The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles and transformation arcsLa construcción dramática de personajes periodistas televisivos en series de cción (2012-2024): perles psicológicos y arcos de transformación doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | 233 January-June of 2026ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: Lorenzo López, J. G. and Úrbez Fernández, P. (2026). e dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles and transformation arcs. Doxa Comunicación, 42, pp. 233-254.https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n42a2751José Gabriel Lorenzo López. PhD in Audio-visual Arts from Rey Juan Carlos University, he also serves as a lecturer on the Audio-visual Communications Degree at Villanueva University, and at the Escuela Superior de Arte Dramático [graduate school of the dramatic arts] of Castilla y León. Professor Lorenzo López also teaches on the Master’s Degree in Screenwriting for Film and TV Series at Rey Juan Carlos University. His publications include the screenplay entitled, El Día del Fin del Mundo [e day the world ended], for which he obtained a grant from the Autonomous Region of Madrid for the development of this and other feature lm scripts. Moreover, he is also the screenwriter for the lm, No Puedo Vivir sin Ti [I can’t live without you], which has been released on Netix in the current year of 2024. In addition to being a screenwriter, his work as a researcher focuses on cinematic narratives and dramatic strategies for both in lm and television scripts.Villanueva University, Spain [email protected]ORCID: 0000-0003-2555-2947Pablo Úrbez Fernández. PhD in Communication from the University of Navarra, in addition to a bachelor’s degrees in both Journalism and History, he also serves as Secretary of the Audio-visual Communications Degree at Villanueva University. His main line of research is historical and biographical portrayals in audio-visual media, which was the subject of his doctoral thesis, and he has also completed one six-year investigative term. He has participated in both national and international conferences in the areas of Communication and Humanities, in addition to having carried out a research stay at the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore in Milan in 2021, and at King’s College London in 2024.Villanueva University, Spain [email protected]ORCID: 0000-0001-7781-8888is content is published under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. International License CC BY-NC 4.0Recibido: 24/07/2024 - Aceptado: 05/11/2024 - En edición: 10/01/2025 - Publicado: 01/01/2026Resumen:En 2012, el éxito de la serie e Newsroom vino acompañado de la polémica que suscitó, entre los profesionales del medio, el idealismo de los protagonis-tas. Aunque las series sobre periodistas de noticiarios televisivos ya existían antes de la llegada de e Newsroom, el impacto mediático que originó su estreno inauguró una nueva tendencia en el género. Este artículo indaga en Received: 24/07/2024 - Accepted: 05/11/2024 - Early access: 10/01/2025 - Published: 01/01/2026Abstract:e success of the series e Newsroom was accompanied by controversy among media professionals regarding the idealism of the protagonists. Although series about television news journalists existed before the arrival of e Newsroom, the media impact of its premiere inaugurated a new trend in the genre. is article looks at some of

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


234 | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | January-June of 2026The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación1. IntroductionFrom classic Hollywood until the 21st century, we nd numerous feature lms starring journalists of dierent cinematic genres and typologies, including the following: comedies such as It Happened One Night ( Frank Capra, 1934), His Girl Friday (Howard Hawks, 1940), and e Front Page (Billy Wilder, 1974); dramas such as Call Northside 777 (Henry Hathaway, 1948), Ace in the Hole (Billy Wilder, 1951), Network (Sidney Lumet, 1976), and e Insider (Michael Mann, 1999); investigative thrillers such as All the President’s Men (Alan J. Paluka, 1976); and exotic adventures such as e Passenger (Michelangelo Antonioni, 1975), e Year of Living Dangerously (Peter Weir, 1982), and e Killing Fields (Roland Joé, 1984).In recent years, we have found many productions that deal mainly with investigative journalism, such as Spotlight (Tom McCarthy, 2015), e Post (Steven Spielberg, 2017), Richard Jewell (Clint Eastwood), and She Said (Maria Schrader, 2022). In between those lms, we nd Bombshell (Jay Roach, 2019), which tells the story of three women who confront the Fox media empire, in addition to war correspondent biopics such as A Private War (Matthew Heineman, 2018), and Another Day of Life (Raúl de la Fuente and Damian Nenow, 2019).Despite the variety, these stories do not depict the everyday activity of a newsroom. Instead, their plots use extraordinary events as a source of dramatic conict. Reecting the journalistic profession in lm has been extensively studied by Saltzman (2002) and Ehrlich (2006), who collaborated in publishing Heroes and Scoundrels: e image of the journalist in popular culture (Ehrlich and Saltzman, 2015). ere are also numerous studies on the convergence of journalism and lmmaking. In Spain, Mera Fernández (2008) compared lms that adapt the stories of real journalists with others that are purely ctional. Moreover, Ofa Bezunartea et al. (2007, 2008a, 2008b and 2010) analyzed journalistic tasks, clichés, female characters, and narcissistic characters that appear in lm. Recently, Coronado Ruiz (2024) has analyzed stereotypes of female journalists in algunas de las producciones televisivas que han surgido entre 2012 y 2024 a raíz del comienzo de e Newsroom. El estudio centra la investigación en la elaboración de una clasicación contemporánea del tipo de personalidad que ostentan los protagonistas de este tipo de subgénero, partiendo de la premisa de que las series analizadas deben reejar en sus tramas los com-portamientos cotidianos de una redacción televisiva al mismo tiempo que el peso dramático de los conictos recae sobre un protagonismo coral de los personajes. El objetivo es mostrar cuál es la construcción dramática de los personajes preferida por los guionistas para hacer más atractivas e intere-santes las tramas de este tipo concreto de series. La investigación ha centrado su análisis en los tres roles principales que son comunes y característicos de los informativos televisivos: quién dirige el informativo, quién lo produce y quién lo presenta. A su estudio se han aplicado las estrategias de guion cine-matográco en la elaboración de personajes dramáticos. Las conclusiones conrman la conuencia de algunos roles.Palabras clave:Periodismo; televisión; presentador; productor; serie de TV.the television productions that have emerged between 2012 and 2024 in the wake of e Newsroom. e study examines the development of a contemporary classication of the personality archetype of the protagonists of this kind of sub-genre, based on the premise that the plots of the series analyzed should reect the day-to-day activity of a television newsroom, while at the same time the dramatic burden of the conict falls on the ensemble cast. e aim is to determine which dramatic construction of the characters is preferred by the scriptwriters for the purpose of making the plots of this specic type of series more attractive and interesting. is research focuses on the three main roles that are typical of a television news program: who directs it, who produces it, and who anchors it. To this end, lm scripting strategies used to develop dramatic characters have also been applied to this study. Moreover, the ndings conrm that some of these roles converge.Keywords:Journalism; television; anchor; producer; TV series.
