Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in AdolescencePiropos online y comunicación digital: la objetivación sexual en la adolescencia doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 479-498 | 479 January-June of 2026ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: Martínez Román, R.; Adá Lameiras, A. and Rodríguez Castro, Y. (2026). Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in Adolescence. Doxa Comunicación, 42, pp. 479-498.https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n42a3045Rosana Martínez Román. Assistant Profesor in the eory and History of Education area at the Faculty of Education and Social Work of the University of Vigo (Galicia, Spain). She holds a PhD in Educational and Behavioral Sciences from the University of Vigo. Her main research line focuses primarily on sexual violence, both in online and oine spaces, aective-sexual education, and coeducation.University of Vigo, Spain [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1122-5585Yolanda Rodríguez Castro. Associate Professor in the Area of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments of the Faculty of Education and Social Work at the University of Vigo (Galicia, Spain). She earned her PhD in Psychopedagogy in 2006. She currently serves as Director of the Equality Unit at the University of Vigo. Her main research focuses on sexual and gender-based violence, both online and oine, gender stereotypes, sexism, and aective-sexual education.University of Vigo, Spain [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0001-9965-2348Alba Adá Lameiras. Assistant Profesor in the Department of Economics and Business at the Rey Juan Carlos University of Madrid (Spain). She holds a PhD in Communication Sciences from the University of Vigo. Her research line focuses mainly on the analysis of gender representations in the media and new technologies.Rey Juan Carlos University, Spain [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3092-1463is content is published under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. International License CC BY-NC 4.0

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


480 | nº 42, pp. 479-498 | January-June of 2026Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in AdolescenceISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación1. IntroductionIn the digital age, social media platforms have become leading spaces for cybersocialization among adolescents, playing a pivotal role in shaping and developing their social, emotional, and communicative bonds (Rodríguez-Castro et al., 2021a). e use of ICTs has become virtually universal: in Europe, 97% of young people between the ages of 16 and 29 use the Internet daily, a gure that has grown exponentially since 2015 (Eurostat, 2025). By 2024, 88% of youths within this age group in the EU were active on social media (Eurostat, 2025). According to the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC, 2024) study by the World Health Organization (WHO, 2024), 36% of adolescents in Europe maintain constant contact with friends through digital platforms –a proportion that rises to 44% among 15-year-old girls and boys. e most popular platforms among Europeans aged 13 to 24 are WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube (Global Digital, 2025).In the Spanish context, internet use among adolescents is virtually universal: 96% regularly surf the internet or digital platforms (INE, 2025), and nearly nine out of ten log in several times daily or remain continuously connected. is hyperconnectivity Recibido: 27/06/2025 - Aceptado: 16/10/2025 - En edición: 24/11/2025 - Publicado: 01/01/2026Resumen:El colectivo adolescente utiliza las redes sociales como una herramienta clave para la comunicación, el inicio y consolidación de las relaciones interpersonales, así como para la expresión de su sexualidad a través de la imagen corporal. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron analizar las experiencias de objetivación a través de los “piropos online” que emite y recibe el colectivo adolescente en la esfera digital, determinar los compor-tamientos de quien emite y recibe estos comentarios, comprender la na-lidad de la emisión, y conocer los sentimientos y reacciones que les genera al colectivo adolescente que recibe piropos en la esfera digital. Los parti-cipantes fueron 232 estudiantes (121 chicas y 111 chicos) de Educación Secundaria y Bachillerato, de entre 15 y 18 años, del noroeste de España, que participaron en 20 grupos de discusión. Los principales resultados mostraron que el colectivo adolescente utiliza las redes sociales para com-partir sus propias imágenes y vídeos e interactuar socialmente a través de comentarios objetivantes, especialmente hacia las chicas. De este modo, la emisión y recepción de piropos online no solamente son una continui-dad de las experiencias que se reejan en el contexto oine, sino que son comportamientos que pueden suceder con más frecuencia y con más du-reza en el contexto virtual. Nuestros resultados sugieren la necesidad de incorporar programas integrales de educación sexual en las escuelas para promover relaciones socioafectivas sanas y libres de violencia.Palabras clave: adolescentes, redes sociales, piropos online, objetivación sexual, ciberacoso sexual.Received: 27/06/2025 - Accepted: 16/10/2025 - Early access: 24/11/2025 - Published: 01/01/2026Abstract: Adolescents use social media as a key tool for communication, initiating and maintaining interpersonal relationships, and expressing their sexuality through bodily self-representation. is study aimed to analyze experiences of sexual objectication through “online compliments” exchanged among adolescents in digital environments; to identify the behaviors of those who send and receive such comments; to understand the intent behind their emission; and to explore the feelings and reactions elicited in adolescents who receive these remarks online. e sample consisted of 232 students (121 girls and 111 boys) enrolled in secondary and post-compulsory education in northwestern Spain, aged between 15 and 18, who participated in 20 focus groups. e main ndings reveal that adolescents use social media to share personal images and videos and to engage socially through objectifying comments, particularly directed at girls. ese online compliments not only mirror oine experiences but often occur with greater frequency and intensity in virtual contexts. Our results underscore the urgent need to implement comprehensive sex education programs in schools to foster healthy, violence-free socio-aective relationships.Keywords:Adolescents, social media, online compliments, sexual objectication, cybersexual harassment.
