Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying CommunicationGeneración Z y tiktokers ecuatorianos: usos y graticaciones en estudiantes universitarios de Comunicación doxa.comunicación | nº 43, pp. 441-461 | 441 July-December of 2026ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978How to cite this article: Lalangui Campoverde, E. C. y Flores Zúñiga, B. R. (2026). Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying Communication. Doxa Comunicación, 43, pp. 441-461.https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.3473Edison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Social Communication from the Central University of Ecuador (UCE) and a Master’s degree in Communication Policy from the Institute of Higher National Studies (IAEN). He works as a lecturer and researcher at the Technical University of Cotopaxi (UTC). His research focuses on the critical analysis of communication processes in Ecuador and Latin America, with an emphasis on digital communication, journalism, interculturality and media studies. He has published articles in high-impact journals on topics such as the attention economy on digital platforms, the media representation of social crises in the press, and narratives of migration among university students and LGBTIQ+ communities. Technical University of Cotopaxi, Ecuador [email protected]ORCID: 0000-0002-3095-1371Belén Raquel Flores Zúñiga. She holds a degree in Communication from the Technical University of Cotopaxi (UTC). Her areas of expertise and research focus on radio broadcasting, digital journalism and audiovisual production, with a particular emphasis on the creation of cultural and educational content. She has participated in various community communication and cultural dissemination projects, where she combines professional practice with critical reection on the media and their audiences. She currently works as an independent producer and manager of cultural content, promoting the development of creative initiatives that strengthen local identity and citizen participation through communication.Technical University of Cotopaxi, Ecuador belen.[email protected]ORCID: 0009-0003-4811-3418 is content is published under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License. International License CC BY-NC 4.0Recibido: 11/11/2025 - Aceptado: 05/03/2026 - En edición: 03/06/2026 - Publicado: 01/07/2026Resumen:En la actualidad, las redes sociales han recongurado los procesos de creación y circulación de la información, que han transformado las di-námicas de consumo. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar desde la Teoría de los Usos y Graticaciones, la inuencia de los contenidos de tiktokers ecuatorianos en las motivaciones de la Generación Z de la Ca-rrera de Comunicación de la Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi, e incorpo-Received: 11/11/2025 - Accepted: 05/03/2026 - Early access: 03/06/2026 - Published: 01/07/2026Abstract:Social media has now reshaped the processes of information creation and circulation, thereby transforming consumption patterns. e aim of this study is to determine, using Uses and Gratications eory, the inuence of content produced by Ecuadorian TikTokers on the motivations of Generation Z students on the Communication degree programme at the Technical University of Cotopaxi, and to incorporate

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


442 | nº 43, pp. 441-461 | July-December of 2026Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying CommunicationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónrar el ciclo académico como variable de segmentación transversal, para analizar las variaciones en la percepción inherente al proceso formativo. Como parte del diseño cuantitativo, se aplicó una encuesta a 201 partici-pantes. Se empleó la técnica de reconocimiento asistido para minimizar sesgos de falso reconocimiento. La abilidad del instrumento se vericó mediante el coeciente alfa de Cronbach α = 0.724, lo que evidenció una consistencia interna aceptable. El procesamiento de los datos incluyó un análisis estraticado según el ciclo académico. Los resultados muestran que los contenidos con mayor preferencia se orientan al humor y al en-tretenimiento, y funcionan como mecanismos de liberación de tensiones y graticación emocional. El entretenimiento digital no puede entenderse como una práctica neutral, pues actúa como un dispositivo que modela percepciones, refuerza marcos interpretativos y redene las dinámicas de interacción en el entorno universitario.Palabras clave:Estudiantes universitarios; identidad virtual; Generación Z; usos y graticaciones; tiktokers ecuatorianos.the academic year as a cross-sectional segmentation variable, in order to analyse variations in perception inherent to the educational process. As part of the quantitative design, a survey was administered to 201 participants. e assisted recognition technique was employed to minimise false recognition bias. e reliability of the instrument was veried using Cronbach’s alpha coecient (α = 0.724), which indicated acceptable internal consistency. Data processing included a stratied analysis according to academic year. e results show that the most preferred content is oriented towards humour and entertainment, and functions as a mechanism for stress relief and emotional gratication. Digital entertainment cannot be understood as a neutral practice, as it acts as a device that shapes perceptions, reinforces interpretative frameworks and redenes the dynamics of interaction within the university environment.Keywords:University students; virtual identity; Generation Z; uses and gratications; Ecuadorian TikTokers.1. IntrductionIn recent decades, the development of digital technology has become abundantly clear, leading to social change due to the ubiquity of various platforms and the mass connectivity of users around the world (Gutiérrez-Arenas et al., 2024). When connecting en masse, internet users acquire, create and disseminate information as prosumers (Colás-Bravo et al., 2013; Fajardo-Pascagaza et al., 2024).In this context, TikTok has emerged as an innovative platform in the social communication landscape, being used primarily for the entertainment of young audiences and for forging connections with other members of the digital community (Ramírez-Pérez et al., 2021; Soto, 2022; Klimenko and Herrera-Varela, 2022; Trejos-Gil et al., 2024; Méndez-Mjuelos et al., 2023). Since its creation in 2016, it has rapidly achieved global reach, particularly during the lockdown caused by the COVID-19 pandemic (García-Muñoz and Rangel-Romero, 2024; Quiroz, 2020). is led people to visit this app more regularly, in order to counteract the reality they were experiencing (Suárez-Álvarez and García-Jiménez, 2021). One of the demographic groups associated with this practice was Generation Z, comprising people born between 1995 and 2010. is group shares a common chronological, social and historical context that highlights shared patterns of behaviour and consumption in digital environments (Twenge et al., 2010). Among its distinctive characteristics is the transition into working life through the start of a university degree or early entry into the labour market. However, this generation was one of the hardest hit during the health crisis, due to the forced shift to online learning and job losses, resulting in greater vulnerability in terms of academic education and socio-economic stability (Pham et al., 2024).