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 233-254 January-June of 2026José Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 235 US series of the last three decades, concluding that the image of these characters “continues to be simplied and stereotyped” (2024: 242). Other works that stand out include the compilation by Mínguez Santos (2012), as well as specic studies on the sub-genre of investigative journalism, such as “El periodismo de investigación en el cine” [investigative journalism in lms] (Martínez-Salanova, 2019), and “Las velocidades del periodismo en el cine: ocho lmes sobre Slow Journalism” [the speed of journalism in cinema: eight lms about slow journalism] (Serrano Martín, 2022), among others.As to why journalistic plots generate interest among the public, Mera Fernández (2008: 507) observed that the protagonists are “privileged spectators of the important events that happen in the world”. is could explain the success of adventurous tales starring reporters and war correspondents, as well as investigative plots with the ultimate goal of re-establishing justice. Nevertheless, it is not very easy to transfer the everyday work newsrooms to lm, as the stories could become lost in a multitude of plots that might result in a loss of interest and impact on the audience. For this reason, García Martínez and Serrano-Puche make the following assertion: “e series format allows us to recreate the daily journalistic routines and work of a newsroom. Moreover, it enables us to focus on gathering detailed information, on learning how to gain the trust of a source, on managing dead time, on the friction between employees and managers, on dealing with ethical problems, on confronting dead ends of an investigation, or on the short pieces that feed into a more far-reaching exclusive” (2013: 280).In the 21st Century, not only lms but also television series built around journalistic plots started to appear, and what began as a one-time event such as e Mary Tyler Moore Show (1970-1977), followed by its spin-o Lou Grant (1977-1982), and rounded out by Murphy Brown (Diane English, 1988-1998), has become more commonplace over the last twenty-ve years1. e appearance of Sports Night (1998-2000), a drama about a TV sports news program, e Generation Kill (2008), linked to the Iraq War from the point of view of a war journalist, as well as e West Wing (1999-2006) and Borgen (2010-2022), whose main plots revolve around politics, not only gave journalism a meaningful subplot, but they also paved the way for a succession of journalistic series. ough not as numerous as other genres such as crime, thrillers, and family dramas, these series have signicantly increased the production in this genre compared to previous decades.In this context, the premiere of the television series e Newsroom in 2012 represented a substantial divergence from previous series. On the one hand, it “generated interest and controversy among specialized critics and the public” in terms of its reception and, on the other hand, it conveyed a “perception of idealism in the way the profession is depicted” (Novoa-Jaso & Serrano-Puche, 2023: 196). e series aroused such intense interest among media professionals and academics of university journalism that in some cases it was used as a resource for the deontological training of future journalists, as shown by Nicolás-Gavilán et al. (2017). Along the same lines, Huerta Floriano and Pérez Morán (2024: 402) have asserted that “the approach to such a transcendental issue for the sound functioning of democratic societies produced nearly every imaginable eect with the exception of indierence”.1 For a more comprehensive list of ctional series about television journalism, we could add the following: the British parody Not the Nine O’Clock News (1979); Argentina’s Mesa de noticias [news desk] (1983); another British parody called Drop the Dead Donkey (1990); Australia’s Frontline (1994); and the American sitcom e Naked Truth (1995).
236 | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | January-June of 2026The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónis is the essence of the study at hand, because in today’s society where opinion is highly polarized and information is transmitted without lters, mainly due to the rise of social media, the work of journalists must hold an essential place in society, if possible, when it comes to communicating news objectively. e rise of journalistic TV series is no coincidence, especially since 2012, after a nancial crisis with enormous social consequences that began in 2008, along with the emergence of many populist movements around the world that have ideologically polarized Western society, which coincides with the loss of faith in the more moderate and traditional political class.For this reason, the cornerstone of this article lies in the way contemporary series portray the essence of the journalistic profession, because this “is how journalism fulls one of its most basic principles: the surveillance of public institutions” (Kovach and Rosenstiel, 2012: 155). Moreover, it “refers to journalism as the ‘fourth estate’, or in other words, as an institution which, given its public service essence, must control the activity of the legislative, executive, and judicial powers’ (García Martínez and Serrano-Puche, 2013: 281).1.1. Objectivese rst objective of this study is to identify ctional series that are similar, which were released between 2012 and 2024. In other words, serialized ctional stories that place a team of journalists in a television newsroom and build the plot according to plausible dramatic conicts that could arise in their daily professional work.e second objective is to conduct a comparative analysis of the dierent series in our sample with regard to the portrayals of diverse characters. We will observe whether the real professional roles of the anchor, the producer, and the news director are found in the journalistic teams of these series2.e third objective is to analyze the dramatic conicts that comprise the backbone of the dierent stories and the transformation arcs of the characters.2. Method2.1. Selection of the simplee timeframe of 2012-2024 was chosen due to the media impact of the premiere of e Newsroom, as many journalism professionals viewed Sorkin’s portrayal as a lesson on what a reporter’s ethics should be. e scriptwriter used real news stories to develop plots regarding the professional routines of a television news program, thereby implicitly suggesting how the news should have been covered at the time. e controversy was so intense that Sorkin publicly apologized: “I have never tried to lecture journalists on how they should work [...] there has been a terrible misunderstanding” (Europa Press, 2014).2 To identify the characters in our analysis, we have relied on the classication system established by Novoa-Jaso, Sánchez-Aranda and Serrano-Puche (2019) regarding the typology of journalists.
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 233-254 January-June of 2026José Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 237 Despite the controversy, the script has an idealistic tone consistent with Sorkin’s previous lm work, which led to a subsequent inux of series about journalists. e purpose of the article at hand is not to study the impact of e Newsroom on its successors, but rather to identify patterns within the eld of television journalism that will enable the construction of an archetypical, recurring character in contemporary series of this genre.e series known as e Hour, which started its broadcasts a year before the appearance of e Newsroom, and which logically escaped its possible inuence, has been included due to its having complied with all the requirements of our sample. Furthermore, the timeframe of this production generally coincides with that of the study.By contrast, we discarded several programs for the following reasons: e Crack (Joel Joan, 2014), and e Curse (Fielder and Safdie, 2023), due to their being reality shows; Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (2014), because of the lack of an ensemble cast and a shortage of collaborative work in the newsroom; UnReal (Shapiro and Noxon, 2015) due to its being a dating show; e Producers (Seo Soo-Min and Pyo Min-soo, 2015), as the plot was set in an entertainment department; Incarnation of Jealousy (Park Shin-woo and Lee Jung-heum, 2016) for prioritizing romance over collaborative newsroom work; Embeds (Danny Jelinek, 2017) because its characters work for news agencies; Murphy Brown II (Diane English, 2018) for being a sequel to the iconic 1990s sitcom; Reboot (Steven Levitan, 2022), as it narrates the production and lming process of a sitcom; Nolly (Russell T. Davies, 2023) because it focuses on developing a soap opera; and Prime Time (Cohn and Duprat, 2023), which prioritizes the investigation of a crime over the routines of a newsroom. ese are just a few examples among many other series.Of all the journalistic series examined, our search yielded six that fullled the established requirements: ve are considered dramedies, if we adhere to the denition given by Gómez Martínez and García García, according to which these are television formats that “realistically combine humor and drama without either aspect going to an extreme or clearly dominating’ (2010: 141). e fth is a type of comedy sitcom, “which is heir to a theatrical tradition whose roots can be traced to certain radio series of the 1930s” (2010: 111), in an attempt to make the viewer laugh by ridiculing the characters.We have also discarded Stay Tuned! (Tadahisa Fujimura, 2017), a Japanese series of merely one season that mixes the sitcom format with a mockumentary. Despite having a producer and reporters at the TV station, neither the anchors nor the news director provide enough dramatic relevance for analysis. Also, the dramatic conicts are too insignicant to allow the authors to compare it with other series.2.2. Description of the samplee Hour (Abi Morgan, 2011-2012), produced by the BBC, consists of two seasons of six episodes each; e Newsroom (Aaron Sorkin, 2012-2014), produced by HBO, consists of three seasons; Argon (Lee Yoon-jung, 2017), made by Netix, is a South Korean miniseries consisting of eight episodes; e Morning Show (Jay Carson, 2019-), made by Apple TV+, has three seasons; e Newsreader (Michael Lucas, 2021- ) is an Australian production with two seasons; and Great News (Tracey Wigeld, 2018) is a sitcom consisting of two seasons.
