Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios on the radio, and in the press and elds related to journalismPercepción de la inteligencia articial aplicada al periodismo en los pódcasts españoles: el discurso metaperiodístico en los audios de radio, prensa y ámbitos vinculados al periodismo doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | 21 January-June of 2026ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: Martín Sánchez, I. M. (2026). Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios on the radio, and in the press and elds related to journalism. Doxa Comunicación, 42, pp. 21-45.https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n42a2702Isabel María Martín Sánchez. Graduate and PhD in Information Sciences from the Complutense University of Madrid. She is currently a Lecturer at that university and is accredited by ANECA as a Senior Lecturer. She teaches the subjects of the History of Spanish Journalism, History of Journalism and History of Social Communication. She has twenty years of teaching and research experience, during which she has directed a research project and participated in other competitive projects with lines of research into the analysis of media discourse; history and memory; history and the media, and contemporary political and social symbols. Moreover, for over ten years she was the director of the postgraduate degree “Communication Cabinets and Social Media”. Her most recent research has focused on hate speech in the media and the impact of articial intelligence on journalism. She was a guest speaker at the Université Sorbonne-Nouvelle Paris 3 conference and has completed several teaching and research stays at various European universities.Complutense University of Madrid, Spain[email protected]ORCID: 0000-0002-6400-8920is content is published under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. International License CC BY-NC 4.0Recibido: 09/06/2024 - Aceptado: 29/10/2024 - En edición: 20/11/2024 - Publicado: 01/01/20226Resumen: La inteligencia articial aplicada al periodismo ha impulsado un dis-curso metaperiodístico que muestra el debate entre los profesionales de la información en torno a los benecios y amenazas de esta tecnología. Este artículo analiza la percepción de la inteligencia articial periodís-tica a través de los pódcast radiofónicos, de prensa, producidos por pod-casters y otros ámbitos vinculados al periodismo y el argumentario a fa-vor o en contra de la inteligencia articial. Pese a la reconocida utilidad de esta herramienta para el desarrollo de diversas tareas periodísticas, el estudio muestra la persistencia del recelo entre los profesionales ante Received: 09/06/2024 - Accepted: 29/10/2024 - Early access: 20/11/2024 - Published: 01/01/20226Abstract: Articial intelligence applied to journalism has driven meta-journalistic discourse that shows the debate among information professionals concerning the benets and threats of the technology. is paper analyses the perception of articial intelligence in journalism through radio and newspaper podcasts, the output of podcasters and in other elds related to journalism, as well as the arguments for or against articial intelligence. Despite the tool’s acknowledged usefulness for the performance of several of journalists’ tasks, the study shows the persistence of wariness among

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


22 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación1. Introductione debate concerning articial intelligence applied to journalism is relatively new, in line with its recent implementation in the eld. Although news automation processes began in a rudimentary manner in the 1980s with the advance of computing (Mondría, 2023), the rst robotic experiments in the eld of journalism date back to 2003, when the Afghan Explorer, a mobile robot designed to carry out basic reporting tasks in the Afghan war, opened up the door to the replacement of journalists in potentially dangerous conict zones (El País, 2003). A qualitative leap came with the development of the Internet (Túñez et al., 2020), which favoured computational journalism (urman, 2019) through the development of software specic to automated content generation (El País, 2010). References to these advances in the Spanish media were episodic and came from a futuristic perspective (Roberge et al., 2020). However, the 2014 use of articial intelligence for automated news writing by the Los Angeles Times and the Associated Press fostered a meta-journalistic discourse about the impact of this technology on journalism (Salaverría, 2015; Ufarte & Manfredi, 2019), something which has intensied with the emergence of intelligent or deep-learning systems (Túñez et al., 2021; Mondría, 2023), such as ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI (Gutiérrez-Caneda, 2023; Lopezosa, 2023), or Gemini –by Google–. Improved versions of these tools pose new challenges, not only for the redenition of the tasks performed by journalists (Túñez et al., 2020), but also in the approach to journalism from a social and ethical perspective. e Spanish media have gone from ignorance of this new technology tecnología (Túñez et al., 2018) and reection on the changes it could bring (Salazar, 2018) about to its acceptance (Mayoral et al., 2023), although its use has opened a debate that transcends the replacement of humans by machines to pose other ethical questions about the truthfulness and reliability of content and the areas of information control (Túñez et al., 2020) which reveal the persistence of an attitude of distrust (Sánchez et al., 2023). e 2023 Professional Journalism Report from the Madrid Association of Journalists revealed that 85% of those surveyed were in favour of its regulation due to the ethical implications and to prevent its use to promote disinformation (Europa Press, 2023). 96% deemed it necessary to identify for the audience that content generated by intelligent systems, in line with the European Union AI Normative of March 13, 2024, point 120 of which establishes labelling as a transparency measure for the use of chatbots (European Parliament, 2024).e benets of articial intelligence do not elude the threats that a sector of journalists warn about. However, the number of Spanish media that use it is increasing (Túñez et al., 2021; Mayoral, et al. 2023), such as the Vocento group (Salazar, 2018; Ufarte & Manfredi, 2019); El Condencial (Rojas & Toural, 2019); the EFE agency and RTVE (Sánchez et al., 2023); Radio Nacional de su uso para promover la desinformación y el temor frente a la deshu-manización del periodismo. Este debate, no obstante, resulta adecuado en un contexto de adaptación de los medios españoles, ya que permite evaluar el impacto, compartir opiniones y experiencias, pero también prevenir los riesgos que todo cambio tecnológico conlleva.Palabras clave: Inteligencia articial; periodismo; discurso metaperiodístico; pódcast; España.professionals due to its use in promoting disinformation and fear of the dehumanisation of journalism. Nevertheless, the debate is appropriate in the context of the Spanish media’s adaptation, since it allows the impact to be evaluated, opinions and experiences to be shared, but also helps forestall the risks that any technological change entails.Keywords: Articial intelligence; journalism; meta-journalistic discourse; podcast; Spain.