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 479-498 January-June of 2026Rosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 481 intensies with age, as 12% of 14-year-olds spend more than four hours a day online or on digital platforms, a gure that rises to 21% among 16-year-olds (Save the Children, 2024). It is also worth noting that digital initiation is occurring at increasingly younger ages –58% begin routinely using the Internet and digital platforms by the age of 11, and nearly one in three start even before turning ten (Save the Children, 2024).Social media platforms are the main reason adolescents go online, with 79.8% of Spanish teenagers citing them as their primary activity, and 13.3% creating content specically to publish on these digital platforms (Save the Children, 2024). e presence of adolescents on social media is extremely high: 98.5% of Spanish teenagers are registered on at least one social network, and 83.5% are on three or more (UNICEF, 2022). e most widely used platforms among Spanish adolescents aged 12 to 17 are WhatsApp (95%), Instagram (86%), TikTok (81%), and YouTube (69%) (IAB Spain, 2025). ese gures reveal a clear preference among adolescents for digital environments characterized by immediacy, interactivity, and constant connectivity, as opposed to oine spaces. However, hyperconnectivity is not without risks: 33% of Spanish adolescents aged 12 to 16 are at high risk of compulsive use of digital services, including social media (ONTSI, 2024). In this regard, the European Kids Online study (O’Neill and Dopona, 2025) ranks Spain as the country with the highest prevalence of problematic Internet use among young people aged 9 to 18. Specically, 13% of those aged 12 to 18 exhibit cyberaddiction behaviors, and 32% are at risk.Beyond risks linked to time spent online, concerns are also emerging regarding exposure to sexual content and inappropriate sexual interactions (O’Neill and Dopona, 2025). According to UNICEF’s latest report (2022), more than 40% of adolescents reported having received erotic or sexual messages, one in ten has received sexual propositions from adults, and one in ve could be experiencing cyberbullying. ese gures highlight that, regardless of geographic context, the intensive and daily use of social media by adolescents worldwide (Bärtl, 2018) transforms these digital environments into key spaces for understanding new forms of socialization, communication, and the expression of sexuality during adolescence, as well as the impact these factors have on adolescents’ psychosocial development.In the virtual sphere, social media platforms constitute highly visual environments, saturated with images and videos focused on physical appearance and the sexualized body (Bell et al., 2024; Burnell et al., 2021). Adolescents on social media share and post images and/or videos in which they consider themselves to “look good,” showcasing their bodies and physical attributes according to the idealized beauty standards promoted by the dominant digital culture (Berne et al., 2014; Burnette et al., 2017). It is noteworthy that during adolescence, physical appearance is a central element in self-perception and in acceptance and recognition by peer groups (Mayeux and Kleiser, 2020). On these digital platforms, the main function of images and/or videos is to encourage interaction through “positive” comments (Paddock et al., 2025; Bell, 2019; Chua and Chang, 2016; Rideout and Fox, 2018), “likes,” or emojis (Nesi et al., 2018). ese comments can range from objectifying remarks about physical appearance to explicit insinuations or sexual propositions (Frisén y Berne, 2020). us, adolescents on social media are constantly exposed to receiving sexualized comments and/or visual reactions (“likes” or emojis) on their posts from both peers and strangers (Vandenbosch et al., 2022). ese forms of social interaction have become a common and normalized mode of communication among adolescents (Rodríguez-Castro et al., 2021a). is practice is embedded within a digital culture that tends to reinforce the objectication of the female body, with girls being the primary
482 | nº 42, pp. 479-498 | January-June of 2026Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in AdolescenceISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónrecipients of such comments, thereby reinforcing gender hierarchies in interpersonal relationships and perpetuating power dynamics and gender stereotypes (Lameiras et al., 2018, 2024; Rodríguez-Castro et al., 2025).To understand how Western culture systematically commodies and objecties the bodies or body parts of girls and women, we rely on Objectication eory developed by Fredrickson and Roberts (1997). is theory explains the consequences of being a woman in a culture that treats girls and women as sexual objects through body evaluation (e.g., catcalls, staring, sexual comments), as well as unwanted sexual advances, harassment, and/or sexual abuse (Kozee et al., 2007). e evaluation of girls’ and women’s bodies through an “objectifying gaze” is dened as the behavior of visually inspecting or staring at another person’s body or sexual body parts (Gervais et al., 2013), with the purpose of being “used” or “consumed” by others (Fredrickson y Roberts, 1997). Focusing attention on bodies leads to “literal objectication,” dened as “any situation in which a person is perceived as an object” (Heick and Goldenberg, 2014, p. 225). In this way, objectication experiences represent a form of dehumanization, placing those who are objectied at a level inferior to human beings (Gervais et al., 2013). Experiences of objectication, through comments on women’s physical appearance and sexualized bodies, often begin during the transition from childhood to adolescence, when girls’ bodies start to attract the gaze, sexualization, and evaluation of boys and men (Fredrickson y Roberts, 1997; Farquhar y Wasylkiw 2007; Rousseau y Eggermont 2017; Tiggemann y Slater 2015; Ward et al., 2015). is stage of development is particularly relevant to the processes of objectication and self-objectication, as experiences of sexualization of the female body increase signicantly with the onset of puberty. e physical changes inherent to this stage not only transform body image but are also accompanied by a growing tendency toward self-objectication, that is, internalizing the external gaze as a form of self-evaluation of physical appearance and the sexualized body (Mustafa y Akram, 2022). In this way, girls and women bind their identity to the value assigned to their bodies and are condemned to dissatisfaction when their bodies do not t beauty standards (Fredrickson and Roberts, 1997). us, for girls and women, body dissatisfaction is more the rule than the exception, and this “normative discontent” persists in contemporary societies (Fallon et al., 2014; Lameiras et al., 2018, 2024), both in analog and digital contexts. Consequently, objectication experiences compromise the identity construction of girls and women, reducing them to their beauty and sexuality and disconnecting them from their bodies, thoughts, feelings, and desires, turning them into objects of sexual interest and attention from boys and men (Fredrickson y Roberts, 1997; Rousseau y Eggermont 2017; Tiggemann y Slater 2015; Ward et al., 2015).Currently, Fredrickson and Roberts’ (1997) objectication theory is particularly relevant in the context of social media, where adolescents, especially girls, post images and videos of themselves to be viewed, objectied, and subjected to objectifying comments (Tiggeman and Barbato, 2018). ese often normalized behaviors constitute forms of sexual cyberbullying that are frequently not recognized as such by those who experience or perpetrate them. us, social media provides a unique digital platform to deeply study the eects of objectifying comments related to physical appearance and the sexualized body (Tiggeman y Barbato, 2018). International scientic literature shows that sexual objectication experiences among adolescents in the online sphere indicate that both viewing and posting images and/or videos on social media increase experiences of sexual objectication through the sending and receiving of online compliments focused on physical appearance and the sexualized body (Bell et al., 2019; Burnell et al., 2021; Butkowski et al., 2019; Frisén et al., 2020; Fardouly et al., 2017; Feltman y Szymanski, 2018; Lin et al., 2022; Manago
