Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)El pódcast diario de noticias en España. Factores predictivos del engagement multiplataforma (iVoox y YouTube) doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | 47 January-June of 2026ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: García-Marín, D. (2026). Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube). Doxa Comunicación, 42, pp. 47-71.https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n42a2754David García-Marín. PhD in Sociology and Media (UNED). Senior Lecturer in the Department of Journalism and Corporate Communication at Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC). Member of the Research Group on the Impact of Cultural Factors in International Relations (PROMAPI), and the Research Group on Mediation and Communication (GUIMEDCOM), both at URJC. He is the author of some hundred publications focused on podcasting and digital audio, disinformation, fact-checking, and articial intelligence applied to communication and journalism. A member of the Research Ethics Committee at Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. He has been part of the Expert Group of the Spanish National Security Department (reporting to the Prime Minister’s Oce) since 2023, conducting studies on disinformation campaigns in the eld of national security. He is a member of the Jean Monnet Chair “EU, Disinformation and Fake News” funded by the European Commission’s Erasmus+ Programme. He also participates in the Mario Kaplún Chair in Media Literacy corresponding to the International Centre for Higher Communication Studies for Latin America (CIESPAL). He currently holds the position of Coordinator of Institutional Development in the Faculty of Communication (URJC).Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Spain [email protected]ORCID: 0000-0002-4575-1911is content is published under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. International License CC BY-NC 4.0Recibido: 29/07/2024 - Aceptado: 31/10/2024 - En edición: 03/12/2024 - Publicado: 01/01/2026Resumen:Este trabajo ofrece algunas claves que pueden ayudar a los productores de pódcast diarios de noticias a potenciar la conexión con sus audiencias. En concreto, pretende medir el efecto de determinadas variables apenas in-vestigadas previamente (temáticas, conexión con la actualidad, día de pu-blicación, alcance y duración, entre otras) en los diferentes indicadores del engagement en iVoox y YouTube. Para ello, se analizaron todos los capí-tulos publicados durante los seis primeros meses de 2024 por los tres prin-cipales pódcast diarios de noticias de España: Hoy en El País, El Mundo al día y Un tema al día (n=708). El análisis se realizó mediante estadística descriptiva e inferencial a través de pruebas correlacionales y estudios de Received: 29/07/2024 - Accepted: 31/10/2024 - Early access: 03/12/2024 - Published: 01/01/2026Abstract:is paper presents some key points that may be of help to producers of daily news podcasts to strengthen their connection with their listeners. It specically aims to measure the eect of certain variables that have seldom been researched (topics, links to current aairs, day of posting, reach, and length, among others) concerning the various engagement indicators on iVoox and YouTube. All the episodes posted during the rst six months of 2024 by the three main daily news podcasts in Spain were analysed: Hoy en El País, El Mundo al día, and Un tema a día (n=708). e analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistics through correlation tests and predictive

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


48 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónfactores predictivos mediante regresiones lineales múltiples. Los resultados observan que la tasa de engagement en YouTube triplica la cifra obtenida por iVoox. Aunque la generación de engagement es altamente contextual (resulta diferente en función de la plataforma de publicación utilizada), el hecho de abordar temas políticos es un potente activador del compromiso en ambas plataformas. También se observa que una duración breve (entre los 11 y los 18 minutos) resulta factor predictivo de la tasa de engagement tanto en iVoox como en YouTube. Palabras clave: News daily podcast; engagement; iVoox; YouTube; España.factor analysis using multiple linear regressions. e results show that the engagement rate on YouTube triples the number achieved by iVoox. Although the generation of engagement is highly contextual (varying depending on the posting platform employed), the fact of addressing political issues is a powerful engagement trigger on both platforms. Short duration 11–18 minutes) is also observed to be a predictive factor of the engagement rate on both iVoox and YouTube.Keywords: Daily news podcast; engagement; iVoox; YouTube; Spain.1. Introduction and theoretical frameworkNews podcasts have emerged in recent years as an important way of narrating and transmitting news, providing fresh nuances to audio communication and the distribution of news to increasingly large audiences (Newman & Gallo, 2020). Despite their limited history, news podcasts have managed to redene journalistic narrative by virtue of a mix of accessibility, intimacy, depth and credibility. For example, there is evidence of the format’s ability to oer reliable information in periods of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic (Lindgren, 2024). Likewise, news podcasts allow for inquiring into certain topics, prioritising quality over quantity (Körner & Grabl, 2024), while presenting “context, depth and greater editorial independence in journalists’ coverage of current aairs” (Martín-Nieto et al., 2024: 2).According to Digital News Report 2023, the United States is the leader in news podcast listenership, 19% of US users surveyed saying they listened to the format during December 2023. News podcasts’ penetration rate in Spain stands at 14%, two points above the international average (12%) and only behind the United States, Sweden, Australia and Ireland (Newman et al., 2023).Podcasts by journalists can take dierent forms. Non-ction narrative projects are particularly common, where the journalist oers serialised in-depth analysis of real events in a way not unlike literary or cinematic narrative. ey utilise techniques from the eld of ction, present detailed, high-quality production, and involve exhaustive research work. e so-called daily news podcasts (the focus of this study) provide content usually based on the day’s news in a non-serialised manner and at regular intervals (generally from Monday to Friday), in short instalments (3 to 30 minutes), and employing a personal narrative style associated with its presenter, who tries to reinforce the identity of the media outlet that produces it (Leoz-Aizpuru & Pedrero-Esteban, 2022).Although the origin of the daily news podcast is usually set in 2006 with the launch of e Guardian’s Newsdesk (Martínez-Costa Pérez & Lus Gárate, 2019), authors such as Bonini (2015) claim that, in reality, the rst program in the format was produced a year earlier by the British newspaper Daily Telegraph. News podcasts appeared in Spain in May 2018 when El País published El País Noticias, a podcast news bulletin that presented a summary of the day’s main stories. Las Noticias de ABC (launched in November that year), adopted the same format in two daily instalments, unlike the El País product. which broadcast a single programme per day (Leoz-Aizpuru & Pedrero-Esteban, 2022).
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 49Following these initial forays, the turning point for daily news podcasts in Spain came in 2020, a year of particular growth for the medium both in terms of the supply and consumption of content. e COVID-19 crisis had an impact on the increase in demand for journalistic podcasts internationally, users wishing not only to be informed but also to enjoy immersive non-ction narratives (Dowling, 2024). News organisations in Spain joined this wave, incorporating voice and audio strategies into their business plans, and the main newspapers launched their own daily audio projects (Martínez-Graña et al., 2023). Professional media’s involvement in the world of podcasts has been growing since 2020 in order to explore “its opportunities for news and opinion” (Martínez-Costa et al., 2022: 1). Two prominent news brands such as El Mundo and elDiario.es began using the format in June and September 2021, while El País’ product was launched in March 2022. Our study is focused on the daily news podcasts of these three media outlets, which are characterised by their commitment to the deep dive format.1.1. e deep dive format for daily news podcasts1Newman & Gallo (2019) propose a taxonomy of journalistic podcasts divided into four categories: (1) summaries or bulletins, (2) deep dive, (3) audio documentary, and (4) long-duration roundtables or extended discussions. Simplifying this classication, we can arm that there are basically two formats of daily news podcasts (Carvajal et al. 2022; Leoz-Aizpuru & Pedrero-Esteban, 2022): (1) the micro-bulletin, which oers brief instalments as a radio bulletin summarising the day’s news items, and (2) the in-depth analysis or deep dive, consisting of a longer monographic programme (usually around 20 minutes) “that goes deeper into an issue, frequently (although not always) something on the immediate agenda, using journalists from that media outlet and experts on the subject to be discussed” (García-Marín, 2024: 5). As mentioned above, daily news podcasts on El Mundo, elDiario.es and El País are examples of the format. All three titles have adopted the structure and style characteristic of the successful e Daily, the deep dive podcast launched by the New York Times in February 2017, considered a benchmark in the sector.e format is characterised by the combination of expository (news), conversational (interviews) and narrative (reportage or documentary) genres. It arises, fundamentally, from the dialogue between the presenter or host of the programme and a journalist from the same medium who specialises in the subject chosen for each episode. Its objective is not to deal with the news of the day (closer to the micro-bulletin format), but to provide depth and context in the analysis of a single topic (its programmes are usually monographic) beyond the rapid consumption of headlines. It is considered an example of slow journalism as opposed to the faster-paced radio news, which is subject to the demands of live broadcasts and breaking news. e term slow journalism was coined by Susan Greenberg in 2007 (Le Masurier, 2015), it favours research and depth when telling stories and oers an alternative to conventional news in order to “give greater meaning to our understanding of the world” (Greenberg, 2013: 381).Deep dive daily news podcasts oer highly contextualised, in-depth journalism in their analysis, as well as a relaxed and personal narrative clearly set by the podcast host. ey are part of a major trend towards the creation of immersive, reective and profuse narrative formats in the presentation of news. Podcasts are ideal as a means of communication for the presentation 1 Although this study is focused on the deep dive format, we also use the formula common in Spain “daily news podcast” (pódcast diario de noticias).