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 23 España (Bazán-Gil et al., 2020); El País and Newtral (Mondría, 2023) or Gabriele, an AI Narrative software that supplies news to several Spanish media outlets (Ufarte & Manfredi, 2019).Neither have the tremendous possibilities oered by this thriving technology gone unnoticed by the radio sector. e PRISA group has introduced articial intelligence in dierent aspects of the journalistic process, such as fact-checking audio pieces, through VericAudio, an application for detecting fake audios (PRISA, 2024), employed primarily in radio newsrooms; the personalisation of content for the audience, through the Audio Data Sentiment (ADS) project, which analyses the public’s emotions associated with audios in order to improve the listener’s experience, detect violent or unethical content, and adapt advertising (Cadena SER, 2022); or the use of generative synthetic voice models, such as Victoria, which is employed on the program Carrusel Deportivo and oers the listener personalised news through Alexa (Cadena SER, 2023). In the eld of podcasting, Prodigioso Volcán has promoted collaborative initiatives between humans and articial intelligence for the creation of audio ction stories, such as its podcast Relatos Sintéticos (Prodigioso Volcán, 2022).In addition to this progressive increase in its use, scientic output on articial intelligence and journalism has grown signicantly, especially since 2015 (Calvo & Ufarte, 2021; Parratt-Fernández et al., 2021). In the case of Spain, several studies have based their analysis on consultations of professionals in the eld of journalism (Túñez et al., 2021; Mondría, 2023; Mayoral et al., 2023), on the treatment of chatbots in the Spanish press (De Lara, 2022; Gómez-Calderón & Ceballos, 2024), on the discourse of journalists on Twitter regarding articial intelligence and disinformation (Peña-Fernández et al., 2023), and on media coverage of articial intelligence in journalism (Parratt-Fernández et al., 2024).Other international studies on media treatment of articial intelligence show the creation of a collective conception, forged since the emergence of the technology (Scott, 2022) and how the British and North American media have constructed a public discourse around its benets and threats (Chuan et al., 2019; Nguyen & Hekman, 2022). Public perception of articial intelligence has been studied by Owsley & Greenwood (2022) in the United States, and by Sun et al. (2022) in China. Moran & Jawaid Shaikh (2022) highlight the tension in the US between industry and journalists concerning the implementation of the technology in the sector.is work aims to contribute to the vision of articial intelligence applied to journalism through podcasts, a format that has experienced a notable boom in recent years, following the consolidation of the Internet and media digitalisation (Alonso-Fernández et al., 2022; Martín-Nieto et al., 2024) by attracting a segment of young and adult audiences up to 45 years of age (Alonso-Fernández et al., 2022; García-Marín, 2018; Martín-Nieto et al., 2024; Martínez-Costa et al., 2019) who consume news through mobile devices and streaming content. According to Statista (2024), the number of podcast listeners in Spain in 2023 exceeded three million. Traditional radio stations and newspapers have taken advantage of the trend, with the incorporation of podcasts as a strategy to attract and retain audiences (Martínez-Costa et al., 2019).e study is applied to audios from Spanish media (press and radio), as well as those created in other professional areas of the Spanish podcast sphere (Gamir-Ríos and Cano-Orón, 2022), such as communication companies, podcasters, universities and foundations aliated with the world of journalism.In order to achieve the research objective, other specic objectives have been outlined, formulated from the following research questions:
24 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación1. Which media outlets dedicate most podcasts to articial intelligence in journalism?2. What perception prevails within the benets-threats dichotomy of articial intelligence in journalism?3. What is the predominating argument in its perception as a benet or as a threat?2. MethodologyA retrospective search was carried out from 2014 to May 2024, the former year being when an increase in news related to the application of articial intelligence to journalism was detected (Parratt-Fernández et al., 2024). e monitoring has been carried out in three areas: press, radio, and the “podcast sphere” and elds related with journalism, through the websites of national non-specialised newspapers, which allow topic-based searches for audios, those corresponding to radio stations and digital audio platforms. Google search has also been employed, which has allowed the completion of results with podcasts from regional newspapers and with audio pieces corresponding to entities close to the eld of journalism, those whose audios are available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iVoox and Spreaker. A combination of words has been utilised for the search, namely: “articial intelligence” and “journalism”; “journalistic articial intelligence”, “ChatGPT” and “journalism”. One of the limitations of this study is the inability to detect audio pieces whose title or summary do not include the search terms employed. However, the sample is considered to be representative in terms of both the quantity and plurality of the relevant Spanish podcasts’ elds of origin.Table 1 lists the media consulted for the podcast analysis, in which three categories have been distinguished: radio stations; press, both national and regional - among which only one podcast from El Correo (Bilbao) was found that deals with the subject analysed; and a third category in which audios produced by podcast journalists; educational/academic institutions and professional entities, close to the world of journalism, have been compiled.Table 1. Media analysed classied by categoriesRadio Station PodcastsSERCOPEOnda ZeroRNE (national broadcaster)
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 25 Press PodcastsABCEl CondencialEl Correo (Bilbao)elDiario.esEl EspañolEl IndependienteEl MundoEl PaísLa RazónPúblicoPodcastersYslaMacCaviare CoeeTraveltechGrowth Hacking CourseEducational/academic entitiesOnda Universitaria (Universidad Francisco de Vitoria)RadiUS (Universidad de Sevilla)Professional entitiesLaboratorio de Periodismo (Fundación Luca de Tena)Source: created by the author

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


26 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónAfter listening to all the audios obtained, those with content related to articial intelligence and journalism were selected. ere are 88 units in the nal balance, catalogued in an Excel database drawn up for each category analysed, and in which numerous elds have been established to ease quantitative and qualitative study (Table 2): media outlet, date, podcast title, digital link, news program/section, platform, presenters, guests/participants, duration, genre (interview, roundtable, reportage, tests with articial intelligence applications, etc.); main/secondary topic, perception of articial intelligence (Chuan et al., 2019) in content: positive (benets), negative (threats) or combination of both (benets-threats); and argumentation within each perception, classied according to the arguments propounded by various authors.Table 2. Fields for quantitative and qualitative analysisDigital radio audiosPress PodcastPodcastersEducational/academic entitiesProfessional entities Radio stationNewspaperPodcast NameMediumPodcast NameMediumDatePodcast TitleDigital linkNews program/ sectionPlatformPresenters/hostsParticipants/guestsDurationGenre/StyleMain/secondary themePerception (positive/negative/both)Argumentation Source: created by the author
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 27 e following aspects have been distinguished within the vision of AI as a threat: Disinformation/image manipulation/fake news/manipulation (Peña Fernández et al., 2023). Violation of intellectual property/copyright (Díaz Noci, 2023). Job losses (Carlson, 2015; Kirley, 2016; Kim & Kim, 2018). Ethical limits/racial, classist or sexist biases (Ferrante, 2021). Lack of transparency regarding the sources used/authorship of the texts (Pauner Chulvi, 2023). Dehumanisation of the news product/loss of quality of content due to the absence of human qualities in articial intelligence, such as humour, irony, critical and interpretive capacity or creativity (Diakopoulos, 2019; Murcia & Ufarte, 2019). Loss of control over articial intelligence (Salaverría, 2018). Control of information by large corporations/commercial use of journalism/news (Whittaker, 2019). Lack of regulation (González & Sanahuja, 2023; Helberger & Diakopoulos, 2023). Within the positive vision, the units analysed have been grouped into the following aspects: Fact-checking (Flores, 2019; Manfredi & Ufarte, 2020; Parratt-Fernández et al., 2021; Newman, 2022). Task automation/optimisation of journalists’ work (Salazar, 2018; Túñez et al. 2018; Ufarte et al., 2021; Mondría, 2023). Audience analysis and monitoring/detection of topics of interest to the audience/personalisation of content (Cham Olmsted, 2019). Opportunity for modernisation of journalism/search for new products (Túñez et al., 2021; Pérez-Seijo et al., 2023; Lopezosa et al., 2024).Furthermore, given the varied origins of the audio pieces, analysis has been applied by categories: digital audio from radio programmes; press podcasts and podcasts from entities related to the eld of journalism.3. ResultsTable 3 shows the distribution of digital audios that address AI and journalism by radio station and year. is is the medium with the largest number of pieces and the one which oers the greatest variety, both by subjects covered and in terms of styles and types of collaborators.Most podcasts consist of fragments of programmes, selected by monographic topic (articial intelligence, in this case), processed and edited for streaming and made available in an archive. e user can access the audio content by searching by topic, programme or using the tag “podcast”.
