Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: The Bold Type of a case studySororidad e interseccionalidad de género en la cción estadounidense: The Bold Type como caso de estudio doxa.comunicación | nº 41, pp. 285-305 | 285July-December of 2025ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: Morejón-Llamas, N. (2025). Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: e Bold Type of a case study. Doxa Comunicación, 41, pp. 285-305.https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n41a2217Noemí Morejón-Llamas. PhD in Journalism and a master’s degree in Institutional and Political Communication from the University of Seville. Accredited by ANECA as an Assistant Professor, she currently works as an Associate Professor (Assistant Professor with a PhD) in the Department of Communication and Education at Loyola Andalucía University, where she teaches courses on Journalistic Genres and History of Journalism. She has previously taught at San Isidoro University Centre (Pablo de Olavide University) and worked at the Audiovisual Council of Andalusia. She was awarded a scholarship by the Senate of Spain to train in institutional and political communication during 2013-2014. Her research focuses on online social movements, political and institutional communication on social media, scientic and political misinformation, and the representation of women in the media and audiovisual ction.Loyola Andalusia University, Spain [email protected]ORCID: 0000-0001-6927-1931 is content is published under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. International License CC BY-NC 4.0Received: 28/02/2024 - Accepted: 18/07/2024 - Early access: 09/09/2024 - Published: 01/07/2025Recibido: 28/02/2024 - Aceptado: 18/07/2024 - En edición: 09/09/2024 - Publicado: 01/07/2025Abstract: Video-on-demand (VOD) platforms revalue the production of ctional series, creating new identities that converge with the sexual diversity and multiculturalism of the Fourth Wave of Feminism. is study aims to verify whether the American series e Bold Type, described by critics as transgressive from a gender perspective, is based on the composition of its technical team, the portrayal of characters and the themes and issues addressed. e ndings show a female predominance in creation and technical development, although there is underrepresentation in sectors such as postproduction and music. New roles and neo archetypes are also introduced, depicting self-sucient, entrepreneurial women who are committed to and supportive of each other. New discussions about women’s health, Resumen: Las plataformas VOD revalorizan la producción de series de cción, creando nuevas identidades que convergen con la diversidad sexual y la multiculturalidad de la Cuarta Ola Feminista. El propósito de este trabajo persigue vericar si la serie estadounidense e Bold Type, enmarcada por la crítica como trasgresora desde una perspectiva de género, lo es según la composición de su equipo técnico, la represen-tación de sus protagonistas y las temáticas abordadas. Los resultados arrojan superioridad femenina en la creación y el desarrollo técnico, aunque infrarrepresentación en sectores como la postproducción y la música. También reejan nuevos roles y neo-arquetipos, que describen a mujeres autosucientes, emprendedoras, comprometidas y solida-rias entre ellas. Se introducen nuevos debates sobre salud femenina,

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


286 | nº 41, pp. 285-305 | July-December of 2025Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: The Bold Type of a case studyISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónas well as sexual, social, and labour demands, are introduced from a multicultural and sexual intersectionality perspective. e Bold Type depicts the serious issues of work‒life balance and the postponement or rejection of maternity, making it a feminist series in its content. However, it operates within a capitalist orbit that glories beauty and luxury, preventing understanding the diversity of these women in dierent socioeconomic contexts, which could oer new voices to the television landscape.Keywords: Stereotypes; audiovisual narratives; TV series; gender; intersectionality; e Bold Type.así como sobre reclamos sexuales, sociales y laborales, desde una in-terseccionalidad multicultural y sexual. e Bold Type escenica los graves problemas de conciliación y la postergación o rechazo a la ma-ternidad, lo que la convierte en una serie feminista por su contenido, aunque bajo una órbita capitalista que hace apología de la belleza y el lujo, imposibilitando conocer la diversidad de estas mujeres en di-ferentes contextos socioeconómicos que aporten nuevas voces al pano-rama televisivo.Palabras clave: Estereotipos; narrativas audiovisuales; serie de televisión; género; inter-seccionalidad; e Bold Type.1. IntroductionIn serialized productions, revalued by video-on-demand platforms (Cascajosa-Virino, 2018; Mateos-Pérez & Ochoa-Sotomayor, 2016), the female gender continues to be underrepresented (Cascajosa-Virino, 2019), hindering the faster evolution of creating new discourses and approaches that represent women. When successful producers such as Teresa Fernández-Valdés, the cofounder of Bambú Producciones and creator of successful productions such as Las Chicas del Cable (Netix, 2017-2020), are found, it is evident that female authorship and its mark on series are conditioned by prot motives (López & Raya Bravo, 2019). Hence, there is a need to continue with feminist intersectional analysis (Contreras & Alfaro-Beracoechea, 2021) on the stereotypes, roles, and archetypes of women and new masculinities in audiovisual media without “detaching from an analysis of capitalism and its strategies of co-opting identities for consumption purposes” (Bonavitta & De Garay-Hernández, 2019: 219).However, technical and artistic teams have slowly become more balanced (Cascajosa-Virino, 2017), especially since the #MeToo and #TimesUp movements (Garrido & Zaptsi, 2021). is evolution has reached masculinized cinema sectors, such as editing and postproduction (Gutiérrez-San Miguel et al., 2020). Owing to the growth of serialized productions directed by and starring women (Gavilán et al., 2019), a trend that favours feminism both behind and in front of the camera can be observed, creating “a more equal and inclusive television landscape” (Garrido & Zaptsi, 2021: 21).is exponential production and distribution of content have brought greater female prominence with the turn of the century (Hidalgo-Marí, 2017; Mateos-Pérez, 2021) and new archetypes and stereotypes that have moved away from the cultural productions of underrepresented and stereotyped women (Belmonte & Guillamón, 2008; Mancinas-Chávez & Morejón-Llamas, 2012). is has occurred especially since the emergence of VOD platforms, which, owing to technology, have hypersegmented audiences (Bernárdez-Rodal, 2017), producing series that meet their needs (Fernández-Manzano et al., 2016) with a signicant plurality of themes and voices for all tastes. In this sense, Netix, Prime Video, or HBO have adopted themes and discourses of third- and fourth-wave feminism, focusing on intersectionality and gender violence (Garrido-Rodríguez, 2021), championing new identities and addressing the problems of these minorities. In contrast, this issue has timidly appeared on the main traditional television channels (Smith, 2020).
