the message senders themselves what the regulatory framework for inuencer marketing activity should be, and how it can enforce responsible behaviour by agencies, brands, and inuencers in providing truthful information and promoting transparency in their activity.Such a framework should consider the need to identify the content as advertising, as well as to establish legal and ethical limits upon which inuencer marketing should be founded.It bears mentioning the recent approval of Royal Decree 444/2024, of 30 April, which regulates the requirements for being categorised as a user of special relevance of video exchange services through a platform, in accordance with the development of article 94 of Law 13/2022, of 7 July, General Law on Audio-visual Communication [General de Comunicación Audiovisual]. Although this legislation only applies to inuencers with an income of more than 300,000 euros per year, and an audience of more than one million followers, at least it establishes a new, and necessary, legal framework to regulate their activity.5. Acknowledgementsis article has been translated into English by Charles E. Arthur, to whom we are grateful for his meticulous work.is work has been funded by the call for grants for the translation of scientic articles and publication fees in open access journals, 2023/2024, of the Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR).is research has been carried out under the auspices of the project entitled, La profesionalizacion de la gura del [micro] inuencer. Análisis de su desempeño en la industria publicitaria y retos para la sociedad en su rol de creador de contenidos [e professionalisation of the [micro] inuencer; an analysis of their performance in the advertising industry and challenges for
216 | nº 40, pp. 203-220 | January-June of 2025Micro-inuencers and advertising. Transparency and ethics in content creationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónsociety in their role as content creators]. e project is a result of a collaboration between FuelYourBrands and the Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR).6. Specic contributions of each authorName and surnameConception and work designErika Fernández-GómezMethodologyErika Fernández-GómezData collection and analysisErika Fernández-Gómez and Natalia Quintas-FroufeDiscussion and conclusionsErika Fernández-Gómez and Natalia Quintas-FroufeDrafting, layout, review and version approvalErika Fernández-Gómez and Natalia Quintas-Froufe7. Conict of intereste authors declare that there is no conict of interest contained in this article. 8. Bibliographic referencesAo, L., Bansal, R., Pruthi, N. y Khaskheli, M.B. (2023). Impact of Social Media Inuencers on Customer Engagement and Purchase Intention: A Meta-Analysis. Sustainability, 15(3), pp. 2744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032744Asociación Española de Anunciantes (AEA) y Asociación para la Autorregulación de la Comunicación Comercial (Autocontrol) (2020). Código de conducta sobre el uso de inuencers en la publicidad. Recuperado el día 30 de mayo de 2023 de https://bit.ly/4gk30C0 Bakker, D. (2018). Conceptualising Inuencer Marketing. Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, I(1), pp. 79-87. https://bitly.ws/35QhCBoletín Ocial del Estado (2024). Real Decreto 444/2024, de 30 de abril, por el que se regulan los requisitos a efectos de ser considerado usuario de especial relevancia de los servicios de intercambio de vídeos a través de plataforma, en desarrollo del artículo 94 de la Ley 13/2022, de 7 de julio, General de Comunicación Audiovisual.Bratu, S. (2019). Can Social Media Inuencers Shape Corporate Brand Reputation? Online Followers’ Trust, Value Creation, and Purchase Intentions. Review of Contemporary Philosophy, 18, pp. 157–163. https://doi.org/10.22381/RCP18201910 Britt, R.K., Hayes, J.L., Britt, B.C. y Park, H. (2020). Too Big to Sell? A Computational Analysis of Network and Content Characteristics among Mega and Micro Beauty and Fashion Social Media Inuencers. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 20(2), pp. 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1763873

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 203-220 January-June of 2025Erika Fernández-Gómez and Natalia Quintas-FroufeISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 217Brito, M.D., Chachalo, G. P. y Murray, M. G. (2021). Marketing de inuencia: análisis de credibilidad e intención de compra impartidas por un líder de opinión. Signo y Pensamiento, 40(78). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.syp40-78.miac Carpenter, C., Lemon, L.L. y Hoy, M.G. (2019). #Sponsored #Ad: Agency Perspective on Inuencer Marketing Campaigns. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 40(3), pp. 258-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2018.1521113 Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C. y Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Inuencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, pp. 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.005 Clemente-Ricolfe, J.-S. y Atienza-Sancho, P. (2019). Percepción de los consumidores respecto al peso que ejercen en ellos los inuencers para la compra de productos. Comunicación y sociedad, 16, e7296. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2019i0.7296 Cooley, D. y Parks-Yancy, R. (2019). e Eect of Social Media on Perceived Information Credibility and Decision Making. Journal of Internet Commerce, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2019.1595362 Conde, R. y Casais, B. (2023). Micro, macro and mega-inuencers on instagram: e power of persuasion via the parasocial relationship. Journal of Business Research, 158, pp. 113708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113708De Frutos Torres, B. y Pastro Rodríguez, A. (2020). ¿Seguimos conando en las redes sociales? Un estudio sobre la valoración de las redes y su publicidad. En Javier Sierra Sánchez y Almudena Barrientos Báez (Coords.), Cosmovisión de la comunicación en redes sociales en la era postdigital (pp. 1.141-1.159). McGraw-Hill. De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., y Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram inuencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising, 36(5), pp. 798-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035EASA (2023). EASA Inuencer Marketing Best Practice Recommendation. Recuperado el día 3 de octubre de 2023 de https://bitly.ws/35Qi8EASA (2015). EASA Digital Marketing Communications Best Practice. Recuperado el día 3 de octubre de 2023 de https://bitly.ws/35Qip Fernández-Gómez, E., Segarra-Saavedra, J. y Feijoo, B. (2023). Alfabetización publicitaria y menores. Revisión bibliográca a partir de la Web of Science (WOS) y Scopus (2010-2022). Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 81, 353-374. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2023-1892Feijoo Fernández y Fernández-Gómez, E. (2021). Niños y niñas inuyentes en YouTube e Instagram: contenidos y presencia de marcas durante el connamiento. Cuadernos.info, 49, 300-328. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.49.27309Fernández-Gómez, J. D., Hernández-Santaolalla, V., y Sanz-Marcos, P. (2018). Inuencers, marca personal e ideología política en Twitter. Cuadernos.info, 42, pp. 19-37. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.42.1348 Fernández-Gómez. E., Fernández Vázquez, J. y Feijoo Fernández, B. (2021). Los niños como creadores de contenido en YouTube e Instagram. Análisis de las narrativas empleadas, la presencia de padres y marcas comerciales. Icono 14, 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v20i1.1762