28 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTable 3. Distribution of radio audios by year. e search was carried out until May 2024, therefore this year’s data corresponds to that date202220232024TotalRadio Station PodcastSER 49114COPE19423Onda Cero112518RNE11    56Source: created by the authore podcasts were concentrated between 2022 and 2024, although the largest number was recorded in 2023. One of the reasons for that is the focus of audios on the launch of articial intelligence applications that directly aect information and journalism, such as Open AI‘s ChatGPT in November 2022; Gemini and Bard, its counterpart on Google, or image creation and modication programs, such as Midjourney and Sora, both by Open AI, which also entered the market between 2022 and 2024. Most podcasts focused on the impact of these systems on journalism and the news. In addition to the informative and journalistic interest of these new applications, the other reason for the concentration of units in this period was the then recent incorporation and consolidation of this type of format in the media analysed; especially, in radio and in the press. Although there had been digitalised radio sound pieces in radio archives since 2005, it was not until ten years later that content began to be processed for on-demand consumption (Alonso-Fernández et al., 2022), through the editing of programme fragments or news segmented by subject matter for online listening through their websites and, later, on podcast platforms.As shown in Table 3, COPE stood out not only for oering the largest number of pieces, but also for experimenting with articial text generation and voice simulation applications, as discussed below. Onda Cero also stood out for the quantity and variety of its audios, followed by Cadena SER. e PRISA group, in alliance with WePod and with the collaboration of other European media outlets, announced the launch in April 2024 of a thematic series entitled “AI and you” to explain the technology to the general public (Cadena SER, 2024). However, most of the audios analysed on this station correspond to radio programmes broadcast and stored in archives for on-demand consumption by users, except for Hora 25. Negocios, hosted by Javier Ruiz, developed expressly as a podcast (Alonso-Fernández et al., 2022). Articial intelligence and journalism have been the subject of analysis and reection in the station’s regular programming, both in the magazines Hoy por Hoy (Àngels Barceló) and La Ventana (Carles Francino), as well as in specialised culture programs (La Hora Extra) or, as a part of A vivir que son dos días, in the discussion show presented by Juan José Millás, Las edades de Millás. Hoy por Hoy’s territorial programming also included roundtable shows and interviews on the topic. It is worth highlighting Hoy por Hoy’s specialised section Tecnología,
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 29 with monographs dedicated to articial intelligence with Jaime García Cantero, a specialist in the eld, which oer in-depth analysis of questions directly related to radio, such as ChatGPT’s ability to write radio scripts or the possibilities oered by synthetic voice applications.e same formula is repeated in the cases of COPE and Onda Cero. However, in the former there are some variants, consisting of short audio clips from news programmes, in which a brief interview with an expert takes place, a concise opinion is voiced in the form of a column by the presenter, or clips from programmes are selected with journalists’ voices cloned by articial intelligence. In-depth treatment was provided in the podcasts by their usual magazines: Herrera en la COPE (Carlos Herrera), La Linterna (Paco Delgado and Ángel Expósito), La Tarde (Pilar García Muñiz), Poniendo las calles (José Manuel Nieto) or Lo que viene (José Ángel Cuadrado), a programme expressly dedicated to technology. It was also treated monographically in extracts from news programmes, such as Mediodía COPE (Pilar Abad; Pilar Cisneros and Jorge Abad) or Noticias n de semana (Cristina López Schlichting), through interviews with an expert. Onda Cero put out podcasts on articial intelligence and journalism which also consisted of the selection of monographic fragments from broadcast programmes, edited in audio format and oered in a catalogue that allows thematic searches and by the tag “podcast”. Here, pieces of their magazines Julia en la onda (Julia Otero), Más de uno (Carlos Alsina) and La rosa de los vientos (Bruno Cardeñosa and Silvia Casasola), are to be found, in addition to other regional programs such as Nits de Ràdio with David Cervelló. On the other hand, only one podcast has been found on Radio Nacional de España (RNE), corresponding to the program Gente despierta, by Carles Mesa. e majority of radio audios therefore consist of content from their broadcast programs processed for streaming. is explains the breadth of pieces on the radio compared to the scarcity of those found in the press, where the main product is text, therefore podcasts are complementary formats to delve deeper into topical issues.Table 4 shows the distribution of podcasts in the press by newspaper and year:Table 4. Distribution of press podcasts. e search was conducted up to May 2024, therefore this year’s data corresponds to that date202220232024TotalPress PodcastABC11El Condencial11El Correo (Bilbao)11elDiario.es213El Español11El Independiente11

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


30 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónEl Mundo1113El País167La Razón11Público22    21Source: created by the authore production of podcasts by the press regarding articial intelligence and journalism was also concentrated between 2022 and 2024, with an increase in pieces in 2023. As in the case of radio, news and journalistic interest generated by the appearance of articial intelligence applications directly related to the news was joined by the novel incorporation of podcasts as a format in digital newspapers. ABC and El País saw the rst micro-newsletters gave way to content edited for podcasts from 2021, when they were extended to all digital newspapers (Martínez Otón et al., 2022).However, within the non-specialised press there are also dierences regarding the coverage of articial intelligence in journalism through podcasts, El País standing out in this area with seven pieces dedicated to this topic in its Hoy en El País section. Ana Fuentes and Íñigo Domínguez are the presenters, with specialised journalists taking part, either in technology, such as Manuel Pascual and Jordi Pérez Colomé; or in similar elds, such as science (Raúl Limón) or data journalism, with Kiko Llaneras. Although the treatment of articial intelligence is approached from a general perspective, the analysis in these podcasts tends towards those aspects that positively or negatively aect journalism and news management.e other two newspapers worthy of mention for their treatment of the subject in their podcast sections are El Mundo, in El Mundo al día (Javier Attard), and elDiario.es, in its Al día section (Juan Luis Sánchez), which dedicated three pieces respectively to the topic. Público dedicated a series entitled IA Desvelada, presented by Joaquín Peña, a professor specialising in digitalisation and articial intelligence, made up of of eight episodes available on YouTube, two of which made reference to this technology in journalism, with particular emphasis on the virtues and threats of ChatGPT in the news eld. El Correo is the only regional newspaper that covered this subject in one of its podcasts entitled Foco, hosted by Marta Madruga, and in which, as will be shown later, it gauges the positive and negative aspects of the technology.In a third category (Table 5), podcasts from journalism-related elds (professional entities, academic environments) and podcasting journalists have been grouped together, albeit in a dierentiated manner. Although these are totally dierent areas from the previous two, it is equally interesting to know the perspective that these agents of news oer their audience, generally made up of followers of podcast-producing journalists in the rst subgroup; students, potential journalists and university professors in the second; and in the third, journalism and communication professionals. Despite their disparity and being a minority, they share an interest in the emergence of articial intelligence in journalism.