238 | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | January-June of 2026The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación2.3. MethodologyNone of the characters is free of conict. e real interest in a dramatic personality comes from the level of diculty of the conicts they face. As argued by McKee, “e true nature of a character is revealed through the choices each human makes under pressure: the greater the pressure, the deeper the revelation, and the more appropriate the choice we make about the character’s essential nature’ (McKee, 2003: 132). In this regard, several studies arm that the aspects of analysis and evaluation to be considered when addressing dramatic characters lie in the evolution of their personalities throughout the story, which corresponds to their psychological features. is point is argued in the respective studies of Forster (1927), Seger (1993) Sánchez-Escalonilla (2001), Galán Fajardo (2005), Sánchez Noriega (2006), Marks (2009), Truby (2009), Pérez Rufí (2016), and Gutiérrez Delgado (2023). Likewise, Galán Fajardo and Pérez Rufí also place emphasis on the construction of a dramatic character based on their physical and sociological aspects.However, in view of these authors’ agreement on the psychological aspects of the characters, the article at hand will focus on analyzing and comparing the psychological dimension with the intention of discovering the similarities in the construction of their personality. us, with regard to the psychological facet of the characters, three aspects will be studied: personality; desire and need; and the transformation arc. We do not intend to develop an original and innovative methodology, but rather to apply a series of parameters for analyzing characters that are widely acknowledged among scriptwriters.1) Personality prevents each character from “becoming a human being that is unrealistic”. erefore, the persona must be built on human psychology, “which distinguishes two integrating principles of personality: temperament and character” (Sánchez-Escalonilla, 2001: 276). Temperament “is the innate and spontaneous dimension of personality’ (idem), which does not vary throughout the life of an individual, because if a change were to occur it would aect the personality in a way that would cause the advent of a new person. On the other hand, character refers to “the stamp left on the personality by the free actions of an individual and the education received’ (idem). In ction, we often work on the psychological typologies applied to reality by Hippocrates and Jung. For both philosophers, temperament is dened by a person’s extroversion or introversion, depending on the degree of interrelation the individual has with the environment. However, character is where viewpoints diverge. For Hippocrates, character is the degree of stability or instability of a person in relation to the fragility or strength that they exercise over the control of their emotions and feelings. us, there are people who are sanguine (extrovert-stable), choleric (extrovert-unstable), phlegmatic (introvert-stable), and melancholic (introvert-unstable). For Jung, people forge their character based on four ways of behaving when facing a problem. e reective individual “shows a special ability to detect and solve a problem” (Sánchez-Escalonilla, 2001: 283); the sensitive person “is more interested in the people who suer from those problems rather than in the solution” (idem); the perceptive person “is skilled at imminent conicts... these are highly sensorial individuals who are aware of objects before people”; and nally, the intuitive person “is able to see problems projected into the future and seek solutions, but rarely oers a rational explanation... they anticipate events with a precision that baes those who are reective” (idem). According to Jung, a combination of the two types of temperament and four kinds of character result in eight psychological typologies that dene people and, of course, ctional characters.In this regard, Galán Fajardo considers that “there are four areas of psychology that dene the internal character of a ctional personality, which are the following: the hidden past, the unconscious, the types of characters, and abnormal psychology, all
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 233-254 January-June of 2026José Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 239 of which are indispensable for its understanding” (2005: 272). Of the four aspects, we are interested in the one referring to character types, which is directly related to the ideas of Sánchez-Escalonilla.For Pérez Rufí, the psychological aspect depends on whether a character is at or round according to the degree of complexity of its dramatic construction. He denes the round character as one that is “full of ambiguity and doubt, and who is unstable and full of contrasts”, while the at character “is built upon a single idea or quality and is easily identied, as they are unchangeable” (2016: 541). In his study of aspects of a novel, Forster was the rst to distinguish between at and round characters. He argued that the former are dened by a single idea or quality, while the latter have the ability to surprise in a convincing way, since they bring with them the unpredictability of life (1927: 48-55). Likewise, Sánchez Noriega approaches these same categories following Forster’s example, yet this author adds that the traits of the at character “make them behave in a predictable way” (2006: 53). For his part, Seger delves into the multidimensionality of a character by giving them three characteristics on which to build their personality: their way of thinking, the ability to make decisions, and their emotional life: “e character is built when all of these aspects work together. ey enter the story by adopting certain attitudes (mindset), actions (decisions), and emotions (emotional life), and when they leave the story, they having changed on each of these levels” (1993: 208).2) Desire “is what the protagonist wants in the story; his or her particular goal... the driving force” (Truby, 2009: 62). Need “is what the protagonist must full internally in order to improve their life’ (2009: 58). Both aspects comprise the two factors that enable them to reach the goal. erefore, weakness is necessary for transformation to take place. Marks calls it the fatal aw, which “distinguishes an aspect of the character that not only denes his or her behavior, but also establishes the inner conict that guides the story” (2009: 115).3) e transformation arc traces the character’s evolution from their initial identity to the appearance of their true personality based on psychological criteria, and driven by their desires and needs, which outline the way they learn the lessons of life in the story. is occurs based on the obstacles encountered in the plot, which sometimes shape the character, and the temperament on other occasions as well, because “every inner change manifests itself in the personality” (Sánchez-Escalonilla, 2001: 350). erefore, narrating the development of a character “forces us to explore the recesses of the human soul [and, therefore,] ... to lay out arcs of transformation” (2001: 292). e dierent transformation arcs are dened as at when neither the character’s personality nor their thinking evolves in the plot; they are moderate when the ctional character maintains their temperament and character, yet there is an evolution in their way of thinking; they are radical when the “dominant life force gives up its preeminent position in favor of another” (2001: 293). In other words, this occurs when ctional characters modify their personalities according to Hippocrates, Jung, or both; and nally, they are circular when the character undergoes a radical evolution, generally during the second act, only to return to their initial personality during the third act.For his part, Seger addresses the development of the transformation arc under a dierent name, yet essentially in a way that is similar to the above denition. He argues that every transformation arc is sustained by two positions: the initial position is dened by the way of thinking, the way of making decisions, and the character’s emotional life, which dene the character in the approach to the story; and a process of evolution, which can be determined by the character’s transformation toward the following two mutually exclusive positions: the moderate position, from which the character modies the emotional dimension of their life, and even the way of thinking; and the extreme position, when the change also includes decision-making, or actions. As can be seen, this classication is similar to the moderate and radical arcs proposed by Sánchez-Escalonilla.