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


218 | nº 40, pp. 203-220 | January-June of 2025Micro-inuencers and advertising. Transparency and ethics in content creationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónGómez-Nieto, B. (2018). El inuencer: herramienta clave en el contexto digital de la publicidad engañosa. Methaodos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 6(1), pp. 149-156. https://doi.org/10.17502/m.rcs.v6i1.212 Gupta, S. y Mahajan, R. (2019). Role of Micro-Inuencers in Aecting Behavioural Intentions. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4-5). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D1045.1284S519 Hernández-Méndez, J. y Baute-Díaz, N. (2024). Inuencer marketing in the promotion of tourist destinations: mega, macro and micro-inuencers. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(8), 1332-1342, https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2214354 Iniesta-Alemán, I. (2019). Ecacia de los inuencers como recurso publicitario en la estrategia de los anunciantes locales. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, 46, pp. 149-169. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2019.i46.09IAB Spain (2023). Estudio anual de redes sociales. Recuperado el día 3 de junio de 2023 de https://bitly.ws/FKkzIAB Spain (2019). Libro Blanco. Marketing de Inuencers. Recuperado el día 3 de junio de 2023 de https://bitly.ws/35QiY ICMEDIA (2021). El Libro blanco de la inuencia responsable. Recuperado el día 15 de mayo de 2023 de https://bitly.ws/35Qjf Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., y Parkinson, J. (2020). When less is more: the impact of macro and micro social media inuencers’ disclosure. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(3-4), pp. 248-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1718740LEY 13/2022, de 7 de julio, General de Comunicación Audiovisual. Boletín Ocial del Estado, 8 de julio de 2022. Recuperado el día 1 de abril de 2023 de https://bitly.ws/DXNq Martín-García, A. (2021). Percepción de los estudiantes del grado de publicidad y RR.PP. sobre la relación entre marcas e inuencers en Instagram. Vivat Academia, 154, pp. 57–78. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2021.154.e1337Martínez-Sanz, R., Buitrago, Á., y Martín-García, A. (2023). Comunicación para la salud a través de TikTok. Estudio de inuencers de temática farmacéutica y conexión con su audiencia. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación/Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 14(1), 83-98. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.23435 Núñez-Cansado, M., López-López, A. y Somarriba-Arechavala, N. (2021). Publicidad encubierta en los kidsuencers. Una propuesta metodológica aplicada al estudio de caso de los diez youtubers menores con más seguidores de España. Profesional de la información, 30(2), e300219. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.mar.19Oneto-González, G., Pérez-Curiel, C. y Riscart-López, J. (2019). Efecto del inuencer sobre el nivel de engagement en publicaciones de Instagram, Redmarka. Revista de Marketing Aplicado, 24(2), pp. 76-94. https://doi.org/10.17979/redma.2020.24.2.7069Padilla-Castillo, G., y Oliver-González, A.B. (2018). Instagramers e inuencers. El escaparate de la moda que eligen los jóvenes menores españoles. aDResearch ESIC International Journal of Communication Research, 18(18), pp. 42–59. https://doi.org/10.7263/adresic-018-03Park, J., Min Lee, J., Yiqi Xiong, V., Septianto, F., y Seo, Y. (2021). David and Goliath: When and Why Micro-Inuencers Are More Persuasive an Mega-Inuencers. Journal of Advertising, 50(5), 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1980470Peres, R., y Silva, M. (2021). e Role of Micro-Inuencers in the Consumer Decision-Making Process in the Hospitality Field. European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, 11(1), pp. 102-112. https://doi.org/10.2478/ejthr-2021-0010