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 31 Table 5. Distribution of podcasts by producers and years. e search was conducted up to May 2024, therefore this year’s data corresponds to that date202220232024TotalProfessional, educational entities and podcastersPodcastersYslaMac112Caviar11e Coee11Traveltech11Growth Hacking Course11Educational entitiesOnda Universitaria112RadiUS11Professional entitiesLaboratorio de Periodismo22Source: created by the authorTwo audios by podcasters must be mentioned at this point, one by Amador Cámara, journalist and creator of the YslaMac website - available on Apple Podcasts -, and the other by Carlos Fité and Joan Martín, directors of the podcast entitled Caviar. ree other audios have been selected because they consist of interviews with journalists focused on articial intelligence and journalism: e Coee, by the writer Mauricio Cabrera, which includes an interview with Kiko Llaneras, a data journalist for El País; Traveltech, by Aron Abarca, CEO of the online tourism agency Gran Voyage, and whose podcast oers the perspective of travel journalist Juanda Núñez; and Growth Hacking Course, by Jean-Noel Saunier, creator of the marketing company of the same name, and whose product has also been included in this study due to the interest oered by the interview with Beatriz Lizarraga, head of digital projects and innovation for the digital newspaper ABC.
32 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicacióne second group in this category is made up of two podcasts by journalist and professor Javier de la Rosa, produced by the Universidad Francisco de Vitoria and available on Spreaker, and a third piece, produced by the Universidad de Sevilla radio station, available on iVoox and which includes an interview with Luis Mauricio Calvo, a journalist and professor at the Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. e last group includes two podcasts developed by the Laboratorio de Periodismo of the Fundación Luca de Tena, hosted by journalist Lluís Cucarella and posted on Spotify.e singularity of the set of podcasts in this section is that, unlike those linked to radio and the press which combine pieces dedicated specically to articial intelligence and journalism with other generic pieces, whose references to the eects on journalism are secondary, independent podcasts focus specically on how the tool aects journalism; that is, they are audio pieces whose monographic subject matter is articial intelligence and journalism.ere is also considerable diversity in terms of genres and styles of content presentation (Martín-Nieto et al., 2024; Martínez-Costa et al., 2019; Martínez Otón et al., 2022), although, as mentioned above, radio podcasts are more varied, since they reproduce the characteristics of this medium by dealing with extracts of programs selected to be listened to as podcasts. However, despite the podcasts’ diering origins, there is little stylistic dierence in the audios, their narrative resources being highly varied. Roundtables and interviews predominate, with the participation of, in addition to journalists, experts from numerous elds: computer engineers, writers, advertising announcers, psychologists, philosophers, lawyers, businesspeople and neuroscientists. e dierentiating resource in the radio podcasts is experimentation with articial intelligence applications, consisting of interviews with ChatGPT to see how it works, or with voice simulation programmes, to show the scope of the technology in this eld.Regarding the titles of the audios, 26 (representing 29.5% of the total number of pieces analysed) made direct reference to articial intelligence and journalism. e digital audios of radio stations stand out in this regard, with 16 headlines focused on the topic, followed by the podcasts catalogued in the third category, expressly dedicated to analysing the application of this technology to journalism, so the headlines are consistent with the content of the audios. Only one specic headline was recorded in the press. e rest of the titles of the audios, 62 (70,5%), contained a generic title. e latter include podcasts dedicated to articial intelligence in general, in which dierent aspects of the technology are confronted - including those that aect journalism - therefore the treatment of journalism as a topic is secondary. Some titles denote the focus of the topic: “e challenge we face with Articial Intelligence: How to know what’s true and what’s false?” (Annex I); “How Articial Intelligence can manipulate this photo to depict a situation very dierent from what you see”; “Learning to use articial intelligence as another tool in a journalist’s arsenal”; “Does AI endanger the profession of journalist and communicator?”; “How to protect ourselves from deepfakes and AI misinformation”.One notable aspect is the use of the terms “robot” and “machine” to refer to articial intelligence, which appear repeatedly in ten podcasts and shows the persistence of the conception created around this technology (Scott, 2022).ere is also great variety in the length of the audios. e average is twenty-two minutes, but the podcasts range from in-depth interviews of over sixty minutes to opinion columns of just two.Regarding the perception of articial intelligence in the podcasts analysed, Table 6 shows the vision in the radio audios:
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 33 Table 6. Perception of articial intelligence through radio podcastsPositiveNegativeBenets/reatsRadio Station PodcastSER 185COPE11012Onda Cero117RNE1Total22925Source: created by the authorAccording to these results, the dual vision predominates of articial intelligence as a useful tool for journalism but also as one that entails threats. e attitude of rejection prevails above all in the audios of Onda Cero and Cadena SER, despite the implementation of articial intelligence applications developed in the radio realm of the PRISA group. COPE oered a balanced vision, as well as a piece in favour of the journalistic use of articial intelligence. e tests used as a resource to show the scope of this tool in the news eld are especially important. On COPE, for example, the Risa Group, made up of journalists David Miner, Óscar Blanco and Fernando Echeverría, carried out two simulations of voices that imitated Juanma Castaño and Manolo Lama (Annex I) in which, in a humorous tone, they demonstrated the ease of manipulating the voices of public gures with false statements. e experiment was also oered as a double-edged sword, with Carlos Alsina: on one hand the ability of articial intelligence to replace the presenter by cloning his voice, on the other the lack of human qualities, such as the interpretation of data, irony, or a sense of humour. As will be discussed below, the loss of jobs in the radio sector or the use of articial intelligence to manipulate voices and generate misinformation are seen as among the most worrying threats for professionals in the medium.Table 7 provides the analysis of press podcasts, where once again a balanced view predominates of the benets and risks of articial intelligence to journalism.
