Ejecución en arbitraje internacional de las decisiones “vinculantes y definitivas” y “vinculantes pero no definitivas” del dispute board conforme a los modelos que integran la Rainbow Suite FIDIC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31921/ArbitrajeRACI.n16.1a3001Palabras clave:
dispute board, arbitraje internacional, FIDIC, ADR, disputas en materia de derecho de la construcciónResumen
El presente estudio versa sobre la ejecución en arbitraje internacional de las decisiones “vinculantes y definitivas” y “vinculantes pero no definitivas” del dispute board en los supuestos de incumplimiento, de acuerdo con los cauces contractuales de impugnación y reclamación previstos en los modelos que integran la Rainbow Suite FIDIC de 1999 y de 2017, aclarando la distinción entre la eficacia vinculante y el carácter definitivo y no definitivo de la decisión. Con el fin de superar las dudas que aún existen en la materia, el autor propone, como fórmula óptima para obtener una rápida ejecución de la citada decisión, la bifurcación del procedimiento arbitral mediante la petición de un laudo parcial, solicitando la ejecución de la decisión vinculante pero no definitiva, así como la revisión de la controversia subyacente mediante un laudo final.
Descargas
Estadísticas globales ℹ️
|
11
Visualizaciones
|
5
Descargas
|
|
16
Total
|
|
Referencias
Bailey, J., Current issues with FIDIC dispute adjudication board, Society of Construction Law, 2015.
Baker, Ellis; Mellors, Ben; Chalmers, Scott; y Lavers, Anthony, FIDIC Contracts: Law and Practice, Informa Law Routledge, 5ª Edición, 2009.
Bunni, N.G., The Gap in Sub-Clause 20.7 of the 1999 FIDIC Contracts for Major Works International Construction Law Review.
Castello, J. E. y Chahine, R., Enforcement of Interim Measures, Parte I, The Guide to Challenging and Enforcing Arbitration Awards - Third Edition, disponible en globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-challenging-and-enforcing-arbitration-awards/3rd-edition/article/enforcement-of-interim-measures
Chern, C., Chern on Dispute Boards Practice and Procedure, fourth edition, Informa Law, 2021.
Dedezade, T. Enforcement of DAB decisions under FIDIC forms of contract, capítulo 10, en Nazzini, R. Construction Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice around the World, Informa Law, Routledge, 2022.
— Are ‘binding’ DAB decisions enforceable? Construction Law International, vol.6, núm. 3, 2011.
— Mind the Gap: Analysis of Cases and Principles Concerning the Ability of ICC Arbitral Tribunals to Enforce Binding DAB Decisions under the 1999 FIDIC Conditions of Contract, International Arbitration Law Review, número 4, 2012.
Draetta, U., Dispute Resolution in International Construction-Linked Contracts, Diritto del commercio internazionale: pratica internazionale e diritto, vol.24, núm. 1, 2010.
Gillion, F., Enforcement of DAB decisions under the 1999 FIDIC Conditions of Contract – a recent development: CRW Joint Operation (Indonesia) v PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK, International Construction Law Review, 2011.
— The Court of Appeal decision in Persero II: Are we now clear about the steps to enforce a non-final DAB decision under FIDIC? International Construction Law Review, Volumen 4, 2016.
Gillion, F.; Morson, R.; Jackson, S. y De Jager, C. The New FIDIC Suite 2017: Significant Developments And Key Changes, International Construction Law Review 384, parte 4, 2018.
Glover, J. y Hughes, S. Understanding the FIDIC Red and Yellow Books, London Sweet & Maxwell, 2006.
Knutson, R. FIDIC: An Analysis of International Construction Contracts, Kluwer Law International, 2005.
McErlaine, M. y Allsop, J., Trends in Questions of Jurisdiction and Admissibility in International Arbitration, Kluwer Arbitration, 2021, disponible en arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/11/02/trends-in-questions-of-jurisdiction-and-admissibility-in-international-arbitration/
Seppälä, C., A welcome decision from Singapore: the second Persero case, Construction International Law, Volumen 10, asunto 1, 2010.
— Enforcement by an Arbitral Tribunal of a Binding but not Final Engineer’s or DAB’s decision under the FIDIC Conditions, International Construction Law Review, 414, 2009.
— How not to interpret the FIDIC Disputes Clause: The Singapore Court of Appeal Judgment in Persero International Construction Law Review, vol. 29, parte 1, 2012.
— International Construction Contract Disputes: Second Commentary on ICC Awards Dealing Primarily with FIDIC Contracts, ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Vol. 19, núm. 2, 2008.
— Pre-Arbitral Procedure on the Settlement of Disputes under the FIDIC Conditions, International Construction Law Review, 315
— Sub-Clause 20.7 of the FIDIC Red book does not justify denying enforcement of a ‘binding’ DAB decision” Construction Law International, 6, 2011. Tweeddale, A. FIDIC’s Guidance Memorandum to users – a half-baked solution? Construction Law International, vol. 9, núm. 2, 2014
— The Courtesy Trap – FIDIC’s Sub-clause 20.5 – Amicable Settlement and Emirates trading, International Construction Law Review, 2016
Veeder, V., ‘Provisional and Conservatory Measures in Enforcing Arbitration Awards Under The New York Convention: Experience and Prospects’ 21, UN Publication Sales, núm. 99, vol. 2, 1999
Viglino, M., Can Parties to a FIDIC Contract Safely Decline Giving Effect to a Dispute Board’s Decision? The Dispute Resolution Board Foundation, Vol. 15, núm. 3, 2011
Informes
International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration, elaborada por White & Case en colaboración con Queen Mary University of London, disponible en arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/2018-International-Arbitration-Survey---The-Evolution-of-International-Arbitration-(2).PDF
International Arbitration Survey: Adapting arbitration to a changing world, elaborada por White & Case en colaboración con Queen Mary University of London y disponible en arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/media/arbitration/docs/LON0320037-QMUL-International-Arbitration-Survey-2021_19_WEB.pdf
Global Construction Disputes Report Successfully navigating through turbulent times, Arcadis, 2021, disponible en www.arcadis.com/en-gb/ knowledge-hub/perspectives/global/global-construction-disputes-report
International Arbitration Survey – Driving Efficiency in International Construction Disputes de 2019, elaborado por Pinsent Masons en colaboración con Queen Mary University of London y disponible en www.pinsentmasons.com/thinking/special-reports/international-arbitration-survey#:~:text=Download%20report%20(49%20pages%20/%205.2%20MB)
Manual de Dispute Board: Guía de Mejores Prácticas y Procedimientos, Dispute Resolution Board Foundation (DRBF).
Modelos FIDIC
FIDIC Multilateral Development Bank (“MDB”) Harmonised Edition (2005).
FIDIC Red Book (1999) Conditions of Contract for Construction.
FIDIC Red Book (2017) Conditions of Contract for Construction.
FIDIC Red Book 4ª edición (1987).
FIDIC Silver Book (1999) Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects.
FIDIC Silver Book (2017) Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects.
FIDIC Yellow Book (1998) (“test edition”).
FIDIC Yellow Book (1999) Conditions of Contract fo Plant and Design-Build.
FIDIC Yellow Book (2017) Conditions of Contract fo Plant and Design-Build.
Sentencias
CRW Joint Operation v PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK [2011] SGCA 33.
T Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation (Indonesia) [2014] SGHC 146.
PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation [2010] SGHC 202.
PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation [2015] SGCA 30.
Laudos CCI
Laudo final CCI núm 19346
Laudo final CCI núm. 13686
Laudo final CCI núm. 16435
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Francisco Julio Dosal Gómez
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Cómo citar