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


50 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónof topics in depth because they provide a focus for listeners’ attention, something very common on image-based platforms or media (Dowling, 2024), achieving a greater measure of audience immersion (Dowling & Miller, 2019).As mentioned above, this type of podcast places emphasis on the gure of the host, who usually adopts a warm, intimate narrative style, forging a close relationship with an audience that gradually becomes a community (Leoz-Aizpuru & Pedrero-Esteban, 2022). e presenters and analysts who participate in these programs do not limit themselves to setting out bare facts, but usually take a position on them in accordance with the editorial line of the medium, which serves to reinforce brand identity. eir usual editorialised tone and the personal narrative that the presenters incorporate in this type of podcast may clash with their informative nature, creating evident tensions between the essence of this type of productions and the limits of traditional journalism (Lee et al., 2023). In this sense, “it is worth asking to what extent listeners are aware that they are listening to editorial content, which is more of an opinion piece than a strictly news report” (Martínez-Graña et al., 2023: 225). is type of journalistic podcast also shows permanent tension between information about the facts and the way they are set out, techniques from ctional stories being employed on occasion (Dowling, 2024; Legorburu et al., 2021).Deep dive podcasts epitomise the opposite of what Walter Benjamin saw as a widespread tendency toward the simplication of narrative formats. Benjamin (2006) argues that the mechanical reproduction of both 20th-century art and news impoverished the narrative forms and structures of the 19th century, which he considered more complex and sophisticated. On the contrary, the deep dive format, like the narrative non-ction podcast, favours a neat and polished narrative, rich in detail and resources and carefully crafted.Nonetheless, this type of podcast can help rejuvenate the audience of audio-based news content (Skalický, 2023). According to studies such as that of Amoedo (2023), under 45-year-olds have a greater preference for receiving news through this medium. Other studies such as that of García-Marín (2024) conrm the tendency. To deepen and expand this connection with a growing number of users, deep dive podcasts must take all possible factors for generating audience engagement into account in a context of information overload where a multiplicity of actors (news brands and content creators) compete ercely for the consumer’s attention.1.2. Engagement and podcaste concept of engagement refers to the degree of interaction, connection and commitment that users have with a brand, product, content or service (Dolan et al., 2016). Askwith (2007) denes it as the set of user behaviours, attitudes and desires in relation to media consumption, their participation in activities and interactions, their identication with aspects of the message or product, and the motivations linked to all of the previously mentioned aspects. User engagement with media texts can contribute to the achievement of a wide range of functions: gaining perspectives on others’ circumstances, identifying with others, and generating feelings of belonging to a group, as well as nding certain common ground in the search for conversation and social interaction (McQuail, 1987).e generation of engagement is linked to a set of the audience’s actions, behaviours and attitudes, including: (1) the volume of interactions, (2) the time that users spend interacting with content, (3) loyalty and repetition (frequency with which users return and continue consuming the content), (4) active participation (content generated by users) and (5) the feeling and
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 51perception that users have about the brand, beyond quantitative metrics. We will focus our work on the rst block of aspects, related to interactions.From the interaction point of view, the level of engagement is measured utilising several indicators, such as the number of likes (an action that expresses conformity and/or enthusiasm towards a post) or the volume of comments (a conversational reaction in which users respond to or foster dialogues with the content creator or with other users). Although their particularities mean it is dierent on each digital platform, the so-called engagement rate is frequently measured through formulas that relate the sum of likes, comments and times that a content is shared with the number of reproductions, in the case of audiovisual content, or the number of followers for other types of posts (García-Marín & Salvat-Martinrey, 2022). Please note that the engagement rate in this work is calculated following this principle, as shown in Table 1.Taking all of the above into account, the potential of podcasts to generate engagement with their audiences is evident by building spaces of intimacy and connection between presenters and listeners (Loviglio, 2024; Adler Berg, 2023; Cook, 2023), while upholding journalistic ethics and aesthetics (Miller et al., 2022). Authors such as Cwynar (2023) point out that podcasts by journalists, especially non-ction narrative formats, sometimes foster the relationship between host and listener even over the story being discussed. Journalists’ voices can convey emotions and nuances that are usually lost in written text. Podcasts allow for a more personal, closer experience, creating a sense of complicity between the narrator and the listener that is essential in building audience loyalty (Lindgren, 2021). Listeners connect especially with the tone, accent and rhythm of a voice (Rae, 2023), which constitutes the most immediate means of expression (Kanngieser, 2015).Clarke & Bjork (2023) argue that the way in which podcasts achieve intimacy is not limited to the revelation of personal information and emotional experiences, but also extends to the ways in which sound design complements and aects those intimate stories. Furthermore, the versatility and adaptability of the medium means that users can access episodes at any time from any device, adapting it to their individual routines and preferences (Budak, 2022).Engagement with podcasts has been analysed from numerous variables. ere have been several studies on the inuence of gender and age on user engagement. Studies by Chan- Olmsted & Wang (2020) showed that men listen more widely and deeply than women, and that younger people consume podcasts more intensely and routinely. ey also found that women, compared to men, are more likely to listen to podcasts at home and less likely to consume them at work, while younger people consume more podcasts in the workplace or on the move rather than at home. e scientic literature shows such habits decisively inuence the generation of engagement with a medium (Perks et al., 2019; García-Marín, 2020a).Connection with the brand (Rhoden et al., 2022), social engagement (Tobin & Guadagno, 2022), parasocial relationships with hosts (Schlütz & Hedder, 2021), and the amount of listening time are other variables analysed in the scientic literature that foster engagement. According to these contributions, users who develop strong parasocial relationships with the hosts of the programmes –consisting of the unilateral connections that people establish with a media gure or a celebrity (Schlütz & Hedder, 2021)– and those who exceed a certain threshold of regular listening to the medium show greater commitment to podcasts. Tobin & Guadagno (2022) relate the motivation for podcast consumption to factors such as the amount of time spent listening, the environments in which consumption takes place, the podcast format, the devices used for listening, and parasocial relationships. García-Marín’s work (2020b) showed that the connection (closeness) between the listener and the
52 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónpodcast host (Frobenius, 2014) and the user’s level of technological and media education are two essential variables in driving engagement with the medium.Despite all the scientic evidence on the functioning of engagement in the eld of podcasts, there is a certain lack of research focused on the relationship between audiences and podcasts by journalists. Some factors that may inuence the connection of users with the medium have barely been analysed, such as the themes of the programmes, their connection with current events or their reach (national or international), all of which are variables that are easily controlled by producers. erefore, this work aims to complement and update research on engagement in this medium by observing variables not yet considered in the scientic literature in order to produce more complete knowledge about podcast listeners’ patterns of participation and commitment, with a focus on the journalistic dimension.is study sets the following objectives:O1: Characterise the current production of daily news podcasts in Spain (in their deep dive format) based on their thematic fronts, connection with current aairs, day of posting, scope (national or international) and duration.O2: Measure the degree of association of the aforementioned variables with the dierent engagement indicators (likes, comments and views), as well as with the engagement rate.O3: Compare the engagement data (likes, comments, views and engagement rate) of this type of programmes on two dierent platforms (iVoox and YouTube). O4: Analyse which of the variables considered in the study (topics, connection with current aairs, day of posting, reach and duration) are predictive of the engagement of these podcasts on the two platforms.2. Method2.1. Research designTo achieve these objectives, quantitative research was designed based on analysis of the three main daily news podcasts produced in Spain: (1) Hoy en El País (El País), (2) El Mundo al día (El Mundo) and (3) Un tema al día (elDiario.es). e choice of these three titles is based on several criteria:1. eir clear commitment to the deep dive format, which involves a more complex production based on e Daily’s model, which “inspired the newspapers El Mundo and elDiario.es in June and September 2021(Martínez Otto et al., 2022: 6). El País joined them in March 2022.2. Due to their relevance, track record and volume of followers, they are usually the podcasts chosen when it comes to researching the phenomenon of the daily news podcast in Spain. Authors such as Martínez Otto et al. (2022), Martínez-Graña et al. (2023) or García-Marín (2024) have included these titles in their recent studies. Furthermore, their relevance is conrmed by the fact that they have been awarded ex aequo with the 2023 Ondas Revelación Award.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 533. e three podcasts are available on the two platforms chosen for the study: iVoox and YouTube, episodes being posted regularly. Note that one of the main contributions of this work is its multi-platform nature, since studies on engagement in digital spaces usually focus on a single platform or service.Table 1 contains the codebook of the variables analysed. Note that almost all independent variables are related to the thematic focus of the episodes (specic topic, connection with current events and scope). Other variables are added to these variables such as the day of the episode’s posting, the length and the formula for preparing the titles (interrogative or not). e dependent variables of the work are those related to the engagement indicators that can be obtained on the platforms analysed (likes, comments and reproductions) and the engagement rate.e engagement data have been obtained from iVoox and YouTube for several reasons. Firstly, they are the two platforms, along with Spotify, with the highest volume of podcast listening in Spain2. Moreover, they oer the data publicly, unlike Spotify.Table 1. Codebook of the studyVariableCategoriesTypeObservationsIssueHealthIndependentPoliticsSportSocietyEconomicsEducationCultureScience / TechnologyEntertainmentOther2 Data available at: https://bit.ly/3yfILVt