34 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTable 7. Perception of articial intelligence through podcasts newspapersPositiveNegativeBenets/reatsPress PodcastABC1El Condencial1El Correo (Bilbao)1elDiario.es3El Español1El Independiente1El Mundo21El País25La Razón1Público11Total1614Source: created by the authorEl Independiente, despite only featuring one podcast hosted by José Antonio Gelado (IntependienTech” #15, December 11, 2023) on articial intelligence and journalism, is the only one that oers a complete overview of the benets of applying the technology. El Condencial and El Español point out the two sides of articial intelligence in their podcasts, despite also being media that are utilising articial intelligence applications: the former has AnaFut, a bot for the automatic generation of sports chronicles (Rojas & Toural, 2019) and the latter has been oering its subscribers an audio-reading service created by an intelligent system since 2022 (El Español, 2022). is is also the case for El País which has, among others, articial intelligence tools for product personalisation (Mondría, 2023), but which highlights the threats of this technology in two of its podcasts, although it also highlights its potential in ve others. e negative perception predominates in the case of El Mundo podcasts, which support arguments related to the use of articial intelligence to promote disinformation and the manipulation or opacity

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 35 of the control of this technology by large corporations and the consequent risk that this entails for freedom of expression. ese ideas, as discussed below, form part of the journalistic argument against articial intelligence.Within the third category, a dual perspective on the positive and negative aspects of the use of this technology in the eld of journalism again prevails, as shown in Table 8.Table 8. Perception of articial intelligence through podcasts from other elds related to journalismPositiveNegativeBenets/reatsPodcastersYslaMac2Caviar1e Coee1Traveltech1Growth Hacking Course1Educational/academic entitiesOnda Universitaria11RadiUS1Professional entitiesLaboratorio de Periodismo  2Total326Source: created by the authorYslaMac by journalist Amador Cámara stands out with its two contributions giving a negative assessment, from an approach that summarised all the arguments against the technology (Table 9). e professor and journalist Javier de la Rosa oered a more positive perspective, displaying in one of the Onda Universitaria podcasts (2024) the option of developing a radio bulletin with articial voices to demonstrate its usefulness in strictly informative genres. Tests with ChatGPT were another of the common resources employed in the podcasts classied in this section, with varying conclusions: negative (making up facts, sexist biases) or positive (improved writing, structuring of texts, choice of headline).
36 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónDespite the dierent categories based on origin, if we conceptualise the units within the digital audio sector as a whole, 51% of the podcasts analysed oered a balance between benets and risks. However, the number of pieces with a negative view of the technology is quite signicant: 37, which represents 42% of the total units in the group. Only six podcasts defended the benets of articial intelligence in journalism.is shows that, as with the emergence of any new technology, the journalistic debate revolves around its proper use. Specically in this case the debate concerns lingering fears of the improper use of articial intelligence, and the expectation about its future development and improvement, the eects of which are as yet unknown due to its recent emergence, but whose application in those media that are using AI is proving to be of great use.In relation to the arguments that support this debate, it should be noted that most podcasts included more than one reasoning within each perception (positive/negative). is implies that a single news piece can be classied into dierent sections. e objective is to show which of the aspects in favour of or against articial intelligence in journalism are the most recurrent.Table 9. Negative perception of articial intelligence in journalism. Argumentation about threats in the podcasts analysed, by categoryRadio audiosPress podcastPodcastersEducational entitiesProfessional entitiesTotalDisinformation/Dissemination of fake news/Manipulation of images and audios411721263Dehumanisation of the news product (lack of humour, irony, ability to interpret and human qualities) / Loss of quality of journalism10321117Lack of ethical values/Racial, classist and sexist biases1031216Job losses in journalism84315Lack of regulation51015Control of the news by large corporations/Commercial use of news621211Violation of intellectual property/copyright621110Lack of transparency regarding the sources used or the authorship of the content44Loss of control over articial intelligence21   3Source: created by the author
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 37 Table 9 shows that the main objection to articial intelligence in all categories is its use in promoting fake news and disinformation through the manipulation of images and videos. at is the hegemonic argument in the world of radio, based on the idea of articial intelligence’s ability to imitate one of the essential elements of the news, the human voice. e experiments carried out with articial intelligence applications sought to warn about the possibility of manipulating the voices of public gures to generate disinformation, along with the feasibility of replacing announcers, which is another of the aspects that arouses the greatest distrust among journalists in the media and which falls under the section concerning fear of job losses in the sector. is was stated, for example, by Carlos Alsina in one of the podcasts on the technology, from his program Más de uno, in which he recognised that “articial intelligence is usually talked about in the media from the point of view of suspicion”, especially “among those of us who fear losing our jobs as soon as articial intelligence knows how to make a radio program, which it is already doing” (Annex I). Likewise, there were warnings that the utilisation of the tool to promote disinformation may have disastrous consequences, not only in the eld of journalism, through the loss of credibility and the disaection of society with the media, but also in the political sphere, through the destabilisation of democracies and the suppression of ideological and informational plurality.e second argument that stands out is the dehumanisation of the news and the loss of quality in journalism. is aspect, moreover, is shown as the loophole whereby articial intelligence will not be able to replace journalists, under the premise that the technology lacks such qualities as irony, humour or the ability to interpret facts (Diakopoulos, 2019). e dehumanisation of journalism is also related to the next most prominent negative aspect in the podcasts analysed, the absence of ethical criteria and the biases detected in the use of the technology. e loss of jobs and the lack of regulation are at the same level within the potential threats, followed by the suspicions aroused by the role of large tech corporations in the development of the technology, through multi-million-dollar investment. However, the lack of regulation of this new technology was one of the aspects that the press podcasts warned of most frequently, a call being made for the drawing-up of regulations to ensure its proper use. is attitude of distrust was also supported by the illicit use of journalistic texts to train and feed generative articial intelligence applications, without the consent of newspapers and journalists. e opacity of the sources utilised and the loss of control over this technology occupy the last places amongst the arguments against it, which sometimes oer an apocalyptic vision of the tool’s potential danger. Jordi Pérez Colomé, a journalist from El País specialising in technology, summarised this attitude in one of the podcasts with the expression “fear of the unknown” (El País, 2022).e theses against articial intelligence were also more varied than those supporting the benets of its use in journalism, as shown in Table 10:
38 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTable 10. Positive perception of articial intelligence in journalism. Argumentation about its benets in the podcasts analysed, by categoryRadio audiosPress podcastPodcastersEducational entitiesProfessional entitiesTotalAutomation of tasks/Optimisation of journalists’ work171234238Opportunity for modernisation of journalism/Creation of new products251311Audience analysis and monitoring/Selection of topics of interest to the audience/Content personalisation314Verifying sources and news/Detecting fake news 3   3Source: created by the authorTable 10 shows that the main idea in favour of articial intelligence in all categories is its usefulness as a tool to help and improve journalists’ work, from the automated generation of texts, which is its most widespread use, to its application in journalists’ varied tasks, with a broad description that covers massive data analysis (big data), text translation, transcription of interviews and videos, image generation, optimisation of writing, creation of radio program theme songs or voiceovers employing synthesised voices. Articial intelligence also appears as a technology that can promote a benecial transformation for journalism, by driving modernisation in the sector –similar to what the emergence of the internet and the move to the digital model meant at the time– along with the opportunity to create new products. To this end, press podcasts, in particular, highlighted the ability of articial intelligence to conduct audience surveys and detect subjects of interest that allow the development of personalised products. e absence of any references to these uses in the world of radio is striking, it being an area where tools for audience segmentation are already being applied, such as the aforementioned Audio Data Sentiment (ADS) project by the PRISA group. Another aspect that was defended in the press podcasts is its usefulness in counteracting one of its main eects, such as misinformation and fake news, through the fact-checking of data and sources. ere are several podcasts in which the need for constant supervision of automated journalistic tasks was stressed, which denotes an absolute lack of condence in the technology. However, the need for the media to encourage professionals to train in articial intelligence is emphasised in order to exploit its enormous potential.
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 39 4. Discussion and conclusionsDespite the long history of the application of articial intelligence to various elds (Salazar, 2018), its extension to journalism has come more recently and has been closely linked to the development of computing and the Internet (Túñez et al., 2020). Nevertheless, its implementation in the Spanish media has enough of a track record to permit a perspective analysis that shows its applications, proposals and attitudes among news professionals. Since the beginning of the millennium, news items have been detected speaking of the rst steps of the technology in journalism. However, the formidable development of articial intelligence over the last ten years has led to a debate within journalism about the usage and threats of this new tool. e debate has intensied, especially since 2023, and particularly in podcasts, due to the emergence of programmes such as ChatGPT (Gutiérrez, 2023; Lopezosa, 2023; Parratt-Fernández et al., 2024), Gemini, Midjurney or Sora, and the manifest ability of articial intelligence to modify images, imitate voices and sounds and generate text autonomously. e extraordinary progress of all these developments over a short period of time has fostered their conception as disruptive technology, since the media are being forced to adapt quickly and introduce new dynamics into their professional methodologies (Túñez et al., 2021; Pérez-Seijo et al., 2023; Lopezosa et al., 2024). e debate is very similar to that which arose with the appearance of the Internet and the digital transformation that the sector experienced only recently. However, this time the variants are dierent, since, if the previous technological revolution fundamentally aected the business model, the current one poses other dilemmas of ethical and social signicance.Radio oers the largest number and greatest variety of audios related to articial intelligence and journalism within the podcast format and shows that this is a recurring subject in its content. at does not mean that it is the area showing most interest in the topic, since it is also present in other media (Parratt-Fernández et al., 2024), but it does mean that, for the public that prefers podcasts for their news, radio is the medium that sets the trend in relation to perceptions of the technology in its application to journalism. El País alone stands out among the press in terms of audios dedicated to the issue, although a long way short of what radio oers. at is because radio utilises its main product and transforms it into a podcast, thus also facilitating the search by programs, subjects or through the tag “podcast”, as well as the option of nding them in the catalogues of the main digital audio platforms (Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Podimo, Podium, Google Podcasts, Spreaker or YouTube). e diversication of radio consumption formats has brought about an expansion of its reach, both among the traditional audience, listeners of live radio, and consumers of streaming audios. e diversication of news in the press has also received a notable boost in recent years. However, the treatment of the issue of articial intelligence and journalism stands out in its main format, which is text (Parratt-Fernández et al., 2024). It must be considered that, despite a lesser representation of the subject in press podcasts, the use of the digital audio format is used to delve into current aairs of great newsworthiness, which implies that, for professionals in the written media, articial intelligence and journalism bring together enough interest to be treated specically through complementary products which allow their analysis to be extended.As regards the audio pieces in the third category, despite the diverse origin of the podcasts, the common denominator is the specic treatment of the subject, with audios expressly dedicated to the application of the tool to journalism which highlight the special attention articial intelligence has aroused among professional journalists and in the eld of academic training.