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 479-498 January-June of 2026Rosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 483 et al., 2015; Paddock et al., 2024, 2025; Sarabia y Estévez, 2016). Girls are the ones who most frequently experience sexual objectication through online compliments, while boys are the primary emitters of these comments (Burnell et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2022). International studies show that between 79.2% and 85% of adolescent girls have received objectifying comments on their social media posts, focused on their physical appearance and sexualized body (Burnell et al., 2021; Paddock et al., 2024, 2025), followed by “likes” and/or emojis (16.7%) (Paddock et al., 2025). ese practices are widely normalized among adolescents and are associated with indicators of social recognition within peer groups (Paddock et al., 2024).us, the use of social media platforms such as Instagram and TikTok, which focus on visual content and immediate feedback through objectifying comments, reinforces and intensies experiences of objectication (Tiggemann and Barbato, 2018; Frisén and Berne, 2020). ese dynamics carry signicant psychosocial risks, as constant exposure to objectifying comments has been linked to heightened self-objectication, body surveillance, increased concern about body image, body dissatisfaction, and lowered self-esteem (Burnell et al., 2021; Rodgers and Melioli, 2016). Moreover, experiences of objectication can also lead to cyberbullying situations (Berne et al., 2014; Rodgers and Melioli, 2016). Cyberbullying is very common among adolescents, and according to Rodgers and Melioli’s (2016) study, nearly 90% of adolescents reported knowing someone who has been a victim of cyberbullying through objectifying comments about their physical appearance, with Instagram identied as the most frequent digital platform for such incidents.In Spain, to the best of our knowledge, the study of objectication experiences during adolescence through online compliments on social media remains an emerging research line. is type of comment, which sexually objecties the body or body parts of women through compliments, constitutes a form of sexual harassment. Compliments are the most common and normalized form of sexual harassment in Western cultures, particularly in countries such as Spain, Portugal, and other Spanish-speaking nations (Bailey et al., 2016; Moya-Garófano et al., 2022), which could lead to these behaviors being perceived as socially positive by society and/or by the recipients themselves (Moya-Garófano et al., 2021). e recent study by Pérez et al. (2024) provides data on the magnitude and characteristics of this form of sexual harassment through experiences of sexual objectication in the online sphere. Pérez et al. (2024) show that 31.6% of young women aged between 18 and 35 have received comments on Instagram treating them as sexual objects. Additionally, 27% have received unsolicited sexual content, 38.3% have received mass messages without responding, 30.5% are aware that someone compulsively views their content, 16.4% have received intimidating messages, 16% have received insults or messages referring to socially perceived bodily aws, and 2% have suered threats, extortion, or blackmail involving the publication of sexual content featuring them.Currently, there are no qualitative studies in the Spanish context that deeply explore objectication experiences through “online compliments” (sexual comments about physical appearance and the sexual body) on social media directed at adolescents, nor that conceptualize these behaviors as manifestations of sexual cyberbullying on digital platforms. e objectives of this study are to analyze the experiences of objectication through the “online compliments” that adolescents both emit and receive in the digital sphere; to determine the behaviors of those who emit and receive these comments; to understand the purpose behind the emission; and to explore the feelings and reactions these compliments generate in the adolescent population. All this with the aim of understanding how adolescents reproduce and adapt traditional gender dynamics from the oine world to the virtual environment, thereby contributing to the perpetuation of sexual objectication and sexual harassment in their new digital forms.
484 | nº 42, pp. 479-498 | January-June of 2026Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in AdolescenceISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación2. Methodology 2.1. Participants is study involved 232 adolescents (121 girls and 111 boys) who were students in the second cycle of compulsory secondary education (ESO) and the rst and second years of Bachillerato, attending public secondary education institutes in the northwest of Spain. eir ages ranged from 15 to 18 years, and they were organized into 20 discussion groups.2.2. InstrumentFor the implementation of the discussion groups, an ad hoc script of questions was developed to address the objectives of this study. e question script was semi-structured for all discussion groups to ensure uniformity of the information collected. is script gathered sociodemographic data (age, gender, and academic year) and included open-ended questions on the following thematic areas: i) online compliments emitted and received in the virtual sphere, ii) the behaviors of adolescents who emit online compliments, iii) the typology of compliments emitted and received by adolescents in the online sphere, and iv) the feelings and reactions of adolescents to receiving online compliments.2.3. ProcedureData collection took place in eight public secondary schools in northwest Galicia (Spain) during the year 2024. e research team provided the school management teams with an explanation of the study’s purpose, as well as its voluntary, anonymous, and condential nature. Regarding ethical considerations, given that the participants were minors, consent was obtained from academic supervisors and signed authorization from the mothers, fathers, and/or legal guardians for the youths’ participation in the discussion groups. e discussion group sessions were held at the same schools during school hours and lasted, approximately, 45-50 minutes.2.4. Data AnalysisDiscussion groups were utilized due to the benets this technique oers in data collection, allowing young participants to feel more comfortable responding to questions and sharing their perceptions and experiences within their peer group (Horner, 2000). All discussion group sessions were recorded to later conduct literal transcription and analysis of the collected information.e processing of the collected information was carried out using the ATLAS.ti version 24 software, which enables the management and analysis of large volumes of data, enhancing transparency, coherence, and scientic rigor in the analytical process (Weitzman, 2000). Furthermore, this software facilitated simultaneous work among the researchers (San-Martín, 2014), allowing data triangulation to manage information processing, ensure coherence, credibility, and content relevance, and to establish thorough coding and categorization. us, a naturalistic content analysis was conducted following ve basic rules (Ruiz-Olabuenaga, 2012): i. exhaustiveness (Bardin, 1986), which consists of categorizing all content; ii. exclusivity, meaning focusing the same idea into a single category; iii. semi-induction, involving careful precategorization or coding; iv.