doxa.comunicación | nº 43, pp. 441-461 July-December of 2026Edison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Raquel Flores Zúñiga ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 443Regarding the level of engagement Generation Z has with social media, studies show that between 2022 and 2024, the number of active TikTok users exceeded 1.3 billion, establishing it as one of the leading platforms for video viewing (Hook Agency, 2025). In 2025, 94% of young people used at least one social media platform on a daily basis, whilst 70% checked their social media more than ve times a day; this conrms that the features of these platforms act as channels for visibility and digital interaction (Lee, 2025). As for the intensive use of TikTok, Generation Z spends an average of 89 minutes a day on the app, opting for short videos; furthermore, content with sound and repeat functions records 42% higher engagement compared to traditional videos (Hook Agency, 2025). Despite TikTok’s growing global popularity, in Ecuador the platform has approximately 12,000,000 users, representing 69.2% of the total population (Pesántez-Valarezo et al., 2024). However, there are no up-to-date data on its specic use by Generation Z. e available information relates to general studies, such as those analysing TikTok’s inuence on young people’s voting intentions or their rejection of advertising managed via the platform’s interface (Pesántez-Valarezo et al., 2024). is lack of statistical data limits our understanding of the consumption patterns, motivations and communication practices of university-aged Generation Z, highlighting the need for more detailed studies to characterise their interaction with TikTok content.Ecuadorian university students are predominantly members of Generation Z and are highly experienced in technological environments and in using mobile devices, social media and digital platforms (Montero-Corrales, 2025). However, although there is a high level of familiarity with information and communication technologies, their digital skills do not always reach advanced levels of critical, creative and academic application, as evidenced by studies in higher education in Latin America. us, within this framework, Ecuadorian Generation Z university students have managed to combine the intensive use of social media and platforms such as TikTok to develop new skills that enable them to harness these technologies for learning and entertainment during the ongoing technological transformation in higher education (Pegalajar-Palomino and Rodríguez-Torres, 2023).In the process of interaction that takes place from Ecuador or any other country, a virtual community is formed around shared interests and preferences, with the aim of capturing the audience’s attention and empathy; as a result, so-called inuencers or TikTokers emerge (Gutiérrez-Rentería, 2017; Bucknell-Bossen and Kottasz, 2020; Abidin, 2020; López-Jiménez et al., 2022; Mulier et al., 2022; Jiménez-Sánchez et al., 2025; Virós-Martín et al., 2025). e dening characteristic of these gures is their ability to inuence the conduct, behaviour or opinions of their followers, thereby adopting a new form of leadership within the technological sphere (Balseca-Mera and Galarza-Schoenfeld, 2024; Maldonado-Pérez, 2024; Martínez-Borda et al., 2024). us, the concept of content creators emerges, referring to people who publish videos on any subject (Booth and Matic, 2011; Ariza et al. 2022). Inuencers with the greatest digital reach receive nancial benets, in line with the number of reactions and views their content receives. Similarly, their content inuences the decisions of those who identify with them or aspire to their lifestyle, leading to a dependency rooted in digital interconnection (Hautea et al., 2021; Jiménez-Sánchez et al., 2025; Martínez-Sanz and Solano-Santos, 2025)
444 | nº 43, pp. 441-461 | July-December of 2026Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying CommunicationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación1.1. eoretical Frameworkis study revisits and updates the epistemological premises of the Uses and Gratications eory through categories that demonstrate a correlation with the young academic population, given that they regularly access social media to meet their emotional, relational and social needs in order to nd satisfaction and interactivity (Tarullo, 2020). e theory put forward by Blumler and Katz in 1973 and 1974 became an alternative to the traditional paradigm, which viewed the audience as a passive entity in the communication process. It was conrmed that recipients are active and have the capacity to accept or reject media content to satisfy or gratify a particular emotional need (Park et al., 2009; Gil-Fernández and CalderónGarrido, 2021; Rovira-Collado et al., 2024).Today, the rise of social media reinforces the premise that Uses and Gratications eory is based on the view that members of an audience are active participants who interpret audiovisual content to meet their psychological and social needs, in relation to personal expectations, motivations and internal norms that facilitate deliberate interaction with digital media (González-Vázquez and Igartua, 2018; Segado-Boj et al., 2020). Consequently, to explore how the content of a media outlet inuences audience perceptions, we revisit the structural and deductive framework proposed by authors such as Blumler and Katz (1974), Rivas-Herrera and Igartua (2021) and Mateus et al.(2023):1. Cognitive: acquisition of information, knowledge and understanding2. Aesthetic and aective: emotion, pleasure and feelings3. Personal integration: credibility, stability and status4. Social integration: interaction with family and friends5. Stress relief: escape and entertainmentese elements enable us to broaden our reection towards a digital environment based on the consumption of audiovisual products, where expectations rise in line with what users express. A supercial identity is rearmed before a community that justies the use of social media (Espinel-Rubio et al., 2021).1.2. Objectivese main objective of this study is to determine, using the Uses and Gratications eory, the inuence of content produced by Ecuadorian TikTokers on the motivations of Generation Z students on the Communication degree programme at the Technical University of Cotopaxi. e academic year is incorporated as a cross-sectional segmentation variable to analyse variations in perception inherent to the educational process. Taking a cross-sectional approach, the following specic objectives are proposed:SO1. To identify the most popular Ecuadorian TikTokers among Communication students, considering the relationship between the academic year and the level of recognition of content creators.SO2. To classify the content consumed by Communication students, distinguishing thematic preferences according to academic year and the content shared by the most popular Ecuadorian TikTokers.
doxa.comunicación | nº 43, pp. 441-461 July-December of 2026Edison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Raquel Flores Zúñiga ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 445SO3. To describe the predominant motivations in the content consumed by Communication students in accordance with the categories of the Uses and Gratications eory, based on the most popular Ecuadorian TikTokers and the academic year.In Ecuador, Latin America, and Spain, studies on TikTok (Suárez-Álvarez and García-Jiménez, 2021; Sánchez-Amboage et al., 2022; Burgaleta-Pérez et al., 2024; Burgaleta-Pérez and Lalangui-Campoverde, 2025) have focused on analyzing content creators and their productions, examining narratives, aesthetics, thematic themes, as well as variables related to age, gender, nationality, or ethnicity. On the other hand, when the focus is on college students, research has analyzed the impact of this platform on learning, academic participation, engagement, and social and political behaviors (Rendón et al., 2022; Yélamos-Guerra, 2022; Flores-Loaiza et al., 2024; Torres-Toapanta et al., 2024; Díaz-Vera et al., 2025). For this reason, the present study makes a distinctive contribution by incorporating the academic cycle as a cross-cutting and segmentation variable, constituting a methodological innovation by highlighting the reconguration of digital practices in motivations and consumption patterns throughout the university trajectory. In this way, it provides evidence situated within the Ecuadorian context, opening up a comparative, broad, and replicable line of inquiry in other higher education systemse hypothesis is that the academic level is signicantly related to the type of content preferred on TikTok and to the perceived gratications. In this regard, it is expected that there will be dierences in consumption patterns between students in early and advanced academic levels, both in terms of content types and associated gratications.2. Methodologye use of a survey as part of the quantitative design made it possible to identify trends and numerical patterns to build knowledge in the eld of digital platforms (Cadena-Iñiguez et al., 2017).Purposive non-probabilistic sampling was applied by dening the Communication Program at the Technical University of Cotopaxi as the unit of analysis, given its direct relationship with social media use due to content creation in the participants’ academic training and professional development (Noguera-Vivo and Grandío-Pérez, 2025; Tejedor et al., 2018). Furthermore, as a public institution, it oers a conducive setting, with students from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds and regions, which enables the collection of more representative and diverse data (3 and Brunner, 2022). During the April-August 2025 academic term, the study population consisted of 201 students: rst cycle (33), second cycle (34), third cycle (19), fourth cycle (29), fth cycle (22), sixth cycle (24), seventh cycle (8), and eighth cycle (32). Regarding potential sources of bias, non-response was not recorded, as the entire selected population responded. With regard to self-selection, the academic context was considered due to its inuence on willingness to respond. Likewise, social desirability was taken into account, understood as the tendency to provide responses that align with academic expectations.To identify the most popular TikTokers in Ecuador, the study by Burgaleta-Pérez et al. (2024) was used as an initial reference. e authors examined more than 1,800 videos from 19 TikTokers, identifying patterns in the messages and correlations between variables such as gender, age, and ethnicity. ese ndings were then compared and updated using data from the websites HypeAuditor and StarNgage (Lee,2025), platforms designed to identify inuencers worldwide. e rst platform contains a database of over 11,000,000 users. Its lters facilitate the search for audiences and content creators by covering aspects such as country, city, and language (Bautista-Jara and Chávez-Yépez, 2020). e second platform analyzes inuencers’ most recent 30
446 | nº 43, pp. 441-461 | July-December of 2026Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying CommunicationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónposts to calculate engagement levels and provide up-to-date data, thereby leading the virtual market with this implementation model (Oneto-González et al., 2020; Puente-Riofrio and Uquillas-Granizo, 2022).e nal sample was obtained using a dataset containing directly observable and measurable variables from the TikTok interface -such as username, age, gender, and number of followers-for accounts with over one million followers. is inclusion criterion is consistent with research published in high-impact journals, such as that by Suárez-Álvarez and García-Jiménez (2021), Sánchez-Amboage et al. (2022), Burgaleta-Pérez et al. (2024), and Burgaleta-Pérez and Lalangui-Campo (2025). Regarding the exclusion criterion, the possibility of considering only the most popular TikToker was ruled out, as this would generate representativeness biases and restrict the generalizability of the results (Tufekci, 2014). erefore, capturing a greater diversity of preferences and content styles improves the accuracy of the ndings (Chen et al., 2024).In addition, rather than asking participants to spontaneously name a content creator they remembered or found familiar, aided recall was implemented as a digital audience measurement technique. As a result, a closed reference framework consisting of 32 proles was obtained. is strategy was adopted to reduce false recognition and avoid confusion in the selection of a native TikToker or inuencer from other platforms, and to improve reliability, ensuring that all participants evaluate the same set of observations (Alvarez-Martinez et al., 2024; Hall, 1982).Table 1. Ecuadorian TikTokers with over one million followersN=UserAgeGenderFollowers[email protected]31.0 M2@soysuco26Male24.3 M3@melissaendara24Female13.1 M4@anthonnyswagg333Male11.1 M5@otracuentadetutoriales22Female6.4 M6@donday33Male6.4 M7@jhonycevallos34Male6.3 M8@jordanalvarezz24Male5.9 M[email protected]10@alexcifuentest22Male5.1 M11@jorgito_guayaco32Male4.9 M12@jeersonrescataec32Male4.0 M
doxa.comunicación | nº 43, pp. 441-461 July-December of 2026Edison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Raquel Flores Zúñiga ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 44713@eliroldan22Female3.8 M14@leitogranda30Female3.8 M15@samiaalava22Female3.1 M16@la_campita21Female2.9 M17@ginaalopeez25Female2.8 M18@andrewarevalow24Male2.3 M19@ñustapicuasi19Female2.3 M20@angelinams0100217Female2.1 M21@annyborja227Female2 M22@shailyngarzon25Female2 M23@chrisxtrejo25Male1.9 M24@jeyderrescataocial34Male1.9M[email protected]26@emmaguerreromosquera29Female1.6 M27@jhonvalverde26Male1.6 M28@michaelsteve27Male1.5 M29@melizayumisaca26Female1.3 M[email protected]1.2 M31@nancyrisol21Female1.2 M32@jhontahancruzjc725Male1.1 MSource: Compiled by the authors based on data from HypeAuditor and StarNgage
448 | nº 43, pp. 441-461 | July-December of 2026Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying CommunicationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación2.1. Instrument and statistical validation Based on the established data, the instrument underwent a validation process through pilot tests conducted by the research team, in which students from various academic programs participated to evaluate its functionality and applicability. As a result, the items related to the recognition level of Ecuadorian TikTokers were adjusted, since participants were unable to identify them by their usernames. In the new instrument, photographs of the 32 TikTokers were included to facilitate socio-virtual detection (Montoya-Zavala et al., 2020). Likewise, it was determined that the questions should follow a multiple-choice design to reduce forced response bias, broaden the diversity of answers, and provide a more detailed understanding of the information (Bartelborth, 2020; Calderón-Garrido & Gil-Fernández, 2022). To determine the statistical reliability of the instrument, Cronbach’s alpha coecient was calculated for the eight questions previously selected and adjusted in the pilot test. is measure of consistency is based on the relationship between the variance of each item and the total variance of the questionnaire. When items are highly correlated with one another, they do not vary independently but tend to change together, resulting in a higher alpha value. e R software (version 4.5.1) was used, as it is widely recognized in the methodological literature for its reliability. After coding the responses on numerical ordinal scales, the value obtained was 0.724, indicating an acceptable level of internal consistency (Tavakol and Dennick, 2011).2.2. Ethical considerationsParticipation by respondents was voluntary, following a verbal explanation of the study’s objectives. Furthermore, it was emphasized that the information collected would be used solely for academic purposes, in order to ensure the anonymity and condentiality of the data and to avoid infringing on students’ privacy (Campos et al., 2025). Secure storage mechanisms were implemented for the content, and participants were asked to use their own mobile devices to access the Google Forms platform. Care was taken to ensure they understood the context of the research, its approximate duration, and the nature of the questions (Lalangui-Campoverde et al., 2025). is procedure ensured that the data collection was more closely aligned with the ethical principles contained in the Declaration of Helsinki, the university’s institutional and logistical provisions, and international guidelines for research involving human subjects (Mainardes, 2019).2.3. Stratied AnalysisTo ensure the accuracy and validity of the ndings, a stratied analysis was conducted to overcome the limitations of general approaches, which tend to homogenize data and obscure variations among identied internal subgroups. is technique made it possible to control for distortions and ensure the specicity of perceptions and patterns dierentiated among participants in each academic cycle (Ochoa-Sangrador et al., 2022). To organize and code the information, a Microsoft Excel workbook was used to construct cross-tabulation matrices that facilitated the specic segmentation of the elements studied and the visualization of patterns by university stratum. Each row represented a participant with their various responses, while the columns corresponded to the academic cycle variable. e selection of this variable was based on criteria of accessibility, relevance, and direct alignment with the research objectives. Its connection to the participants’ educational process or
doxa.comunicación | nº 43, pp. 441-461 July-December of 2026Edison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Raquel Flores Zúñiga ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 449development allowed for the observation of variations in the gratications perceived by students regarding the presented content (Suarez-Gonzalez et al., 2024). In this way, the stratied analysis increased the diversity across academic cycles and the internal validity of the results. It thus constituted a distinctive methodological contribution, revealing nuances and dierences that a global analysis would not have been able to detect.3. ResultsAs part of the administration of the instrument, it was found that the students’ ages range from 18 to 28 years. Regarding gender distribution, 53.20% are women and 46.80% are men. e highest concentration of students is in the rst through fourth academic cycles, accounting for 71%, while the fth through eighth cycles account for the remaining 29%, revealing lower participation at higher levels.R1 based on OE1. To identify the most popular Ecuadorian TikTokers among Communication students, the relationship between the academic cycle and the level of recognition of content creators is considered.Figure 1. Popular Ecuadorian TikTokers in the university community Source: Compiled by the author As shown in Figure 1, which displays the distribution of responses regarding recognition of the most popular Ecuadorian TikTokers over eight academic cycles, stable patterns and significant variations in user preferences are evident. The first academic year highlights @anthonnyswagg3 (comedy, dancing), @melissaendara (beauty, blogging, parodies), and @donday (lip-syncing, dance). The preference for these creators stems from a desire for entertainment and emotional connection. They serve as a source of recreation and escapism, especially for students just starting college, who find in TikTok a space for communication, socialization, and relaxation. In the second cycle, the distribution remains centered on @anthonnyswagg3, but diversifies with the presence of @jhonycevallos (humor, motivation) and @jhonvalverde (comedy, music, reflections). A trend emerges in which viewers prefer not only entertainment but also motivational content focused on self-understanding and career guidance. The trend in the third cycle points toward a decline in popularity. Mentions are spread across TikTokers such as @anthonnyswagg3, @jhonvalverde, @michaelsteve (comedy), and @jorgito_guayaco (humor). However, the most popular content continues to focus on everyday humor. In the fourth cycle, engagement increases, with an emphasis on creators such as @anthonnyswagg3, @jorgito_guayaco, and @jhonycevallos, all of whom produce comedy content. This resurgence signals a transition toward content that blends humor with representations of popular culture. 