doxa.comunicación | nº 41, pp. 285-305 July-December of 2025Noemí Morejón-LlamasISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 287 e portrayal of women in ctional series has been widely studied, given television’s transformative and socializing nature (Menéndez-Menéndez & Zurian, 2014). ese cultural productions reect stereotypes and archetypes that convey meanings (Galán, 2006) and construct the viewer’s identity, as television series act as vehicles “for highly individualized and cybernetic audiences” (Morejón-Llamas, 2020: 126) and even more so with the rise of this type of on-demand consumption (Cascajosa-Virino, 2018). is regeneration in protagonists and their discourses helps audiences internalize, through symbolic modelling (Yubero-Jiménez, 2004), new roles and themes, addressing the need to represent “more alternative and nuanced models in series, characters that escape gender stereotypes and heteronormative models” (Masanet and Fedele, 2019: 22), which are equally important in adolescence and adulthood (Marcos-Ramos & González-de-Garay, 2021).From a gender perspective, this capacity has prompted studies since the beginning of the 21st century (Belmonte & Guillamón, 2008; Coronado & Galán, 2015; Galán, 2006, 2007; Gordillo-Álvarez et al., 2009) on constructing protagonists and their storylines and determining whether they correspond to reality by depicting new family, work, and social contexts.Series began to build stories with unconventional themes which used complex, non-linear narrative structures that appealed to diverse audiences. Regardless of their narrative genre, their plots and characters were developed based on reality. Series were therefore fertile grounds to raise topical issues for debate that traversed and alluded to identities, collective imaginations, representations and social discourses. (Mateos-Pérez, 2021: 172)ese studies suggest greater female prominence in recent years, as well as greater diversity in their proles and roles (Cascajosa-Virino, 2017; Lacalle & Gómez-Morales, 2018; Menéndez-Menéndez & Zurian, 2014), despite the continued presence of patriarchal representations at both the national and international levels (Bonavitta & De-Garay-Hernández, 2019; Gavilán et al., 2019; Mateos-Pérez, 2021; Parra-García et al., 2019). In Spain, studies show gender underrepresentation and limited sexual diversity, as well as a professional gap, with a high prevalence of domestic settings and a decrease in the execution of professional roles. Women are also depicted as emotional rather than rational (De-Caso-Bausela et al., 2020).e catalogue of existing series and the scientic literature reveal that the new setting for women is the workplace. Consequently, protagonists have been examined in their family and professional environments, as well as for their ability to balance both, indicating a gradual acceleration in US productions (Medina-Bravo et al., 2009; Sánchez-Aranda et al., 2011), although not many Spanish (Hidalgo-Marí, 2017; Lacalle & Gómez, 2016; Ruiz-Muñoz & Pérez-Rufí, 2020; Tous-Rovirosa & Aran-Ramspott, 2017) or Latin American productions (Mateos-Pérez & Ochoa-Sotomayor, 2016). However, television series break gender stereotypes and represent empowered women (Padilla & Sosa Sánchez, 2018) who are supportive of one another (Cuenca-Orellana & Martínez-Pérez, 2020), ending the rivalries often depicted in the previous century. Some productions also depict the transformation of postfeminist entertainment into increasingly politically committed feminism, albeit from a neoliberal perspective (Fegitz, 2023). Nonetheless, thematic gaps exist that prevent the visibility of issues such as women’s health problems, for example breast cancer (Lacalle & Gómez-Morales, 2018), or abortion (Hidalgo-Marí & Palomares-Sánchez, 2020), which are present in our society.e gradual evolution of female representation in ctional series underscores the need to study feminist productions, either to turn them into coeducational models (Belmonte & Guillamón, 2008) or to demystify them if they embody patriarchal stereotypes. Hence, the main objective of this research is to analyse the American ensemble ction series e Bold Type (2017-
288 | nº 41, pp. 285-305 | July-December of 2025Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: The Bold Type of a case studyISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación2021), judged by media and experts (Fegitz, 2023; Korneld & Long, 2023) as a feminist series. e primary purpose of this study is to verify this information by reviewing the archetypes, stereotypes, discourses, and themes present in e Bold Type from a gender perspective. To this end, the specic objectives of this paper are as follows: SO1. Analyse the presence of women in front of and behind the camera. SO2. Study the proles and roles of the protagonists within their narrative as representative case studies. SO3. Identify the storylines contextualized in fourth-wave feminism, characterized by the ght against violence towards women and the parity between men and women in any sphere.2. Methodologye sample selection was based on the following criteria: a) a series featuring women in early adulthood, within the 25–35 age range; b) an ensemble series (Ruiz-Muñoz and Pérez-Rufí, 2020) to showcase dierent voices; c) distributed by streaming on various platforms, in this case, on Freeform, Hulu, Prime Video, and Netix, the platforms that promote international dissemination and viewing; and d) considered and categorized by media and critics as a feminist series.e Bold Type (2017-2021) is an American series inspired by the life of Cosmopolitan’s editor-in-chief, Joanna Coles. Created by Sarah Watson and produced by Universal Television for Freeform, it premiered in 2017 and concluded in 2021 after 5 seasons and 52 episodes. It was distributed on Hulu, Prime Video and Netix, capturing a female audience that rates it 7.8 out of 10 on IMDb and amassing 469,000 followers on Instagram (@theboldtypetv).is ensemble ction, led by women and starring Katie Stevens, Aisha Dee, Meghann Fahy, and Melora Hardin, chronicles their professional adventures at Scarlet magazine in dierent departments, including fashion, social media, and editorial, with diverse hierarchical roles—Jacqueline as a mentor and gatekeeper, Kat as a director, and Sutton and Jane as apprentices. e series also depicts the romantic experiences of its protagonists in Manhattan, in the style of other productions such as Sex and the City (HBO, 1998-2004), Gossip Girl (e CW, 2007-2012), or Girls (HBO, 2012-2017), blending professional, personal, and social spheres.is series has been praised by various Spanish media outlets (Table 1), which have heralded the subversive discourse of the series and its characters. According to the study by Gavilán et al. (2019), in addition to the media, the public also appreciates the feminist ethos, reecting women’s perceptions of this series and its inuence on their preferences, attitudes, and judgements. e study emphasizes the normalization of bodies, the depiction of new workplace scenarios, and the protagonists’ involvement in the gender struggle. Nevertheless, there are discrepancies due to the idealization of their jobs and the recurring need to resort to romantic relationships as a measure of happiness.
