Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous Region of Murcia¿Polarizan los medios? La cobertura mediática en la campaña electoral del 28M en la Región de Murcia doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | 43January-June of 2025ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: Melero López, I.; López Palazón, M. I. and Quiles Bailén, M. (2025). Do the media create polarization? e media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous Region of Murcia. Doxa Comunicación, 40, pp. 43-66.https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n40a2188Inmaculada Melero López. PhD in Political Science and Public Administration from the University of Murcia, with an Extraordinary Doctorate Award. She also holds a Master’s Degree in Government, Administration and Public Policy from the same university. Currently, Professor Melero López is serving as Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science, in addition holding the post of Executive Secretary of the Asociación Latinoamericana de Investigadores en Campañas Electorales (ALICE) [Latin American Association of Researchers for Electoral Campaigns]. She also carries out research work at the Centro de Estudios Murciano de Opinión Pública (CEMOP) [Murcian Research Centre for Public Opinion] and serves as coordinator of the political communication journal known as Más Poder Local.University of Murcia, Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0002-0064-9139María Isabel López Palazón. Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science, Government and Public Administration from the University of Murcia, with an Extraordinary Award for her capstone project in the academic year 2021-2022. She was also awarded the Prize for Citizen Participation, Transparency, and Good Governance by the Autonomous Region of Murcia for the same capstone endeavour, and she holds a Master’s Degree in Applied Political Analysis with a specialisation in Political Communication as well. Moreover, she has been awarded a position on a programme of pre-doctoral University Professorial Training (FPU) by the Ministry of Universities, which will take place at the University of Murcia. She also collaborates with the Murcian Research Centre for Public Opinion (CEMOP), in addition to serving as a member of the Editorial Board of Más Poder Local.University of Murcia, Spain[email protected] ORCID: 0009-0005-8594-4071 María Quiles Bailén. PhD from Miguel Hernández University of Elche and Jaume I University of Castellón. She is a member of the research group known as ECULGE [Economics, Culture and Gender], under the auspices of Miguel Hernández University, in addition to being a member of the Murcian Research Centre for Public Opinion (CEMOP). Doctor Quiles Bailén also serves as Head of Training and Documentation of the Public Policy Chair at the University of Murcia and she works as an Associate Professor on the Bachelor’s Degree of Political Science, Government and Public Administration at the same university as well.University of Murcia, Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0002-4931-7784 is content is published under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. International License CC BY-NC 4.0

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


44 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación1. Introductione media have historically played a fundamental role in the development and consolidation of democracies by providing citizens with information that is independent of ideological positions (Villafranco Robles, 2005), all of which is combined with the building of greater trust in institutions (Norris, 2000). In addition to guaranteeing the development of democracies, this situation has also encouraged audiences to consume media products (Mani and Echeverría, 2019). e guarantee oered by the media can be seen in the narrative strategies of journalists, which emphasise democracy and essential values such as a commitment to public service (Cornejo Urbina, 2022).is research addresses not only the role of the media, but their content as well, referring specically to the possible polarizing nature of their informative messages. Polarization perceived by audiences can lead to a communication scenario that fosters an informative oering further away from ideological centre, with more extreme editorial lines (Majó Vázquez and González Bailón, 2022). is situation is exacerbated by a scenario in which ideology, social behaviour, and the perception of reality are usually subordinated to the power of constructing polarization (Blanco and De la Corte, 2003). ese issues are fundamental pillars that allow agents such as the media to act as social elites, which have the power to take stances and adopt beliefs that are part of the dynamic role acquired by newsrooms (Martín Baró, 2003; Villa Gómez et al., 2020). In addition, nearly half of Spanish people (49%) believe that the media are very distant from each other ideologically, having have become agents that have the capability of fostering political polarization (Vara et al., 2022).Received: 04/01/2024 - Accepted: 02/04/2024 - Early access: 09/05/2024 - Published:Recibido: 04/01/2024 - Aceptado: 02/04/2024 - En edición: 09/05/2024 - Publicado: Abstract:Can media coverage during election campaigns be considered polarizing? Is the media content we consume neutral, especially during periods of heightened political activity, or does it encourage social division into two opposing ideological camps? In an attempt to answer these questions, the media coverage and polarizing content of the 2023 Murcia Regional elections were analysed, specically regarding television broadcasts, including those of La 7 and La 1 of TVE in its territorial broadcasting, as well as regional press outlets La Verdad and La Opinión. By using a content analysis methodology, the results indicate that the news disseminated by the media did not appear to transmit signicant polarization in the Murcia Region during the election campaign of 28M. Keywords:Press; television; election campaign; media; polarization.Resumen:¿La cobertura que realizan los medios de comunicación en campaña electoral puede considerarse polarizante? ¿Son los contenidos mediá-ticos que consumimos, sobre todo en periodos de mayor actividad po-lítica, neutrales o alientan la división social en dos polos ideológicos enfrentados? Para tratar de responder a estas cuestiones se analiza la cobertura de los medios de comunicación y los contenidos polarizantes, durante el periodo de campaña electoral autonómica de 2023 en la Re-gión de Murcia, concretamente la televisión (La 7 y La 1 de TVE en su emisión territorial) y la prensa regional (La Verdad y La Opinión). A partir del análisis de contenido como técnica metodológica, los resulta-dos apuntan a que la información transmitida por los medios no parece presentar una polarización destacable en la Región de Murcia durante la campaña electoral del 28M. Palabras clave:Prensa; televisión; campaña electoral; medios de comunicación; polarización.