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


54 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónCurrent AairsYesIndependentis refers to whether the episode is connected to the news agenda of the day or, at least, the week.NoPosting dayMonday-SundayIndependentPlease note that the same episode may be posted on dierent days on each of the platforms analysed.ScopeNationalIndependente “Not applicable” category is established when the topic addressed is general and transversal to any area, national or international.InternationalNot applicableTitle formulaInterrogativeIndependente same episode may have its title in dierent formats depending on the platform.Non-interrogativeLengthQuantitative variable. Measured in minutesIndependente length in minutes is rounded up after 30 seconds. For example, an episode with a length of 12 minutes and 20 seconds is reported as having a length of 12 minutes, while an episode with a length of 12 minutes and 40 seconds is considered to have a length of 13.LikesQuantitative variableDependentAvailable on iVoox and YouTubeCommentsQuantitative variableDependentAvailable on iVoox and YouTubePlaysQuantitative variableDependentAvailable on iVoox and YouTubeEngagement rateQuantitative variableDependente following formula is used to calculate the rate: [(number of likes + number of comments) / number of views] x 100 (López-Navarrete et al., 2021; García-Marín and Salvat- Martinrey, 2022)Source: created by the author2.2. SampleAll episodes posted by the three podcasts on the two platforms during the rst six months of 2024 (January 1 - June 30) were analysed. e choice of this period seeks to obtain the most up-to-date picture possible of the production and consumption of this type of podcast, rather than obtaining a global sample of the entire life of each of the programmes. e sample consisted of a total of 708 episodes, 395 of which were posted on iVoox (55.8%) and 313 on YouTube (44.2%). Since all the episodes included in the period analysed are hosted on iVoox, posting on this service will be taken as a reference for the study of general data
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 55(section 3.1.). e distribution of the sample by media was balanced: 239 episodes of Hoy en El País (33.8%), 236 of elDiario.es (33.3%) and 233 episodes of El Mundo al día (32.9%) were studied.2.3. Data analysisDescriptive (O1) and inferential (O2, O3, and O4) statistical calculations were used for data analysis. Before deciding whether to use parametric or non-parametric tests in the inferential statistics calculations, normality tests were performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test applied to the dependent variables. e tests determined the absence of normality in the distribution of variable values (p < .001 in all cases), so the application of non-parametric calculations was chosen: correlations using Spearman’s coecient and Kruskal-Wallis tests (for non-dichotomous variables) and the Mann-Whitney U test (for dichotomous variables). In the approach to O4 (study of predictive factors), multiple linear regressions were performed.Analysis of the episodes that make up the sample was carried out by a single coder. In order to grant greater robustness to the study, Cohen’s Kappa test was applied, taking a total of 71 works from the sample (10.02%). is subsample was analysed by the same coder at the beginning of the eld work (1st week of May) and again some three months later (3rd week of July) in order to compare the concordance between the results. For this reliability analysis, only the variables that imply some level of interpretation (topics, connection with current events and scope) were considered. e results of the test were between k=1 and k=.920 in the three variables (see complete results of the intra-coder reliability test at: https://bit.ly/4dJEtV7), values that can be considered highly satisfactory according to the existing scientic literature (Landis & Coch, 1977).All statistical work was performed using SPSS v.26 software (full database available at: https://bit.ly/3LHGO7y).3. Results3.1. General characteristicse results obtained allow us to draw up a general prole of the deep dive daily news podcast in Spain (O1) which, from a thematic point of view, basically focuses on political, social and economic issues. 77.2% of the sample analysed falls into one of these three thematic categories, although the majority look into political issues (50.1%) (Table 2). 73.9% address issues related to current aairs. ey are posted on weekdays (Monday to Friday). ere are no episodes published on Saturday, and Sunday is practically symbolic as a posting day (6.3%). Most episodes deal with issues of national scope (53.7%) and do not use interrogative formulas in their titles (62.53%). e average duration of an episodes is around 18 and a half minutes (18.34).