doxa.comunicación | nº 41, pp. 285-305 July-December of 2025Noemí Morejón-LlamasISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 289 Table 1. Headlines published in digital media about e Bold Type DateMediaHeadline30/06/2018elpais.com‘e Bold Type’, mujeres que apoyan a mujeres25/08/2018lavanguardia.comPor qué ‘e Bold Type’ es la serie ligera y femini-sta que te pide el cuerpo07/05/2019vogue.esModa, amistad y feminismo en ‘e Bold Type’, la última serie que me ha hecho feliz03/08/2019fotogramas.es‘e Bold Type’: La serie feminista de Amazon Prime Video perfecta para el verano03/09/2019elcondencial.com‘e Bold Type’ (Amazon): la serie feminista que todas las adolescentes deberían ver16/03/2021larazon.esModa, FEMINISMO y amistad en ‘e Bold Type’, la última serie que ha enamorado a Mery Turiel y que deberías ver este 8 M16/03/2021smoda.elpais.com‘e Bold Type’ le da vuelta al estereotipo de la directora tiranaSource: own elaborationAfter conducting a bibliographic and newspaper analysis to address the state of the art, the composition and parity of the artistic-technical team were studied via the Inclusion Rydel by Stacy L. Smith (Gutiérrez-San Miguel et al., 2020), which considers it necessary to have at least 50% women behind the cameras. is analysis was carried out through the technical sheet on the IMDb website and the credits appearing in the episodes viewed.Content analysis (Piñuel, 2002) of the protagonists, their discourses, and themes was employed after viewing the rst four seasons, as the last season was not available on Netix or Prime Video in Spain. e total sample comprises 46 episodes (S1, 10; S2, 10; S3, 10; S4, 16), with an average duration of 45 minutes each. For the analysis, the following ad hoc sheet was applied after an initial viewing of the series (Table 2), inspired by the physical, psychological, and sociological dimensions (Galán, 2006, 2007) and the behavioural dimension (Gordillo-Álvarez et al., 2009) of the protagonists, to detect the representation of stereotypes on which female characters are constructed (Menéndez-Menéndez & Zurian, 2014) and the feminist challenge through discourses, attitudes, and relationships.Finally, new themes focusing on female conicts from an intersectional perspective were dened, emphasizing axioms inherent to feminism (Donstrup, 2022:31): liberal feminism (individualism, equal rights in the market, legal and political equality), radical feminism (patriarchy, the personal is political, sisterhood, denunciation of gender-based violence, myth of romantic love), racial feminism (racism, multiple oppression, dierences among women), and postmodern feminism (deconstruction

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


290 | nº 41, pp. 285-305 | July-December of 2025Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: The Bold Type of a case studyISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónof gender identity, antifundamentalism). is approach will help understand the behaviour and interactions of these women (Gordillo-Álvarez et al., 2009) with fourth-wave feminism (Aguilar-Barriga, 2020; Garrido-Rodríguez, 2021).Table 2. Character analysis sheetVariablesCategoriesPhysicalAge: young (15–24), young/adult (25–44), adult (45–64), over 65.Cultural/ethnic origin: Caucasian, African-American, Arab, Asian.Physical appearance: attractive/very attractive, average, unattractive.Style of dress: elegant, sexy, casual/sporty, masculine.PsychologicalPersonality: extroverted, introverted.Temperament: intuitive, perceptive, reective, sensitive.Goals/objectives: career advancement, becoming a good professional, economic necessity, altruism.SociologicalSexual orientation: heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, queer.Marital status: single, married, divorced/separated, widowed.Relationship stability: stable, changing.Number of children: none, 1, 1–2, more than 2.Economic level: high, medium, low.Profession: journalist, editor, marketing/communication, photographer.Position in the job hierarchy: executive/assistant executive, high qualication, medium qualication, low qualication.BehaviouralDiscourses: references to feminism, sexual, ethnic, religious or political diversity, violence against women.Attitudes: valence (positive, negative, neutral), activity (proactive, reactive), motivation (self-interested, altruistic), evaluation of stimuli (emotional, rational).Relationships: inclusive, manipulative, passive, aggressive, assertive, permissive.Source: own elaboration
doxa.comunicación | nº 41, pp. 285-305 July-December of 2025Noemí Morejón-LlamasISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 291 3. Results3.1. Prominence with exceptionsApplying the Rydel inclusion test to the cast reveals gender parity with a slight predominance of women, at 43 women (58.11%) compared with 31 men (41.89%). When the actors and actresses are divided into categories based on their appearance, we observe that among the main characters who appeared in 30 –to 52 episodes, 5 were women (55.56%), and 4 were men (44.44%). Of the secondary characters, with appearances in 15– to 29 episodes, 1 was a woman (33.33%), and 2 were men (66.67%). For occasional characters who appeared in 5 to 14 episodes, there were 9 women (64.29%) and 5 men (35.71%). Finally, among the sporadic characters with appearances in 2 to 4 episodes, 28 were women (58.33%), and 20 were men (41.67%). Notably, in the department of stunt doubles, whose actors perform risky stunts, there are two women for the stunt doubling of Aisha Dee and Katie Stevens and one man who participates as a driver in one episode. Here, women also predominated at 66.67%, compared with the male at only 33.33%.Behind the scenes (Figure 1), signicant data are presented, which, depending on the sector analysed, conrm underrepresentation. When all the positions are computed, we nd a female prevalence, with 201 women (55.52%) compared with 161 men (44.48%). By sector, we observe female dominance in the direction department, whether as directors (12 women; 70.59%) or assistant directors (18 women; 58.06%), as well as in the writing department (22 women, 75.86%) and script supervision (8 women, 80%).Figure 1. Composition of the technical-artistic teamSource: own elaboration
292 | nº 41, pp. 285-305 | July-December of 2025Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: The Bold Type of a case studyISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicacióne dierence in production is less signicant (23 women, 47.92%; 25 men, 52.08%), although here, it is notable that men dominate the production leadership roles (4 women, 26.67%; 11 men, 73.33%). Conversely, in production design, only one man and one woman assumed a role, with the man doing so only anecdotally in one episode, whereas the woman was responsible for 51 episodes. e set design team (3 women, 60%; 2 men, 40%) and the location team (4 women, 57.14%; 3 men, 42.86%) display a balanced composition.Furthermore, the prevalence of women is noticeable in departments such as the art department, led by 2 women (66.67%) and one man (33.33%), as well as within the art department itself, comprising 25 women (59.52%) and 17 men (40.48%). e presence of females is signicant in casting (14 women, 87.5%; 2 men, 12.5%), costume design (27 women, 93.1%; 2 men, 6.9%), and makeup (25 women, 78.13%; 7 men, 21.87%). However, in several sectors of the artistic–technical team, there is a clear male dominance. is is the case in the editing department (4 women, 36.36%; 7 men, 63.64%), cinematography (1 woman, 20%; 4 men, 80%), sound (5 women, 11.11%; 40 men, 88.89%), visual and special eects (4 women, 14.29%; 24 men, 85.71%), and music (4 women, 30.77%; 9 men, 69.23%).e study of women’s presence in front of and behind the camera oers relevant data that demonstrate equal representation (Cascajosa-Virino, 2017), contributing positively to the #TimesUp movement, with women in leadership roles both as protagonists and behind the scenes. e test application conrms that e Bold Type meets the necessary 50% requirements in most departments. However, there is underrepresentation in sectors traditionally associated with men, such as production leadership, editing, cinematography, sound, visual and special eects, and music, aligning with other studies such as that of Gutiérrez-San Miguel et al. (2021). Conversely, there are feminized departments, such as casting, costume design, and makeup. Despite their underrepresentation in these traditionally male-dominated sectors, the leadership and writing departments are predominantly female, providing the series with a distinct voice from its creator, Sarah Watson, and a female-driven team that crafts stories by, for, and about women.3.2. Female sisterhood in personal and professional growthe physical dimension of the protagonists (Table 3) reveals the presence of young/adult women (Jane, Kat and Sutton) and an adult woman (Jacqueline), with three instances of women of Caucasian origin compared with one African-American woman. ese women share the common trait of conforming to the beauty standards imposed by the entertainment industry (Korneld & Long, 2023). However, they are not depicted perfectly, nor do they use their attractiveness to achieve their goals. is distances them from the femme fatale, opportunistic woman, or objectied woman images commonly portrayed in female-centric television series such as Desperate Housewives (ABC, 2004-2012), Revenge (ABC, 2012-2015), Gossip Girl (e CW, 2007-2012), or Pretty Little Liars (Freeform, 2010-2017) (Morejón-Llamas, 2020), among others. Adena, a recurring character, is of Arab origin and beautiful. Perhaps the only woman who does not conform to traditional beauty standards is Sage, a journalist and colleague at Scarlet, who, despite appearing in more than 30 episodes, does not have storylines or signicant interventions and, thus, is not considered by this analysis.e protagonists use their clothing to express their emotions and personalities: Jane is sexy on the outside but shy on the inside; Kat is assertive, creative, and bold; Sutton is elegant, sweet, and self-assured; and Jacqueline is elegant, empowered,