05101520253012345678ACADEMIC YEAR@melissaendara@anthonnyswagg3@donday@jhonycevallos@jorgito_guayaco_o@leitogranda@ginaalopeez@jhonvalverde@michaelsteve@jhontahancruzjc7Source: Compiled by the authorAs shown in Figure 1, which displays the distribution of responses regarding recognition of the most popular Ecuadorian TikTokers over eight academic cycles, stable patterns and signicant variations in user preferences are evident.e rst academic year highlights @anthonnyswagg3 (comedy, dancing), @melissaendara (beauty, blogging, parodies), and @donday (lip-syncing, dance). e preference for these creators stems from a desire for entertainment and emotional
450 | nº 43, pp. 441-461 | July-December of 2026Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying CommunicationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónconnection. ey serve as a source of recreation and escapism, especially for students just starting college, who nd in TikTok a space for communication, socialization, and relaxation.In the second cycle, the distribution remains centered on @anthonnyswagg3, but diversies with the presence of @jhonycevallos (humor, motivation) and @jhonvalverde (comedy, music, reections). A trend emerges in which viewers prefer not only entertainment but also motivational content focused on self-understanding and career guidance.e trend in the third cycle points toward a decline in popularity. Mentions are spread across TikTokers such as @anthonnyswagg3, @jhonvalverde, @michaelsteve (comedy), and @jorgito_guayaco (humor). However, the most popular content continues to focus on everyday humor.In the fourth cycle, engagement increases, with an emphasis on creators such as @anthonnyswagg3, @jorgito_guayaco, and @jhonycevallos, all of whom produce comedy content. is resurgence signals a transition toward content that blends humor with representations of popular culture.In the fth cycle, the gures of @anthonnyswagg3, @melissaendara, and @leitogranda (family, humor, fashion) stand out. is selection combines everyday experiences with the aspirational realm: fashion, lifestyle, and humor. It seeks role models for emotional and generational identication that transcend the notion of popularity inherent to the Ecuadorian TikToker.In the sixth cycle, @anthonnyswagg3, @melissaendara, and @jorgito_guayaco dominate. Humorous content remains the favorite. e seventh grade ranks @jorgito_guayaco_o as the most recognized, followed by @anthonyswagg3 and @jhonycevallos. is is because it is the grade with the fewest students, resulting in a lower proportion of responses compared to the other grades. ere remains a correlation with TikTokers in the comedy genre.e eighth cycle ranks more than three TikTokers as the most popular. In rst place is @anthonyswagg3, followed by @michaelsteve (comedy), and in third place, with an equal number of mentions, are @ginaalopeez (comedy, makeup), @jhonycevallos, @melissaendara, @jorgito_guayaco, and @jhontahancruzjc7 (comedy), all with humorous, motivational, and aesthetic content. In short, there is a consistent concentration on a small group of Ecuadorian TikTokers, particularly @anthonnyswagg3, whose presence spans all educational levels. Popularity is not distributed evenly because recognition in the digital environment does not depend exclusively on the academic cycle, but rather on the ability of certain Ecuadorian TikTokers to maintain constant visibility across dierent educational levels. is suggests that communication students tend to focus and legitimize their attention on a small group of creators, reinforcing dynamics of symbolic centralization in which a few proles accumulate high levels of recall and positioning.R2 based on OE2. Classify the content consumed by communication students, distinguishing thematic preferences according to the academic cycle and the content shared by the most popular Ecuadorian TikTokers.
doxa.comunicación | nº 43, pp. 441-461 July-December of 2026Edison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Raquel Flores Zúñiga ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 451Figure 2. Classication of content according to the academic cycleIn the fifth cycle, the figures of @anthonnyswagg3, @melissaendara, and @leitogranda (family, humor, fashion) stand out. This selection combines everyday experiences with the aspirational realm: fashion, lifestyle, and humor. It seeks role models for emotional and generational identification that transcend the notion of popularity inherent to the Ecuadorian TikToker. In the sixth cycle, @anthonnyswagg3, @melissaendara, and @jorgito_guayaco dominate. Humorous content remains the favorite. The seventh grade ranks @jorgito_guayaco_o as the most recognized, followed by @anthonyswagg3 and @jhonycevallos. This is because it is the grade with the fewest students, resulting in a lower proportion of responses compared to the other grades. There remains a correlation with TikTokers in the comedy genre. The eighth cycle ranks more than three TikTokers as the most popular. In first place is @anthonyswagg3, followed by @michaelsteve (comedy), and in third place, with an equal number of mentions, are @ginaalopeez (comedy, makeup), @jhonycevallos, @melissaendara, @jorgito_guayaco, and @jhontahancruzjc7 (comedy), all with humorous, motivational, and aesthetic content. In short, there is a consistent concentration on a small group of Ecuadorian TikTokers, particularly @anthonnyswagg3, whose presence spans all educational levels. Popularity is not distributed evenly because recognition in the digital environment does not depend exclusively on the academic cycle, but rather on the ability of certain Ecuadorian TikTokers to maintain constant visibility across different educational levels. This suggests that communication students tend to focus and legitimize their attention on a small group of creators, reinforcing dynamics of symbolic centralization in which a few profiles accumulate high levels of recall and positioning. R2 based on OE2. Classify the content consumed by communication students, distinguishing thematic preferences according to the academic cycle and the content shared by the most popular Ecuadorian TikTokers. Figure 2. Classification of content according to the academic cycle 05101520253012345678ACADEMIC YEARComedySocial CommentaryCookingMotivational tipsDance tutorialsModelingMusicVideo gamesLifestylesBeautyEducationNewsCosplaySource: Compiled by the authorAs shown in Figure 2, the rst cycle highlights a preference for comedy content (25 mentions). is is followed by motivational tips (19 mentions), music (18 mentions), and dance tutorials (18). is indicates that comedy plays a fundamental and constant role as the primary source of entertainment for students, due to its ability to promote relaxation and disengagement at various points throughout the academic year. e limited presence of categories such as education, social commentary, or news suggests that in the early academic years, TikTok use is linked more to fun than to learning or reection.e second cycle continues the trend toward comedy (22 mentions); however, mentions of motivational advice and music decline. Meanwhile, cooking (11 mentions) features prominently. is shift is inuenced by TikTokers with diverse content (@ginaalopeez or @leitogranda), who incorporate themes related to home life and everyday routines.With reduced engagement, the third cycle ranks comedy (16 mentions) and music (7 mentions) among the top preferences. e other categories achieve marginal gures. Consumption becomes sporadic and selective, with a lack of focus on critical or professional content.e fourth cycle features several themes: comedy (20 mentions), music (19 mentions), education (13 mentions), and motivational content (13 mentions). e content from TikTokers such as @jhonycevallos or @jhonvalverde reects a dual approach that blends humor with advice and inspirational narratives.In the fth cycle, comedy decreases (13 mentions) while preference increases for lifestyle (15 mentions), social criticism (10 mentions), education (4 mentions), and beauty (7 mentions). is indicates a shift toward content that reects personal aspirations, professional identity, and critical thinking.