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


56 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTable 2. Descriptive statistics of the general sampleIndependent variableFrequencies (%)IssueHealth14 (3.5%)Politics198 (50.1%)Sport11 (2.8%)Society85 (21.5%)Economics22 (5.6%)Education9 (2.3%)Culture18 (4.6%)Science / Technology8 (2.0%)Entertainment1 (0.3%)Other29 (7.3%)Current AairsYes292 (73.9%)No103 (26.1%)Posting dayMonday74 (18.7%)Tuesday74 (18.7%)Wednesday73 (18.5%)ursday74 (18.7%)Friday75 (19%)Sunday25 (6.3%)
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 57ScopeNational212 (53.7%)International150 (38%)Not applicable33 (8.3%)Title formulaInterrogative148 (37.5%)Non-interrogative247 (62.5%)DurationM = 18.34 minutes (SD=6.10). Range: 11-65Source: created by the authorFrom the general data on engagement, and in line with O3, it can be seen that YouTube oers better performance than iVoox in all indicators (likes, comments, views and engagement rate) (Table 3). e video platform multiplies the number of likes by 16, has 20 times more comments and quintuples the number of views compared to iVoox. In addition, the engagement rate on YouTube triples the gure obtained by iVoox. e Mann-Whitney U tests observe statistically signicant dierences between platforms (p =.000 in likes, comments and engagement rates, and p<.001 in views) in all variables, thus, it can be inferred that the use of YouTube is a relevant factor in the activation of all the engagement indicators observed.Table 3. Comparison of engagement indicators between platformsVariableAverage iVoox (SD)Average YouTube (SD)p(Mann-Whitney U test)Likes15.95 (13.83)259.94 (488.77).000*Comments3.08 (4.22)61.08 (137.88).000*Reproductions1579.86 (756.44)8827.57 (14196.85)<.001*Engagement rate1.12 (0.53)3.17 (1.81).000**Signicant dierences when p<.050Source: created by the author
58 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación3.2. Deep dive daily news podcasts on iVoox3.2.1. Likes (iVoox)In the case of iVoox, the topic with the highest number of likes is that related to science and technology (M = 18.38), followed by politics (M = 17.94) (Table 4). However, it is necessary to highlight the low frequency of episodes dedicated to the rst category (science / technology), therefore for the rest of the statistical calculations the political category will be considered as the topic with the highest average of likes. Episodes that address current issues receive more likes (M = 16.37 compared to M = 15.34), those posted on Mondays and ursdays, those with national reach (M = 16.21 compared to M = 14.67), and those that do not use interrogative formulas in their titles (M = 18.55 compared to M = 11.61).Table 4. Study of engagement in iVooxIndependent variableAverage Likes (SD)Average Comments (SD)Average Plays (SD)Average Engagement (SD)IssueHealth14,14 (10.59)*3.07 (4.95)1559.07 (689.01)*0 .99 (0.41)Politics17.94 (15.24)*3.26 (4.39)1719.90 (785.37)*1.13 (0.43)Sport10.82 (6.86)*1.82 (2.96)1212.45 (553.73)*1.01 (0.46)Society15.66 (13.01)*3.02 (3.94)1545.85 (797.12)*1.17 (0.74)Economics10.32 (5.29)*2.86 (4.52)1131.45 (417.04)*1.13 (0.42)Education10.89 (6.58)*2.33 (2.34)1096.67 (435.97)*1.16 (0.37)Culture11,33 (8.82)*2.83 (3.01)1347.22 (671.69)*0.99 (0.50)Science / Technology18.38 (28.10)*1.63 (0.91)1452.38 (712.92)*1.06 (0.78)Entertainment3 (-)*2 (-)816.00 (-)*0 ,61 (-)Other14.52 (10.34)*3.25 (5.38)1568.86 (633.56)*1.07 (0.44)Current AairsYes16.17 (11.61)3.14 (4.33)1607.18 (772.05)1.13 (0.53)No15.34 (18.81)2.89 (3.88)1502.40 (708.20)1.09 (0.51)
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 59Posting dayMonday17.74 (20.77)*3.07 (4.12)1584.96 (823.24)1.16 (0.53)*Tuesday15,34 (11.16)*2.99 (4.54)1587.18 (746.15)1.05 (0.40)*Wednesday16,34 (12.51)*2.74 (3.9)1674.77 (809.03)1.07 (0.38)*ursday17.66 (13.78)*3.14 (4.74)1568.86 (751.32)1.30 (0.80)*Friday15.51 (9.74)*3.72 (4.14)1551.76 (757.80)1.15 (0.35)*Sunday7.60 (3.81)*2.24 (2.86)1382.84 (341.62)0 ,70 (0.28)*ScopeNational16,21 (12.16)3.29 (4.27)1611.09 (801.34)1.13 (0.45)International14.67 (9.56)2.78 (4.27)1521.95 (640.54)1.10 (0.60)Formula of the headlineInterrogative11.61 (9.81)*2.14 (3.06)*1300.72 (639.93)*1.01 (0.44)*Non-interrogative.18.55 (15.19)*3.64 (4.69)*1747.12 (772.51)*1.18 (0.56)*LengthRho =-.306 p <.001*Rho = -.146p =.004*Rho = -.072p =.153Rho =-.397 p <.001**Signicant dierences when p<.050Source: created by the authorIn relation to O2, statistically signicant dierences are observed in the thematic variable [H (9, n = 395) = 22.915, p =. 006], the day of posting [H (5, n = 395) = 19.364, p = .002] and the title formula (U = 24,712, p < .001). As regards subject matter, deviations in the number of likes are found between politics and (1) cultural topics (p = .008), (2) sports (p = .047) and (3) economics (p = .007). Likewise, the length of the episodes correlates negatively with the number of likes (Rho = -.306, p < .001): the shorter the episode, the greater the volume of likes received (within the sample range, between 11 and 65 minutes).Of all these factors (topic, posting day, title formula and length), only (1) the topic and (2) the length are included in the analysis of predictive factors. e variable related to the day of posting is discarded because the only dierences are established between Sunday and weekdays and, given the low number of episodes posted on Sundays (n = 25; Fr = 6.3%), the variable is not considered relevant. Neither is the formulation of the titles (with or without interrogatives) taken into account, because the majority of the non-interrogative titles are used by Un tema al día, the podcast of elDiario.es, whose gures in all the engagement indicators are considerably higher (with statistically signicant dierences) than the other two podcasts, so we can infer that the results of this variable are aected by another factor, in this case the medium which posts the podcast.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