doxa.comunicación | nº 41, pp. 285-305 July-December of 2025Noemí Morejón-LlamasISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 293 decisive, and feminist. ere are scenes discussing sexual assault, abortion, the glass ceiling, and feminist struggles where the protagonists use the colour red as a symbol of empowerment (e.g., S1E4, S2E1, S3E2).e psychological dimension shows an excellent representation of extroverted women focused on their professional careers, such as Jane and Sutton. is allows the plots to delve deeper into their internal issues. On the other hand, Kat and Jacqueline exhibit an altruistic and committed focus, reecting an understanding of their work and social responsibilities.Table 3. Physical, psychological, sociological, and behavioural dimensions of the protagonistsCharactersDimensionsJaneP: Young/adult, Caucasian, very attractive, dresses sexy.PS: Introverted, reective, sensitive, aims to become a good professional.S: Heterosexual, single, changing relationships, no children, high economic level, journalist, medium qualication.B: Discourses: feminism, sexuality, sexual violence, women’s health. Attitude: negative, reactive, self-interested, emotional. Relationships: inclusive, passive.KatP: Young/adult, Afro-American, attractive, dresses casually/sporty (sometimes with a masculine style).PS: Extroverted, perceptive, sensitive, altruistic.S: Queer, single, uctuating relationships (indelity), no children, high economic status, social media director, highly qualied.B: Discourses: feminism, sexual diversity, political activism, ethnic diversity, new technologies. Attitude: positive, proactive, altruistic, emotional. Relationships: inclusive, assertive.SuttonP: Young/adult, Caucasian, very attractive, dresses elegantly (with a softened style).PS: Extroverted, intuitive, perceptive, rising in professional hierarchy.S: Heterosexual, single/married, uctuating relationships (indelity), no children (one abortion), low economic status (high since marriage), fashion assistant, lower qualications.B: Discourses: feminism, professional advancement, rejection of motherhood. Attitude: positive, proactive, interested, rational. Relationships: manipulative, assertive.
294 | nº 41, pp. 285-305 | July-December of 2025Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: The Bold Type of a case studyISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónJacquelineP: Adult, Caucasian, very attractive, dresses elegantly.PS: Extroverted, perceptive, reective, altruistic.S: Heterosexual, married/separated, stable relationship (with crises and an aair), two children, very high economic status, editor, executive.B: Discourses: feminism, violence against women, glass ceiling, work-life balance. Attitude: positive, proactive, altruistic, rational. Relationships: inclusive, assertive.*Note: P=physical; PS=psychological; S=sociological; B=behaviouralSource: own elaborationKat, a biracial and queer character, ts the neo-archetype of the ghter-heroine (Garrido & Zaptsi, 2021) who battles, challenges limits, and feels obligated to save everyone. Kat ghts tirelessly for issues aecting her due to her biracial identity and sexual orientation. She begins as a “proud heterosexual” (S1E1) and evolves to identify as bisexual and later as queer throughout the series. Her struggle is intersectional, encompassing feminism (#MeToo, #TimesUp, #BodyPositive) and racism (#BlackLivesMatter), as mentioned in various episodes. erefore, she focusses on cyberbullying, hate speech on social media, fear of women’s bodies, rights and equality, female political activism, the ght for creative freedom, ethnic diversity, and religious plurality.Jacqueline, the boss, demonstrates an altruistic drive in her ability to contribute selessly to the training of her employees at Scarlet, breaking gender stereotypes that associate leadership roles with female rivalry and portraying successful women as arrogant and authoritarian (Lacalle & Gómez, 2016). e archetype that Jacqueline represents is that of the female ghter–ruler (Garrido & Zaptsi, 2021) who can inuence, dominate, and lead professionally and within her family. is breaks the negative representation of female executives in other audiovisual productions with similar themes, such as e Devil Wears Prada (David Frankel, 2006). Jacqueline is a boss, but above all, she is a woman who feels obligated to support her team so its members can soar. e three young adults support one another without judgement, work collectively against injustices, and help the others advance in their careers.As we previewed with the character of Kat, e Bold Type presents a broad spectrum of sexualities (Lotz, 2001). e main plot points and resolutions are focussed on accepting one’s sexual identity and the uncertainties that arise during the recognition process. However, in the workplace and social spheres, normalization of the LGTBI+ community is assumed (Marcos-Ramos and González-de-Garay, 2021). Indeed, the plots focus on feelings, doubts, and decisions rather than community acceptance. is natural acceptance of diversity is highlighted by other male characters (often highly stereotyped), such as Olivier, the fashion director, and Andrew, the assistant director, who performs as a drag queen in his free time. Adena, Tya, and Eva, Kat’s partners, are depicted as powerful, hardworking, multiracial lesbian women.Sexual experimentation involves two protagonists and situations: Jane, through her articles exploring sexuality, and Kat, who tries to answer her questions about her sexual identity through open, heterosexual, and bisexual relationships. In line with
doxa.comunicación | nº 41, pp. 285-305 July-December of 2025Noemí Morejón-LlamasISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 295 Lacalle and Castro (2017), indelity, a recurring theme in serial ction, is portrayed in e Bold Type through three protagonists: Sutton and Jacqueline, with their ex-lovers, and Kat, for pleasure and experimentation. Romantic relationships are also uid, showing complicated connections that evolve over the seasons. Despite their romantic and sexual experimentation, each character has a signicant other: Jane has Ryan, Kat has Adena, Sutton has Richard, and Jacqueline has Ian.e protagonists’ high economic level promotes a consumer society through the tyranny of fashion, as seen in various serialized productions (Morejón-Llamas, 2020) and perfectly aligned with intensive neocapitalism. Jane, a journalist, and Sutton, a fashion assistant, exhibit a high standard of living that does not correspond to their incomes. In Sutton’s case, this standard rises signicantly after marrying Richard, a wealthy member of Saord Publishing –the parent company of Scarlet–highlighting not economic dependence, as she works, but an improvement in her nancial situation.e protagonists are portrayed as self-sucient in their nances and work activities (Lacalle & Hidalgo-Marí, 2016). ese women are successful in their jobs and grow thanks to their eorts, although it is more challenging for them to achieve success than it is for men, except in the case of Jacqueline. Additionally, they must make extra sacrices to break the glass ceiling (Hidalgo-Marí, 2017). For example, when they reach management, they do not ascend to the next level, the Board, which has two women and approximately twenty men chair members. is is highlighted when Kat asks Jane, “What does it take to be a board member? Being bald, wearing tailored suits, juggling” (S1E6).With respect to the attitudes of these four protagonists, there is a diversity in their behaviours, depicting a wide range of women who face life according to their resources and perceptions but always showcasing female empowerment through sisterhood. ey discard the stereotype of the conict-driven woman who needs to trample her rivals for professional advancement and who criticizes and belittles the work of other women. ey even breakdown stereotypes such as