452 | nº 43, pp. 441-461 | July-December of 2026Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying CommunicationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónIn the sixth grade, comedy is the most popular choice (15 times); however, there is an increase in the selection of social commentary (9 times), lifestyle content (14 times), and education (6 times). is results in a balanced mix of educational, reective, and entertaining content. is diversity of interests is framed within content aligned with personal and academic goals, reecting more intentional consumption.e seventh grade shows lower overall engagement; comedy (6 times) and motivational advice (3 times) remain the preferred content. e limited content consumed reinforces the idea that entertainment serves a relaxing function rather than an informative one.In the eighth cycle, there is a diverse resurgence of content: comedy (19 mentions), music (15 mentions), lifestyle (13 mentions), and education (11 mentions). e variety of thematic areas encompasses professional, emotional, and recreational domains.Although slight variations are observed in the thematic classication, consumption is primarily associated with entertainment, revealing a weak foundation in terms of educational or professional development. Even in the upper grades, comedy maintains a dominant position, suggesting that the content created by Ecuadorian TikTokers has a greater inuence on shaping preferences than academic progress itself. Although motivations diversify in the fth, sixth, and eighth cycles, this does not displace the recreational umbrella but rather complements it. Consequently, the continuity in the thematic hierarchy is grounded in recreation.R3 based on OE3. Describe the predominant motivations in the content consumed by Communication students according to the categories of Uses and Gratications eory, based on the most popular Ecuadorian TikTokers and the academic cycle.Figure 3. Content preferences and their correlation with the Uses and Gratications eorythe content created by Ecuadorian TikTokers has a greater influence on shaping preferences than academic progress itself. Although motivations diversify in the fifth, sixth, and eighth cycles, this does not displace the recreational umbrella but rather complements it. Consequently, the continuity in the thematic hierarchy is grounded in recreation. R3 based on OE3. Describe the predominant motivations in the content consumed by Communication students according to the categories of Uses and Gratifications Theory, based on the most popular Ecuadorian TikTokers and the academic cycle. Figure 3. Content preferences and their correlation with the Uses and Gratifications Theory Source: Compiled by the author In Figure 3, the first cycle shows high levels of motivation, with the “stress relief” category (50 mentions) and the “affective/aesthetic” category (35 mentions) standing out. Aesthetic gratification is complemented by an attraction to content such as makeup and blogs, created by content creators like @melissaendara, @donday, or @anthonnyswagg3. Cognitive gratification (34 mentions) indicates that, in the early stages, students consume entertainment-based content to stay informed and learn through tutorials. In the second cycle, motivations related to stress relief (37 mentions), affective/aesthetic (22 mentions), and cognitive (22 mentions) remain predominant. The content consumed reveals an active emotional component linked to humor, aesthetics, and symbolic identification with young TikTokers. Meanwhile, at lower levels, the motivations are personal and social integration. In the third cycle, fewer motivational factors are observed compared to the previous cycles. The cognitive and affective levels do not exceed 27 mentions. This is explained by less interaction with the content presented. However, stress relief (27 mentions) continues to emerge as the emotional outlet in students’ personal identification. 010203040506012345678ACADEMIC YEARCognitiveAffective/AestheticPersonal integrationSocial IntegrationStress reliefSource: Compiled by the author
doxa.comunicación | nº 43, pp. 441-461 July-December of 2026Edison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Raquel Flores Zúñiga ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 453In Figure 3, the rst cycle shows high levels of motivation, with the “stress relief” category (50 mentions) and the “aective/aesthetic” category (35 mentions) standing out. Aesthetic gratication is complemented by an attraction to content such as makeup and blogs, created by content creators like @melissaendara, @donday, or @anthonnyswagg3. Cognitive gratication (34 mentions) indicates that, in the early stages, students consume entertainment-based content to stay informed and learn through tutorials.In the second cycle, motivations related to stress relief (37 mentions), aective/aesthetic (22 mentions), and cognitive (22 mentions) remain predominant. e content consumed reveals an active emotional component linked to humor, aesthetics, and symbolic identication with young TikTokers. Meanwhile, at lower levels, the motivations are personal and social integration.In the third cycle, fewer motivational factors are observed compared to the previous cycles. e cognitive and aective levels do not exceed 27 mentions. is is explained by less interaction with the content presented. However, stress relief (27 mentions) continues to emerge as the emotional outlet in students’ personal identication.e fourth cycle shows one of the highest rates of stress relief (49 mentions), during which students begin to consider criteria for thematic inclusion and exclusion, such as those published by @jhonycevallos or @jhonvalverde. Cognitive motivation (31 mentions) and aective/aesthetic motivation (29 mentions) remain high. Notably, this is the only cycle to record 12 mentions in the personal integration category, reecting a more complex and functional experience in digital consumption.e only cycle where the aective/aesthetic (30 mentions) and personal integration (10 mentions) categories predominate is the fth. ere is still a strong emphasis on stress relief (27 mentions) and cognitive (18 mentions) spaces, conrming a mixed trend between learning and emotional entertainment.In sixth grade, a pattern similar to the earlier grades is observed, in that stress relief (31 mentions) and aective/aesthetic (30 mentions) gratications continue to appear as the most predominant categories. In third place is cognitive content (21 mentions). is reects a balance in the selection of content that provides entertainment alongside academic or emotional value. Motivational, social, and humorous discourse are combined within digital exploration.e seventh cycle is characterized by the lowest interaction rates with the preselected categories; however, “stress relief” has the highest number of mentions (11). Short-form content with a relaxing eect is preferred.In the eighth cycle, motivations are consolidated: stress relief (38 mentions) and aective/aesthetic (32 mentions). is student segment combines the consumption of humorous content with reective and emotional purposes, implying a greater interest focused on critical thinking and stress reduction.e preference for stress relief across all grade levels indicates that TikTok functions primarily as a mechanism for emotional regulation in the face of academic demands, rather than as an educational tool. Although cognitive and personal development dimensions appear at certain levels, they do not overshadow the platform’s recreational nature. Consumption responds to dynamics of immediate gratication promoted by contemporary digital culture. Even in higher grades, where greater alignment with professional and reective interests is observed, the aective and aesthetic component remains central, given that identity construction and symbolic validation outweigh the critical or academic appropriation of the content.