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 January-June of 2025Inmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 45 is study addresses the media coverage during the 2023 electoral campaign in the Autonomous Region of Murcia. As such, the aim of the research is to analyse the content of media agendas in the 28M election campaign in the Murcia Region, and whether the messages broadcast contained polarizing features. Consequently, the research question set forth is the following: With regard to the content of the media agenda in the 28M election campaign in the Murcia Region, how can it be described?e media addressed in this paper include television and the digital version of the press. As the quintessential media outlet (De Casas Moreno et al., 2020), television reects a powerful version of reality by combining visual and auditory elds, making it a channel with great inuence on public opinion. Added to this idea is the agility and simplicity of television language, and the ease with which viewers can understand the news (Fernández, 2006). On the other hand, the press has been an essential media outlet for information related to deciding how to vote (Nir and Druckman, 2008). Despite this situation, the pressure for immediacy and the new informative mechanisms make it necessary to redene productive routines and the development of informative content based on these information structures (Barrios Rubio and Gutiérrez García, 2022). is means that the new informative mechanisms are transferring consumption to the digital environment, with the media becoming the agents that respond to these needs through digitisation of their content, facilitating widespread access to political information (Casero Ripollés, 2016).1.1. e media as a mobilising agente relentless volume of information circulating in the digital ecosystem has an impact on the prestige, trust, and credibility of traditional media in facing new audiences (Silva Rodríguez et al., 2022). Its power lies in the crucial work of building content that is memorable, extensive, and immersed in narratives (Canel and Sanders, 2005). Exposure to the media can occur through dierent mechanisms, yet all of them appeal to ideology and semantics, with the aim of inuencing political and governmental agendas, and ultimately public aairs (Cornejo Urbina, 2022).However, added to this focus on ideological inuence is the relationship between politics and communication, which not only has an impact on political governance, but also on the shaping of public opinion and the development of content for mediatised audiences (Castells, 2009). is set of ideas is reinforced by the work of conrmation and refutation exercised by the media to cognitively and aectively pose questions based on their pre-existing narratives, which update an already known model of the world (Aruguete and Calvo, 2023). When addressing the relationship between the media and the rest of the actors involved, diverse theories that have delved into the eects of the media must be addressed. e origin of such research dates back to the predominance of what is known as the direct eect paradigm, or magic bullet theory, which held that “the audience is a passive and malleable entity upon which media messages would always have an impact” (Igartua and Humanes, 2004: 204). is idea consisted of creating pseudo-events based on the behaviour of individuals who rejected everything that did not happen in the media (McCombs and Shaw, 1972; McCombs, 2006; Aruguete, 2015). Between the 1940s and 1960s, this tradition was reversed. e theory of media eects that predominated at the time, or in other words, the well-known minimal eects hypothesis, pointed out that the media had almost no eect on public opinion. During this period, audiences played a key role by selecting the messages to which they wanted to focus their attention, interpreting them, and nally assimilating them (Ardévol Abreu et al., 2020).
46 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónAfter considerable criticism in the 1950s by authors who rejected the limited power of the media (Lang and Lang, 1955; Cohen, 1963; Semetko, 1995), the agenda-setting theory emerged (McCombs and Shaw, 1972). Based on this theory, the authors concluded that “over time, issues highlighted in the news were eventually considered important by the public” (McCombs, 2006: 29). is traditional concept is divided into two levels: the rst addresses topic diversity, which is the result of media consumption. us, the objective of the rst level emphasizes the variety of issues used in the agendas, while the second level of agenda-setting went a step further and highlighted the aspects, characteristics, or attributes used by the media to describe those issues. As such, the key was no longer which issue predominated, but how that issue was covered (Crespo and Melero, 2022).1.2. Content and polarizing rhetoricOne of the inherent features of the media in terms of its role in political control refers to the type of messages transmitted, which can exert considerable inuence over the citizenry. An example might be the provocation of polarizing feelings when they speak in a derogatory and aggressive tone about the “others”, who are seen as the enemy of their own audiences (McCombs, 2006). One pioneering study shows how polarizing semantics have increased in the media, specically on US television since 2016. To reach this conclusion, they conducted a comparative analysis of two dierent television channels by analysing identical and politically controversial keywords. Specically, in their on-air language CNN and Fox News were more semantically diverse in their use of key words such as “racist”, “racism”, “black criminal”, “immigrant”, “immigration”, “climate change”, “global warming”, and “healthcare” (Ding, Horning and Rho, 2023). Although not the objective of this research, it is highly important to associate polarizing media content with the use of emotion. Moreover, harmful emotions such as disgust or hatred are the ones that appear most often in electoral campaigns, an example of which is the elections of the Autonomous Region of Madrid in 2021 (Moret Soler et al., 2022), or that of the United States in 2020 (Domínguez García et al., 2023). In Spain, people who are politically informed display a prole that is emotionally active and with a greater presence of negative emotions. e media act as an interpretative framework of feelings by directly inuencing attitudes, and oering not only a cognitive approach, but one that is emotional as well (Cazorla et al., 2022). In addition, they no longer reect merely ideological aliation, but they also produce content to increase rejection and victimisation. is is due to the fact that in today’s communications, polarizing media discourses attract audiences and advertising. Likewise, they construct news to intensify fear and feed prejudice in their audiences (Waisbord, 2020). In this way, the media end up not only determining the most important content, but also making positive or negative interpretations of certain topics (Rubio, 2009). erefore, polarization occurs when the stance of one group implies a negative reference to the viewpoint of another group, considering it to be a rival. is phenomenon is a dynamic process of social forces in which the approach to one of the standpoints involves both the distancing and active rejection of the other (Martín, 2003). Frames involving the media, political discourse, and meaning are all productive instruments for structuring the features of polarizing narratives during electoral campaigns (Muñiz et al., 2022). Among the variety of frames that exist, that of conict, which dates back to Neuman, Just and Crigler (1992), is crucial for analysing the strategies used by political leaders in their discourse, and for examining the adaptation of this discourse to media coverage. ese frames refer to conicting interests that have a detrimental eect on citizens, as they tend to focus on negativity and on the qualities of other leaders, parties, groups or
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 January-June of 2025Inmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 47 institutions (Semetko and Valkenburg, 2000). is framing has been the object of various studies involving inductive approaches, as in the case of Lind and Salo (2002). rough content analysis, these authors identied six frames associated with the media coverage of feminism. Along with polarization, other concepts such as negativity in the media itself can be triggers for a greater or lesser amount of polarizing content in the media. Lengauer et al. (2011) propose ve features that determine the degree of negativity of a news item: tone, coniction, incapability, depiction, and pessimism. Moreover, other issues such as the lack of security, immigration, and the inner workings of democracy tend to be treated with higher levels of negativity due to their inherent features of polarization and social confrontation (Esser et al., 2016). Finally, numerous studies have argued that the characteristics of a particular media outlet can determine its level of negativity (Takens et al., 2013).In the present study, the following frames have been identied, which are related to the previously mentioned frame of conict: the presence of sharp criticism; the use of insulting language; mentioning the danger of actions taken; comments about changing the rules of the game; irresponsible and contradictory attitudes of the actors; protagonist vs. adversary; juxtaposed stances; use of competitive terms; using warfare language; and describing the opponent using negative terms. As mentioned above, along with the frames used for the present analysis, negativity complements the measurement of polarization in media content.2. Methodologies and dataWith the aim of analysing the content of media agendas in the 28M election campaign in the Murcia Region, and discovering whether the messages issued contain polarizing features, diverse media such as the press and television were consulted during the campaign, which ran from 12-16 May, 2023.Likewise, the following research question is posed: How can the content that comprises the media agenda in the election campaign of 28 May in the Murcia Region be described?With regard to the press, the newspapers analysed were the digital versions of La Verdad and La Opinión as they are the two media with the highest volume of political content at the regional level, according to the General Media Study (Avante, 2023). e units of analysis were drawn from each newspaper’s editorials, opinion articles, and news items related to the subject in question. In the coding, the order used was the title of the article, subtitle, and the text. Given that media content in digital format is modied and altered up to three times during the course of one day, the compilation of the analysis units was carried out each day in the early hours of the morning.In the case of television, the news programmes of La 7 and La 1 of TVE were analysed. Television viewing increased by 1.74% in 2022 compared to 2021, even surpassing news consumed through the Internet (Avante, 2023). Coding the units was carried out from the beginning to the end of the journalistic coverage, so when the topic changed, the analysis of a new unit began. Given the characteristics of the media, both the presentation of the news item by the journalist and the subsequent images detailing the news item in the same unit were analysed. e analysis content consisted of news items that addressed political issues, with priority given to the topics included in the initial rundown of the newscast. e news programmes analysed were Noticias Edición Mediodía of La 7, and Noticias Murcia of La 1-TVE, both of which aired at 2 p.m.