240 | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | January-June of 2026The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónMarks also arms the possibility of a character’s transformation, approaching the issue as a triad of mutually dependent conicts, so that the main discord cannot be resolved without the character overcoming the inner strife that stops them from taking action, and rst resolving the relational conict that keeps the character inwardly paralyzed (2009: 165).3. Results3.1. e characters’ personalities3.1.1. The HourTable 1. Main characters of e Hour and their occupationCharacterOccupationFreddie Lyon Reporter and anchorHector MaddenNews anchorBel RowleyProducerClarence FendleyNews director (T.1)Randall BrownNews director (T.1)Source: prepared by the authorsFendley is characterized as an enigmatic and observant personality. He does not speak more than is necessary, and he confronts the owners of the network when they ask him to make the editorial line more supportive of the government. Moreover, the revelation in the last episode of his being a Soviet spy gives him a personality which, according to Hippocrates would be phlegmatic, and according to Jung would be an intuitive introvert, since the real purpose of his work, apart from managing the network’s news, is to recruit disciples among the British to supply information to the USSR. His double-dealing is doomed to failure when his intentions are discovered by Lyon.Meanwhile, the new head of the news department, Brown, displays a condent personality who does not hesitate to make tough decisions when the professional or personal situation calls for it. ese judgements, however, suggest a pragmatic attitude that avoids jeopardizing the program and his position in the face of government pressure. Nevertheless, he ultimately becomes more idealistic and committed to the journalistic profession. us, according to Hippocrates and Jung, Brown has a sanguine and perceptive-extrovert personality as well.Rowley, on the other hand, is a tough and astute producer who always tries to inform the public while remaining objective. In this regard, she concurs with Lyon’s ideals of making a program that objectively informs the audience. Moreover, the love triangle she
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 233-254 January-June of 2026José Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 241 enters into with Madden and his wife, and the nal decision she makes to put aside the interests of her heart, reveal a stable character, even if she has at times surrendered to the temptation of love. For this reason, Rowley is considered a sanguine and reective extrovert.Finally, the two anchors Lyon and Madden could not be more antagonistic. Lyon also works as a reporter. He is idealistic, always in search of the truth, and committed to democracy and the need for journalism aimed at informing without ltering for scoops or giving biased reporting, in his opinion. is situation causes regular confrontations with his superiors, except for Rowley, who supports his view. His personality is that of a sanguine and reective extrovert.Madden is a person subject to manipulation, who has no appreciation for journalism; all he wants to do is satisfy his ego and lust for success. In fact, he has been appointed as an anchor by his father-in-law, who is a shareholder in the broadcasting company. For him, the ideal news program is the one that involves as little commitment as possible. is attitude makes him lose his temper on various occasions, especially when he is under pressure from Lyon and Rowley. erefore, the personality that best describes his behavior is a choleric and perceptive extrovert.3.1.2. The Newsroom Table 2. e main characters of e Newsroom and their occupationCharacterOccupationWill McAvoy AnchorMacKenzie McHaleProducerCharlie SkinnerACN News DirectorSource: prepared by the authorsSkinner’s personality can be described as romantic and idealistic, which leads to his making a drastic decision in the rst episode: to make a program that simply reports the facts, without being inuenced by the ideological bias of the news, “because the important thing in democracy is to have a well-informed electorate” (1x01). At the same time, he must stand rm in his decision in the face of pressure from the more pragmatic and self-interested owners of the station, represented by Leona Lansing and her son Reese, whose goal is to meet the nancial objectives of the business. His extroverted temperament and stable character make Skinner a sanguine personality, according to Hippocrates, and a reective extrovert, according to Jung.McHale’s idea of journalism matches the new spirit that Skinner hopes to bring to the program. Moreover, she is the one who can best deal with the self-centered and arrogant personality of the anchor, as they had a romantic relationship in the past. As head of news production, her main task is to convince McAvoy to make a commitment to oering an objective and truthful news program, while at the same time prevent him from thinking about ratings. McHale has a sanguine personality, according to Hippocrates, and is a sensitive extrovert based on Jung’s psychology, which allows her to “remain faithful to the values she knows” and not fall in love “with the wrong person” (1x01).
242 | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | January-June of 2026The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónMcAvoy, on the other hand, has a bold and impetuous personality. He is impulsive when faced with situations beyond his control. In front of an audience, he can maintain an aable and friendly tone, even if his attitude were insolent or overly eusive just moments before going on the air. His ability to adapt emotionally to the demands of the situation displays a sanguine personality. For Jung, he would be considered a perceptive extrovert, as the character is governed by a cynical, realistic and pragmatic attitude based on ratings.3.1.3. ArgonTable 3. e main characters of Argon and their occupationCharacterOccupationKim Baek-jinAnchorSin ChulProducerSource: prepared by the authorsere is not a news director in this series, as the role is carried out by the anchor instead. Baek-jin is a withdrawn and patient character who carries an inner wound caused by the death of his wife. is experience has turned him into a phlegmatic and intuitive introvert. However, he has a total commitment to the truth, and despite his introverted temperament he stands up to the owners of the TV station in order to maintain the veracity of the information.Producer Sin Chul is Baek-jin’s faithful squire, yet he is much more confrontational in his dealings with other people. He has a personality that leads him to make drastic and improvised decisions to remain loyal to his conscience, even if he himself is harmed by those decisions. ese traits make him a choleric and sensitive extrovert.3.1.4. The Morning ShowTable 4. Main characters of e Morning Show and their occupation CharacterOccupationAlex LevyAnchorBradley JacksonAnchorCory EllisonUBA News DirectorChip BlackProducerSource: prepared by the authors
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 233-254 January-June of 2026José Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 243 Levy has a mainly sanguine personality who, according to Jungian typologies, is a perceptive extrovert as well. She is likeable and able to disguise her feelings of rejection. Moreover, she performs well in social circles and does not allow her emotions to inuence her professional activity. is is how she maintains her position as a news anchor while her former colleague, Mitch, is regularly criticized. ough constrained by political correctness, she knows how to compromise and please others so as not to damage her reputation.Jackson is also mostly sanguine, although her impulsiveness can be related to the choleric type as well, yet with an outgoing and intuitive demeanor. Her spontaneity and sincerity appeal to audiences, who believe she is synonymous with authenticity. ese character traits lead her to champion noble causes and even to be politically incorrect, which leads to immediate tension with those who do not share her point of view.Ellison also has a mainly sanguine temperament, coupled with an outgoing and intuitive personality. Despite his intentions to restructure the TV station, he has no specic program to do so: he is guided by intuition and is deeply pragmatic, willing to modify his plans if he considers it more useful for the broadcaster. He hires Jackson on a whim, and despite the uncertainty of what could happen he enjoys the daily tasks without giving it much thought. For this reason, his psychological prole is not that of a perceptive personality, because rather than pursuing his own benet he is more interested in the well-being of the station.As producer of the news team, Black is a sanguine and thoughtful extrovert. Not only is he rational and orderly, but he resolves crisis situations as well, even if he dislikes improvisation and uncertainty. Moreover, he acts as Levy’s advisor when she goes too far.3.1.5. The NewsreaderTable 5. e main characters of e Newsreader and their occupationCharacterOccupationHelen NorvilleAnchorDale JenningsAnchorDennis TibbProducerLindsay CunninghamNews DirectorSource: prepared by the authorsAs for Norville, she has a mostly sanguine personality and is a reective extrovert as well. Her glamour is attractive to both the TV crew and the audience, and she is not afraid to commit herself to risky projects, nor does she compromise in the face of injustice. However, she sometimes displays insecurity and occasionally doubts her decisions, both professionally and in her relationships with others, which leads to distancing herself and breaking the bonds of aection.
