Who are "us"? Preliminaries to an Identitarian Politics

Authors

  • Daniel Innerarity Universidad de Zaragoza

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n3a2

Keywords:

Systems theory, perspectives, isolated identity , constitutional order, community, society

Abstract

The modern societies are characterized by their complexity. From a systems theory point of view, it means that modern societies can always be observed from many perspectives and also means that the observer is watched as well. Under these conditions, it is impossible to find a linking belonging; an isolated identity able to be understood as ‘ourselves’.  A paradoxical ‘ourselves’, that it gradually reproduces and changes itself, remains at the constitutional order into the democratic coexistence. That is the reason why the institutional realities, the societies organization and the ritual State cannot monopolize the politics. “Politics is rather than a place where the society acts over itself and renovate the public sphere methods”. For that, the identity of the common interest does not have a chronological nature. The ‘society’, such Tönnies explains, has not loomed up out of the losing of a previous ‘community’ –it does not mean that the people do not exist not at all– but the society is an unsteady scale, an opening and mutating reality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Global Statistics ℹ️

Cumulative totals since publication
692
Views
178
Downloads
870
Total

References

Beck, Ulrich (1986): Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Beiner, Ronald (1983): Political Judgement, Chicago: Unversity of Chicago Press.

Bentham, Jeremy (1948) [1823]: An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Oxford: Blackwell.

Beriain, Josetxo, (1995): “La integración en las sociedades modernas”, Inguruak. Revista vasca de sociología y ciencia política, 11, 33-63.

Castoriadis, C. (1989): La institución, vol. 2, Barcelona.

Derrida, Jacques (1980): “Nietzsches Otobiographie oder Politik des Eigennamens”, en Fugen. Deutsch-Französiches Jahrbuch für Text-Analytik, Olten und Freiburg i. Br.

Fuchs, Peter (1991): “Vaterland, Patriotismus und Moral. Zur Semantik gesellschaftlicher Einheit”, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 1991/2, 89-103.

Giesen, B. (1991): Die Entdinglichung des Sozialen. Eine evolutionstheoretische Perspective auf die Postmoderne, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Günther,Gotthard(1979):“Life as Poly-Contexturality”, en Beiträge zur Grundlegung einer operationsfähigen Dialektik, tomo II, 283-306, Hamburg.

Habermas, Jürgen (1985): Die Neue Unübersichtlichkeit, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Innerarity, Daniel (1993): Hegel y el romanticismo, Madrid: Tecnos.

Luhmann, Niklas (1981): “Wie ist soziale Ordnung möglich?”, en Gesellschaftstruktur und Semantik, tomo 2, 195-285, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Luhmann, Niklas (1984): Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Luhmann, Niklas (1990): Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Luhmann, Niklas/Fuchs, Peter (1989): Reden und Schweigen, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

Lyotard, François (1989): “Sensus communis, le sujet à l’état naissant”, Cahiers Confrontation, 20, 161-179.

Röttgers, K. (1983): Texte und Menschen, Würzburg.

Taylor, Charles, (1993): “Liberale Politik und Öffentlichkeit”, en AAVV, Die liberale Gesellschaft, Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 21-67.

Tönnies, Ferdinand [1887] (1960): Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Downloads

Published

04-12-2005

Issue

Section

Miscellaneous of Research articles and essays

How to Cite

Innerarity, D. (2005). Who are "us"? Preliminaries to an Identitarian Politics. Doxa Comunicación. Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication Studies and Social Sciences, 3, 33-44. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n3a2
PlumX Metrics