40 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónMost podcasts, as a whole, address the impact of this technology on journalism in depth, adopting a reective and analytical perspective and utilising specialised sources to present dierent approaches. Radio podcasts are the ones that most commonly resort to in situ demonstrations of the use of articial intelligence through voice or text generation software to show its negative or positive potential. However, despite the notable presence of journalistic articial intelligence in the news agenda, it did not stand out as a priority topic, except in the podcasts in the last category. Radio and press audios in which it appeared as a secondary issue predominate, within pieces generally dedicated to articial intelligence.As for perceptions of the application of this technology to journalism and news, a balanced view prevails in all categories concerning the benets and threats, although the number of pieces with a negative perception is quite signicant, especially on the radio, where greater concern about the potential dangers of this new technology is revealed through its audios. e negative view is also quite prevalent in the press, while it is a minority in podcasts classied in the third category. e data is striking since, despite the implementation of articial intelligence in journalism and its proven usefulness, there is still mistrust regarding the challenges and threats it may represent for this sector. It is clear, however, that journalists distinguish between professional use of the technology, with all its benets, and the use that may be made in spheres other than journalism, such as politics or economics, which is the basis of one of their main arguments against the tool, and they therefore assign any responsibility for the potentially harmful eects of this technological development to those other spheres.Qualitative analysis shows that, within the arguments about the negative perception of articial intelligence in journalism through podcasts, the fear of improper use of articial intelligence to promote disinformation and the spread of fake news stands out in all categories, an argument that has gained ground among professionals, especially from 2023 onwards, more than the loss of jobs, which at rst represented the essential misgiving (Túñez et al., 2021). ere is also agreement on the second unfavourable aspect of articial intelligence, which is the dehumanisation of the news, a vision that is closely linked to the ethical and social conception of journalism, and which also results in a loss of quality in journalism. at is the second most frequent argument in radio podcasts, which utilise tests with imitations of the voices of well-known announcers as a resource to demonstrate the inability of articial intelligence to replicate the humour, irony or empathy of those being imitated. Another warning related to the idea of dehumanisation that stands out from the eld concerns the risk of discrimination due to the dissemination of biased texts created by intelligent systems. at gures in all podcast categories, as indeed does the warning about the lack of ethical values. Within negative perceptions, concern about the lack of regulation is of interest, such perceptions manifesting above all through press podcasts, which show the fear among professionals in the print media about the uncontrolled use of this technology and the opacity regarding the control of information by large technology corporations for unknown purposes.As regards positive perceptions, there is a consensus about its usefulness in aspects such as task automation and optimisation of journalists’ tasks, this being seen as the most highly-valued element, with a great wealth of applications, followed by the opportunity oered by articial intelligence to modernise journalism and create new products.However, most podcasts address articial intelligence in journalism from both positive and negative perspectives, so the debate is chiey focused on the proper or improper use of the technology. In this sense, there is a diversity of opinions among journalists, as shown by the survey carried out by Mayoral et al. (2023), in which a large majority of those interviewed
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 41 expressed a favourable opinion of articial intelligence, and which reveals the disparity of sensibilities that exist around the issue (Nguyen & Hekman, 2022).It would be interesting to extend this analysis to other media such as television. Similarly, it would be pertinent to carry out comparative research, by contrasting the meta-journalistic discourse in dierent countries to understand the varying sensitivities of professionals with respect to the implementation of articial intelligence in journalism.5. Acknowledgementsis article has been translated into English by Brian O’Halloran to whom we are grateful for his work.e paper is part of project PR3/23-30837, “Application of articial intelligence to journalism: professional challenges and implications for content, audiences and training”, funded by the Complutense University of Madrid.6. Conict of intereste author declares that there is no conict of interest contained in this article. 7. Bibliographic referencesAlonso-Fernández, J. A., Rodríguez-Luque, C., & Legorburu-Hortelano, J. M. (2022). La radio no muere en la antena. Podcasting y estrategias de difusión a la carta en emisoras generalistas. Profesional de la Información, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.sep.08Bazán-Gil, V., Pérez-Cernuda, C., Marroyo-Núñez, N., Sampedro-Canet, P., & De-Ignacio-Ledesma, D. (2021). Inteligencia articial aplicada a programas informativos de radio. Estudio de caso de segmentación automática de noticias en R. Profesional de la Información, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.may.20Cadena SER. (2024, abril 30). WePod presenta ‘La IA y tú’, un podcast internacional para explicar la inteligencia articial al público europeo. http://bit.ly/45bpi4BCadena SER. (2023, mayo 28). Victoria, la voz sintética de Cadena SER, mejor producto internacional de audio del año. https://bit.ly/3XI5EKdCadena SER. (2022, octubre 11). La Cadena SER, seleccionada en el programa Innovation Challenge de Google News Initiative. https://bit.ly/3BgNMOSCalvo Rubio, L. M., & Ufarte Ruiz, M. J. (2021). Inteligencia articial y periodismo: Revisión sistemática de la producción cientíca en Web of Science y Scopus (2008-2019). Communication & Society, 34(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.34.2.159-176Carlson, M. (2015). e robotic reporter. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 416-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976412Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2019). A review of articial intelligence adoptions in the media industry. International Journal on Media Management, 21(3-4), 193-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2019.1695619

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