60 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónAnalysis using multiple linear regression (O4) determines that politics as the subject matter is a predictor of the number of likes (ß =.145, adjusted R2 =.018, p =.004) (Table 5). e fact of making podcasts focused on political issues causes an increase in the engagement indicator: political topics explain 1.8% of the variance in the number of likes.To calculate the predictive capacity of length with respect to the number of likes, this aspect was converted into a dichotomous variable by establishing the following categories: (1) duration below the sample average (18 minutes and less) and (2) duration above the sample average (greater than 18 minutes). As can be seen, the cut-o point was established at the average length of the episodes analysed (18.34 minutes). Note that this was also done for the rest of the engagement factors on the two platforms. e results of the linear regression show that creating podcasts that are shorter than the average (18 minutes or less) increases the number of likes (ß =.343, adjusted R2 =.116, p <.001). Creating podcasts that are shorter than the average explains 11.6% of the variance in this variable.Table 5. Predictive factors of engagement in iVooxDependent variableIndependent variableStandardised coecient (ß)pModel SummaryLikesPolitical issue.145.004F =8.38p= .004Adjusted R2 = .018 Short duration (18 minutes and less).346<.001F =52.45p< .001Adjusted R2 = .116 CommentsShort duration (18 minutes and less).224<.001F =20.67p< .001Adjusted R2 = .048 ReproductionsPolitical issue.186<.001F =14.05p< .001Adjusted R2 = .032 Engagement rateShort duration (18 minutes and less).289<.001F =35.75p< .001Adjusted R2 = .081 Source: created by the author3.2.2. Comments (iVoox)e episodes that receive the greatest number of comments on iVoox are those on a political issue (M = 3.26), those that address current issues (M = 3.14 versus M = 2.89), those posted on Fridays and ursdays, those of national scope (M = 3.29 versus M = 2.78), and those headed by non-interrogative titles (M = 3.64 versus M = 2.14) (Table 4). Statistically relevant deviations are observed in the variable related to the formulation of the titles: non-interrogative ones receive a signicantly higher number of
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 61comments than those that opt for interrogative formulas (O2). However, as explained above, this variable will not be considered in the analysis of predictive factors.Likewise, the correlational study between the duration and the number of comments observes a negative association between the two variables: the shorter the duration of the episode, the greater the number of comments (Rho = -.146, p = .004). erefore, the only factor included in the analysis of predictive factors is length. e tests using linear regression determine that length is a factor that inuences the number of comments (O4). e variable explains 4.8% of the variance in the volume of comments (ß = .224, adjusted R2 = .048, p < .001) (Table 5).3.2.3. Plays (iVoox)e listening volume (number of times played) of the podcasts analysed follows a similar pattern to the aforementioned engagement factors. e most listened to are those on political matters (M = 1719.90), those dealing with current aairs (M = 1607.18 compared to M = 1502.40), those posted on Wednesdays and Tuesdays (it is worth noting that, from Wednesday onwards the number of plays decreases), those with national reach (M = 1611.09 compared to M = 1521.95) and those that do not have interrogative titles (M = 1747.12 compared to M = 1300.72) (Table 4). Notable dierences are only perceived in the thematic variable [H (9, n =395) =32.250, p <.001], especially between politics and (1) education (p =.006), (2) economics (p <.001), (3) sports (p =.012), (4) culture (p=.018), and (5) society (p =.045). Unlike what is observed in likes and comments, there is no correlation between length and the number of reproductions (O2).e creation of podcasts on political issues contributes to increasing the number of plays on iVoox (ß =.186, adjusted R2 =.032, p <.001) (Table 5). is variable, therefore, inuences the number of listens, with a predictive capacity of 3.2% on the behaviour of the number of plays (O4).3.2.4 Engagement rate (iVoox)Episodes on social issues generate the highest engagement rate (M = 1.17), followed closely by those dealing with politics (M = 1.13). e other variables keep up the trend indicated in the previously analysed indicators: episodes on current aairs garner greater engagement (M = 1.13 compared to M = 1.09), as do episodes with a national scope (M = 1.13 compared to M = 1.10) and those that do not formulate the title with interrogative structures (M = 1.18 compared to M = 1.01). ursday and Monday are the posting days with the highest engagement. Signicant dierences are only perceived in the posting day and the use of non-interrogative headlines (O2). Both variables are discarded for the study of predictive factors for the reasons explained in section 3.2.1.Length, which is also negatively associated with engagement rate (Rho = -.397, p <.001), has an impact on this variable (O4): making podcasts below the average duration explains 8.1% of variance in engagement rate (ß = .289, adjusted R2 = .081, p <.001).
62 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación3.3. Daily news podcast on YouTube3.3.1. Likes (YouTube)e distribution of the number of likes on YouTube follows a similar tendency to that observed on iVoox. Political matters receive more likes (M = 391.80), as do episodes that deal with current aairs (M = 288.87 compared to M = 153.72), those posted on Tuesdays and ursdays, those of national scope (M = 312.10 compared to M = 216.28), and those that do not use interrogative titles (M = 325.32 compared to M = 153.35) (Table 6).Tabla 6. YouTube engagement studyIndependent variableAverage Likes (SD)Average Comments (SD)Averages Plays (SD)Average Engagement (SD)IssueHealth130.54 (190.30)*16.69 (24.18)*3086.54 (3633.06)*3.09 (1.86)Politics391.80 (612.47)*96.89 (175.78)*13126.86 (16697.14)*3.41 (1.80)Sport70.33 (97.26)*25,11 (59.94)*4338.00 (8578.08)*2.77 (1.68)Society120.47 (258.58)*15.73 (31.17)*4849.11 (10945.59)*2.79 (1.61)Economics52.76 (67.71)*12.76 (27.15)*2218.14 (2963.17)*2.94 (1.55)Education53.00 (95.06)11.00 (19.78)*538.00 (208.54)*3.15 (2.59)Culture114.67 (169.73)*51.33 (125.94)*2880.92 (3231.22)*3.91 (2.79)Science / Technology11.33 (3.05)*1.33 (1.15)*756.67 (378.80)*1.89 (0.78)Entertainment16.00 ( -)*2.00 ( -)*1578.00 ( -)*1.14 (-)Other237.80 (364.47)*49.30 (103.45)*7682.45 (11809.19)*2.89 (1.80)Current AairsYes288.87 (501.03)*71.84 (149.88)*10346.27 (15302.21)*3.20 (1.80)No153.72 (427.67)*21.58 (66.82)*3126.58 (6252.32)*3.07 (1.84)
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 63Posting dayMonday250.17 (501.76)*53.16 (111.43)*7980.18 (12172.11)*3.22 (1.95)Tuesday364.39 (618.21)*102.95 (227.13)*12567.29 (18924.37)*3.42 (1.83)Wednesday215.46 (379.65)*46.67 (84.71)*8010.76 (12288.42)*3.30 (1.92)ursday253.03 (434.59)*59.07 (125.97)*8756.87 (13549.43)*3.06 (1.57)Friday248.66 (497.24)*52.25 (101.90)*7980.03 (13457.13)*3.06 (1.82)Saturday16.25 (20.29)*3,13 (3.56)*850.38 (531.23)*1.97 (1.27)ScopeNational312.10 (527.10)72.84 (145.87)10414.57 (14279.33)3.14 (1.78)International216.28 (503.32)54.50 (137.28)7721.30 (14942.80)3.36 (1.86)Title formulaInterrogative153.35 (439.36)*53.77 (167.07)*7470.68 (16426.02)*2.47 (1.56)*Non interrogative 325.32 (506.82)*65.57 (116.67)*9654.42 (12622.68)*3.60 (1.82)*LengthRho =-.181 p =.001*Rho = -.161p =.004*Rho = -.126p =.027*Rho =-.267 p <.001**Signicant dierences when p<.050Source: created by the authorSignicant dierences are observed in the following variables: (1) issue [H (9, n =313) =47.663, p <.001], (2) topicality of the subject addressed (U =6020, p <.001), (3) day of posting and (4) headline formula (O2). e association between length and the number of likes is also maintained (Rho =-.181, p =.001). In the case of the rst variable (subject matter), deviations are established, above all, in relation to politics and (1) science/technology (p =.028), (2) education (p =.010), (3) economics (p <.001), (4) sports (p =.012), (5) society (p <.001), (6) culture (p =.045), and (7) health (p =.040). Concerning the day of posting, dierences are observed between Saturday and the other days (no deviations are established between working days). Given the small number of episodes posted on Saturdays (n =8, Fr =0.25%), this variable is not considered in the calculation of predictive factors. Neither is the variable related to the title formula included for the reasons explained in section 3.2.1.e only predictive factor of the number of likes on YouTube is the subject matter (ß =.279, adjusted R2 =.072, p <.001) (Table 7). Coverage of political issues explains 7.2% of the variance in the number of likes received (O4).
64 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónTable 7. Predictive factors of engagement on YouTubeDependent variableIndependent variableStandardised coecient (ß)pModel SummaryLikesPolitical issue.279<.001F =13.174p <.001Adjusted R2 = .072 CommentsPolitical issue.237<.001F =10.200p< .001Adjusted R2 = .081 Posted on Tuesday.125.023F =10.200p< .001Adjusted R2 = .081 ReproductionsPolitical issue.262<.001F =13.333p< .001Adjusted R2 = .107 Short duration (18 minutes and less).134.019F =5.606p =.019Adjusted R2 = .015 Engagement rateShort duration (18 minutes and less).369<.001F =48.533p< .001Adjusted R2 = .134 Source: created by the author3.3.2. Comments (YouTube)In the case of comments, the results are practically the same as for the variable related to likes. e podcasts receiving most comments are those on politics (M = 96.89), or current aairs (M = 71.84 versus M = 21.58), those posted on Tuesdays and ursdays, being national in scope (M = 72.84 versus M = 54.50) and those that do not have interrogative titles (M = 65.57 versus M = 53.77) (Table 6). ere is also a correlation between brevity and the number of comments (Rho = -.161, p = .004).Signicant dierences are also established between political issues and the other categories [H (9, n =313) =64.694, p <.001], current aairs (U =4850,500, p <.001), and the formulas for writing the title (O2). Added to these is the posting of the podcast on a Tuesday [H (5, n =313) =12.985, p =.024], a variable that will be integrated into the study of predictive factors.e linear regression model (O4) determines that both political matters (ß =.232, adjusted R2 =.081, p <.001) and the podcast being on a Tuesday (ß =.125, adjusted R2 =.081, p =.023) are factors that predict the number of comments on YouTube (Table 7).
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 653.3.3. Plays (YouTube)e patterns observed in the case of reproductions are identical. Political issues (M = 13,126.86), current aairs (M = 10,346.27 versus M = 3,126.58), episodes posted on Tuesdays and ursdays, those of national scope (M = 10,414.57 versus M = 7,721.30), and those that do not use interrogative titles (M = 9,654.42 versus M = 7,470.68) are listened to more often (Table 6). Likewise, the negative correlation between duration and listening volume is maintained: the shorter the podcast, the greater the number of plays (Rho = -.126, p = .027).e deviations are exactly the same as those detected in the case of comments (O2). ey are observed in the variable of subject matter (between politics and the rest of the categories) [H (9, n =313) =59.647, p <.001], current aairs (U =4882, p <.001), appearing on Tuesday [H (5, n =313) =12.376, p =.030], and the formulas for writing the title.e factors that predict the number of views are: (1) political issues (ß =.262, adjusted R2 =.107, p <.001) and (2) being shorter than average (ß =.134, adjusted R2 =.015, p =.019) (Table 7).3.3.4. Engagement rate (YouTube)After cultural topics (M = 3.91), politics is the thematic category with the highest engagement rate on YouTube (M = 3.41) (Table 6). However, the data on episodes that address cultural issues is not deemed to be relevant due to their low frequency (n=12, Fr=3.88%).Almost all the trends present in the previously analysed indicators are repeated: current aairs topics achieve higher rates (M = 3.20 versus M = 3.07), as do episodes published on Tuesdays (it is relevant that, from this day onwards, the engagement rate decreases) and those with non-interrogative titles (M = 3.60 versus M = 2.47). Unlike the previous factors, it is surprising that issues of international scope achieve higher rates than national ones (M = 3.36 versus M = 3.14). Duration and engagement rate are inversely associated (Rho = -.267, p <. 001).Finally, no signicant dierences are observed for any variable, except for length (O2), so only this last factor is considered for the study of predictive factors. In this case, a duration below the average contributes to a higher engagement rate (ß =.369, R2 adjusted =.134, p <.001) (Table 7).4. Discussion and conclusionsis study allows the sketching of the central characteristics of the daily news podcast in Spain in its deep dive modality through consideration of the three main titles posted in the country in 2024. From a thematic point of view, this type of podcast basically focuses on political, social and economic issues (almost 8 out of 10 episodes in the sample address those topics), although the single commonest thematic focus is political. Almost three out of four podcasts in the rst half of 2024 address aspects related to current aairs, which register better values in all engagement indicators on both platforms than episodes not connected to the news agenda. ose results coincide with previous studies that arm that information needs, rather than social or emotional needs, may be more relevant motivations for podcast listening (Chan-Olmsted & Wang, 2020; Tobin & Guadagno, 2022).
66 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónMost episodes deal with issues of national scope and do not use interrogative formulas in their titles. Episodes last an average of around 18 and a half minutes (18.34). is result conrms that obtained by Martínez Otto et al. (2022) in a study carried out on the same podcasts two years before this study, which seems to point to the existence of a certain stability and standardisation in the length of this type of programme.Despite not being a specic tool (nor designed) for podcast consumption, YouTube oers better performance than iVoox in all the indicators analysed (likes, comments, plays and engagement rate). e larger number of plays on YouTube is not surprising given that it is second among platforms where most podcasts are listened to in Spain, just ahead of iVoox (Statista, 2024). Our results show that the posting of podcasts on YouTube (only in audio, without the need for an accompanying video) is a relevant factor in the fostering of such engagement factors. Future research will be able to conrm whether this trend is maintained in other types of podcasts, apart from the titles studied here. e deviations in the data on the two platforms conrm that, in the eld of podcasts, the generation of engagement is highly contextual: it may dier depending on the posting platform used. Previous studies had already demonstrated this contextual nature of engagement depending on the type of user and the sector analysed, as well as the geographical and sociocultural location of the study (Wahid & Gunarto, 2021). Kim & Yang (2017) for example found that posts on Facebook which incorporate photographs stimulate the number of likes, but negatively inuence the volume of comments. In contrast, De Vries et al. (2012) and Tafesse (2015) claim that visual content does not aect the number of likes and comments. Along similar lines, other studies such as that of Cvijikj & Michahelles (2013) show that the use of video has no impact on the number of comments on social media platforms. However, the results of our study show certain coincidences worthy of mention in the engagement achieved on iVoox and YouTube, as they point to several trends that remain unchanged regardless of the posting platform analysed (see comparison of engagement indicators on iVoox and YouTube at: https://bit.ly/485OESS). is is one of the most original contributions of this research, which measures the same object of study – engagement – on two dierent platforms. On the one hand, political topics (in terms of engagement rates, politics is second behind social issues), current aairs, national reach (except in the case of the engagement rate, where international topics perform better on YouTube) and non-interrogative titles receive more likes, comments, reproductions and higher engagement rates. Although there are hardly any coincidences in the functioning of the variables with respect to the day of posting, ursday turns out to be the second-best day to receive likes and comments. On both platforms, a negative correlation is observed between length and number of likes, comments and engagement rates. Only for that latter variable (engagement rates) is a short duration (below average) a predictive factor both on iVoox and on YouTube. Likewise, on both platforms, political issues have a statistically signicant impact on the number of likes and views. It is therefore observed that addressing political topics is a powerful activator of engagement in the deep dive daily news podcast and that the eect of this variable is transversal on several platforms. is fact conrms previous studies that show that “the specic topics of each episode generate dierences in the level of engagement, therefore it is possible to nd episodes of a podcast widely commented on by its followers while others go completely unnoticed” (García-Marín, 2020b: 56).According to our results, the weekend is hardly used to post on either platform and, when it is, engagement gures are very low. ere do not seem to be any major dierences in the engagement observed between episodes published on dierent weekdays, although the number of comments received by podcasts published on Tuesday on YouTube is double that of the