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 479-498 January-June of 2026Rosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 485 category relevance, evaluating whether it is appropriate to maintain the category; and v. objectivity, which was ensured by cross-checking codications and categorizations of content analysis among the members of the research team. e content analysis of the adolescent discourse allowed the establishment of the following primary categories: i) Online compliments emitted by adolescents on social media; ii) Online compliments received by adolescents on social media; and iii) Feelings and reactions to the reception of online compliments on social media. ese primary categories were further detailed into secondary categories, through which the results are presented. e coding used for each participant included their gender followed by the discussion group number (e.g., M, FG3).3. Results3.1. Online compliments emitted by adolescents on social medial 3.1.1. Online compliments emitted by boys on social mediaIn the content analysis, it was identied that more than half of the male participants (n=67 out of 111) showed a tendency to use social media as platforms to perpetuate the practice of sending online compliments: “I send more compliments on social media” (M, FG7). Among these, 47 boys (out of 67) indicated that they send online compliments to known girls (e.g., friends or partners): “I send compliments to girls I know” (M, FG5), and 15 boys stated that they also send compliments to unknown girls (n=15 boys): “I look at girls’ social media, and those I nd attractive, I say whatever” (M, FG20). 3.1.1.1. Typology of online compliments emitted by boys on social medial Nearly one third of the boys (n=31 out of 111) reported sending comments regarding the physical appearance and sexualized bodies of girls, emphasizing physical appearance as the primary focus on social media: “I tell them they have a nice ass, or something like that…” (M, FG17), “On social media, I don’t hold back anymore, there I even call them ‘horny’ or something…” (M, FG7). Additionally, 15 boys (out of 111) admitted to sending sexually explicit requests, i.e., comments related to sexual acts: “I tell them, ‘babygirl, I’m going to give it to you’” (M, FG1).e content analysis also identied that 28 boys (out of 111) reported sending online compliments related to the physical beauty of girls: “I write on their Instagram stories ‘beautiful’ or something like that...” (M, FG10) “¡How beautiful you are! You’re gorgeous, my girl!” (M, FG1).3.1.1.2. The purpose of boys emitting online compliments on social media Analysis of the boys’ discourse revealed that 8 boys (out of 111) stated that the primary purpose of sending online compliments is to “irt” with the recipient: “Yes, I say compliments online to irt” (M, FG7), “I hooked up with my current girlfriend on social media” (M, FG16)”. Even the boys point out that liking girls’ posts on social media or reacting to their posts by sending them an emoticon is also considered a form of complimenting: “On Instagram, by reacting to stories with an emoticon or liking
486 | nº 42, pp. 479-498 | January-June of 2026Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in AdolescenceISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónany post of the girl, you are already irting with her with the intention of starting a conversation and asking her when we meet in person” (M, FG20).3.1.2. Online compliments emitted by girls on social media Girls send fewer online compliments compared to boys, with less than one third of them (n=25 out of 121) reporting that they send them: “I do send compliments on social media” (F, FG11). e girls who send online compliments indicated they send them to people they know, such as their friends: “On social media, I send compliments to people I know, to my friends, when they post a story on Instagram, for example, but I don’t say anything rude” (F, FG14), “I also send compliments to my friends on social media” (F, FG6)”. Very few adolescent girls (n=3 out of 121) reported sending compliments to strangers via social media, but they specied that these were famous people: “I send compliments to famous guys that I nd very handsome, and I tell them, ‘How handsome you are’” (F, FG5).3.1.2.1. Typology of online compliments emitted by girls on social media Content analysis revealed that 25 girls (n=25 out of 121) sent sexually themed compliments about the sexualized body, or specic body parts, of the recipient: “Many times I tell my friends, ‘What a hottie’” (F, FG9), “I tell him, ‘What a body’” (F, FG19). e analysis also found that these girls made comments about the recipient’s physical beauty: “If a friend posts a story on Instagram, I write ‘handsome’” (F, FG5), followed by comments related to sexual relations: “I tell him, ‘I’ll eat your mouth or see you tomorrow in bed’ or things like that…” (F, FG3).3.2. Online compliments received by adolescents on social media 3.2.1. Online compliments received by girls on social media Almost all the participating girls (n=96 out of 121) reported receiving compliments through social media: “I receive many compliments on social media” (F, FG3). ey identied Instagram and the instant messaging app WhatsApp as the social media platforms through which they most frequently receive compliments: “Yes, we receive compliments on social media such as Instagram or WhatsApp” (F, FG6).3.2.1.1. From whom girls receive online compliments on social media Two-thirds of the participants (n=74) indicated from whom they receive online compliments. More than half of these girls (n=43) stated they receive compliments from known individuals, some (n=12) specifying that these come from their friends, especially male friends: “e compliments I receive on social media are all, or mostly, from people I know and get al.ng with, that is guys who follow me and whom I follow, so just acquaintances” (F, FG3), “e compliments we mostly receive on social media come from friends” (F, FG6).
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 479-498 January-June of 2026Rosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 487 Nevertheless, a signicant portion of adolescent girls, just under one third of them (n=31), reported also receiving online compliments from strangers: “I have received compliments on my social media posts from unknown boys” (F, FG9), “from unknown boys or even fake accounts you don’t know” (F, FG12). Some girls even reported receiving private messages: “Mostly from strangers, and not just on a post you upload, sometimes they message you privately” (F, FG12).3.2.1.2. Typology of online compliments received by girls on social mediaOne third of the participants (n=36) stated that they receive online comments with sexual content referring to their sexualized body: “I receive quite a few sexual comments on Instagram or TikTok about my body” (F, FG14). e participants recognize a wide range of sexualizing comments, dierentiating between comments they receive about their body, about specic parts of their body: “ey respond to my Instagram stories saying things like ‘What boobs!’ or something like that” (F, FG15), comments related to sexual relations: “I posted photos in a bikini on social media and received comments like ‘I’d fuck you all over’” (F, FG11), “ey say, ‘You’re hot, ¡I’d do anything to you!’” (F, FG5), as well as multimedia reactions to content they previously posted on social media: “Sometimes they respond with re emojis and you already know what they mean or want...” (F, FG6), “You get the usual re or devil emojis when I post a story on Instagram” (F, FG15).e participants reported that they have also received unsolicited multimedia comments of sexual content: “But we also receive highly sexual photos... that you didn’t ask for” (F, FG15). Some participants even received unwanted sexual requests asking them to post photos or videos on social media showing their body or parts of their sexualized body: “It has happened to me that I post a story wearing sweatpants and a huge sweatshirt, and they reply, ‘We want to see your body with a little less clothing’” (F, FG14).Furthermore, some of the participating girls (n=10) expressed having received compliments related to their beauty, as well as multimedia reactions to content they previously posted on social media: “You receive comments like ‘How beautiful!’ or also an emoticon referring to your beauty” (F, FG9). 3.2.2. Online compliments received by boys on social media Content analysis identied that less than one-third of boys reported receiving online compliments: “Yes, I do receive compliments on social media” (M, FG5), “Well, I do receive some online” (M, FG4). 3.2.2.1. From whom boys receive online compliments on social media Twenty-three boys (out of 111) reported receiving compliments on social media from people they know, such as friends: “I only receive them from people I know, because I don’t follow strangers” (M, FG5), “ey’re people I know, and only friends or acquaintances can respond to me” (M, FG10). Nevertheless, eight boys (out of 111) also reported receiving online compliments from unknown girls: “I’ve received comments from unknown girls who follow me, but I don’t know them, saying ‘How handsome’ and such” (M, FG1), “I’ve received compliments on social media from unknown girls who reply to my posts” (M, FG20).