454 | nº 43, pp. 441-461 | July-December of 2026Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying CommunicationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación4. Discussion and Conclusionse ndings of this study partially align with the research by Espinel-Rubio et al. (2021), who identify the aective and aesthetic as recreational functions. However, they demonstrate that this landscape expands with the use of other platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook, and YouTube for academic purposes; their functionalities are leveraged for educational communication, resource sharing, and the building of learning communities.In comparison with subsequent studies, Virós-Martín et al. (2025) conclude that Spanish adolescents perceive the inuence of digital tools on their social lives in a supercial manner, an aspect that contrasts with the case of Ecuadorian university students regarding the inuence on their daily activities. However, it is claried that the European study is grounded in psychological and social well-being, whereas the present research focuses on the academic sphere.Fresneda’s-Osorio (2025) study highlights that both men and women access TikTok in a similar manner and consume content primarily related to humor and sports, with no signicant dierences by gender. In contrast, the present study observes a preference for comedy, followed by music, educational content, advice, and lifestyle topics, indicating a preference for a variety of content.Other studies, such as those by Cuesta-Cambra et al. (2021), conrm that young people actively use the internet out of a desire to obtain real-time information. Although university students use the platform for entertainment, this does not imply that they form a lasting emotional bond with content creators; rather, their use is limited to leisure and entertainment. In addition to emotional escape and entertainment, other frequent uses include motivational advice, dance and cooking tutorials, and educational content. In this article, the results show that recognition of Ecuadorian TikTokers consistently centers on creators associated with humor and motivation, particularly gures such as @anthonnyswagg3 and @jorgito_guayaco, who appear consistently across several academic cycles. is recurrence conrms that entertainment constitutes the dominant focus of student consumption, beyond specic variations at each level.Regarding thematic areas, comedy achieves the highest values in most academic cycles, while education and social criticism register signicantly lower gures. Although diversication toward lifestyle content and social criticism is observed in intermediate cycles, these increases do not displace the preference for entertainment.Stress relief shows the highest scores across nearly all levels, followed by the aective and aesthetic dimensions. erefore, TikTok functions as a space for emotional regulation in the face of academic pressure. Although cognitive motivation reaches signicant levels in certain stages, it fails to surpass the dimensions linked to leisure, highlighting a persistent tension between the platform’s educational potential and its recreational use. e absence of educational content creates a gap between the pedagogical potential of the digital environment and its actual adoption by university students. is poses a challenge for Ecuadorian higher education in terms of critical digital literacy and the pedagogical reframing of social media.One of the strengths of this study was the implementation of stratied analysis using cross-tabulation matrices for the segmentation and cross-sectional analysis of the academic cycle variable and its relationship to the previously established
doxa.comunicación | nº 43, pp. 441-461 July-December of 2026Edison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Raquel Flores Zúñiga ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 455objectives. is approach made it possible to observe in detail and with specicity the consumption preferences of university students across the eight academic cycles.e main limitation lay in the absence of a critical-interpretive component that delves into the meanings that college students ascribe to the digital content they consume, preventing the capture of discursive or ideological nuances. Consequently, it is recommended that future research incorporate qualitative techniques such as in-depth interviews, focus groups, ethnographies, and discourse analysis. is will allow for a more reective perspective on the role of TikTokers as cultural mediators and opinion leaders in youth and academic spaces.Regarding digital inequalities and divides, the study did not incorporate socioeconomic variables, technological access, or digital capital to explore structural dierences in TikTok usage. It is recommended that future research integrate indicators related to access conditions, digital competencies, and socio-educational trajectories, in order to analyze whether recreational consumption responds solely to cultural preferences or to inequalities in academic access capacity within socio-digital environments.5. Acknowledgmentsis article has been translated into English by Alison Paulina Mena Barthelotty6. Specic contributions of each authorNames and LastnamesStudy designBelén Flores ZúñigaMethodologyEdison Cristóbal Lalangui CampoverdeData Collection and AnalysisBelén Flores Zúñiga and Edison Cristóbal Lalangui CampoverdeDiscussion and ConclusionsEdison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Flores ZúñigaWriting, Formatting, Review, and Approval of VersionsEdison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Flores Zúñiga7. Conicts of Intereste authors declare that there are no conicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
456 | nº 43, pp. 441-461 | July-December of 2026Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying CommunicationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicación8. ReferencesAbidin, C. (2020). Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140Alvarez-Martinez, A., Sampedro-Vizcaya, M., y Fernandez-Rey, J. (2024). Examining the eects of pleasantness ratings on correct and false recognition in the DRM paradigm: accuracy, recollection and familiarity estimates. Front. Psychol, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1265291Ariza, A., March, V., y Torres, S. (2022). Horacio “tiktoker”: un análisis de los discursos, herramientas, temas y contenidos en la comunicación política del jefe de Gobierno porteño en Tik Tok. Austral Comunicación, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.26422/aucom.2022.1101.ariBalseca-Mera, J. M. y Galarza-Schoenfeld, A. S. (2024). Inuencers y su impacto en los adolescentes, generación “Z”. Revista Cientíca y Arbitrada de Ciencias Sociales y Trabajo Social: Tejedora6(12), 203-221. https://doi.org/10.56124/tj.v6i12ep.0109Bartelborth, T. (2020). e Rehabilitation of Deductive Reasoning. THEORIA. An International Journal for eory, History and Foundations of Science, 35(2), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.20549Bautista-Jara, A. A. y Chávez-Yépez, H. F. (2020). Marketing de inuenciadores como estrategia de las campañas publicitarias. Uniandes Episteme, 8(1), 33-47. https://revista.uniandes.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/EPISTEME/article/view/1836Blumler, J. y Katz, E. (1974). e uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratications research. Sage.Booth, N., y Ann-Matic, J. (2011). Mapping and leveraging inuencers in social media to shape corporate brand perceptions. Corporate Communications. An International Journal, 16(3), 184-191. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563281111156853Bucknell-Bossen, C. y Kottasz, R. (2020). Uses and gratications sought by pre-adolescent and adolescent TikTok consumers. Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, 21(4), 463-478. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2020-1186Burgaleta-Pérez, E., Gancino, J. M., Lalangui-Campoverde, E. C., Rubio-Molina, P. G., y Arias-Medina, B. L. (2024). Gender, Ethnicity, and Age on TikTok: Content Analysis of Ecuadorian Tiktokers. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health, 25, 2704-2717. https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.2510Burgaleta-Pérez, E., & Lalangui-Campoverde, E. C. (2026). Tiktokers indígenas en Latinoamérica: nuevas narrativas en la cultura del entretenimiento. Palabra Clave28(4). https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2025.28.4.6Calderón-Garrido, D., y Gil-Fernández, R. (2022). Explorando adopciones, nalidades y usos de las redes sociales en el ámbito educativo desde la perspectiva de Usos y Graticaciones. Representaciones de los futuros docentes y los profesores en ejercicio. Aula Abierta, 51(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.17811/rie.51.1.2022.67-74Campos, E., Díaz-Estévez, L. Y., y Cárdenas-Flórez, D. (2025). Ética de la investigación educativa. Ciencia Latina Revista Cientíca Multidisciplinar, 9(3), 7957-7972. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i3.18418Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Cai, H., Liu, L., Liao, M., y Jiaming, F. (2024). A comprehensive overview of micro-inuencer marketing: Decoding the current landscape, impacts, and trends. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030243