victorious, arrogant, and tough women (Lacalle & Gómez, 2016).ese women are capable of marking their territory when their partners attempt to rescue, help, or defend them, deconstructing the image of the rescued-dependent woman present in patriarchal female archetypes. e help they reject from men is replaced by female solidarity, which buries the struggle exhibited in other television productions (Menéndez-Menéndez, 2014). Additionally, they are positive and proactive, solving their problems, taking the initiative, and opening debates, except for Jane, the young journalist whose life is constantly immersed in drama due to real problems –her mother’s orphanhood, cancer predisposition, and double mastectomy– and who dramatized her personal and work situations. Jane fears change, doubts herself, and relies on others for reinforcement, demonstrating a reactive attitude.In their relationships, they are inclusive, except for Sutton, who is not afraid to lie or do whatever it takes to achieve a fashion director position, including manipulation. She is also aggressive in her impositions, as nothing can stop her in her professional career, much like Kat, who aggressively ghts to end social injustices, especially those concerning feminism, racism, or gender diversity. Although she always adheres to professional ethics, Jane shows self-interest when pursuing news stories. In contrast, Jacqueline, like Kat, is altruistic, inclusive, and assertive, naturally combining power and empathy, as previously mentioned.Furthermore, there is a balance between the emotional women, Jane and Kat, and the rational women, Jacqueline and Sutton. is rationality leads them to reject love in favour of professional growth –Jacqueline with her marital crisis; Sutton, when she
296 | nº 41, pp. 285-305 | July-December of 2025Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: The Bold Type of a case studyISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicacióndecides to stay in Manhattan working, even though her ancé Richard moves to San Francisco; or when she asks for a divorce because she does not want to be a mother.3.3. New perspectives on fourth-wave feminisme Bold Type initiates a current debate on women’s living conditions, inequality, and the violence they face in each of its episodes, bringing to light messages framed within the fourth wave of feminism (Aguilar-Barriga, 2020), explicitly referenced in S2E8. is is also evident in the pilot episode, where the production’s intention is stated through a line from Jacqueline, the boss, about Scarlet magazine: “We are a fashion magazine that talks about jeans, but those jeans that allow you to climb the world.”Feminism, the central axis of the series, interacts with other social issues highlighted in movements such as #BlackLivesMatter, #MeToo, #TimesUp, and #BodyPositive, occasionally transcending the screen. Aisha Dee, the actress who portrays Kat, voiced concerns on Instagram about the lack of LGTBI+ representation and multiracial equity in the artistic and creative teams, which hinders gender advancement in the nal product. Social audience pressure on networks, supported by Dee, prompted the writers to create an alternative ending for the fourth season (Mullor, 2021).e handling of feminist themes and discourses is always conducted with an informative, educational, and preventive tone, especially regarding issues related to sexuality and women’s health. It also adopts a cautionary tone when addressing the objectication of women on social media and in the new cultural industry.Table 4. emes and subthemes related to feminismemesSubthemesProfessional careerWork-family balanceGlass ceilingMobbing, workplace, and sexual harassmentSocial implications and activismPolitical implicationsSexualityExploration of female pleasureSatisfactory relationshipsPolygamyFemale pornographyDating apps as sexual enticementSexual diversitySexual objectication of womenNaturalization of bodiesSexual activity in old agePositive discriminationGender: parity in companies, institutions, and politics; women’s associationsCultural Origin/Sexual Identity: multiracial and sexual inclusion in companies
doxa.comunicación | nº 41, pp. 285-305 July-December of 2025Noemí Morejón-LlamasISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 297 Women’s healthMedical care for womenPink taxGenetic mutation and predisposition to female cancers (breast, cervical, and ovarian)Surgical approaches (mastectomy or double mastectomy, hysterectomy)Sexually transmitted diseasesMenstruationMenopauseContraceptive methodsAbortionMotherhoodSingle parenthoodChildbearing agePostponement or rejection of motherhoodEgg freezingMental loadEconomic limitationsWomen on social mediaCyberbullyingCyber aggressionSextingHate crimesCyber chauvinismFreedom of expressionFemale discussion forumsSocial networks as a source of incomeOnline activismLifestyle habitsPromotion of sportsPromotion of healthy eatingSource: own elaborationWomen in e Bold Type face various obstacles in their professional careers, ranging from family–work balance to seemingly unbreakable glass ceilings. ese barriers include workplace mobbing and harassment perpetrated by cultural industry magnates, as well as sexual abuse in the workplace. ese elements not only limit women’s professional growth but also reect a social reality where power and control are used to intimidate and silence them. Additionally, the series highlights the limitations women face in social movements and political careers, where patriarchal structures and a lack of institutional support hinder their progress and visibility.e series examines female sexuality openly and progressively. It addresses the exploration of female pleasure and depicts satisfying relationships (Korneld & Long, 2023). At times, it promotes polygamy, steering away from the myth of romantic love (the myth of marriage or the myth of exclusivity) (Rebollo-Bueno, 2023) and advocating for openness in romantic and sexual relationships. It also focusses on pornography aimed at female audiences and the use of dating apps as a means of sexual exploration. Furthermore, it addresses sexual diversity and the objectication of women, challenging traditional norms
298 | nº 41, pp. 285-305 | July-December of 2025Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: The Bold Type of a case studyISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónand promoting the normalization of bodies and sexual activity in old age. is approach contributes to a more inclusive and realistic representation of female sexuality tied to liberal feminism.In e Bold Type, positive gender discrimination is intersectional, converging with the multiethnicity and sexual diversity inherent to racial and postmodern feminism. e series advocates for parity in businesses, institutions, and politics and highlights the importance of female associationalism related to radical feminism. It also focusses on multiracial and sexual inclusion in the workplace, promoting a more diverse and equitable environment. ese eorts are essential to combat inequality and create opportunities for all women, regardless of their background or identity.e series opens a debate on various aspects of women’s health, from medical assistance and the pink tax to genetic predispositions to certain cancers (such as breast, cervical, and ovarian cancer) and the necessary surgical approaches (mastectomy, hysterectomy). Topics such as sexually transmitted diseases, menstruation, menopause, contraceptive methods, and miscarriage are also discussed, although the debate on the voluntary termination of pregnancy is not open. Sexually transmitted diseases are discussed in an informative tone, as are the ailments that women suer during menstruation or the sensations and challenges they face during menopause. is comprehensive approach allows for a greater understanding of women’s unique health challenges.Motherhood is another crucial theme, exploring single parenthood’s economic limitations and diculties. e series delves into the pressure of the fertile age, postponing motherhood, the decision not to have children to pursue a successful career, and egg freezing as a solution to this internal debate that forces women to choose between family and work. Additionally, the emotional burden and guilt many women feel when delegating functions are highlighted. ese narratives reect the complexities and dicult decisions many women face, helping them understand low birth rates and increased maternal age.Social media plays a signicant role in the lives of e Bold Type characters, serving as both a platform for empowerment (cyberfeminism) and a space of vulnerability. e series addresses cyberbullying, cyber aggression, sexting, and hate crimes, as well as online misogyny. It also discusses the limitations of publishing about female bodies (such as the #FreeNipple movement) and female conversation forums. At the same time, it shows the potential of social media to economically and socially empower women, oering a platform for self-expression and connection.Fiction promotes healthy lifestyle habits, such as exercise and healthy eating. rough characters like Jacqueline, who is often shown exercising in her oce, the series emphasizes the importance of running, yoga, and Pilates. e need to maintain a balanced diet is highlighted, with frequent examples of salads and healthy meals. ese habits contribute to physical well-being and reinforce the idea of self-care and personal empowerment. Despite this, during moments of emotional destabilization, the characters resort to junk food and alcohol as a means of release, another lm cliché that associates binge eating with emotional problems (Hundley, 1995).e story promotes the habits of a healthy lifestyle, such as exercise and healthy eating. rough characters such as Jacqueline, who often appears exercising in her oce, the series emphasizes the importance of running, yoga, and Pilates. Additionally, it highlights the need to maintain a balanced diet, frequently featuring salads and healthy meals. ese habits contribute to physical well-being and reinforce the idea of self-care and personal empowerment. Despite this, during periods of emotional