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 203-220 January-June of 2025Erika Fernández-Gómez and Natalia Quintas-FroufeISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 219Pérez-Curiel, C., y Sanz-Marcos, P. (2019). Estrategia de marca, inuencers y nuevos públicos en la comunicación de moda y lujo: Tendencia Gucci en Instagram. Prisma social: revista de investigación social, 24, pp. 1-24. https://bitly.ws/35QjPPérez-Ordóñez, C., y Castro-Martínez, A. (2023). Creadores de contenido especializado en salud en redes sociales. Los micro inuencers en Instagram. Revista de Comunicación y Salud, 13, pp. 23-38. https://doi.org/10.35669/rcys.2023.13.e311Prendes, M.P. (2006). Internet aplicado a la educación: estrategias didácticas y metodologías. En J. Cabero (Coord.), Nuevas tecnologías aplicadas a la educación (pp. 205-222). Editorial McGraw-Hill.Ramos-Gutiérrez, M. y Fernández-Blanco, E. (2021). La regulación de la publicidad encubierta en el marketing de inuencers para la Generación Z: ¿Cumplirán los/as inuencers el nuevo código de conducta de Autocontrol? Prisma Social: revista de investigación social, 34, pp. 61-87. https://bitly.ws/35Qk7 Rios-Marques, I., Casais, B., y Camilleri, M.A. (2020). e eect of macro celebrity and microinuencer endorsements on consumer-brand engagement on Instagram. In Camilleri, M.A. (Ed.) Strategic Corporate Communication in the Digital Age (pp. 131-143). Emerald, Bingley. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-264-520211008 Romero-Cantero, T., González-Díaz, C. y Quintas-Froufe, N. (2022). La comunicación de los inuencers veganos en Instagram: el caso español. Cuadernos.info, 52, 307-329. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.52.38267 Sanz-Marcos, P., Jiménez-Marín, G., y Elías, R. (2019). La incorporación de la gura del inuencer en las campañas publicitarias: consecuencias para las agencias de publicidad españolas. adComunica. Revista Cientíca de Estrategias, Tendencias e Innovación en Comunicación, 18, pp. 63-86. https://doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2019.18.5Sarmiento-Guede, J.R., y Rodríguez-Terceño, J. (2020). La comunicación visual en Instagram: estudio de los efectos de los micro-inuencers en el comportamiento de sus seguidores. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 26 (3), pp. 1205-1216. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.65046 Segarra, J., & Hidalgo, T. (2018). Inuencers, moda femenina e Instagram: el poder de la inuencia en la era 2.0. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación/Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 9(1), pp. 313-325. https://www.doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2018.9.1.17 Shen, Z. (2021). A persuasive eWOM model for increasing consumer engagement on social media: evidence from Irish fashion micro-inuencers. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(2), pp. 181-199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-10-2019-0161Sierra-Bravo, R. (2001). Técnicas de investigación social. Teoría y Ejercicios. Madrid: Editorial Paraninfo.Silalahi, A. T. (2021). Micro-inuencer celebrity’s communication strategy in brand promotion. Humaniora, 12 (1), pp. 21-28. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v12i1.6786Silva, A. y Mendes-Filho, L. (2023). Credibilidade do travel inuencer no Instagram afetando a intenção do viajante na escolha de destinos. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Turismo, 17, e-2669. https://doi.org/10.7784/rbtur.v17.2669Sinha, I. J. y Fung, T. (2021). How Social Media Micro-Inuencers Are Disrupting the Business of Youth Fashion. Rutgers Business Review, 6 (1), pp. 44-50. https://bitly.ws/35Qkx

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


220 | nº 40, pp. 203-220 | January-June of 2025Micro-inuencers and advertising. Transparency and ethics in content creationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónSixto-García, J. y Álvarez-Vázquez, A. (2020). Inuencers en Instagram y publicidad engañosa: la necesidad de regular y autorregular. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 26(4), pp. 1611-1622. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.66921e New York Times Educational Publishing (2020). Social Media Inuencers: Apps, Algorithms and Celebrities. Nueva York: e Rosen Publishing Group.Taillon, B.J., Mueller, S.M., Kowalczyk, C.M., y Jones, D.N. (2020). Understanding the relationships between social media inuencers and their followers: the moderating role of closeness. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(6), pp. 767-782. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2019-2292 Tur-Viñes, V., Núñez-Gómez, P., y Martínez-Pastor, E. (2019). YouTube, menores y cultura colaborativa. Revisión bibliográca de la investigación académica. Historia y comunicación social, 24 (1), pp. 331-351. https://doi.org/10.5209/HICS.64498Vilajoana-Alejandre, S., Rom-Rodríguez, J. y Miotto, G. (2019). Retos de la autorregulación publicitaria ante los riesgos jurídicos y éticos del marketing de inuencers. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación/Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 10 (2), pp. 115-129. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2019.10.2.15 Villegas-Simón, I., Fernández-Rovira, C., Giraldo-Luque, S. y Bernardi, A. (2022). Radiography of microinuencers in the digital platform economy: dissatisfaction, free labor and unequal remuneration. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 80, pp. 452-474. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2022-1805

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]