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 43, pp. 441-461 July-December of 2026Edison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Raquel Flores Zúñiga ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 457Colás-Bravo, P., González-Ramírez, T., y Pablos-Pons. J. 2013. Jóvenes y redes sociales: Motivaciones y usos preferidos. Comunicar 40, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.3916/C40-2013-02-01Cuesta-Cambra, U., Niño-González, J. I., y De Marchis, G. (2021). Uses and gratications of multiscreen news consumption among Spanish youth. Communication & Society, 34(2),15-29. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.34.2.15-29Espinel-Rubio, G. A., Hernández-Suárez, C. A., y Prada-Núñez, R. (2021). Usos y graticaciones de las redes sociales en adolescentes de educación secundaria y media: de lo entretenido a lo educativo. Encuentros, 19(01), 137-156. http://repositorio.ufps.edu.co/handle/ufps/1260Díaz-Vera, J. P., Almagro-Macias, L. Á., Delgado-Simbaña, D. J., y Soriano-León, A. E. (2025). Inuencia de TikTok en la intención de voto de jóvenes universitarios. Polo del Conocimiento, 10(7), 1260-1282. https://n9.cl/7wue2Fajardo-Pascagaza, E., Tobón-Tobón, S., y Cervantes-Estrada, L. C. (2024). El impacto de TikTok en la formación policial en Colombia. Visual Review16(5), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.62161/revvisual.v16.5297Fresneda-Osorio, H. M. (2025). Oportunidades de la red TikTok como medio de comunicación entre la población centennial. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 10, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1963Flores-Loaiza, R. P., León-Belduma, K. D., Ortega-Pesantez, Z. M., y Carpio-Ayala, C. R. (2024). La inuencia del uso de Instagram y TikTok en los estudiantes universitarios. Revista Cientíca Multidisciplinaria SAPIENTIAE, 7(15), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.56124/sapientiae.v7i15.005García-Muñoz, A., y Rangel-Romero, X. G. (2024). Tik Tok como efecto generador de imitación de conductas riesgosas en jóvenes: reexiones desde la literatura. Tlatemoani. Revista Académica de Investigación15(45), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.51896/tlatemoani.v15i45.573Gil-Fernández, R., y Calderón-Garrido, D. (2021). Implicaciones de la Teoría de Usos y Graticaciones en las prácticas mediadas por redes sociales en el ámbito educativo. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Aloma, 39(2), 63-74. https://revistaaloma.blanquerna.edu/index.php/aloma/article/view/533González-Vázquez, A., y Igartua, J. J. (2018). ¿Por qué los adolescentes juegan videojuegos? Propuesta de una escala de motivos para jugar videojuegos a partir de la teoría de usos y graticaciones. Cuadernos.Info, (42), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.42.1314Gutiérrez-Arenas, M. P., Díaz-Pareja, E. M., Ramírez-García, A., y García-Rojas, A. D. (2024). Motivaciones y contradicciones en el uso de las redes sociales en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Comunicación23(1), 259-278. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC23.1-2024-3425Gutiérrez-Rentería, M. E., Santana-Villegas, J. C., y Pérez-Ayala, M. (2017). Smartphone: usos y graticaciones de los jóvenes en México en 2015. Palabra Clave, 20(1), 47-68. https://palabraclave.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/palabraclave/article/view/6049Hall, J. (1982). List organization and recognition memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 35-36. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334795

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


458 | nº 43, pp. 441-461 | July-December of 2026Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying CommunicationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónHautea, S., Parks, P., Takahashi, B., y Zeng, J. (2021). Showing they care (or don’t): Aective publics and ambivalent climate activism on TikTok. Social Media & Society, 7(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211012344Hook Agency. (2025, abril 13). Social media usage statistics: What you need to know for. Retrieved from https://hookagency.com/blog/social-media-usage-statistics-2/HypeAuditor. (2025, abril 13). Top 1000 TikTok inuencers en Ecuador. Retrieved from https://hypeauditor.com/es/top-tiktok-ecuador/Jiménez-Sánchez, L., Moreno, A., y Fuentes-Lara, M. C. (2025). Redes sociales e inuencia en la salud de los jóvenes: un estudio sobre las actitudes de bronceado y fotoprotección en España. Palabra Clave28(1), 1-32.https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2025.28.s1.1xKlimenko, O., y Herrera-Varela, D. (2022). Uso de TikTok, procrastinación académica y gestión del tiempo: caracterización de estudiantes universitarios colombianos. Psicoespacios, 16(29), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.25057/21452776.1476Labraña, J., y Brunner, J. J. (2022). Transformación de la educación superior latinoamericana y su impacto en la idea de la universidad: Del acceso de élite a la masicación y universalización del acceso. Perles Educativos, 44(176). https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2022.176.60539Lalangui-Campoverde, E. C., Pachacama-Pachacama, Á. E., & Vásconez-Pérez, M. B. (2025). Narrativas del proyecto de vida de jóvenes universitarios foráneos en Ecuador. Praxis educativa20, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.20.24717.078Lee, R. A. (2026). TikTok statistics 2025: Monetization trends, platform growth. SQ Magazine (Feb. 10, 2026) https://sqmagazine.co.uk/tiktok-statistics/López-Jiménez, D., Dittmar, E. C., y Vargas-Portillo, J. P. (2022). Nuevas estrategias publicitarias con inuencers: Un examen multidisciplinar. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 28(4), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v28i4.39117Mainardes, J. (Coord.). (2019). Ética e pesquisa em educação: Subsídios (Vol. 1). Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Educação (ANPEd). https://n9.cl/6d5dd5Maldonado-Pérez, P. (2024). Jóvenes y consumo de información en redes sociales: Inuencers y cambios en la percepción sobre el periodismo. Revista Argentina de Estudios de Juventud, (18), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.24215/18524907e081Martínez-Borda, R., Infante-Pineda, S., García-Vega, A., y Barrajón-Lara, I. (2024). El origen del mito del superhéroe en TikTok. La evolución del personaje en su recorrido por los medios tradicionales y digitales. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 9, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2024-1638Martínez-Sanz, R., y Solano-Santos, L. F. (2025). Museos e inuencers: La representación del museo en TikTok desde la óptica del visitante. Palabra Clave, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2025.28.1.5Mateus, J. C., León, L., y Vásquez-Cubas, D. (2023). Aplicaciones de la Teoría de Usos y Graticaciones en la investigación en Comunicación: una revisión sistematizada. Observatorio (OBS*), 17(3), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS17320232327