doxa.comunicación | nº 41, pp. 285-305 July-December of 2025Noemí Morejón-LlamasISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 299 instability, the characters turn to junk food and alcohol as a means of release, another lm cliché that associates binge eating with emotional problems (Hundley, 1995).In addition to its feminist themes, e Bold Type employs inclusive vocabulary, using concepts such as intersectional feminism, patriarchy, empowerment, gender issues, and new terms that appeal to identication, such as cisgender, transgender, queer, and pansexual. e challenge is reected in the protagonists’ mobilization, for example, when they expose their breasts to protest Instagram censorship in S1E6 and denounce sexual abuse and assault in S2E1, “Carry the Weight,” and S2E6, “e Domino Eect.” As Kat states in S1E9, “ere is no feminism without intersectionality.” erefore, feminism converges with xenophobia (questioning immigration, rejecting the use of the hijab, executing deportations, granting dual citizenship, issuing work visas, stigmatization, and association with conict, police repression attitudes) and sexual diversity (new gender identities, new sexual identities). e #BlackLivesMatter movement is also reected, demonstrating once again the thematic intersectionality between feminism and multiculturalism (Garrido & Zaptsi, 2020; Lotz, 2001).Additionally, the series addresses the sacrices of motherhood, the biological pressure on women, and the high cost of freezing eggs and postponing motherhood due to the labour market. Abortion is discussed from a dierent, more sensitive perspective. However, the conservative perspective (Hidalgo-Marí & Palomares-Sánchez, 2020) depicts involuntary pregnancy termination instead of the protagonist’s voluntary decision –Sutton does not want to continue because she fears that it will hinder her professional career, so when she miscarries, she feels relieved. e innovation lies in her friends’ sisterhood, understanding her, not judging her, and liberating her, portraying friendship as a safety net.4. Discussion and conclusionsDrawing on Lotz’s (2001) approach and Eagly’s social role theory (1987), we consider that e Bold Type breaks some gender stereotypes by producing substantial changes in the roles of these women, as well as in their relationships with other women and men. It is a feminist and transgressive series in terms of how it represents its protagonists in their psychological, sociological, and behavioural dimensions, although less so in the physical dimension due to its lack of diversity, in contrast with productions such as Orange is the New Black (Netix, 2013-2019) (Martínez-García and Aguado-Peláez, 2017). While the protagonists are beautiful women, they do not take advantage of their looks; in fact, they worry about how others perceive their career advancements owing to their attractiveness, thereby ending the stereotype of the opportunistic sexual object. Additionally, the series’ emphasis on the protagonists’ high standard of living and the trivialization of consumption (Morejón-Llamas, 2020) prevent viewers from seeing women in dierent socioeconomic contexts and link success with wealth creation, subordinating the construction of new identities to the capitalist interests of television (Bonavitta and De-Garay-Hernández, 2019; Korneld and Bassett, 2023).Despite this, the series can be considered feminist owing to its narrative strategies related to issues such as sisterhood, the economic independence of its protagonists, the work context they focus on, and the protests and mobilizations that showcase a commitment to sexual and gender diversity, multiculturalism, and feminism (Garrido and Zaptsi, 2021). Notably, the only lesbian relationship in the series portrays a powerful but complex couple, with the weight of all the themes introduced by
300 | nº 41, pp. 285-305 | July-December of 2025Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: The Bold Type of a case studyISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónthe intersectionality of third-wave feminism and the violence against women of the fourth wave falling on their characters (Garrido-Rodríguez, 2021).In this sense, e Bold Type oers a multifaceted conception of female representation, with an unwavering sisterhood as the central theme (Cuenca-Orellana and Martínez-Pérez, 2020) in both personal and professional terms. e protagonists are able to balance their families and personal and professional lives in line with new serialized productions (Lacalle and Hidalgo-Marí, 2016), although they are not portrayed as tireless superwomen (Hidalgo-Marí, 2017), as they sometimes sacrice their family or relational lives to focus on their work. e workspace ultimately behaves as a key place for female empowerment, even if it requires, or the protagonists choose, sacrice in certain areas of their private lives (Fegitz, 2023). In this context, Jacqueline embodies one of the most transgressive characters; despite being the magazine’s editor, she is not depicted as a perfect woman who manages everything. is is reected in the series through a marital crisis, her husband’s ability to commit to her dedication to work, and her lack of presence at important family moments.Although progress is evident, there are still stereotypical relationships, such as the impossibility of friendship between men and women, the association of success with indelity, or relationships between an older man and a younger woman. As a result, some romantic relationships remain toxic and complicated. ese women are portrayed as sexually liberated, with an active sex life not always tied to romantic relationships and seduction, as shown in other content (Lacalle & Castro, 2017). However, they still desire to be loved, professing the “myth of romantic love” (Cambra-Badii et al., 2019), an issue already noted by Gavilán et al. (2019), whose interviewees criticized the protagonists’ need to resort to romantic relationships as a source of happiness. is is also seen in series aimed at adolescents, portraying female characters with self-perception issues (Valenzuela-Monreal et al., 2023: 16).e themes introduced in e Bold Type surpass those of previous productions by addressing issues through dissemination and prevention, for example, when they expose one of the protagonists to breast cancer (Lacalle & Gómez-Morales, 2018) or other sexual health issues, such as sexually transmitted diseases, menstruation, contraceptive methods, egg freezing, or abortion (Hidalgo-Marí & Palomares-Sánchez, 2020). Other topics related to sexuality, such as female pleasure, sexual boundaries, experimentation, pornography, and dating apps, as well as those denouncing sexual assault, abuse, and rape, are also addressed. e series portrays sexual predators and the bravery of victims with great honesty. It provides information and encourages debate through dialogues and storylines highlighting reproductive rights, the importance of consent in relationships –promoting a culture of respect and open communication– and the power of cyberfeminism to amplify voices and create networked support.e storylines are contextualized by fourth-wave feminism and characterized by the ght against violence towards women (Donstrup, 2022). is is evident when situations arise where the protagonists must deal with inappropriate behaviour in the workplace, illustrating not only the personal and professional impact of harassment but also the importance of solidarity and mutual support among women to confront and overcome these situations. e series portrays the abuse of power in all spheres while showing how the protagonists navigate these dynamics, seeking justice and holding their harassers accountable. is is closely related to the social and political activism in the series (Korneld & Long, 2023), which aims to raise awareness and mobilize through collective action to eradicate violence against women.