48 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónFor the treatment of the compiled data, a content analysis was used as the research technique to examine the media. is method is considered a systematic, objective, and quantitative way to analyse the characteristics of a message (Neuendorf, 2002), by taking a purely descriptive approach. Moreover, this technique enables valid inferences to be drawn, reproduced, and applied to a given context. e purpose of this tool is to provide knowledge and concordance in the eld of communication (Krippendor, 1997). Likewise, evaluation and coding must be uniform and analysed by using the same criteria (Igartua and Humanes, 2004; Piñuel Raigada, 2002).To analyse the polarizing content in the media, variables linked to agenda-setting have been used to reveal the main topics (McCombs, 2006), in addition to a series of concepts related to negativity in the media. is negativity is linked to the electoral system in which the metaphors of war, competition, and the perception of candidates and polls, among other factors, become overly important (Cappella and Jamieson, 1997). Its measurement is made possible by analysing information that is positive, negative or neutral, for the purpose of determining the degree of negativity (Soroka and McAdams, 2015) and polarization (Robles et al., 2022) that is most common in media content.e variables used to monitor media coverage, polarization and negativity in the media are as follows:Table 1. Analysis variablesIdentication variablesNews dateXX/XX/XXXXMedia typeTelevision or the press.Name of the media analysedLa 7, La 1 of TVE, La Verdad and La Opinión.Topic content variablesMain topicis enables identication of the predominant topics in the agendas, i.e., it covers the rst level of the agenda-setting (McCombs and Shaw, 1972).SubtopicsA series of specic subtopics is broken down from each main topic.Variables of political polarization in the mediaPresence of sharp criticismContains a direct and specic attack on a well-known political leader or party, it is also coded according to which actor is the target of the attack.Presence of journalists’ opinionsContains opinions of the journalists who report the news on an issue.Perception of rigore consumer perceives that it is presented in a rigorous, truthful, and ethical manner without indicating any opinion about the issue.
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 January-June of 2025Inmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 49 ToneAddresses the emotional dimension of the second level of agenda-setting (positive, negative, or neutral) (McCombs, 2006).Presence of insulting languageInsulting or oensive terms are used to address other political actors –coded dichotomously (yes or no).Mentioning the danger of actions takenA political actor, or the actions carried out by such a person, might pose a danger to society.Comments about changing the rules of the gameis refers to possibly changing of the rules of the game for the actor’s or political party’s own benet based on ideological interests.Irresponsible and contradictory attitudes of the actorse attitude of a leader or political actor is irresponsible or illegitimate with regard to the prevailing values and principles of the society. is variable is coded dichotomously (yes or no).Protagonist vs. adversaryere is a verbal attack by one actor or party against another with the aim of highlighting the dierences between the two.Juxtaposed stancesis is appraised if large groups are created that are far apart on the issue being analysed, and if allusions are made to terms that put distance between the groups. Coded dichotomously (yes or no).Use of competitive termsNouns, adjectives, or verbs that denote competitiveness and conict are used. Coded dichotomously (yes or no).Using warfare languageTerms linked to the eld of war, such as battle, combat, weapons, etc. is variable is coded dichotomously (yes or no).Describing the opponent using negative termsAn actor or political party is identied using negative terms that foments rejection, which can be interpreted as an insult. Coded dichotomously (yes or no).Source: created by the authorsAs previously mentioned, the media analysed are those that have a larger audience at the regional level. Apart from having a regional scope, the two daily newspapers consulted, which include La Verdad of the Vocento Group, and La Opinión of the Prensa Ibérica Group, also have higher readership compared to other media in the Murcia Region. In the case of television, La 7 is the regional public television channel of Murcia, while La 1 (of RTVE) is a national public television channel, whose analysed programme is part of its daily regional coverage (Avante, 2023). Based on the aforementioned criteria and variables, the units of analysis collected are as follows:
50 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTable 2. Analysis units  Number%Digital pressLa Opinión5751.4%La Verdad5448.6%Total (press) 111100%TelevisionLa 78264.1%La 14635.9%Total (television)128100%Source: created by the authorsCoding the analysis units was carried out by a team of four researchers by using the previously mentioned codebook. Excel was employed as the data collection tool. Afterward, the IBM SPSS Statistics 28 programme was used to analyse the information. Regarding the reliability coecient, two collaborators from the Public Policy Chair of the University of Murcia calculated the intercoder reliability based on re-coding 12% of the total sample. e results obtained using the Holsti method indicated that the results were reliable (.72).2.1. e political context of 28M in the Murcia Region On 28 May, 2023, municipal and regional elections were held in the Autonomous Region of Murcia in Spain. With only 45 seats, the Murcia Regional Assembly is the fourth smallest regional parliament in Spain. e only ones that are smaller include Castilla-La Mancha, La Rioja, and Cantabria, with the same number of seats as the Principality of Asturias (García Escribano, 2015).e scenario faced by the inhabitants of the Murcia Region in electing representatives in its XI Legislature resulted from a failed attempt at a motion of censure in 2021. At that time, Ciudadanos severed its relationship with the Partido Popular (PP), with whom it had shared power in the regional government, and presented a motion of censure together with the Partido Socialista Obrero Español (PSOE), which eventually failed (Caballero, 2023). Various political parties were nominated for the regional elections. e most prominent, due to their previous representation in the Regional Assembly, were the following: Partido Popular (PP), with candidate Fernando López Miras; Partido Socialista de la Región de Murcia (PSRM), whose candidate was José Vélez; Ciudadanos, with candidate María José Ros; VOX, with José Ángel Antelo; and Unidas Podemos, with María Marín. is miscellany of actors occurred despite the fact that over the years, the Murcia Region has had several presidents, all from the Partido Popular, which has been governing the Region continuously since 1995, either with absolute majorities or through political alliances.