488 | nº 42, pp. 479-498 | January-June of 2026Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in AdolescenceISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación3.2.2.2. Types of online compliments received by boys on social media Very few boys (n=7) indicated the types of compliments they receive through social media. All of them stated receiving comments related to their sexualized body: “Compliments like ‘You’re so horny’” (M, FG4), or they have also received comments about their physical attractiveness: “I’ve been told I’m handsome” (M, FG16).e participants pointed out the signicant inuence of digital platforms in receiving compliments, highlighting that they often receive compliments about their physical appearance through multimedia reactions to content they have previously posted online. For example, “You get a reply to an Instagram story with a re emoji as a compliment” (M, FG5). 3.3. Feelings and reactions to receiving online compliments on social media 3.3.1. Girls’ feelings and reactions to receiving online compliments on social media e participating girls reported experiencing more negative than positive feelings when receiving compliments through social media, highlighting feelings such as displeasure or discomfort as the most common emotional responses.Regarding negative feelings, one third of the participating girls (n=32) expressed their displeasure at receiving online compliments: “I don’t like receiving compliments online” (F, FG3), “Receiving them on social media, for example, makes me feel a bit anxious” (F, FG6), “I nd it disgusting” (F, FG16). Some adolescent girls (n=15) pointed out that they feel particular discomfort when online compliments focus on their sexualized body; they feel objectied, which contributes to their emotional distress: “On Instagram, when you start getting to know someone and they immediately start with stu like ‘You’re so hot,’ it feels bad because you don’t know them at all, and instead of asking about your life, they just start with ‘You’re so hot,’ ‘What tits you have,’ and that makes you feel awful” (F, FG19), “Because they see us for our looks, treat us like objects, something you can throw a compliment or a comment at and we’re supposed to like it” (F, FG11).ese girls predominantly express rejection, especially when the sender is an unknown boy, causing them discomfort and distress: “It makes you feel uncomfortable” (F, FG9). Furthermore, the girls also refer to the feelings of guilt that such comments provoke: “And you always think it’s your fault, but it’s never your fault. And I don’t know, it also makes you feel uncomfortable” (F, FG4).Regarding positive feelings experienced by adolescent girls when receiving online compliments, very few (n=10) reported feeling pleased to receive them. However, eight girls revealed that they particularly appreciate compliments from their friends on social media, suggesting that such comments positively inuence their mood: “Often, it boosts your self-esteem when people you know tell you how beautiful you are” (F, FG6), “If someone I know pays me compliments respectfully, it doesn’t bother me” (F, FG15), “If friends compliment me, obviously I love it, but otherwise, no” (F, FG3).Girls’ reactions to receiving online compliments, 37 participants expressed that they avoid interacting with the sender. More than half of these students (n=22) reported reacting by ignoring the boy who sent the compliment: “e typical thing is that he sends you a request or messages you privately and you just don’t respond” (F, FG14). Some of them (n=8) highlighted that they respond by deleting or blocking the sender on their social media to set clear boundaries and prevent future uncomfortable
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 479-498 January-June of 2026Rosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 489 situations: “Sometimes on social media, I prefer to delete them” (F, FG12), “What I do is block them, because rst they send a compliment, then they respond to your stories with lovestruck emojis, but I block them and move on” (F, FG15).However, only a few adolescent girls (n=6) highlighted that they had responded by expressing their displeasure to the sender of the online compliments. ese girls demonstrate their rejection of behaviors that make them feel uncomfortable, such as receiving online compliments, by providing negative feedback to the sender: “Sometimes on social media, I respond negatively to convey my feelings” (F, FG12), “If I trust the person, I say, ¡‘Hey! What are you doing?’ and tell them o, because that’s not acceptable” (F, FG15), “I told him, ¡‘You’re an idiot!’” (F, FG6).3.3.2. Boys´ feelings and reactions to receiving online compliments on social media Analysis of the participating boys’ discourses revealed that only a few (n=13) articulated their feelings about receiving online compliments, with the majority admitting to feeling positive about it. Notably, among the boys who expressed their sentiments, most reported experiencing pleasure, satisfaction, and even pride upon receiving online compliments: “I felt good” (M, FG1), “It’s perfect if a stranger tells me, in fact, I keep talking to her. If you’re direct and all that, perfect, I accept everything” (M, FG8), “I like it. I mean, it makes me proud” (M, FG20).However, some adolescent boys (n=6) did not express any signicant emotional response, indicating neutral feelings upon receiving online compliments. None of the participating boys reported negative feelings regarding online compliments, suggesting a possible absence of adverse experiences in this regard: “I don’t care about receiving online compliments” (M, FG25), “I don’t pay much attention either, it doesn’t bother me” (M, FG4), “I don’t give them much importance because you don’t see the person, and you can’t tell if they’re serious or not. rough the screen, you just don’t know” (M, FG5)”.Regarding boys’ reactions to receiving online compliments, three participants expressed that their response involved deleting the online compliment or even multimedia sexual content when such inappropriate material appeared on their devices, especially if parental supervision of their electronic devices was in place: “It was from a girl I didn’t know, and I deleted the photo” (M, FG16), “I’d look at it rst and then delete it. I have the problem that my mom checks my phone” (M, FG12).4. Discussion e objective of this study has been to analyze the online compliments exchanged by adolescents within the digital realm, to identify the behaviors of those who send and receive these comments, to understand the purpose behind their delivery, and to explore the feelings and reactions elicited among the adolescent cohort receiving compliments in the virtual sphere. e study aims to uncover how adolescents transfer and perpetuate traditional gender dynamics from the oine environment into the virtual space. e results obtained clearly demonstrate that online compliments are a common and normalized form of interaction among adolescents on social media. is practice, far from being harmless or playful, perpetuates dynamics of sexual objectication (Fredrickson and Roberts, 1997; Burnell et al., 2021; Paddock et al., 2025), reinforces gender hierarchies in interpersonal relationships, and reproduces gender stereotypes (Lameiras et al., 2018; Rodríguez-Castro et al., 2012, 2025). e adolescent
490 | nº 42, pp. 479-498 | January-June of 2026Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in AdolescenceISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónparticipants in our study report frequently sending and receiving online compliments through social networks or other digital media, with boys identied as the primary senders and girls as the recipients of objectifying and sexualizing comments regarding their physical appearance and sexualized bodies.Numerous studies have demonstrated that intensive use of and exposure to the internet and social media among adolescents is associated with an increase in experiences of sexual objectication, particularly among preadolescent girls, adolescents, and young university women (Butkowski et al., 2019; Fardouly et al., 2018; Lin et al., 2022; Manago et al., 2015; Tiggemann y Barbato, 2018; Lin et al., 2022; Rodgers y Melioli, 2016). In particular, Burnell et al. (2021) nd that 85% of university students, mostly girls, frequently receive objectifying comments about their physical appearance and sexualized bodies on social media, especially on Instagram. Social media thus emerges as a key space for cyber-socialization, where online compliments serve not only as communication but also reect oine male power and control dynamics (Smahel et al., 2020). e results of the present study also reveal that boys issue online compliments to both known and unknown girls, whereas girls tend to direct online compliments primarily to known boys. is nding reects how girls communicate in the online sphere with greater caution compared to boys, being acutely aware of the risks they face as females when interacting with strangers online. As Rodgers and Melioli (2016) assert, the anonymity and disinhibition aorded by Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) facilitate the emergence of cyberbullying scenarios, especially when online interactions pertain to physical appearance, a phenomenon particularly pernicious for young women and females. Cyberbullying is highly prevalent among adolescents, with 90% of the adolescent cohort reporting knowing