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 67rest of the days. e gure is surprising because episodes released on Tuesdays on iVoox are relatively little commented-on compared to the rest of the week.In summary, the results of this work contribute to greater understanding of engagement and the factors that drive consumption and participation in podcasts, complementing previous studies focused on other variables. e work of García-Marín (2024) shows that (1) listening to journalists’ podcasts is associated with age in that those under 45 years of age are twice as likely to consume news podcasts, and (2) the habit of reading newspapers that produce news podcasts predicts the listening to this medium for informational purposes. However, previous evidence determines that feelings of gratitude and connection with a brand also have a statistically signicant positive impact on user engagement in podcasts (Rohden et al., 2022). Although they cannot be considered chat podcasts (Martín-Nieto et al., 2024), the narrative form of daily news podcasts, based on a dialogue between the presenter and other journalists or experts, helps listeners connect with the programme’s hosts (Perks & Turner, 2018).Finally, the limitations of this work are to be found in three aspects. Firstly, as is usual in studies of this type, the results may be inuenced by the period selected (the rst half of 2024), which may have caused certain issues specic to that period to be somewhat overrepresented. Secondly, although the study focuses on more than one platform, it does not include data from other actors essential to an understanding of current podcast consumption in Spain, such as Spotify (the aggregator where most podcasts are listened to over the period observed) or the platforms of the media analysed. Studies of podcast consumption in those spaces could complement or qualify the results presented here. Finally, our work incorporates variables almost exclusively focused on the thematic focus of the programs (content, topicality and scope) that could be completed with research on engagement focused on other variables of a narrative (genres, openings, intros and outros), expressive (resources / eects, tunes, use of music, sex of the participating voices, indicators, etc.) or strategic type (promotion of the newspaper or design of the covers) (Martínez Otto et al., 2022). us, a comprehensive understanding of how engagement occurs in deep dive daily news podcasts would be achieved, which would help producers who invest in the medium to improve their connection with the public, reinforce their brand image and enhance the impact of quality audio-based journalism.5. Acknowledgementsis article has been translated into English by Brian O’Halloran to whom we are grateful for his work.is work is supported by the Mario Kaplún Educommunication Chair “Today is Tomorrow”, corresponding to the International Centre for Advanced Studies in Communication for Latin America (CIESPAL).6. Conict of intereste author declares that there is no conict of interest contained in this article.
68 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación7. Bibliographic referencesAdler Berg, F. S. (2023). Analysing podcast intimacy: Four parameters. Convergence, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231220547Amoedo, A. (2023). La escucha de pódcast se consolida en España. En A. Amoedo-Casais, E. Moreno-Moreno, S. Negredo-Bruna, J. Kaufmann-Argueta, & A. Vara-Miguel (Eds.), Digital News Report España 2023 (pp. 157-167). Servicio de Publicaciones Universidad de Navarra.Askwith, I. (2007). Television 2.0: Reconceptualizing TV as an engagement medium [Tesis de máster, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. https://bit.ly/4f1OI8uBenjamin, W. (2006). e storyteller: Reections on the works of Nikolai Leskov. En D. J. Hale (Ed.), e novel: An anthology of criticism and theory 1900-2000 (pp. 361-378). Blackwell Publishing.Bonini, T. (2015). La “segona era” del podcasting: El podcasting como nuevo medio de comunicación de masas digital. Quaderns del CAC, 18(41), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.34810/qcac41id405451Budak, E. (2022). An analysis on new journalism forms created by technological innovations: Podcast journalism in Turkey. Turkish Review of Communication Studies, 40, 257-276. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.1048581Carvajal, M., Marín-Sanchiz, C. R., & Navas, C. J. (2022). e daily news podcast ecosystem from the strategy and business model perspectives. Profesional de la Información, 31(5), e310514. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.sep.14Chan-Olmsted, S., & Wang, R. (2022). Understanding podcast users: Consumption motives and behaviors. New Media & Society, 24(3), 684-704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820963776Clarke, K., & Bjork, C. (2023). ‘Listening closely’ to mediated intimacies and podcast intimacies in Song Exploder. Convergence, 29(4), 818-835. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231160886Cook, I. M. (2023). Scholarly podcasting: Why, what, how? Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003006596Cvijikj, I. P., & Michahelles, F. (2013). Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 843-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-013-0098-8Cwynar, C. (2024). Giving voice or creating a spectacle? Personality, intimacy, and ethics in rst-person narrative nonction podcasting. En M. Hilmes & A. J. Bottomley (Eds.), e Oxford handbook of radio and podcasting (pp. 339-358). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197551127.013.18De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeang, P. S. H. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the eects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.003Dolan, R., Conduit, J., Fahy, J., & Goodman, S. (2016). Social media engagement behaviour: A uses and gratications perspective. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3-4), 261-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2015.1095222Dowling, D. O. (2024). Podcast journalism: e promise and perils of audio reporting. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/dowl21322