244 | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | January-June of 2026The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónJennings is phlegmatic and sensitive introvert. Due to his diculty in establishing emotional bonds, he exudes inner complexity and hesitates to share his feelings with others, as he does not even understand himself. Despite his apparent rationality and control of the situation, his sensitivity sometimes leads him to become irrational in extreme situations.Tibb, on the other hand, is mostly sanguine, according to Hippocrates’ ideas, and a perceptive extrovert according to Jung. Although he is poor at reasoning, he is pragmatic. e actions he takes as producer are not daring, as he relies instead on Cunningham’s decisions to reject certain news items. Moreover, he seems rather lazy and even ignorant in some of the newsroom meetings.Finally, Cunningham has a choleric personality, according to Hippocrates, and a perceptive-extrovert personality, according to Jung. Although he is a well-respected professional with a nose for news, his aggressive and dismissive way of dealing with reporters, as well as his racial prejudice, make him a dicult character to deal with.3.1.6. Great NewsTable 6. e main characters of Great News and their occupationCharacterOccupationKatie WendelsonReporterGreg WalshProducerChuck PierceAnchorPortia Scott-GrithAnchorSource: prepared by the authorse personality of Wendelson is both sanguine and sensitive-extrovert. ough insecure, she is cheerful, hardworking, and stable. She is very interested in the opinion of her team, avoids falling in love with Walsh, and feels she is undervalued given the tasks she is expected to carry out in the newsroom.Walsh has a phlegmatic and reective-extrovert personality. Underscoring his British background, his personal life is a mystery to his workmates. Moreover, he is often unfriendly when communicating with his anchors and reporters.Veteran anchor Pierce exhibits a demeanor that is both extrovert-choleric and perceptive. Obsessed with being popular, he has made compromises throughout his career in order to keep his position as an anchor. His arrogance, the reluctance to innovate, and his refusal to accept new ways of doing things results in rejection by his team.Portia, on the other hand, is a sanguine and perceptive extrovert. Although she is young, modern, and feminist like Pierce, she is also pragmatic, realistic, and lacking in ideals. However, her sanguine personality, which is unlike that of Pierce, leads to her being accepted by the newsroom.
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 233-254 January-June of 2026José Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 245 3.2. Desires, needs, and the transformation arcFrom Lyon’s opening monologue, e Hour makes a commitment to objective news as the essence of quality journalism. Truthful information is absolutely everything. In this regard, the character of Fendley, who is news director in the rst season, has no needs other than to avoid being discovered as a spy, yet he wants to recruit followers who are sympathetic to the communist ideals of the USSR. As he fails to undergo any evolution, the psychological prole of Fendley’s behavior remain stable, thereby displaying a at transformation arc.Brown, however, has a need; he dares not break the government’s rules about how the news program is to be run, yet he is eventually driven by the desire to tell the truth no matter who falls by the wayside. He remains sanguine in terms of the Hippocratic aspect of his psychological prole, yet he undergoes an evolution in line with the ideas of Jung. is is displayed by his submissive obedience to the government mandate not to broadcast any material that could be detrimental to those at the executive level, and his character evolves into that of a reective extrovert who strives to broadcast the truth despite the consequences for the powers that be. Furthermore, the same evolution continues in his search for his missing daughter.As producer of the program and Lyon’s main supporter, Rowley, in her idealistic crusade, has a personal need: to live with Madden, with whom she has fallen in love, even though she knows the diculties of maintaining a relationship with a married man. In the professional realm, her desire is reected in her ambition to broadcast honest news without a subjective slant. From the beginning of the series to the end, she exhibits a sanguine and reective-extrovert personality, and she keeps her feet on the ground while never doubting the service that the television program should oer to the citizens of a democracy. us, her transformation arc is at.Finally, the psychological proles of the two anchors undergo very dierent transformation arcs. On the one hand, Lyon’s need takes shape in his reckless behavior in search of the truth, which impels him to put his life at risk on many occasions. Driven by idealism, his desire coincides with that of Rowley: to communicate the news to society in an objective way. He remains the same throughout the series, so his personality does not evolve, even though it has been constantly tested. us, his transformation arc is at.Madden has several crippling needs: he is an inveterate womanizer and his commitment to news is far from the truth, as his main aspiration is to maintain his standard of living, which results in a pragmatic life. Desired objectives nally settle into his head when, in the middle of the second season, he makes a commitment to the journalistic profession equal to that of Lyon and Rowley, discarding everything that has kept him morally half-hearted. us, he has a transformation arc that allows him to evolve psychologically when he nally makes a commitment to the program and decides to make an eort to broadcast the truth. His arc of transformation is radical, according to both Hippocrates and Jung, evolving from choleric to sanguine, and from perceptive-extrovert to reective-extrovert, respectively.In e Newsroom, neither the character of Skinner nor McHale displays any need at the beginning of the story. Nevertheless, they have one desire: to tell the facts as they are. However, McAvoy has a need, or weakness: he is a despotic and arrogant character who treats his colleagues as such, and his lack of commitment to reality leads him to deal with news without real interest so as not to damage his popularity. After learning of Skinner’s new directive, he reluctantly accepts his wish. From then on, pressure and conict come from outside forces, mainly from the top management of the TV station.