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 43, pp. 441-461 July-December of 2026Edison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Raquel Flores Zúñiga ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 459Méndez-Majuelos, I., López-López, P. J., y Sobrados-León, M. (2023). TikTokers y discapacidad. Entretenimiento, inclusión y difusión de valores entre los jóvenes de habla hispana. ICONO 14. Revista Cientíca de Comunicación y Tecnologías Emergentes21(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v21i2.2026Montero-Corrales, L. (2025). TikTok y prácticas informativas en la generación Z universitaria. Revista de Comunicación de la SEECI, 58, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2025.58.e931Montoya-Zavala, E. C., Herrera-García, M. C., y Ochoa-O’leary, A. (2020). Foto-voz como Técnica de Investigación en Jóvenes Migrantes de Retorno. Trayectorias migratorias, identidad y educación. Empiria. Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, (45), 15-49. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.45.2020.26303Mulier, L., Slabbinck, H., y Vermeir, I. (2022). is way up: e eectiveness of mobile vertical video marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 55(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.12.002Noguera-Vivo, J. M., y Grandío-Pérez, M. M. (2025). Mejorando de la alfabetización algorítmica: estudio experimental sobre la conciencia de los estudiantes de comunicación sobre las noticias basadas en algoritmos. Análisi71, 37-53. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3718Ochoa-Sangrador, C., Molina-Arias M., y Ortega-Páez, E. (2022). Métodos de ajuste de sesgos. Análisis estraticado. Evid Pediatr. 1-7. https://n9.cl/tib3bOneto-González, G., Pérez-Curiel, C., y Riscart-López, J. (2020). Efecto del inuencer sobre el nivel de engagement en publicaciones de Instagram. Redmarka. Revista de Marketing Aplicado, 24(2), 76-94. https://doi.org/10.17979/redma.2020.24.2.7069Park, N., Kee, K., y Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook Groups, uses and gratications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729-733. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0003Pegalajar-Palomino, M. C., y Rodríguez-Torres, A. (2023). Digital literacy in university students of education degrees in Ecuador. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1299059Pesántez-Valarezo., Solangie, B., Naguas-Nagua, N. E., y Avila-Rivas. V. A. (2024). Tiktok y su inuencia en la generación Z en la intención de voto campañas presidenciales del Ecuador 2023: caso Daniel Noboa. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 9(4), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2024.4.2399Pham, T. H., Nguyen, T. M. H., La, T. C. T., Hoang, X. Q., Kiat-Kok, S., Han, J.W., y Dang, Q. (2024). A bibliometrics analysis of studies on Generation Z’s self-perceived careers. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2327120Puente-Riofrio, M. I., y Uquillas-Granizo, G. G. (2022). Análisis del engagement en redes sociales de las empresas más valoradas en el mundo. Esprint Investigación1(2), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.61347/ei.v1i2.34Quiroz, N. T. (2020). TikTok: La aplicación favorita durante el aislamiento. Revista Argentina de Estudios de Juventud, (14). 1-9. https://doi.org/10.24215/18524907e044

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


460 | nº 43, pp. 441-461 | July-December of 2026Generation Z and Ecuadorian TikTokers: uses and gratications among university students studying CommunicationISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978doxa.comunicaciónRamírez-Pérez, J. F., Corchado-López, D., y Morejón-Valdés, M. (2021). Algoritmo para la medición y análisis de la autoridad e inuencia de los usuarios en las redes sociales y profesionales. PAAKAT: Revista de Tecnología y Sociedad, 11(21), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.32870/Pk.a11n21.598Rendón, P. A., Jordán, N., Arias, D., y Núñez, G. (2022). Tik tok as a teaching tool: e motivation of university students in Ecuador. 2022 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies on Education & Research (ICALTER), Lima, Peru, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALTER57193.2022.9964670Rivas-Herrero, B., y Igartua, J. J. (2021). Los jóvenes se sumergen en Instagram. Un estudio desde la perspectiva de los usos y graticaciones. Profesional de la Información, 30(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.sep.09Sánchez-Amboage, E., TouraL-Bran, C., Membiela-Pollán, M., y Crespo-Pereira, V. (2022). Short video content en la estrategia de marca: Análisis del uso de TikTok por el Museo del Prado. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 13(1), 331-344. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.20836Segado-Boj, F., Díaz-Campo, J., y Navarro-Sierra, N. (2020). Emociones y difusión de noticias sobre el cambio climático en redes sociales. Inuencia de hábitos, actitudes previas y usos y graticaciones en universitarios. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (75), 245-69. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2020-1425Soto, H. M. (2022). Estéticas en Tik Tok: entre lo histórico y lo digital. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación, (152), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.18682/cdc.vi152.6688Suárez-Álvarez, R., y García-Jiménez, A. (2021). Centennials en TikTok: tipología de vídeos. Análisis y comparativa España-Gran Bretaña por género, edad y nacionalidad. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (79), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1503Suarez-Gonzalez, K. D., Novillo-Luzuriaga, N. N., Vargas-Olalla, V. P., y Suarez-Gonzalez, E. S. (2024). Segmentación de estudiantes universitarios según el nivel socioeconómico, ingesta calórica y composición corporal utilizando el algoritmo K-means. Tesla Revista Cientíca, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.55204/trc.v4i2.e433StarNgage. (2025, julio 3). Top 1 000 inuencers de TikTok en Ecuador. https://starngage.com/plus/es/inuencer/ranking/tiktok/ecuadorTarullo, R. (2020). ¿Por qué los y las jóvenes están en las redes sociales? Un análisis de sus motivaciones a partir de la teoría de usos y graticaciones. Revista Prisma Social, (29), 222-239. https://revistaprismasocial.es/article/view/3558Tavakol, M., y Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4205511/Tejedor, S., Carniel-Bugs, R., y Giraldo-Luque, S. (2018). Los estudiantes de Comunicación en las redes sociales: Estudio comparativo entre Brasil, Colombia y España. Transinformação, 30(2), 267-276. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/3843/384357164010/html/Torres-Toapanta, S. M., Taipe-Guamushig, P. E., y Lomas-Chacón, P. E. (2024). Preferencias en el consumo de contenidos en tik tok por estudiantes de la Universidad Técnica de Cotopaxi en Ecuador: entre la educación y el entretenimiento. Revista Imaginario Social7(2). https://doi.org/10.59155/is.v7i2.176

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]


doxa.comunicación | nº 43, pp. 441-461 July-December of 2026Edison Cristóbal Lalangui Campoverde and Belén Raquel Flores Zúñiga ISSN: 1696-019X / e-ISSN: 2386-3978| 461Trejos-Gil, C. A., Tordecilla-Pájaro, C. C., y Mena-Mena, D. (2024). Adicción a la red social Tik Tok en jóvenes universitarios. Revista de Comunicación y Salud14, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.35669/rcys.2024.14.e339Twenge, J., Campbell, S., Homan, B., y Lance, C. (2010). Generational dierences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117-1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352246Tufekci, Z. (2014). Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representativeness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls. In ICWSM ‘14: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2014. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1403.7400Virós-Martín, C., Jiménez-Morales, M., y Montaña-Blasco, M. (2025). Adolescentes, TikTok e Instagram: percepciones sobre el impacto de las tecnologías digitales en su vida social. Revista de Comunicación24(1), 519-537. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC24.1-2025-3774Yélamos-Guerra, M. S., García-Gámez, M., y Moreno-Ortiz, A. J. (2022). e use of Tik Tok in higher education as a motivating source for students. Porta Linguarum. An International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, (38), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi38.21684

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]

[Enlace de URL / hc (has AS)]