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 January-June of 2025Inmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 51 According to pre-election polls carried out by CEMOP, 2023, the expected winner was Partido Popular (PP) with an estimated 28.8% of the votes and 22 seats1, close to an absolute majority of 23, with a candidate who had already served as president of the Region. is meant that he had an advantage over his adversaries. Second place was expected to be taken by PSRM (16.4%), with an estimated 12-13 seats, and third place was envisioned for VOX (12.4%), which was forecast to obtain between eight and nine representatives. Further behind were Unidas Podemos (4.3%) and Ciudadanos (1.3%), the latter of which was excluded from the Regional Assembly of Murcia, as the minimum for these elections was 3%.3. Results3.1. Analysis of the media content in relation to issues To analyse the media coverage of the 28M campaign in the Murcia Region, the main topics were compiled in order to reveal the leading issues in the two weeks prior to the elections. Graph 1. Principal media topics in the 28M elections (%)Source: created by the authors
52 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónBoth in the press and on television, the most frequently covered topics were political parties, followed by social policy, healthcare, and the Mar Menor2 crisis. In evaluating the dierences between both media, it has been observed that all the issues mentioned have a greater presence in the press than on television, except for healthcare, which stands out on television, yet with only slight dierences between both media. Moreover, issues such as the economy, transportation, and communication are more prominent on television news. In general, there is a predominance of topics with an ideological component, also known as public policy issues (Mazzoleni, 2010), which are typical of campaign periods and aim to highlight the main problems of citizens and the solutions or proposals of each candidate. To reveal the specic features of each topic, details were provided regarding the subtopics, and although they were connected to the main topics, they were intended to oer more detailed information on the issues highlighted by the regional media during the campaign.Table 3. e main subtopics of the media in the 28M elections (%) PressTelevisionTotalCampaign events10.811.711.3e so-called “sucient majority” of López Miras 14.43.98.8Election debates12.62.37.1Election forecasts6.36.36.3Transportation and communication in cities and towns2.78.65.9Housing4.56.35.4e Mar Menor crisis: solutions and accountability6.33.95Lowering taxes for the middle class073.8e closing of the Tajo-Segura water pipeline: solu-tions and accountability1.84.73.3Hospital waiting lists1.84.73.32 When social policy and healthcare issues are addressed, reference is made to public services related to education, dependency, social services, healthcare, and others, yet when comments are made about the Mar Menor situation, these denote content associated with the preservation and recovery of this natural resource of the Murcia Region. e Mar Menor is the largest saltwater lagoon in Europe, which for some years has been suering ecological deterioration as a result of pollution, agricultural exploitation, DANAS, and tourism, among many other casuistries identied by experts. Given the characteristics of this natural asset, it is protected under the auspices of both regional and national governments, and its maintenance, recovery, improvement, and management was one of the key issues in the 28M election campaign in the Murcia Region.
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 January-June of 2025Inmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 53 Sports2.73.12.9Assistance for disadvantaged people and families3.61.62.5Budget of the Ministry of Education1.82.32.1Accusations of vote-buying1.81.61.7Others293230.6Total 100100100Source: created by the authorsContrary to what occurs in the main topics, the subtopics have a predominance of content related to the campaign. is typology refers to messages associated with campaign organisation and other strategies that end up becoming news. Based on this classication, there are also political topics, or in other words, issues related to the political-electoral situation and the ideological viewpoints of the candidates and parties. One example is the subtopic related to the “sucient majority” of López Miras, which refers to the minimum number of votes that would allow him to govern alone without the support of other political parties, in this case VOX. is topic, together with the issue of electoral debates, is more prominent in the press than on television, as this type of content is often more prevalent in opinion articles or in the reections of journalists covering the news. Along with these topics, campaign events and election forecasts are part of the typology of political and electoral campaign issues, which stand out contextually during election campaigns.Regarding the actors or protagonists of the media news, it has been observed that the most frequently mentioned are the candidates for President of the Murcia Regional Government. In other words, Fernando López Miras (PP) heads the list with a 20.9% presence in the units analysed; in second place is José Vélez (PSRM) with 16.7%; next is María José Ros (Ciudadanos) at 10%; José Ángel Antelo (VOX) has 8.4%; and María Marín (Unidas Podemos) has 6.7%.e scarce presence of national leaders indicates that the media campaign focused mainly on the top regional candidates and their parties, contrasting the leadership and personalisation exercised by party representatives in regional politics (Laguna Platero, 2011). In the case of the Murcia Region, the main protagonist was Fernando López Miras, who was the regional president at the time. As a result, the media, and especially television, tend to oer more expanded coverage of these leaders’ messages (Rodríguez Virgili et al., 2014). is increase in content, together with the personalisation of the leaders, not only encompasses the President of the Autonomous Region of Murcia, but also the candidates who have greater representation in their chambers, which is the case of José Vélez. e rest of the candidates, despite being among the most prominent with regard to parties, national leaders, associations, institutions and companies, are unable to achieve a level of inuence similar to that of the two candidates who belong to the parties with the greatest representation, which are the PP and PSRM in the Murcia Region.