246 | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | January-June of 2026The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónSkinner, on the other hand, does not evolve according to Hippocrates’ concept: he remains sanguine despite his occasional angry outbursts resulting from the buckling of his idealistic and rational attitude in the rst season, and at times during the third season, when social networks threaten to replace the work of the classic journalist. However, according to Jung, the character becomes a perceptive extrovert, adopting a more pragmatic and materialistic view in order to save the TV station. As a result, his transformation arc is radical, according to Jung, although the series’ approach to this change is rather comical.As for McHale, the series’ succession of obstacles and vicissitudes do not bring about any evolution in her personality, neither in the classication of Hippocrates, nor in that of Jung. erefore, her transformation arc is at.Nevertheless, McAvoy remains a sanguine psychological type, becoming somewhat more restrained and balanced than at the beginning of the series. According to Jung’s parameters, he makes a shift from extrovert-perceptive to reective, as he becomes a person of righteous principles who nally accepts Skinner’s challenge and forges ahead with all its consequences. In this way, his transformation arc is radical, according to Jung.In Argon, news anchor Baek-jin displays a need, which is the lack of attention his daughter receives due to his professional commitments, and which gradually causes a greater distance between the two of them. e diculty of balancing his professional and personal lives is his weakness, which is described in the rst chapter. A longing arises from the successive clashes he has with his daughter, which makes him realize that he must not sacrice his love for his daughter by dedicating all his time to his work. He undergoes a small transformation by pushing his idealism to the limit when he places journalistic duty before his own reputation, because his conscience forces him to report a story that shows his lack of professionalism, which happened on the same day of his wife’s death. For Baek-jin, however, this circumstance does not lessen his indirect responsibility in the case, which highlights the character’s high moral character. For this reason, his transformation arc is moderate: he rediscovers his paternal commitment to his daughter and approaches her.Sin Chul’s case is similar to that of the anchor, as he feels the need to subordinate his entire personal life to the professional realm. A desired objective does not appear until he falls in love with a female editor, at which time his mindset starts to change. He evolves into a sanguine and intuitive extrovert, thereby balancing his personal and professional lives as a result of falling in love.Looking at the characters on e Morning Show, we see that Levy wants to keep her job as host of the show, and she is willing to place all the blame for the sexual abuse on Mitch and hire Jackson, if it leads to higher ratings. As she is afraid of losing her job and reputation, her conict revolves around whether she can overcome this fear, and whether she can stay true to herself by telling the facts and moving away from political correctness, or if she will just continue to pretend. She undergoes a moderate transformation, yet with dierent interpretations: she becomes aware of her deciency in setting an example while anchoring the program with Mitch; she comes to terms with her involvement in the cover-up of the sexual abuse; she acknowledges her part in the supercial news coverage; and she comes to terms with the pain she has caused to her family. is results in her teaming up with Jackson at the end of the rst season to expose Fred, who is the owner of the station. However, there is an ongoing inner conict between whether she is acting out of selessness or from a hidden desire not to damage her reputation, as the concern for her image continues in the second season (Maggie’s book). Moreover, she fails to resolve her family conict, and she is not able to end the relationship with Mitch.
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 233-254 January-June of 2026José Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 247 Jackson wants to change society for the better through journalism. erefore, she obviously does not want to work for a prestigious media outlet. Nevertheless, she appreciates being hired by e Morning Show, as she now has a larger audience for exposing social problems. Of all the characters in the series, she is the most idealistic. Her dramatic conict arises from the clash between her idealism and the show’s pragmatism: although she wants to be honest and address politically incorrect topics, she must continually decide whether to give in to the demands of production. In Jackson, we see a radical transformation of her character. e impetuous behavior she displays at the beginning is moderated for the purpose of conforming to the demands of television journalism. Moreover, she also loses her initial quixotic ideas in order embrace pragmatism, which occurs at the end of the second season. As such, she claims to be responsible and loyal to the network in order to keep the show on the air, yet the program loses its initial freshness and spontaneity that dened it at the beginning.As for Ellison, his desire is to regain the lost reputation of UBA in the wake of Mitch’s sex scandal. As news director, he nds himself caught between the newsroom and Fred. He wants to bring new ideas to the newsroom and avoid past mistakes, so his dramatic conict is between siding with political incorrectness and the new approach embodied in Jackson, or pragmatism, silence, and the fear of a paradigm shift embodied in Levy and Fred. Regarding Ellison, he undergoes a moderate transformation, yet it is more personal than professional. Although he remains true to his personality, his initial independent behavior is overlaid by his dependence on and infatuation with Jackson.Lastly, Black’s conict stems from the debate between producing fresh, politically incorrect content or continuing to rely on the innocuous and supercial reporting of the past. In the same vein, he hesitates between confessing what he knows about the alleged sexual abuse or remaining silent to protect the station. He undergoes a very moderate transformation in the rst season when he decides to take part in reporting the abuse. However, his involvement is blurred in the second season.Consequently, the dramatic conict on e Morning Show is based on a previous situation of journalistic and labor malpractice. Faced with this situation, the characters are torn between exploring what has happened in depth, which in some cases would entail acknowledging their own guilt, or keeping silent and continuing to produce the same supercial infotainment content.As for e Newsreader, Norville wants to regain her prestige as an anchor and gain inuence over production decisions. Following a career decline due to relationship and health issues, she aspires to become a prestigious anchor once again. Loss of aection and self-esteem are problems she needs to overcome. Conict arises from professional strain with Geo and Cunningham regarding whether or not to give in to their labor demands, and romantic tension with Jennings regarding whether to get involved with him or not. Given the situation, Norville undergoes a circular transformation. Her initially sanguine temperament takes on a melancholic tone as a result of her conict, and later becomes sanguine once again. e viewer sees her as a talented and independent journalist, yet one who has fallen from grace due to loneliness and insecurity. As the episodes progress, she regains her self-condence and the courage not only to anchor the news, but also to lead a team of people in search of an exclusive story. Based on the theories of Jung, she loses her reectiveness in order to become sensitive, and later returns to being reective again.Jennings is mainly interested in professional recognition, not in a general sense, but from a specic female character embodied in Norville. Jennings strongly desires Norville’s admiration, and the conict results from the romantic tension between the two. His rise and fall in the profession, his achievements, and his insecurities, are linked to Norville’s greater or lesser recognition.