someone who has been a victim of cyberbullying due to their physical appearance, with girls prominently noted as the primary victims (Rodgers and Melioli, 2016). In this vein, Berne et al. (2014) highlight that adolescents tend to normalize cyberbullying situations, accepting that anyone can become a victim and hence must be prepared to navigate such encounters when engaging on social media platforms.e types of online compliments exchanged, clear dierences emerge between the sexes. Boys tend to issue online compliments related to girls’ beauty, physical appearance, and sexualized bodies, with physical appearance being the primary focus for compliments on social media, followed by comments soliciting sexual relations. On the other hand, girls typically direct online compliments toward boys’ beauty or physical attractiveness. ese ndings align with previous research demonstrating that objectication and sexualization of girls’ physical appearance and sexualized bodies in digital spaces is a common and normalized practice among adolescents (Burnell et al., 2021; Paddock et al., 2024, 2025). In this respect, Burnell et al. (2021) note that 60% of adolescent boys admit to posting sexual comments on social media targeting photos and videos shared by girls, specically highlighting certain parts of their sexualized bodies or physical appearance. is practice reinforces the notion that the female body remains the principal object of evaluation and desire in adolescent digital culture, thereby perpetuating the dynamics of inequality and objectication that characterize both oine and online spaces.e typology of online compliments received, the study’s ndings identify that the majority of adolescent girls are recipients of objectifying remarks focused on their beauty, physical appearance, and sexualized bodies, including unsolicited and unwanted propositions for sexual relations. Such comments came from both known and unknown boys. In contrast, boys predominantly received online compliments concerning their beauty and/or physical attractiveness, mostly from acquaintances. ese ndings concur with prior qualitative research (Burnell et al., 2021; Paddock & Bell, 2021, 2024). It is crucial to underline
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 479-498 January-June of 2026Rosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 491 that online compliments addressing physical appearance and sexualized bodies reect a troubling trend of objectifying and sexualized commentary experienced by girls within the virtual sphere, as it epitomizes the reduction of girls’ worth to their physical appearance and sexualized forms. It is also important to highlight that receiving online compliments can heighten adolescents’ concern and pressure to conform to the beauty standards promoted on social media (Kvardova et al., 2023; Saiphoo and Vahedi, 2019), thereby further reinforcing such standards. However, these virtual interactions fulll an additional social function, as they enable adolescents to gather information about their acceptance and valuation within peer groups (Chua and Chang, 2016). us, the need to receive comments and “likes” becomes an indicator of approval not only on an aesthetic level but also socially. Consequently, garnering more “likes” on objectied images can be interpreted as positive reinforcement, increasing the frequency with which such content is posted (Bell et al., 2019). e results of the current study invite reection on the role of social media as agents of socialization that reinforce dominant beauty standards, especially concerning the female body image. During adolescence, physical appearance and sexual attractiveness become key elements for obtaining social status within peer groups. Girls perceived as attractive, sensual, or erotic tend to be accepted, while those who do not conform to aesthetic ideals—such as having a slim or athletic body—may face rejection or exclusion (Mayeux and Kleiser, 2020). is pressure to t into beauty ideals promoted on social media generates ongoing concern about body image (Calzo et al., 2012; Mayeux and Kleiser, 2020), which can become a persistent issue extending into adulthood (Fredrickson and Roberts, 1997).Diverse studies highlight that frequent objectifying comments in the digital sphere about women’s physical appearance and sexualized bodies are linked to elevated levels of self-objectication, surveillance, and body dissatisfaction (Rodgers and Melioli, 2016; Wang et al., 2022). As Paddock et al. (2025) note, such sexualized comments may foster a widespread perception that physical appearance and the sexualized body are the most important personal attributes, particularly for girls. is dynamic can inuence the construction of female gender roles and drive the need for girls to conform to traditional gender norms when receiving or soliciting compliments about their physical appearance and sexualized bodies (Ward and Grower, 2020).e results of this study highlight an interesting aspect of adolescent digital interaction: objectifying comments are not only recognized as online compliments but also interpreted through “likes” and emoticons as forms of sexual interaction. Bell et al. (2019) explain that various social media interactions serve multiple purposes, with sending or receiving “likes” on sexual content being equivalent in meaning to objectifying comments. Kaye et al. (2016) further note that emoticons function to nuance sexual comments, adding emotional intensity to the messages. It is critical to emphasize that sexual comments about physical appearance and sexualized bodies on social media are constant, unbounded, and can be publicly viewed and reinforced through “likes” and emoticons, thereby amplifying their psychosocial impact on adolescents (Burnell et al., 2021; Vendemia and DeAndrea, 2021). is evolving semiotic system involves the use of emojis as coded language expressing sexual meanings among youth, signicantly shaping their digital socialization and identity development.e ndings of this study highlight the divergent emotional responses that online compliments provoke among adolescents. Boys exclusively reported positive emotions upon receiving online compliments, such as pleasure and satisfaction. Conversely, the majority of girls expressed predominantly negative feelings, including displeasure, discomfort, distress, and even fear.
492 | nº 42, pp. 479-498 | January-June of 2026Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in AdolescenceISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónese outcomes align with the qualitative study by Paddock et al. (2025), which illustrates that girls frequently experience negative emotions in response to objectifying remarks concerning their physical appearance or sexualized bodies on social media. e study also found that 10 adolescent girls expressed positive attitudes toward receiving online compliments from acquaintances, but not from unknown boys or men. However, Moya-Garófono et al. (2021) caution that even when compliments are perceived positively, they may have harmful short- or medium-term eects for girls and women by reinforcing body shame and promoting sexual self-objectication, surveillance, and control. Regarding reactions to online compliments, adolescents reported defensive behaviors such as rejecting, ignoring, or blocking the sender on social media. Only 6 girls indicated they explicitly expressed dislike toward the compliment sender. is aligns with Pérez et al. (2024), who found that victims of cyberbullying typically choose to delete or block their harassers as a primary coping strategy.e results of this study reect that adolescents use social media as a key tool for communication, initiating and consolidating interpersonal relationships, and particularly for constructing their identity, including expressing their sexuality through body image (Boyd, 2014). Social media play a signicant role in perpetuating sexual discrimination and sexual violence behaviors toward girls and women. e study also points to a concerning situation where adolescents actively share their own images and videos, engaging socially through objectifying and hypersexualizing comments, especially directed at girls. us, the sending and receiving of online compliments are not only a continuation of oine experiences but can also happen more frequently and with greater severity in the virtual context due to the features and functionalities of digital platforms.5. Conclusionse present study highlights how experiences of sexual objectication through online compliments (sexual comments about physical appearance and the sexual body) among adolescents constitute a subtle yet persistent form of sexual objectication directed at girls. ese experiences transfer, reinforce, and perpetuate oine gender stereotypes, power dynamics, and inequalities into the virtual world (Rodríguez-Castro et al., 2025). Notably, social media not only replicate but may also amplify such objectifying behaviors toward girls, normalizing sexual (cyber)harassment behaviors. Hence, there is an urgent need to promote and implement aective-sexual education interventions with a gender perspective focused on digital literacy. Such programs would empower adolescents to identify, transform, and eradicate experiences of sexual objectication in both oine and digital realms (Rodríguez-Castro et al., 2021b). e ultimate goal is to build egalitarian analog and digital societies free from sexual objectication targeting girls and women.
doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 479-498 January-June of 2026Rosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 493 6. Specic contributions of each author:Name and surnameConception and design of the stuydRosana Martínez Román and Yolanda Rodríguez Castro MethodologyRosana Martínez Román and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroData collection and analysisRosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroDiscussion and conclusionsRosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroWriting, formatting, revisión and approval of versionsRosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez Castro7. Conicts of Intereste author(s) declare(s) that there is no conict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.8. Funding and acknowledgmentse Government of Spain (Ministry of Science and Innovation) supported this work in the 2019 call (reference PID2019-109613RB-I00).We also thank Nuria Magro Jiménez for the English translation of this manuscript.9. ReferencesBailey, S. K., Schroeder, B. L., Whitmer, D. E., & Sims, V. K. (2016). Perceptions of mobile instant messaging apps are comparable to texting for young adults in the United States. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (pp. 1235-1239). Sage Publications.Bardin, L. (1986). Análisis de contenido. Akal.Bärtl, M. (2018). YouTube channels, uploads and views: A statistical analysis of the past 10 years. Convergence: e International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 24(1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736979 Bell, B. T., Cassarly, J. A., & Dunbar, L. (2019). Sele-objectication: Self-objectication and positive feedback (“likes”) are associated with frequency of posting sexually objectifying self-images on social media. Body image, 26, 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.06.005

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


494 | nº 42, pp. 479-498 | January-June of 2026Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in AdolescenceISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónBell, B. T., Talbot, C. V., & Deighton-Smith, N. (2024). Following up on# tspiration: A comparative content analysis and thematic analysis of social media content aiming to inspire tness from 2014 and 2021. Psychology of Popular Media, 13(4), 666-676. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000523Berne S., Frisén A., Kling J. (2014). Appearance-related cyberbullying: A qualitative investigation of characteristics, content, reasons, and eects. Body Image, 11(4), 527-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.08.006Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: e social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.Burnell, K., George, M. J., Kurup, A. R., & Underwood, M. K. (2021). “Ur a freakin goddess!”: Examining appearance commentary on Instagram. Psychology of Popular Media, 10(4), 422. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000341Burnette C. B., Kwitowski M. A., & Mazzeo S. E. (2017). “I don’t need people to tell me I’m pretty on social media”: A qualitative study of social media and body image in early adolescent girls. Body Image, 23, 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.09.001Butkowski, C. P., Dixon, T. L., & Weeks, K. R. (2019). Body surveillance on Instagram: Examining the role of sele feedback investment in young adult women’s body image concerns. Sex Roles, 81, 385-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0993-6Calzo J. P., Sonneville K. R., Haines J., Blood E. A., Field A. E., Austin S. B. (2012). e development of associations among body mass index, body dissatisfaction, and weight and shape concern in adolescent boys and girls. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(5), 517-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.02.021Chua, T. H. H., & Chang, L. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful seles: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers in Human Behavior55, 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.011Data Reportal. (2025). Digital 2025: Top social platforms in 2025. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-sub-section-top-social-platformsEurostat. (2025). Young people - digital world. Statistics Explained. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?oldid=675610 Fallon, E. A., Harris, B. S., & Johnson, P. (2014). Prevalence of body dissatisfaction among a united stated adults sample. Eating Behaviours, 15(1), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.11.00.Fardouly, J., Willburger, B. K., & Vartanian, L. R. (2018). Instagram use and young women’s body image concerns and self-objectication: Testing mediational pathways. New Media & Society, 20, 1380-1395. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448176944Farquhar, J. C., & Wasylkiw, L. (2007). Media images of men: Trends and consequences of body conceptualization. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 8, 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.8.3.145.99Feltman, C. E., & Szymanski, D. M. (2018). Instagram use and self-objectication: e roles of internalization, comparison, appearance commentary, and feminism. Sex Roles, 78, 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0796-1Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectication theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 479-498 January-June of 2026Rosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 495 Frisén, A., & Berne, S. (2020). Swedish adolescents’ experiences of cybervictimization and body‐related concerns. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology61(1), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12561Gervais, S. J., Bernard, P., Kelin, O., & Allen, J. (2013). Toward a unied theory of objectication and dehumanization. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectication and (de)humanization. 60th Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 1-24). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_1 Heick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2014). Seeing eye to body: e literal objectication of women. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414531599Horner, S. D. (2000). Using focus group methods with middle school children. Research in Nursing & Health, 23(6), 510-517. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200012)IAB Spain. (2025). Estudio de Redes Sociales 2025. https://iabspain.es/estudio/estudio-de-redes-sociales-2025/ Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE). (2025). Encuesta sobre equipamiento y uso de tecnologías de información y comunicación en los hogares. https://www.ine.es Kaye, L. K., Wall, H. J., & Malone, S. A. (2016). “Turn that frown upside-down”: A contextual account of emoticon usage on dierent virtual platforms. Computers in Human Behavior60, 463-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.088Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvarth, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Interpersonal Sexual objectication Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.xKvardova, N., Machackova, H., & Gulec, H. (2023). ‘I wish my body looked like theirs!’: How positive appearance comments on social media impact adolescents’ body dissatisfaction. Body Image, 47, 101630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.101630Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Fernández, A. G., & Lopez, J. F. (2018). Objectifying Women’s Bodies is Acceptable from an Intimate Perpetrator, at Least for Female Sexists. Sex Roles, 79(3), 190-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0862-8Lameiras, M., Rodríguez-Castro, Y., Martínez-Román, R., & Adá, A. (2024). Rethinking the objectication of women: the Spanish version of the Objectication and Enjoyment of Sexualization Scale (OESS). Current Psychology, 43(40), 31358-31371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06718-7Lin, S., Li, L., & Jiang, L. (2022). Online interpersonal sexual objectication experiences and teenage girls’ self-objectication: the role of broad conceptualization of beauty. Behavioral Sciences, 12(7), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12070210Manago, A. M., Ward, M. L., Lemm, K. M., Reed, L., & Seabrook, R. (2015). Facebook involvement, objectied body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men. Sex Roles, 72, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0441-1.Mayeux, L., & Kleiser, M. (2020). A gender prototypicality theory of adolescent peer popularity. Adolescent Research Review, 5(3), 295-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00123-z