54 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación3.2. Analysis of political polarization in the mediae presence of verbal attacks during election campaigns is one of the variables that has allowed the authors to study negativity and polarization in the media, as media outlets are crucial sources of information during campaign periods. Moreover, citizens’ dependence on the media tends to increase during such periods in order to satisfy their information needs (Muñiz, 2022; Bjarnøe et al., 2020). Consequently, if the messages of the media shift toward conict, citizens will perceive it as such, and this could generate a certain level of political polarization and rejection of the opponent, among other aftereects. Although analysing the inuence of the media on individuals would involve a broader examination not addressed in this paper, the authors of the present study have explored the discursive tools used by the media to cover confrontational messages that might have an impact on citizens. Table 4. e presence of verbal attacks in the media analysed during the campaign (%) PressTelevisionLa OpiniónLa VerdadLa 7La 1None35.131.553.756.5Yes, against Fernando López Miras21.133.311.06.5Yes, against Pepe Vélez1.83.70.00.0Yes, against José Ángel Antelo0.01.90.00.0Yes, against María Marín7.03.70.00.0Yes, against the Autonomous Region of Murcia (CARM), or Murcia Regional Government7.05.612.28.7Yes, against the PP5.37.44.910.9Yes, against the PSOE1.81.92.40.0Yes, against VOX0.00.00.00.0Yes, against Ciudadanos1.80.00.00.0Yes, against Unidas Podemos0.01.90.00.0Yes, against the Spanish National Government12.17.29.710.9Yes, against another actor or entity7.01.96.16.5Total100100100100Source: created by the authors
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 January-June of 2025Inmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 55 In 28M campaign in the Murcia Region, the highest percentages can be found in the category of none with regard to verbal attacks. is indicates that a signicant percentage of the media’s coverage did not include any verbal attacks, especially on television, where more than half of the news on La 7 and La 1 do not use this media strategy to generate political polarization in their content. is percentage is lower in the case of the press, as more verbal attacks were detected in this medium, the vast majority of which were directed at the president of the regional government, Fernando López Miras. Specically, La Verdad published a higher number of attacks on the regional president, as this outlet was more critical of the PP candidate than the rest of the media analysed. Sharp verbal attacks on both the regional and national governments of Spain also stand out3.An example of this kind of attack on leaders and institutions was made against Fernando López Miras in an opinion article in La Opinión, which read, “e PP, led by López Miras, lacks identity and ambition in this campaign. e governing parties cannot resolve the election situation through populist measures and by correcting their adversaries. Inuential politicians must be knowledgeable about how to foresee what they call the framework, and they must establish a model for the Murcia Region that involves a true majority, not just ‘the sucient majority’ to continue doing things the same way as always”. Table 5. e presence of the journalists’ opinions in the media analysed (%) Digital pressTelevisionLa OpiniónLa VerdadLa 7La 1None54.475.995.1100.0Yes. ey make a joke, wisecrack or humorous comments 5.33.70.00.0Yes. ey appear serious3.51.91.20.0Yes. ey show concern3.53.72.40.0Yes. ey display doubtfulness3.51.90.00.0Yes. ey clearly express their opinion29.813.01.20.0Total100100100100Source: created by the authorsObjectivity has always been one of the pillars of journalism. e construction of frames and the use of framing to transmit real life situations is one of the main premises that distinguishes the personal opinion of journalists from factual news (Sádaba, 2008). In the case at hand, it can be observed that in all the units analysed from La 1, and in 95.1% of those of La 7, the objectivity of journalists has been defended to the utmost. e percentage is also high for the digital press, with La Verdad standing out at the rate of nearly 76% of the units analysed, and 54.4% for La Opinión. As such, the research data indicate that La Opinión is the newspaper that displays its opinion the most at 29.8%. A possible explanation for this tendency is that the verbal attacks directed
56 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónat Fernando López Miras could be a strategy orchestrated by La Opinión itself. us, it appears that La Opinión took a more critical stance toward the Regional Government than the rest of the media analysed. An example of such criticism, based on analysing the results of an election survey of this media, is the following comment: “e only option for regional government has a name of its own, Fernando López Miras, who has within his reach the ‘sucient’ or ‘required’ majority, to which the PP has incessantly made reference during this election campaign”.Table 6. e presence in the media analysed of danger regarding actions taken (%) Digital pressTelevisionLa OpiniónLa VerdadLa 7La 1None59.657.453.760.9Yes, regarding the economy of the Murcia Region 7.07.415.923.9Yes, regarding the economic well-being of individuals (employment, housing, income, etc.)3.53.715.98.7Yes, in relation to governmental stability7.05.63.72.2Yes, in relation to democracy and liberties1.89.38.54.3Yes, regarding the rights of certain groups (women, LGTBIQ+, ethnic minorities, etc.)0.00.01.20.0Yes, regarding the region’s image abroad0.01.90.00.0Yes, regarding other issues21.114.81.20.0Total100100100100Source: created by the authorsAs for mentions regarding the danger of actions taken, referring to whether political actors or their actions might pose a danger to society, there were hardly any comments regarding this issue. However, when such mentions do occur, they appear mainly on television, along with allusions to the risk for the economy of the Autonomous Region of Murcia and the economic well-being of its residents. As the media coverage analysed does not point out political dierences, it does generate negativity and political polarization through its content. One example of comments about the danger to democracy and freedom from taking action has been seen in La Verdad, when the second in line for the regional candidacy of the Podemos-IU-Alianza Verde coalition, Víctor Egío, made the following statement in a public interview: “e lack of support from the regional government has forced public higher education centres to reduce the number of available spaces for degree programmes and lay o professors”.
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 January-June of 2025Inmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 57 Table 7. Comments about changing the rules of the game in the media analysed (%) Digital pressTelevisionLa OpiniónLa VerdadLa 7La 1None80.777.891.593.5Yes, changes regarding parliamentary or decision-making rules 1.85.600Yes, changes to election rules14132.42.2Yes, changes to regional government operations and legal procedures01.94.92.2Yes, changes to rules related to transparency1.81.900Yes, changes to other rules are mentioned1.801.22.2Total100100100100Source: created by the authorse data reveal a considerable lack of mentions in the media with regard to changing the rules of the game, especially on television, where more than 90% of the units show no evidence of this type of content. However, the press highlights changes to election rules, which might be linked not only to the coverage carried out by the journalists themselves, but also to the importance of opinion articles written by their colleagues in newsrooms.One of the most controversial cases during the election campaign was Podemos candidate María Marín’s refusal to share half of her time in the debate with Helena Vidal of the party known as Más Región-Verdes Equo, as ruled by the Electoral Board after the joint candidacy of both parties was presented for the 2019 regional elections. In this case, changes to the rules of the game were reected as follows: “e debate started as planned, and everything was proceeding as usual until the moment arrived when María Marín had to leave the lectern and hand it over to Helena Vidal. In what was supposed to be the end of her turn, e Podemos-IU-Alianza Verde candidate refused to leave the stage, claiming that it seemed “unfair”, and making it clear that “if you want me to leave, you will have to kick me out”.