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 69Dowling, D. O., & Miller, K. J. (2019). Immersive audio storytelling: Podcasting and serial documentary in the digital publishing industry. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 26(1), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2018.1509218Frobenius, M. (2014). Audience design in monologues: How vloggers involve their viewers. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 59-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.008García-Marín, D. (2020a). Hacia una lingüística de la interacción mediática: Aproximación al diseño de la participación signicativa medio-usuario desde el podcasting independiente. Profesional de la información, 29(5), e290505. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.05García-Marín, D. (2020b). Mapping the factors that determine engagement in podcasting: Design from the users and podcasters’ experience. Communication & Society, 33(2), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.2.49-63García-Marín, D. (2024). Predictores del consumo de pódcast informativo en España: Estudio a partir de los datos del Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CSIC). RAE-IC, Revista de la Asociación Española de Investigación de la Comunicación, 11(21), raeic112113. https://doi.org/10.24137/raeic.11.21.13García-Marín, D., & Salvat-Martinrey, G. (2022). Viralizar la verdad: Factores predictivos del engagement en el contenido vericado en TikTok. Profesional de la información, 31(2), e310210. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.mar.10Greenberg, S. (2013). Slow journalism in the digital fast lane. En R. L. Keeble, R. Lance, & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Global literary journalism: Exploring the journalistic imagination (pp. 381-393). Peter Lang.Kanngieser, A. (2015). Geopolitics and the Anthropocene: Five propositions for sound. GeoHumanities, 1(1), 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2015.1075360Kim, C., & Yang, S. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behaviour diers from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.006Körner, M., & Grabl, M. (2024). Podcasts: Provider of in-depth journalistic information. En K. Meier, J. A. García-Avilés, A. Kaltenbrunner, C. Porlezza, V. Wyss, R. Lugschitz, & K. Klinghardt (Eds.), Innovations in journalism (pp. 171-177). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032630410-21Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). e measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310Le Masurier, M. (2015). What is slow journalism? Journalism Practice, 9(2), 138-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.916471Lee, N. Y., Kim, J., & Kim, C. (2023). How do South Korean podcasts reect changes in journalistic norms and practices? Comparing podcasts of professional journalists with podcasts of non-journalists. Media International Australia, 187(1), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X221136931Legorburu, J. M., Edo, C., & García González, A. (2021). Reportaje sonoro y podcasting, el despertar de un género durmiente en España: El caso de Podium Podcast. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 27(2), 519-529. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.71204Leoz-Aizpuru, A., & Pedrero-Esteban, L. M. (2022). Audio storytelling innovation in a digital age: e case of daily news podcasts in Spain. Information, 13(4), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13040204