248 | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | January-June of 2026The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónJennings undergoes a radical transformation as he gradually changes from being introverted and phlegmatic to a more sanguine personality. Professionally, he overcomes his shyness to lead projects and report the news on the scene. Above all, he changes emotionally: in his romantic relationship with Norville, he never made a full commitment because he did not conde in her with his most intimate secrets. Forced by circumstances, such as the revelation of his brush with homosexuality, he confesses his complex personal situation and shares his feelings.Cunningham does not display any specic need beyond maintaining the prestige of the station’s news desk, which is the same for Tibb in his role as producer. On successive occasions, the two appear in the same camera shot, which indicates similar views in the way they run the news desk. is is further evidenced by the nal conversation with Jennings when he is told in a matter-of-fact way that he will substitute Geo in anchoring the news. Although these two characters remain at, the latter begins to appreciate Noele when she starts to acquire sports knowledge. Finally, we must bear in mind the sitcom format of Great News. Due to her insecurity, Wendelson has a desire to be recognized and valued professionally. Her need is linked to self-esteem and how she is perceived by others. us, her purpose is to uncover an exclusive story and gain inuence in the newsroom. As for Walsh, his conict is linked to the infatuation he feels for Wendelson. As a producer, he does not want a relationship that might interfere with his professional work. Both characters undergo a moderate transformation. Although their temperament and character do not change, Walsh learns to communicate and have conversations with Wendelson, and he is more exible in the profession. Finally, Wendelson gains self-esteem despite the opinion of her mother, as well as the views of Walsh and her colleagues.Regarding Pierce, as an anchor he feels the need to maintain his popularity with the public. He undergoes a radical transformation from choleric to sanguine, and from a perceptive extrovert to an intuitive extrovert: the formerly pragmatic coward becomes an idealist. As for Portia, although she has the support of the audience and the newsroom sta, she has a strong desire to be recognized by a veteran anchor like Pierce. Consequently, her character is at.4. Discussion and conclusionsere seems to be a common belief that an anchor must have an extroverted temperament, which is considered essential and dramatically necessary in order for scriptwriters to create a prole of charismatic personalities. ere are only two cases of dramedies in which the character is developed based on an introverted temperament. ese are Baek-jin (Argon) and Jennings (e Newsreader). Both of these characters experience inner conict arising from events in the distant past. ese events have left a mark on each individual, with which they are still struggling. In the case of Baek-jin, it involves the death of his wife. As for Jennings, there was a homosexual encounter, which he keeps hidden, yet it generates internal conict to such an extent that it prevents him from interacting naturally with other people. Regarding the other anchors, although they experience inner conicts that arise during the development of the plots, these struggles do not involve traumatic events for the characters, but instead revolve around personal aws they must confront.
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 233-254 January-June of 2026José Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 249 Table 7. Temperament, character, and transformation arc of the anchors and reportersAnchors and reportersSeriesCharacter(Hippocrates)(Jung)Transformation arce HourFreddie Lyon (reporter and anchor)SanguineReectiveextrovertFlatHector Madden (anchor)CholericPerceptiveextrovertRadical transformationHe evolves into a sanguine and reective extroverte NewsroomWill McAvoySanguinePerceptive extrovertRadical transformationEvolves into being reectiveArgonKim Baek-jinPhlegmaticIntuitive introvertFlate Morning ShowAlex LevySanguinePerceptive extrovertRadical transformationEvolves into being reectiveBradley JacksonSanguineIntuitive extrovertRadical transformationEvolves into perceptivee NewsreaderHelen NorvilleSanguineReective extrovertRoundDale JenningsPhlegmaticSensitive introvertRadical transformation Evolves into SanguineEvolves into a reective extrovertGreat NewsKatieSanguineSensitive extrovertModerateChuckCholericPerceptive extrovertRadical transformationEvolves into being sanguineEvolves into an intuitive extrovertPortiaSanguinePerceptive extrovertFlatSource: prepared by the authorsRegarding the producers, they all have extroverted temperaments, which is typical of professionals who must know how to organize the work of a team always pressed for time. e exception is Great News, which gets its humor specically from the phlegmatic personality of the producer Walsh.
250 | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | January-June of 2026The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTable 8. Temperament, character, and transformation arc of the producersProducersSeries Character(Hippocrates)(Jung)Transformation arce HourBel RowleySanguineReective extrovertFlate NewsroomMacKenzie McHaleSanguineSensitive extrovertFlatArgonSin ChulCholericSensitive extrovertRadical transformationEvolves into sanguine and intuitivee Morning ShowChip BlackSanguineReective extrovertFlate NewsreaderDennis TibbSanguineReective extrovertFlatGreat NewsGregPhlegmaticReective extrovertModerateSource: prepared by the authorsRegarding the directors, it can be armed that an extroverted temperament coupled with management skills also dominates, except in the case of Fendley, whose double-dealing leads him to be cautious and not reveal his true intentions.Table 9. Temperament, character, and transformation arc of the news directorsNews directorsSeriesCharacter (Hippocrates)(Jung)Transformation arce HourClarence FendleyPhlegmaticIntuitive introvertFlatRandall BrownSanguinePreceptive extrovertRadical transformationEvolves into a reective extroverte NewsroomCharlie Skinner SanguineReective extrovertRadical transformationEvolves into being perceptivee Morning ShowCory EllisonSanguineIntuitive extrovertModeratee NewsreaderLindsay CunninghamCholericPerceptive extrovertFlatSource: prepared by the authors
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 233-254 January-June of 2026José Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 251 When analyzing a character, it is much more common to nd stable personalities, according to Hippocrates, which is inspired by the prototypical hero who is willing to ght for objective information in a situation where unbiased facts dominate. Jackson, McAvoy and Madden nd it hard to engage in the same ght, as they struggle to control their choleric impulses. ey must constantly grapple with the uneasiness of life that is in conict with their professional side.A stable character is also prevalent among the producers, except in the case of Chul, who displays a certain degree of instability at the outset, due to his being an impulsive person who does not know how to exercise common courtesy regardless of who he is talking to.A similar situation occurs with the directors, as a stable character is prevalent, except for Cunningham, whose cantankerous behavior with everyone on the editorial sta of e Newsreader often borders on abuse and makes his behavior nearly unbearable for his colleagues.However, if the characters are analyzed according to Jung’s psychological proles, there is no standard model to follow, since the character that denes directors, producers and anchors varies according to the series and the conicts that emerge, nor can any common patterns be established. In this regard, it can be armed that what is truly important in creating an attractive character is to make them stable, rather than to establish a common model for the way they face problems. As a result, scriptwriters do not see the need to establish an ideal pattern.Regarding the desire-need duality, which leads to overcoming a aw in order to achieve a goal, it can be concluded that most of the characters have the desire to create honest newscasts committed to the truth, regardless of their role. Cynicism and pragmatism are either not the purpose of the protagonists, or in some cases they are aws that must be overcome in order for the character to exhibit their true personality. In this regard, the only characters that deviate from the common criteria are news directors Fendley and Cunningham, producers Sin Chul and Walsh, and anchors Levy, Wendelson, Jennings and Norville. However, among the shortcomings there is a large and miscellaneous set of needs that make it impossible to obtain a common measure. Among these aws, the following can be found; a lack of courage, recklessness, rudeness, excessive dedication to work, pragmatism, a lack of self-esteem, and the desire to please the audience.Regarding the evolution of the characters as the transformation arc unfolds, there is a tendency among the news directors not to change their personalities. e only characters who break this mold are Skinner and Brown, yet for very dierent reasons. In Skinner’s case, he undergoes a radical evolution along the lines of Jung’s characteristics, yet he does so on a comic level that has little to do with serious drama. However, Brown’s situation takes place on a more somber level being aligned with a commitment to convey the truth.As for the producers, a at transformation arc also dominates, either due to their status as secondary characters in the plot (e.g. Tibb and Black) or, even if they are main characters like McHale and Rowley, the reason could be that the obstacles they face further reinforce their initial ideas. Basically, these characters are free of inner conict and their role is subordinated to that of the anchors they work for, who either make their mission easier, as in the case of Rowley, McHale and Black, or hinder it, as in the case of Tibb. Only Chul undergoes a radical transformation, which is even consistent with both Hippocrates’ and Jung’s parameters, thereby achieving a more stable life balance.