doxa.comunicación | nº 41, pp. 285-305 July-December of 2025Noemí Morejón-LlamasISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 301 e series also reects gender parity, emphasizing equality in the workplace. e storylines highlight the protagonists’ eorts to achieve equal pay and parity in leadership roles. is includes ghting against glass ceilings and promoting an inclusive and equitable work environment, demonstrating that feminism is practised in and through work: “ey strengthen the cultural discourse that work is meaningful and, thus, sacricing one’s private life in labour –and time– intensive careers is not only worthwhile but also morally preferable” (Fegitz, 2023:13). e Bold Type strives to represent women in positions of power and leadership, highlighting the ability and competence of women in roles traditionally dominated by men. is approach not only challenges gender stereotypes but also inspires female viewers to aspire to similar roles. It addresses intersectionality by showcasing the diversity among its female characters, including women of dierent racial backgrounds, sexual orientations, and socioeconomic contexts, characteristic of postmodern feminism (Donstrup, 2022).e need to monitor the evolution of women in serialized productions is undeniable, as is examining new masculinities, which introduce a renewed worldview featuring “sensitive, understanding, advisory, caregiving, aectionate, patient men who also engage in domestic work” (Contreras & Alfaro-Beracoechea, 2021: 303), which is also observed in e Bold Type. Despite the limitations of this study, we foresee a female projection free of stereotypes on and o screen, owing to the inclusion eorts in casting and creative and technical teams, contributing to new and positive modelling of roles and stereotypes for audiences.5. Acknowledgementsis article has been translated into English by the company American Journal Experts (AJE) to whom we express our gratitude.Funding Sources: Loyola Andalusia University, Spain6. Conict of intereste author declares that there is no conict of interest contained in this article. 7. Bibliographic referencesAguilar Barriga, N. (2020). Una aproximación teórica a las olas del feminismo: la cuarta ola. Femeris, 5(2), 121-146. https://doi.org/10.20318/femeris.2020.5387Belmonte, J., & Guillamón, S. (2008). Co-educar la mirada contra los estereotipos de género en TV. Comunicar, 31, 115-120. https://doi.org/10.3916/c31-2008-01-014Bernárdez-Rodal, A. (2017). Cultura mediática y feminismo: identidad, política e ideología en el universo mainstream. Investigaciones Feministas, 8(2), 317-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/INFE.55315Bonavitta, P., & De-Garay-Hernández, J. (2019). La casa de papel, Rita y Merlí: entre nuevas narrativas y viejos patriarcados. Investigaciones Feministas, 10(2), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.66490

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


302 | nº 41, pp. 285-305 | July-December of 2025Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: The Bold Type of a case studyISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónCambra-Badii, I., Mastandrea, P., Paragis, M. P., & Martínez, D. (2019). Big Little Lies: una serie contemporánea sobre la representación de la subjetividad femenina y la violencia hacia la mujer. Comunicación y Medios, 28(39), 14-29. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-1529.2019.51522Cascajosa-Virino, C. (2017). Tiempos difíciles, mujeres protagonistas: la obra televisiva de Virginia Yagüe. Investigaciones Feministas, 8(2), 385-400. https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.55073Cascajosa-Virino, C. (2018). Las series de televisión españolas ante la llegada de los servicios VOD (2015-2017). Profesional de la información, 27(6), 1303-1312. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.nov.13Cascajosa-Virino, C. (2019). Mar Coll’s Matar al padre / Killing the Father (Movistar+ 2018): a female Auteur between lm and television in Spain. Feminist Media Studies, 19(7), 977-990. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1667063Contreras Tinoco, K., & Alfaro-Beracoechea, L. (2021). Género y cción televisiva: ¿Nuevas feminidades y masculinidades en la serie mexicana Club de Cuervos? Cuadernos.Info, 51, 288-309. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.51.27299Coronado, C., & Galán, E. (2015). ¿Tontas y locas?: Género y movimientos sociales en la cción televisiva sobre la Transición Española. Historia y Comunicación Social, 20(2), 327-343. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2015.v20.n2.51387Cuenca-Orellana, N., & Martínez-Pérez, N. (2020). Reescribiendo la feminidad en las series españolas: las nuevas heroínas en La otra mirada. RPC, 2, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.21555/rpc.v0i2.2337De-Caso-Bausela, E., González-De-Garay, B., & Marcos-Ramos, M. (2020). Representación de género en las series generalistas de televisión españolas emitidas en prime time (2017-2018). Profesional de la Información, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.08Donstrup, M. (2022). Feminism on Amazon Prime Tv-series. Multidisciplinary Journal of Gender Studies, 11(1), 24-48. https://doi.org/10.17583/generos.6758Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex dierences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Editorial Erlbaum.Fegitz, E. (2023). Neoliberal feminism and intergenerational relations at work: an analysis of media representations of feminist mentorship in popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2258300Fernández-Manzano, E. P., Neira, E., & Clares-Gavilán, J. (2016). Gestión de datos en el negocio audiovisual: Netix como caso de estudio. Profesional de la Información, 25(4), 1699–2407. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2016.jul.06Galán, E. (2006). Personajes, estereotipos y representaciones sociales. Una propuesta de estudio y análisis de la cción televisiva. Revista ECO-PÓS, 9(1), 58-81. https://doi.org/10.29146/eco-pos.v9i1.1060Galán, E. (2007). Construcción de género y cción televisiva en España. Comunicar, 15(28), 229-236. https://doi.org/10.3916/C28-2007-24Garrido Rodríguez, C. (2021). Repensando las olas del feminismo. Una aproximación teórica a la metáfora de las olas. Investigaciones Feministas, 12(2), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.68654Garrido, R., & Zaptsi, A. (2021). Archetypes, Me Too, Time’s Up and the representation of diverse women on TV. Comunicar, 68, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2021-02

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 41, pp. 285-305 July-December of 2025Noemí Morejón-LlamasISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 303 Gavilán, D., Martínez-Navarro, G., & Ayestarán, R. (2019). Las mujeres en las series de cción: el punto de vista de las mujeres. Investigaciones Feministas, 10(2), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.66499Gordillo-Álvarez, I., Guarinos, V., Ramírez-Alvarado, M. A., & Jaime De Pablo, M. E. (2009). Mujeres adolescentes y envejecientes en las series de televisión. Conictos de identicación. En Identidades Femeninas en un Mundo Plural. IV Congreso Internacional de la Asociación Universitaria de Estudios de las Mujeres (pp. 327-334). https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/25638Gutiérrez-San Miguel, B., Catarina Pereira, A., & Acle Vicente, D. (2020). De los estereotipos a la brecha de género y la vida después de los 70 años en la serie Grace y Frankie. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 77, 413-430. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1465Hidalgo-Marí, T. (2017). De la maternidad al empoderamiento: una panorámica sobre la representación de la mujer en la cción española. Prisma Social, 2, 291-314. https://bit.ly/3AZcc9XHidalgo-Marí, T., & Palomares-Sánchez, P. (2020). Ser madre en la cción televisiva: una comparativa entre series españolas y estadounidenses. Área Abierta. Revista de comunicación audiovisual y publicitaria, 20(1), 123-137. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/arab.62518Hundley, H. L. (1995). e Naturalization of Beer in Cheers. Journal of Broadcast and Electronic Media, 39(3), 350-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159509364311Korneld, S., & Bassett, E. (2023). Televising popular feminism. Popular Communication, 21(1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2071900Korneld, S., & Long, C. (2023). Bold resistance: Developing tenets of femme analysis for an era of popular feminism. Sexualities, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13634607231152597Lacalle, C., & Hidalgo-Marí, T. (2016). La evolución de la familia en la cción televisiva española. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 71, 470-483. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1105Lacalle, C., & Castro, D. (2017). Representations of female sexuality in Spanish television ction. Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 24(75), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v0i75.4656Lacalle, C., & Gómez, B. (2016). La representación de las mujeres trabajadoras en la cción televisiva española. Comunicar, 47, 59-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C47-2016-06Lacalle, C., & Gómez-Morales, B. (2018). Educar entreteniendo: los problemas de salud de los personajes femeninos en la cción TV española. Signo y Pensamiento, 37(73). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.syp37-73.eepsLópez, F. J., & Raya Bravo, I. (2019). Teresa Fernández-Valdes y la producción femenina de series de televisión en España. Las chicas del cable como caso de estudio. Feminist Media Studies, 19(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1667062Lotz, A. (2001). Postfeminist televisión criticism: Rehabilitating critical terms and identifying postfeminist attributes. Feminist Media Studies, 1(1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680770120042891

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


304 | nº 41, pp. 285-305 | July-December of 2025Sisterhood and gender intersectionality in American ction: The Bold Type of a case studyISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónMancinas-Chávez, R., & Morejón-Llamas, N. (2012). Presencia social de las mujeres en series de cción y cine estadounidense: análisis de estereotipos, contextualización, diagnóstico y perspectiva. En Actas del I Congreso Internacional de Comunicación y Género, Sevilla (pp. 1259-1272). Universidad de Sevilla. https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/38475Marcos-Ramos, M., & González-De-Garay, B. (2021). Gender Representation in Subscription Video-On-Demand Spanish TV Series. International Journal of Communication, 15, 581–604. https://bit.ly/2X8W5spMartínez-García, P., & Aguado-Peláez, D. (2017). La reapropiación de los cuerpos de las mujeres en la cción televisiva. Análisis de Orange is the New Black. Investigaciones Feministas, 8(2), 401-413. https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.54974Masanet, M. J., & Fedele, M. (2019). El «chico malote» y la «chica responsable»: modelos aspiracionales y representaciones juveniles en las teen series españolas. Palabra Clave, 22(2), e2225. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2019.22.2.5Mateos-Pérez, J. (2021). Modelos de renovación en las series de televisión juveniles de producción española. Estudio de caso de Merlí (TV3, 2015) y Skam España (Movistar, 2018). Doxa Comunicación, 32, 143-157. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n32a7Mateos-Pérez, J., & Ochoa-Sotomayor, G. (2016). Contenido y representación de género en tres series de televisión chilenas de cción (2008-2014). Cuadernos.info, 39, 55-66. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.39.832Medina-Bravo, P., Aran, S., Rodrigo Alsina, M., Munté, R. A., & Guillén, M. (2009). La representación de la maternidad en las series de cción norteamericanas. Propuesta para un análisis de contenido. Desperate Housewives y Brothers & Sisters. En II Congreso Internacional de la Asociación Española de Investigadores en Comunicación. https://bit.ly/3BSrHS7Menéndez Menéndez, M. I. (2014). Ponga una mujer en su vida: análisis desde la perspectiva de género de las cciones de TVE «Mujeres» y «Con dos tacones» (2005-2006). Área Abierta, 14(3), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ARAB.2014.v14.n3.45722Menéndez-Menéndez, I., & Zurian, F. (2014). Mujeres y hombres en la cción televisiva norteamericana hoy. Anagramas. Rumbos y sentidos de la comunicación, 13(25), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.22395/angr.v13n25a3Morejón-Llamas, N. (2020). Estereotipos de género y ciberbullying en las series de cción adolescentes: un análisis comparativo de Gossip Girl, Pretty Little Liars y Get Even. Fonseca, Journal of Communication, 21, 125-145. https://doi.org/10.14201/fjc202021125145Mullor, M. (25 de marzo de 2021). e Bold Type: el nal de la temporada 4 se cambió en el último momento. Fotogramas. https://acortar.link/MwK5PWPadilla, G., & Sosa Sánchez, R. P. (2018). Ruptura de los estereotipos de género en la cción televisiva sobre el poder político: el caso Borgen. Vivat Academia. Revista de Comunicación, 145, 73-95. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2018.145.73-95Parra-García, P., Postigo-Gómez, I., & Vera-Balanza, T. (2019). Resistencias y variaciones de la construcción del género en la nueva cción seriada. Girls y Big Little Lies. Revista Comunicación y género, 2(2), 233-247. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/cgen.66514Piñuel, J. L. (2002). Epistemología, metodología y técnicas del análisis de contenido. Estudios de Sociolingüística, 3(1), 1-42. https://bit.ly/3jfrQYARebollo-Bueno, S. (2023). Ideología y mitos del amor romántico en los dating shows. Estudio de audiencia de La isla de las tentaciones. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 29(3), 677-688. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/esmp.84540

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 41, pp. 285-305 July-December of 2025Noemí Morejón-LlamasISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 305 Ruiz-Muñoz, M. J., & Pérez-Rufí, J. P. (2020). Hermanas, amigas y compañeras en serie. La cción coral femenina española de las televisiones generalistas y plataformas VOD (1990-2019). Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, 26(2), 807-826. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.67828Sánchez-Aranda, J. J., Fernández Gómez, E., Gil Gascón, F., & Segado Boj, F. (2011). Las mujeres en la cción televisiva española de prime time. I Informe del Observatorio Audiovisual de Identidades de la Universidad Internacional de La Rioja. Universidad Internacional de la Rioja.Smith, P. J. (2020). Sociedades dramatizadas: la cción televisiva de calidad en España y México. index.comunicación, 10(3), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.33732/ixc/10/03SociedTous-Rovirosa, A., & Aran-Ramspott, S. (2017). Mujeres en las series políticas contemporáneas. ¿Una geografía común de su presencia en la esfera pública? Profesional de la Información, 26(4), 684-694. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.jul.12Valenzuela-Monreal, S., Lozano Delmar, J., & Araque-Padilla, R. A. (2023). Evaluating the Presence of Sustainable Development Goals in Digital Teen Series: An Analytical Proposal. Systems, 11(4), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11040195Yubero-Jiménez, S. (2004). Socialización y aprendizaje social. En I. Fernández-Sedano, S. Ubillos Landa, E. Mercedes Zubieta, & D. Páez Rovira (Eds.), Psicología social, cultura y educación. Editorial Pearson.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]