42 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónChuan, C. H., Tsai, W. H. S., & Cho, S. Y. (2019). Framing articial intelligence in American newspapers. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 339-344). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314285De Lara, A. (2022). Retos de la divulgación de la inteligencia articial en los cibermedios españoles. Contratexto, 38, 205-226. https://doi.org/10.26439/contratexto2022.n038.5701Diakopoulos, N. (2019). Automating the news: How algorithms are rewriting the media (Illustrated ed.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674239302Díaz Noci, J. (2023). Inteligencia articial, noticias y medios de comunicación: Una aproximación jurídica desde la perspectiva de la propiedad intelectual al concepto de atribución y autoría. Textual & Visual Media, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.56418/txt.17.1.2023.1El Español. (2024, marzo 9). Escucha nuestras noticias: El Español lanza un servicio de audiolectura. El Español. http://bit.ly/3U8jBiNEl País. (2023, enero 23). Un robot periodista critica la censura a la guerra. El País. http://bit.ly/4b1PLTWEl País. (2010, abril 5). El robot que publica exclusivas. El País. http://bit.ly/447UBwHEuropa Press. (2023, diciembre 13). El 85% de los periodistas apuesta por regular el uso de la inteligencia articial generativa en la profesión, según la APM. http://bit.ly/3Joe56HFerrante, E. (2021). Inteligencia articial y sesgos algorítmicos. ¿Por qué deberían importarnos? Nueva Sociedad, 294, 27-36.Flores Vivar, J. M. (2019). Inteligencia articial y periodismo: Diluyendo el impacto de la desinformación y las noticias falsas a través de los bots. Doxa Comunicación, 29, 197-212. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n29a10Gamir-Ríos, J., & Cano-Orón, L. (2022). Características de la podcastfera española. Entre la democratización y la lógica comercial. Profesional de la Información, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.sep.05García-Marín, D. (2019). La radio en pijama. Origen, evolución y ecosistema del podcasting español. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 25(1), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.63723González Esteban, E., & Sanahuja, R. (2023). Exigencias éticas para un periodismo responsable en el contexto de la inteligencia articial. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 90, 131-145. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon.557391Gómez-Calderón, B., & Ceballos, Y. (2024). Periodismo e inteligencia articial. El tratamiento de los chatbots en la prensa española. index.comunicación, 14(1), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.62008/ixc/14/01PeriodGutiérrez-Caneda, B., Vázquez-Herrero, J., & López-García, J. (2023). Aplicación de la inteligencia articial al periodismo: ChatGPT y los usos y riesgos de una tecnología emergente. Profesional de la Información, 32(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.14Helberger, N., & Diakopoulos, N. (2023). e European AI and how it matters for research into AI in media and journalism. Digital Journalism, 11(9), 1751-1760. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2082505

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 43 Kim, D., & Kim, S. (2018). Newspaper journalists’ attitudes towards robot journalism. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 340-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.009Kirley, E. A. (2016). e robot as cub reporter: Law’s emerging role in cognitive journalism. European Journal of Law and Technology, 7(3). http://bit.ly/4d5g0KJLopezosa, C., Pérez-Montoro, M., & Rey-Martín, C. (2024). El uso de la inteligencia articial en las redacciones: Propuestas y limitaciones. Revista de Comunicación, 23(1), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC23.1-2024-3309Lopezosa, C., Codina, L., & Ferrán-Ferrer, N. (2023). ChatGPT como apoyo a las systematic scoping reviews: Integrando la inteligencia articial con el framework SALSA. Col·lecció del CRICC. Universitat de Barcelona. http://bit.ly/4hrgOvRManfredi Sánchez, J. L., & Ufarte Ruiz, M. J. (2020). Inteligencia articial y periodismo: Una herramienta contra la desinformación. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 124, 49-72. https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2020.124.1.49Martín-Nieto, R., Pedrero-Esteban, L. M., Martínez-Otón, L., Pérez-Escoda, A., & Castillo-Lozano, E. (2024). El auge del podcast narrativo de no cción en España: Análisis de la producción original en las plataformas de audio bajo demanda. RAE-IC, Revista de la Asociación Española de Investigación de la Comunicación, 11(21). https://doi.org/10.24137/raeic.11.21.04Martínez-Costa Pérez, M. P., & Lus Garate, E. (2019). El éxito de los podcasts de noticias y su impacto en los medios de comunicación digital. Miguel Hernández Communication Journal, 10(2), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.21134/mhcj.v10i0.314Martínez-Otón, L., Leoz Aizpuru, A., & Pedrero Esteban, L. M. (2022). Los podcasts informativos diarios en España. Evolución de la oferta en 2021. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 13(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.26849Mediapost. (2023, noviembre 7). Impacto de la inteligencia articial en la industria de los medios de comunicación. Mediamix. https://bit.ly/3t7FxyVPérez-Rodríguez, M. (2022). El podcasting en España: Entre la comunicación tradicional y las nuevas narrativas. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 56, 47-63. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2022.56.47-63Pintado, M., & Peña-Serrano, M. (2023). La ética en los algoritmos: Aproximación a los riesgos de la inteligencia articial en el periodismo. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 81, 347-367. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2023-1815Ponce, M., & García-Murillo, M. (2023). El impacto de la inteligencia articial en la producción y distribución de contenido en los medios. Comunicació, 41(3), 295-314. https://doi.org/10.6035/comunicacio.2023.41.3.5Rasmus, K. (2020). La automatización de los medios: Teoría y práctica de la “robotización” del periodismo. Foca: Revista de Comunicación, 7(14), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.32801/foca.2020.14.01Sampedro, P., & Pérez-Cernuda, C. (2022). La inteligencia articial en el ámbito informativo: De la automatización a la personalización de las noticias. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, 5(2), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.23852/rci.2022.5.2.07Sánchez, J. A., & Llorente, M. (2023). Nuevas tecnologías y el futuro de la radio: El fenómeno podcast en el ecosistema sonoro. Revista de Comunicación y Sociedad, 23(2), 213-230. https://doi.org/10.7203/RCS.23.2.12345

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


44 | nº 42, pp. 21-45 | January-June of 2026Perceptions of articial intelligence applied to journalism in Spanish podcasts: meta-journalistic discourse in audios...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónSotelo, M., & Villa, J. (2023). La inteligencia articial en la radio: Potencialidades y desafíos. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 81, 203-220. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2023-1794urman, N., & Lupton, D. (2017). Journalism in the age of algorithms. Journalism Practice, 11(6), 666-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1208089Vázquez, F. (2023). La automatización del periodismo en España. Prensa, 28(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.11144/jm.v28i2.602

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 21-45 January-June of 2026Isabel María Martín SánchezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 45 8. AnnexAnnex I. List of podcasts cited in the analysisMediumPodcast TitleDateProgram of originLinkRadio podcastsCOPEJuanma Castaño listens to how articial intelligence makes his program and this happens: “Last season”12/10/2023El Partidazo de COPEhttps://bit.ly/3VibtwDCOPEPaco González reacts to the latest AI creation: “If you are driving…”09/23/2023Tiempo de Juegohttps://bit.ly/3XgIxrkCOPEe challenge we face with Articial Intelligence: How to know what is true and what is false? 06/17/2023Fin de Semanahttps://bit.ly/3VcZr7xCOPEis is how Articial Intelligence can manipulate this photo to reect a situation very dierent from what you see04/04/2023Lo que vienehttps://bit.ly/4c5E9QNOnda CeroHow to protect ourselves from AI deepfakes and misinformation?03/15/2024News/Economicshttps://bit.ly/3VhG6SKOnda CeroDoes AI endanger the profession of journalist and communicator? 02/29/2024Nits de radiohttps://bit.ly/4cco1fEOnda CeroDiego Martínez: “Our challenge is to ensure that AI is developed ethically and responsibly.”02/14/2024Más de unohttps://bit.ly/3yUSuAHOnda CeroLearning to use articial intelligence as another tool in a journalist’s arsenal07/31/2023Más de unohttps://bit.ly/3xbDcXJOnda CeroArticial Intelligence makes Más de uno03/02/2023Más de unohttps://bit.ly/3Xjav5NPress PodcastEl PaísHow to clone a voice?11/16/2022Podcast. Hoy en El Paíshttps://bit.ly/3VvwZiOPodcast of educational/academic entitiesOnda Univer-sitariaNewsletter with AI neural voices 01/03/2024Francisco de Vitoria Universityhttps://bit.ly/3RkziCJ

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]