Strategic Communication and Public Relations in the Philosophy of Byung-Chul Han: A Pro-materialist Critique Against the Hypertrophy of Storytelling and the Destruction of the Public Sphere
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n40a2012Keywords:
Public relations, strategic communication, public sphere, storytellingAbstract
This article takes a communicative approach to the work by Byung-Chul Han. The philosopher criticises how advertisers and organisations, through the incessant and abundant supply of information, have appropriated the public sphere by excessively emphasising storytelling. Han advocates for materialism, condemns the inflation of storytelling and suggests the need for message ecology to make the public sphere less distracting and more sustainable. The author highlights that Han opens up new avenues for the development of the field of corporate communication and public relations by suggesting a novel concept of CSR that involves restricting message dissemination.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
1216
Views
|
1803
Downloads
|
|
3019
Total
|
|
References
Bak-Coleman, J.B., Alfano, M., & Barfuss, W. (2021). Stewardship of global collective behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(27), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025764118
Bucher, T. (2018). If…Then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2012). Fringe public relations: How activism moves critical PR toward the mainstream. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 880-887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.02.008
Crawford, M. (2015). The world beyond your head: On becoming an individual in an age of distraction. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Erzikova, E., Waters, R., & Bocharsky, K. (2018). Media Catching: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Strategic Mediatization in Public Relations? International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1424713
Ewen, S. (1996). PR, a social history of spin. Basic Books.
Falkinger, J. (2008). Limited Attention as a Scarce Resource in Information‐Rich Economies. The Economic Journal, 118(532),1596–1620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02182.x
Farrer, B. (2022). Political communication as a Tragedy of the Commons. Political Studies, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221138414
Foucault, M. (2012). Vigilar y castigar. Biblioteca Nueva.
Franck, G. (2019). The economy of attention. Journal of Sociology, 55(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783318811778
Franck, G. (2020). Vanity fairs. Another view of the economy of attention. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41532-7
García, C. (2022). Book review: Byung-Chul Han, Undinge: Umbrüche der Lebenswelt. No Cosas: Quiebras del mundo de hoy. Public Relations Inquiry, 11(2), 331-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X221082194
Grunig, J. E. (1992). Communication, public relations, and effective organizations: An overview of the book. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication Management (pp. 1-28). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. MIT Press.
Han, B. (2013). La sociedad de la transparencia. Herder.
Han, B. (2014a). En el enjambre. Herder.
Han, B. (2014b). Psicopolítica: Neoliberalismo y nuevas formas de poder. Herder.
Han, B. (2017a). La expulsión de lo distinto: Percepción y comunicación en la sociedad actual. Herder.
Han, B. (2017b). Por favor, cierra los ojos. Herder.
Han, B. (2017c). La sociedad del cansancio. Herder.
Han, B. (2021). No cosas. Taurus.
Han, B. (2022). Infocracia. Taurus.
Heidegger, M. (1994). Conferencias y artículos. Ediciones del Serbal.
Holtzhausen, D. R. (2000). Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR12016
Holtzhausen, D. R. (2002). Toward a postmodern research agenda for public relations. Public Relations Review, 28(3), 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00131-5
Holtzhausen, D. R. (2012). Public relations as activism: Postmodern approaches to theory and practice. Routledge.
Hwang, T. (2020). Subprime attention crisis: Advertising and the time bomb at the heart of the internet. FSG.
Illing, S., & Gershberg, Z. (2022). The paradox of democracy. Free speech, open media and perilous persuasion. University of Chicago.
Klein, E. (2022, Diciembre 11). The great delusion behind Twitter. The New York Times. https://bitly.ws/3hR7Z
Klikauer, T. (2021). Media Capitalism: Hegemony in the Age of Mass Deception. Palgrave Macmillan.
L’Etang, J., McKie, D., Snow, N., & Xifra, J. (2016). Introduction. In J. L’Etang., D.
McKie., N. Snow. & J. Xifra (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical public Relations (pp. 3-16). Routledge.
L’Etang, J. (2008). Public relations: Concepts, practice and critique. Sage.
Le Bon, G. (1986). Psicología de las masas, Ediciones Morata.
Lessig, D. (2015, July 9). The century of the self. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJ3RzGoQC4s
Lippmann, W. (1997). Public opinion. Free Press.
Lippmann, W. (2007). The phantom public. Transaction Publishers.
Mazur, P. (1928). American prosperity, its causes and consequences. Viking Press.
McKie, D., & Munshi, D. (2011). Reconfiguring public relations: Ecology, equity and enterprise. Routledge.
McKie, D. (2005). Critical theory. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public relations (pp. 226-228). Sage. McNamara, J. (2009). Public relations in an interactive age: the need for new practices, not just new media. Asia Pacific Public Relations Journal, 10, 1-16. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/11851
Mills, C. W. (1956). The Power Elite. Oxford University Press.
Morris, T., & Goldsworthy, S. (2008). PR – A persuasive industry?: Spin, public relations and the shaping of modern media. Palgrave Macmillan.
Munshi, D., Kurian, P., & Xifra, J. (2017). An (other) ‘story’ in history: Challenging colonialist public relations in novels of resistance. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.016
Nocera, P. (2008). Masa, público y comunicación. La recepción de Gabriel Tarde en la primera sociología de Robert Park. Nómadas. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas, 19(3), 1-15. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=18101909
Pieczka, M. (2006). Paradigms, systems theory and public relations. In J. L’Etang, M.
Pieczka (Eds.), Public relations, critical debates and contemporary practice (pp. 333-358). L. Erlbaum and N. J. Mahwah.
Pieczka, M. (2011). Public Relations as dialogic expertise. Journal of Communication Management, 15(2), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632541111126346
Postman, N. (2005). Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business. Penguin.
Protheroe, J., Rogers, A., Kennedy, A.P. et al. 2008). Promoting patient engagement with self-management support information: a qualitative meta-synthesis of processes influencing uptake. Implementation Sci, 3(44), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-3-44
Tarde, G. (1904). L’opinion et la foule. Félix Alcan.
Tye, L. (2002). The father of the spin: Edward Bernays and the birth of public relations. Henry Holt and Company.
Verdú, V. (2003). El estilo del mundo. Anagrama.
Waters, R., Tindall, N. & Morton, T.S. (2010) Media Catching and the Journalist-Public Relations Practitioner Relationship: How Social Media are Changing the Practice of Media Relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(3), 241-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627261003799202
Young, P. (2016). Activism and public relations. In A. Theaker (Ed.), The public relations handbook (pp. 470-486). Routledge.
Zuboff, S. (2020). La era del capitalismo de la vigilancia. Paidós.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 César García Muñoz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License, Attribution-NonCommercial, International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). The scientific community is free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon that material under the following terms: Proper credit must be given (journal, authors, URL/DOI), and it is not used for commercial purposes.



