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


496 | nº 42, pp. 479-498 | January-June of 2026Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in AdolescenceISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónMoya-Garófano, A., Moya, M., Megías, J. L., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2022). Ambivalent sexism and women’s reactions to stranger harassment: e case of piropos in Spain. Psychology of Women Quarterly46(4), 454-467. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221115339 Moya-Garófano, A., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., Moya, M., & Megías, J. L. (2021). Stranger harassment (“Piropo”) and women’s self-objectication: e role of anger, happiness, and empowerment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence36(5-6), 2306-2326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518760258Mustafa, S., & Akram, M. (2022). Self‐Consciousness, Self‐Objectication, and Social Anxiety as Predictors of Photo Editing Behavior among Emerging Adults. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, (1), 6609752. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6609752Nesi J., Choukas-Bradley S., & Prinstein M. J. (2018). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: Part 1 -A theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(3), 267-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-018-0261-xO’Neill, B. & Dopona, V. (2025). e Better Internet for Kids Policy Monitor Report 2025. European Schoolnet, prepared for the European Commission. https://better-internet-for-kids.europa.eu/en/knowledge-hub/policy-monitor. Observatorio Nacional de Tecnología y Sociedad (ONTSI). (2024). Impacto del aumento del uso de Internet y las redes sociales en la salud mental de jóvenes y adolescentes. https://www.ontsi.es/es/publicaciones/Impacto-del-uso-de-Internet-y-redes-sociales-salud-mental-jovenes-adolescentes Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). (2024). Teens, screens and mental health: New WHO report sheds light on adolescents’ digital lives. https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/25-09-2024-teens--screens-and-mental-healthPaddock, D. L., & Bell, B. T. (2024). “It’s better saying I look fat instead of saying you look fat”: A Qualitative Study of UK Adolescents’ Understanding of Appearance-Related Interactions on Social Media. Journal of Adolescent Research39(2), 243-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584211034875Paddock, D. L., Bell, B. T., & Cassarly, J. (2025). “OMG you look amazing”: A systematic examination of the text-based interactions surrounding UK adolescent girls’ self-images on Instagram. Body Image, 52, 101839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101839Pérez, I., Rodés Paragarino, V., & Gutiérrez San Miguel, B. (2024). Reacciones y acciones de mujeres jóvenes ante la violencia machista en Instagram. Doxa Comunicación: revista interdisciplinar de estudios de comunicación y ciencias sociales, 38, 61-79. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n38a1996Rideout, V., & Fox, S. (2018). Digital health practices, social media use, and mental well-being among teens and young adults in the US. https://www.hopelab.org/reports/pdf/a-national-survey-by-hopelab-and-well-being-trust-2018.pdf Rodgers, R. F., & Melioli, T. (2016). e relationship between body image concerns, eating disorders and internet use, part I: A review of empirical support. Adolescent Research Review, 1, 95-119.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-015-0016-6Rodríguez-Castro, Y., Alonso, P., Martínez, R., & Adá, A. (2021b). “NI ♀N NI FF”, Programa coeducativo de prevención de (ciber)acoso sexual. Aranzadi omson Reuters.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 42, pp. 479-498 January-June of 2026Rosana Martínez Román, Alba Adá Lameiras and Yolanda Rodríguez CastroISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 497 Rodríguez-Castro, Y., Lameiras, M., Carrera, M.V., & Magalhães, M. J. (2012). Estereotipos de género y la imagen de la mujer en los mass media. In Comunicación y justicia en violencia de género (pp. 37-67). Tirant lo Blanch. Rodríguez-Castro, Y., Martínez, R., Alonso, P., Adá, A., & Carrera, M. V. (2021a). Intimate partner cyberstalking, sexim, pornography and sexting in adolescents: new challenges for sex education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042181Rodríguez-Castro, Y., Martínez-Román, R., & Lameiras-Fernández, M. (2025). e Dark Side of Boys’ Compliments to Girls: Exploring eir Relationship with Sexism and Cyberviolence Towards Intimate Partners. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050572Rousseau, A., & Eggermont, S. (2017). Television and preadolescents’ objectied dating script: Consequences for self-and interpersonal objectication. Mass Communication and Society, 22, 71-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1341533.Ruiz-Olabuenaga, J. I. R. (2012). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Universidad de Deusto.Saiphoo, A. N., & Vahedi, Z. (2019). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media use and body image disturbance. Computers in Human Behavior101, 259-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.028Salomon, I., & Brown, C. S. (2019). e sele generation: Examining the relationship between social media use and early adolescent body image. e Journal of Early Adolescence39(4), 539-560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618770809San-Martin, D. (2014). Teoría fundamentada y Atlas.ti: recursos metodológicos para la investigación educativa. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 16(1), 104-122.Save the Children. (2024). Derechos #SinConexión: Informe sobre infancia y adolescencia en el entorno digital. https://www.savethechildren.es/notasprensa/nuevo-informe-casi-9-de-cada-10-adolescentes-se-conectan-varias-veces-al-dia-internet-o Smahel D., Machackova H., Mascheroni G., Dedkova L., Staksrud E., Ólafsson K., Livingstone S., Hasebrink U. (2020). EU kids online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-and-communicationssets/documents/research/eu-kids-online/reports/EU-Kids-Online-2020-10Feb2020.pdfTiggemann, M., & Barbato, I. (2018). “You look great!”: e eect of viewing appearance-related Instagram comments on women’s body image. Body Image, 27, 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2018.08.009 Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2015). e role of self-objectication in the mental health of early adolescent girls: Predictors and consequences. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsv021.UNICEF. (2022). Impacto de la tecnología en la adolescencia: Relaciones, riesgos y oportunidades. https://www.unicef.es/publicacion/impacto-de-la-tecnologia-en-la-adolescencia Vandenbosch, L., Fardouly, J., & Tiggemann, M. (2022). Social media and body image: Recent trends and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology45, 101289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.002Vendemia, M. A., & DeAndrea, D. C. (2021). e eects of engaging in digital photo modications and receiving favorable comments on women’s seles shared on social media. Body Image37, 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.01.011

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


498 | nº 42, pp. 479-498 | January-June of 2026Online Compliments and Digital Communication: Sexual Objectication in AdolescenceISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónWang, Y., Fardouly, J., Vartanian, L. R., Wang, X., & Lei, L. (2022). Body talk on social networking sites and cosmetic surgery consideration among Chinese young adults: A serial mediation model based on objectication theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly46(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211026273Ward, L. M., & Grower, P. (2020). Media and the development of gender role stereotypes. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology2(1), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-051120-010630Ward, L. M., Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2015). e impact of men’s magazines on adolescent boys’ objectication and courtship beliefs. Journal of Adolescence39, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.12.004 Weitzman, E. A. (2000). Software and qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2, 803-820.

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]