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


70 | nº 42, pp. 47-71 | January-June of 2026Daily news podcasts in Spain. Predictive factors of multi-platform engagement (iVoox and YouTube)ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónLindgren, M. (2021). Intimacy and emotions in podcast journalism: A study of award-winning Australian and British podcasts. Journalism Practice, 17(4), 704-719. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1943497Lindgren, M., & Bird, D. (2024). Listening to the pandemic: Podcasting COVID-19. In M. Lewis, E. Govender, & K. Holland (Eds.), Communicating COVID-19 (pp. 45-64). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41237-0_3López-Navarrete, A. J., Cabrera-Méndez, M., Díez-Somavilla, R., & Calduch-Losa, A. (2021). Fórmula para medir el engagement del espectador en YouTube: Investigación exploratoria sobre los principales youtubers españoles. Revista Mediterránea de comunicación, 12(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM000013Loviglio, J. (2024). From radio to podcasting: Intimacy and massication. e Velvet Light Trap, 93, 52-54. https://doi.org/10.7560/VLT9306Martínez Otón, L., Leoz Aizpuru, A., & Pedrero Esteban, L. M. (2022). Los podcasts informativos diarios en España: Evolución de la oferta y aportaciones narrativas del formato. Austral Comunicación, 11(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.26422/aucom.2022.1102.leoMartínez-Costa, M. P., & Lus Gárate, E. (2019). El éxito de los podcasts de noticias y su impacto en los medios de comunicación digital. Miguel Hernández Communication Journal, 10(2), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.21134/mhcj.v10i0.314Martínez-Costa, M.-P., Amoedo-Casais, A., & Moreno-Moreno, E. (2022). e value of podcasts to journalism: Analysis of digital native media brands’ oerings, production and publishing in Spain. Profesional de la Información, 31(5), e310503. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.sep.03Martínez-Graña, P., Elías, C., & Soengas-Pérez, X. (2023). Daily podcasts: e challenge of producing journalistic audio content beyond the radio. In M. C. Negreira Rey, J. Vázquez-Herrero, J. Sixto-García, & X. López-García (Eds.), Blurring boundaries of journalism in digital media: New actors, models and practices (pp. 215-227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43926-1_15Martín-Nieto, R., Pedrero-Esteban, L. M., Martínez Otón, L., Pérez Escoda, A., & Castillo-Lozano, E. (2024). El auge del podcast narrativo de no cción en España: Análisis de la producción original en las plataformas de audio bajo demanda. Revista de la Asociación Española de Investigación de la Comunicación, 11(21), raeic112104. https://doi.org/10.24137/raeic.11.21.4McQuail, D. (1987). Mass communication theory: An introduction. Sage.Miller, K., Fox, K., & Dowling, D. (2022). From Black Lives Matter to COVID-19: Daily news podcasts and the reinvention of audio reporting. Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media, 20(2), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao_00063_1Newman, N., & Gallo, N. (2019). News podcast and the opportunities for publishers. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Newman, N., & Gallo, N. (2020). Daily news podcasts: Building new habits in the shadow of coronavirus. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2023). Digital news report 2023. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Perks, L. G., & Turner, J. S. (2018). Podcasts and productivity: A qualitative uses and gratications study. Mass Communication and Society, 22(1), 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1490434

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 47-71 January-June of 2026David García-MarínISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 71Perks, L. G., Turner, J. S., & Tollison, A. C. (2019). Podcast uses and gratications scale development. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(4), 617-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1688817Rae, M. (2023). Podcasts and political listening: Sound, voice and intimacy in the Joe Rogan Experience. Continuum, 37(2), 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2023.2198682Rohden, S. F., Tassinari, G., & Netto, C. F. (2022). Listen as much as you want: e antecedents of the engagement of podcast consumers. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 18(1), 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIMA.2023.128152Schlütz, D., & Hedder, I. (2021). Aural parasocial relations: Host-listener relationships in podcasts. Journal of Radio & Audio Media, 29(2), 457-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376529.2020.1870467Skalický, M. (2023). Motivations behind the production of news podcasts in established Czech media. Communication Today, 14(1), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.34135/communicationtoday.2023.Vol.14.No.1.10Tafesse, W. (2015). Content strategies and audience response on Facebook brand pages. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(6), 927-943. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-07-2014-0135Tobin, S. J., & Guadagno, R. E. (2022). Why people listen: Motivations and outcomes of podcast listening. PLOS ONE, 17(4), e0265806. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265806Wahid, R. M., & Gunarto, M. (2021). Factors driving social media engagement on Instagram: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Global Marketing, 35(2), 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2021.1956665

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]