58 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTable 8. Confrontational stances of protagonists vs. adversaries in the media analysed (%) Digital pressTelevisionLa OpiniónLa VerdadLa 7La 1None49.148.153.756.5Yes, PP vs. PSOE21.127.825.621.7Yes, PP vs. Unidas Podemos1.85.64.92.2Yes, PSOE vs. VOX0.00.02.40.0Yes, VOX vs. Unidas Podemos0.00.00.00.0Yes, PP vs. VOX15.85.63.70.0Yes, Unidas Podemos vs. PSOE1.83.70.00.0Yes, other combinations of discord10.59.39.819.6Total100100100100Source: created by the authorsAlong the same lines, there is a certain presence of confrontational stances between protagonists and adversaries. In this case, the opposing viewpoints are linked, on the one hand, to the two parties with the highest number of representatives in the Regional Assembly (PP vs. PSOE) and, on the other hand, to the two right-wing parties with a greater chance of governing in coalition according to electoral forecasts (PP vs. VOX). One explanation for the use of this strategy by the media is to generate opposing and more competitive arenas among the leaders. Regarding the Murcia Region, the polls indicated that the PP, PSRM and VOX were essential in forming a government, especially the PP and VOX, given that both parties in coalition could exceed the absolute majority. Nevertheless, we cannot leave aside the fact that the PSRM is the main opposition party, in addition to being a pillar of regional partisanship. Television was one of the media that maintained the strategy of confrontation between the PP and PSOE, an example of which is La 7’s coverage of the day after the election debate, highlighted by accusations between the leaders of both parties, Fernando López Miras (PP) and José Vélez (PSOE), as they accused each other of implementing policies that did not result in a reduction in unemployment compared to the national average.
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 January-June of 2025Inmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 59 Table 9. Dichotomous variables of polarization in the newspapers of the media analysed (%)  Digital pressTelevisionPerception of rigourNo13.52.3Yes86.597.7Presence of insulting languageNo90.193.0Yes9.97.0Irresponsible attitudesNo82.061.7Yes18.038.3Juxtaposed stancesNo81.159.4Yes18.940.6Use of competitive termsNo73.078.9Yes27.021.1Use of warfare languageNo78.485.9Yes21.614.1Describing the opponent using negative termsNo96.488.3Yes3.611.7Source: created by the authorse last variables analysed for the purpose of verifying the degree of political polarization that the media are capable of generating in the Region are linked to the use of terms and frames in their media discourse. In general, the data continue to show that the media did not play an important role in the construction of polarizing news, although it has been observed that certain data make a distinction between press and television coverage. Media comments regarding irresponsible attitudes stand out on television (38.3%), compared to those of the press (18%). e same situation occurs with the juxtaposed stances, where television once again is considerably more prolic in creating confrontational frames (40.6%) compared to the press (18.9%).
60 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación3.3. Which issues, actors and media are more polarizing? e results indicate that the vast majority of issues have been addressed using a neutral tone, which ensures impartial news coverage. Only in topics related to election campaigns, such as political parties and the events and acts they organise to obtain votes, is there a greater presence of insulting, competitive, and warlike language, as well as the use of negative adjectives to describe the adversary, as well as irresponsible attitudes and juxtaposed stances to distinguish oneself from the opponents.Among the media analysed, the tone is mostly neutral in both the press (67.6%) and television (91.4%), and when the tone is perceived as negative (27%), the press is more prominent in this regard. is is related to the formidable objectivity perceived in the treatment of information, as there are hardly any cases in which journalists’ opinions are presented. Among the press, La Opinión stands out for its use of a negative tone (33.3%) compared to La Verdad (20.4%). e opposite occurs with the neutral tone, where La Verdad (72.2%) uses it more than La Opinión (63.2%). e same situation takes place on television, where all the units of La 1 are neutral, and about 87% of the news of La 7 also use this tone. In fact, television could be considered the most neutral medium. Table 10. Association between the presidential candidates of the regional government and the variables of polarization in the media analysed (%)  Fernando López MirasJosé VélezJosé Ángel AnteloMaría MarínMaría José RosTotal unitsPerception of rigourYes8810010087.5100142No120012.508Presence of insulting languageYes122.52012.58.315No8897.58087.5220135Irresponsible attitudesYes2037.55556.312.348No8062.54543.887.5102Juxtaposed stancesYes26357037.520.852No74653062.579.298Use of competitive languageYes2817.56031.3038No7282.54068.8100112
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 January-June of 2025Inmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 61 Using warlike termsYes142.570258.328No8697.5307591.7122Describing the opponent using negative termsYes005004.211No1001005010095.8139Source: created by the authorsNote: the nal column of total units represents the sum of yes and no responses for each of the variables. us, the total number of units for each of the variables is 150.One datum that stands out, which is indicated by the dichotomous variables that measure negativity and polarization of the media and the candidates, is the prevalence of irresponsible attitudes with regard to María Marín and José Ángel Antelo. In the case of María Marín, it may be due to the cancellation of the only electoral debate among candidates for the Presidency of the Region of Murcia, for refusing to share her time with the candidate of Más Región Equo. Regarding José Ángel Antelo, it could be the result of his diverse and conicting speeches and proposals, which altered the course of the campaign.At the same time, the candidates from Unidas Podemos and VOX are the ones who appeal more to juxtaposed stances, competitive terms, and warfare language. us, the data suggest that the media coverage of the candidates located at the extremes of the political spectrum in the Murcia Region show more distancing and, as a result, more negativity and discursive polarization compared to the rest of the media. Nevertheless, this investigation is a descriptive media study, and to bring this idea to a conclusion, it would be necessary to carry out quantitative research in order to conrm the assertion.4. Discussion and conclusionsIn reviewing the research question and objectives of this study, in addition to examining the polarizing messages, the aim is to explain the nature of the media content in the electoral campaign of 28 March in the Autonomous Region of Murcia. e study concludes that the media analysed did not generally display negative content with polarizing features during the campaign. Despite the fact that emotional polarization in the Murcia Region is generally 10 points higher than the national average (Crespo and Mora, 2021), the data seem to indicate that such polarization is not necessarily due to the news coverage or campaign messages transmitted by the media. Furthermore, the results suggest that the tone with which the news is covered on television is almost entirely neutral (91.4%), compared to the press (67.6%). ese data appear to indicate that emotional polarization predates the consumption of media content by citizens who obtain political information through these media. Consequently, the negative tone is higher in the press at 27%, while television barely reaches 7.8%. e main contribution of this research is the verication that media content is neither negative nor polarizing. is conclusion is signicant, as it highlights the fact that digital media covering the Murcia Region safeguard their principles of objectivity in the construction of frames that depict real world events (Sádaba, 2008), contrary to other regional studies, which have analysed newspaper coverage on digital platforms and, in one specic case, the content was mostly negative (Córdoba