252 | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | January-June of 2026The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónRegarding the anchors, there is more variety with a recurring phenomenon of radical personality transformation. Madden, Levy, Jackson, Pierce and McAvoy are characters who evolve into journalists more committed to the values of free and democratic journalism, which is typical of a democracy, except in the case of Jackson who becomes more pragmatic as he loses his initial idealism and starts to obey the orders of those in charge. As for Norville, she displays a round arc due to the fact that she nishes the series as an exemplary character, just like at the beginning, because despite having suered personality setbacks during the story, she nally overcomes them and renews her original essence. e only characters who do not evolve are Lyon and Baek-jin, but for dierent reasons. Lyon keeps his personality intact despite the obstacles that his idealistic nature must confront as he struggles to comply with news ethics. For his part, we could say that Baek-jin fails due to his inability to overcome the wound he carries around following the death of his wife. In the end, his idealism is disregarded because he fails to implement his ideals into the guidelines of the network.5. Acknowledgementsis article has been translated into English by Charles E. Arthur, to whom we are grateful for his work.6. Specic contributions of each authorName and SurnameConception and design of the workJosé Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezMethodologyJosé Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezData collection and analysisJosé Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezDiscussion and conclusionsJosé Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezDrafting, formatting, version review and approvalJosé Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez Fernández7. Conict of intereste authors declare that there is no conict of interest contained in this article. 8. Bibliographic referencesBezunartea, O., Cantalapiedra, M. J., Coca, C., Genaut, A., Peña, S., & Pérez, J. (2007). Si hay sangre, hay noticia: Recetas cinematográcas para el éxito periodístico. Palabra Clave, 10(2), 61-74. http://bit.ly/4hH2qj9

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 233-254 January-June of 2026José Gabriel Lorenzo López and Pablo Úrbez FernándezISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 253 Bezunartea Valencia, O., Cantalapiedra González, M. J., Coca García, C., Genaut Arratibel, A., Peña Fernández, S., & Pérez Dasilva, J. Á. (2008a). … So What? She’s a newspaperman and she’s pretty. Women journalists in the cinema. Zer, 13(25), 221-242. http://hdl.handle.net/10810/40982Bezunartea Valencia, O., Cantalapiedra González, M. J., Coca García, C., Genaut Arratibel, A., Peña Fernández, S., & Pérez Dasilva, J. Á. (2008b). Divismo y narcisismo de los periodistas en el cine. Textual & Visual Media, 1, 107-120. https://bit.ly/3YNT38RBezunartea Valencia, O., Cantalapiedra González, M. J., Coca García, C., Genaut Arratibel, A., Peña Fernández, S., & Pérez Dasilva, J. Á. (2010). El perl de los periodistas en el cine: Tópicos agigantados. Intercom - Revista Brasileira de Ciências Da Comunicação, 33(1), 145-167. http://hdl.handle.net/11441/68879Coronado Ruiz, C. (2024). Periodismo, género y televisión: La imagen de las mujeres periodistas en las series estadounidenses (1988-2022). Doxa Comunicación, 39, 239-256. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n39a2126Ehrlich, M. C., & Saltzman, J. (2015). Heroes and scoundrels: e image of the journalist in popular culture. Champaign. https://doi.org/10.5406/illinois/9780252039027.001.0001Europa Press. (2014, abril 22). Aaron Sorkin se disculpa por las lecciones de periodismo en “e Newsroom”. http://bit.ly/48KcaF6Forster, E. M. (1927). Aspects of the novel. RosettaBooks.Galán Fajardo, E. (2005). La creación psicológica de los personajes para cine y televisión. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3(1), 263-273.García Martínez, A. N., & Serrano-Puche, J. (2013). El precio de la verdad: La imagen de los periodistas en las series de televisión contemporáneas. En J. J. García-Noblejas & R. Gutiérrez Delgado (Eds.), Poéticas de la persona. Creación, responsabilidad y vigencia en la comunicación pública y la cultura: Estudios en homenaje a Juan José García-Noblejas (pp. 279-290). Universidad de Navarra.Gómez Martínez, P. J., & García García, F. (2010). El guión en las series televisivas: Formatos de cción y presentación de proyectos. Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Editorial UFV.Gutiérrez Delgado, R. (2023). Si Aristóteles levantara la cabeza: Manual de escritura de series. Eunsa.Huerta Floriano, M. A., & Pérez Morán, E. (2024). Análisis del estilo audiovisual en la representación del periodismo: El ser y el deber ser en e Wire (Bajo escucha) y e Newsroom. Doxa Comunicación, 39, 401-419. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n39a2120Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2012). Los elementos del periodismo: Todo lo que los periodistas deben saber y los ciudadanos esperar. Punto de Mira.Lippmann, W. (2003). La opinión pública. Langre.Marks, D. (2009). Inside story: e power of the transformational arc. ree Mountain Press.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


254 | nº 42, pp. 233-254 | January-June of 2026The dramaturgical construction of journalistic TV characters in ctional series (2012-2024): psychological proles...ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónMartínez-Salanova, E. (2019). El periodismo de investigación en el cine. Aularia, 8(2), 1-12. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6932560Mckee, R. (2003). El guión: Sustancia, estructura, estilo y principios de la escritura de guiones. Alba.Mera Fernández, M. (2008). Periodistas de película. La imagen de la profesión periodística a través del cine. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, 14, 505-525. https://bit.ly/3ZdpsHnMínguez Santos, L. (2012). Periodistas de cine: El cuarto poder en el séptimo arte. T&B Editores.Nicolás-Gavilán, M.-T., Galbán-Lozano, S.-E., & Ortega-Barba, C.-F. (2017). e Newsroom: Uso de una serie de televisión para la formación ética de futuros profesionales de la información. El profesional de la información, 26(2), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2017.mar.14Novoa-Jaso, M. F., & Serrano-Puche, J. (2023). La audiencia de e Newsroom (HBO) en España: Perles, identicación y roles periodísticos. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, 29(1), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.80293Novoa-Jaso, M. F., Sánchez-Aranda, J. J., & Serrano-Puche, J. (2019). De la redacción a la (gran) pantalla: Roles profesionales del periodismo y su representación en la cción audiovisual. Icono14, 17(2), 32-58. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v17i2.1368Pérez Rufí, J. P. (2016). Metodología de análisis del personaje cinematográco: Una propuesta desde la narrativa fílmica. Razón y Palabra, 20(95), 534-552.Serrano Martín, C. (2022). Las velocidades del periodismo en el cine: Ocho lmes sobre slow journalism. Revista de Comunicación de La SEECI, 55, 101-120. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2022.55.e745Sánchez-Escalonilla, A. (2001). Estrategias de guión cinematográco. Ariel.Sánchez Noriega, J. L. (2006). Historia del cine: Teoría y géneros cinematográcos, fotografía y televisión. Alianza Editorial.Seger, L. (1993). Cómo convertir un buen guion en un guion excelente. Rialp.Truby, J. (2009). Anatomía del guion: El arte de narrar en 22 pasos. Alba.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]