62 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónCabús et al., 2021). us, the present research clearly shows the importance of considering the unique aspects of each context, due to the fact that the media agenda is one of the most important factors to consider, together with the preferences of the public, which in turn are inuenced by the wide diversity of existing media and the respective content that they transmit to the public. Cases in which negative content has been observed is related to the candidates at the ideological extremes of the Region, who belong to VOX and Unidas Podemos. Only in these two cases have negative terms been observed, which show a certain amount of confrontation between the leaders of both parties. As a result, a new communicative strategy of these parties has been revealed, which might be an attempt to highlight ideological dierences in a more aggressive way in order to mobilise their voter base and clearly dierentiate themselves from their political opponents.In a study similar to the one at hand, Berganza Conde et al. (2016) concluded that media coverage in Spain regarding political news is not completely negative. Instead, such content generally uses a neutral frame, and its average level of negativity is considerably lower than other European countries such as Portugal and Austria. Furthermore, the presence of negativity is also related to topics that are more prevalent in the study herein, or in other words, to issues related to electoral campaigns, such as events, ceremonies, political party activities, etc. As pointed out by Domínguez García et al. (2023), after analysing the US campaign and the strategies used by each of the candidates, they conclude that Biden’s strategic frames in which the main content focused on building a narrative based on political priorities such as health, education, and public policy management, have a more transversal nature. is study reaches a similar conclusion. In other words, the data suggest that more cross-cutting topics tend to result in less polarizing messages, as they address issues that are relevant and applicable to a broad spectrum of the population, which reduces the inclination to generate division. Added to this idea is the fact that the vast majority of the issues are regional in nature, with hardly any reference to matters of a national scope, yet regional elections are generally dominated by content that refers to national concerns (Zugasti Azagra and García Ortega, 2018; Rivas de Roca, 2021). Although this research oers a specic case study at the regional level, the results can be extrapolated to the national media for the purpose of conrming whether their content is negative and polarizing during election campaigns. However, the nature of the present analysis limits the conclusions to a media discourse based on a specic selection of media, which does not allow the results to be generally applied. For future research, in addition to increasing the size of the sample, another recommendation is to select media that are more diverse, and to compare the mainstream media in dierent contexts in order to conrm whether the same dynamics are replicated. Finally, in order to study the impact of a negative and polarizing narrative on public opinion, subsequent studies are recommended that focus on the construction of polarizing opinion as a consequence of media coverage. 5. Acknowledgmentsis article has been translated into English by Charles E. Arthur, to whom we are grateful for his meticulous work.is study was made possible by funding provided by the Autonomous Region of Murcia, through a call for project grants that focus on the development of scientic and technical research by competitive groups, under the auspices of the Programa Regional de Fomento de la Investigación Cientíca y Técnica de Excelencia (Plan de Acción 2022) [Regional Programme for the Promotion of Scientic and Technical Research of Excellence] [Action Plan 2022], as part of the Fundación Séneca, Agencia de
doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 January-June of 2025Inmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 63 Ciencia y Tecnología de la Región de Murcia [the Seneca Foundation, Science and Technology Agency of the Autonomous Region of Murcia] Ref: 21876/PI/2022.6. Specic contributions of each authorName and SurnameConception and design of the workInmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénMethodologyInmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénData collection and analysisInmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénDiscussion and conclusionsInmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénDrafting, formatting, version review and approvalInmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles Bailén7. Conict of intereste authors declare that there is no conict of interest contained in this article. 8. Bibliographic referencesArdèvol Abreu, A., Gil de Zúñiga, H. y McCombs, M. (2020). Orígenes y desarrollo de la teoría de la agenda setting en Comunicación. Tendencias en España (2014-2019). Profesional de la información, 29(4), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.14Aruguete, N. (2015). El poder de la agenda. Política, medios y público. Editorial Biblios.Aruguete, N. y Calvo, E. (2023). Nosotros contra ellos. Cómo trabajan las redes para conrmar nuestras creencias y rechazar las de los otros. Siglo veintiuno.Avante (2023). Estudio General de Medios de la Región de Murcia. https://avantemedios.com/ Barrios Rubio, A. y Gutiérrez García, M. (2022). Comunicación mediática y social en el entorno de crisis, polarización e inconformismo colombiano. Profesional de la información, 31(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.20 Berganza Conde, M. R., Arcila Calderón C. y Miguel Pascual, R. (2016). La negatividad en las informaciones políticas de los medios españoles. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 71, 160-178. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1089 Bjarnøe, C., de Vreese, C. H. y Albæk, E. (2020). e eect of being conict non-avoidant: linking conict framing and political participation. West European Politics, 43(1), 102-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1572334

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


64 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónBlanco, A. y De la Corte, L. (2003). Psicología social de la violencia: introducción a la perspectiva de Ignacio Martín-Baró. Poder, violencia e ideología, 9-62.Caballero, A. (20 mayo 2023) Las claves de las elecciones en la Región de Murcia: el PP deende un bastión que gobierna desde hace 30 años. RTVE. https://acortar.link/Jd5ha2 Canel, M. J. y Sanders, K. (2005). El poder de los medios en los escándalos políticos: la fuerza simbólica de la noticia icono, Analisi, 32, 163-178. https://acortar.link/Mdbz9L Casero Ripollés. A. (2016) La honda de David: internet, periodismo, democracia y participación ciudadana. En A. Casero Ripollés (Ed.), Periodismo y democracia en el entorno digital [Journalism and democracy in the digital environment]. Sociedad Española Periodística (SEP).Castells, M. (2009). Comunicación y poder. Alianza editorial.Cappella, J. N. y Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of Cynicism: e Press and the Public Good. Oxford University Press.CEMOP (2023). Encuesta Preelectoral Elecciones Autonómicas 2023. Región de Murcia. https://acortar.link/PevdoD Cohen, B. (1993). e Press and Foreign Policy (1963). University of California.rdoba Cabús, A., Hidalgo Arjona, M. y López Martín, Á. (2021). Cobertura de diarios en Twitter de las elecciones autonómicas de Madrid 2021. Procesamiento de lenguaje natural y algoritmos de aprendizaje automático. Profesional de la información, 30(6), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.nov.11Cornejo Urbina, F. M. (2022). El poder de la comunicación: medios, política y ciudadanos. Comuni@cción, 13(1), 74-85. https://doi.org/10.33595/2226-1478.13.1.674Crespo, I. y Melero, I. (2022). El cambio de las agendas políticas y mediáticas en campaña electoral: El caso del 20-d y 26-j en España. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 28(1), 621-637. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/esmp.76689 Crespo, I. y Mora, A. (2021, noviembre 21). ¿Cuánto están de polarizados los electores de la Región de Murcia? La Verdad. https://acortar.link/YQyGgs De Casas Moreno, P., Vizcaíno Verdú, A. y Aguaded, I. (2020). La televisión sensacionalista y hábitos de consumo en España e Italia. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 26(2), 483-496. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.67582Domínguez García, R., Méndez Muros, S., Pérez Curiel, C. y Hinojosa Becerra, M. (2023). Political polarization and emotion rhetoric in the US presidential transition: A comparative study of Trump and Biden on Twitter and the post-election impact on the public. Profesional de la información, 32(6), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.nov.06Esser, F., Engesser, S., Matthes., J. y Berganza, R. (2016). Negativity in the news. Exploring Drivers of Bad-News Tendency. En C. De Vreese, F. Esser y D. Hopmann, (Eds.), Where´s the Good News? Comparing Political Online and Oine Jornalism in 16 Countries. Routledge. Fernández, J. (2006). Ser humano en los conictos. Alianza Editorial. García Escribano, J. J. (2015) Las elecciones autonómicas de 2015 en la Región de Murcia. Cuadernos Manuel Giménez Abad, 10,149-164

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 40, pp. 43-66 January-June of 2025Inmaculada Melero López, María Isabel López Palazón and María Quiles BailénISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 65 Igartua, J. J., y Humanes, M. L. (2004). Teoría e investigación en comunicación social. Editorial Síntesis.Krippendor, F. (1997). Metodología de análisis de contenido. Paidós Comunicación.Laguna Platero, A. (2011). Liderazgo y comunicación: la personalización de la política. Anàlisi, 43, 45-57. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/13306339.pdf Lang, G. y Lang, K. (1955). e Inferential Structure of Political Communications: A Study in Unwitting Bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19(2), 168–183, https://doi.org/10.1086/266559 Lengauer, G., Esser, F. y Berganza, R. (2011). Negativity in Political News: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key ndings. Journalism: eory, Practice & Criticism, 13(2), 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427800Majó zquez, S. y González Bailón, S. (2022) Polarización en las audiencias de los medios en España. EsadeEcPol. https://acortar.link/bS6wld Mani, E. y Echeverría, M. (2019). Conanza política y medios de comunicación. Teoría, hallazgos y metodologías. Revista de Comunicación Política, 1, 53-74. https://doi.org/10.29105/rcp1-3 Martín-Baró, I. (2003). Poder, ideología y violencia. Trotta.Mazzoleni, G. (2010). La Comunicación Política. Alianza Editorial.McCombs, M. y Shaw, D. (1972). e agenda setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31(2), 176-187. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2747787 McCombs, M. (2006). Estableciendo la agenda. Paidós.Miller, L. (2020). Polarización en España: más divididos por ideología e identidad que por políticas públicas. EsadeEcPol Policy Insight. https://acortar.link/PQphT4 Moret Soler, D., Alonso Muñoz, L. y Casero Ripollés, A. (2022). La negatividad digital como estrategia de campaña en las elecciones de la Comunidad de Madrid de 2021 en Twitter. Revista Prisma Social, (39), 4873. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/4860Muñiz, C. (2022). Cuando el debate se conecta con el ataque. Presencia del conicto en el tratamiento informativo de las elecciones federales mexicanas de 2018 y 2021. Comunicación y Sociedad, 19, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2022.7841 Muñiz C., Aruguete N., Ingrassia P. y Marques, J. (2022). Estudios de framing en Latinoamérica. Revista cientíca internacional de acceso abierto. https://acortar.link/ReaeUa Neuendorf, K. (2002). e content analysis guidebook. SAGE Publications. Nir, L. y Druckman, J. N. (2008). Campaign Mixed-Message Flows and Timing of Vote Decision, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20(3), 326–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edn035Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609343

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


66 | nº 40, pp. 43-66 | January-June of 2025Do the media create polarization? The media coverage of the 28 May (28M) election campaign in the Autonomous...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónPiñuel Raigada, J. S. (2002). Epistemología, metodología y técnicas del análisis de contenido. Estudios de Sociolingüística, 3(1), 1-42. https://acortar.link/XGQUgv Rivas de Roca, R. (2021). Estudio de discursos políticos y mediáticos en las elecciones gallegas de 2020. Doxa Comunicación, 33, 121-136. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n33a1492Robles, J., Guevara, J., Casas Mas, B., y Gómez, D. (2022). When negativity is the fuel. Bots and Political Polarization in the COVID-19 debate. Comunicar, 71, 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3916/C71-2022-05 Rodríguez Virgili, J, Jandura, O. y Rebolledo de la Calle, M. (2014). La personalización de la política en la cobertura mediática: una comparación de las campañas electorales en España y Alemania. Trípodos, 34, 61-79. https://acortar.link/3C0Tz3 Rubio, M. (2009). Opinión pública y medios de comunicación. Teoría de la agenda setting. Gazeta de antropología, 25(1), 1-17. https://acortar.link/rNvLA daba, T. (2008). Framing: el encuadre de las noticias. El binomio terrorismo-medios. La Crujía.Semetko, H. A. (1995). Investigación sobre las tendencias de la agenda-setting en los noventa. En A. Muñoz Alonso y J. I. Rospir (Ed.), Comunicación Política. Editorial Universitas, S.A.Semetko H. y Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93‐109.Silva Rodríguez, A., Vázquez Herrero, J. y Negreira Rey, M. C. (2022). Actualización de las fases del contenido periodístico para dispositivos móviles. Revista de Comunicación, 21(1), 367387. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC21.1-2022-A19 Soroka, S. y McAdams, S. (2015). News, Politics, and Negativity. Political Communication, 32(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.881942Takens, J., Van Atteveldt, W., Van Hoof, A., y Kleinnijenhuis, J. (2013). Media logic in election campaign coverage. European Journal of Communication 28(3), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113478522Vara, A., Amoedo, A., Moreno, E., Negredo, S. y Kaufmann, J. (2022). Digital News Report España 2022. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra. https://doi.org/10.15581/019.2022Villa Gómez, J. D., Velasques Cuartas, N., Barrera Machado, D. y Avendado Ramírez, M. (2020). El papel de los medios de comunicación en la fabricación de recuerdos, emociones y creencias sobre el enemigo que facilitan la polarización política y legitiman la violencia. El Ágora USB, 20(1), 18-49. https://doi.org/10.21500/16578031.4642 Villafranco Robles, C. (2005). El papel de los medios de comunicación en las democracias. Andamios, 2(3), 7-21. https://acortar.link/rwbEGC Waisbord, S. (2020). Is it Valid to Attribute Political Polarization to Digital Communication? On Bubbles, Platforms and Aective Polarization. Revista SAAP, 14(2), 248-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.46468/rsaap.14.2.a1 Zugasti Azagra, R. y García Ortega, C. (2018). Los temas de los líderes políticos españoles en twitter. Análisis de las dos campañas electorales de 2015. Revista ICONO 14. Revista Cientíca De Comunicación Y Tecnologías Emergentes, 16(1), 136-59. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1137

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]