Political discourse and ideology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n1a12Keywords:
Discourse analysis, Ideology, Political debateAbstract
This paper analyses the influence of ideologies on political discourse, in terms not only of content but also of form and interaction, defining ideology in the broadest sense of basic beliefs shared by members of a group and understanding political discourse to be a class of genres defined by a social domain, namely that of politics. The ways in which ideologically based beliefs are exhibited in discourse and discursive evidence in the interplay of several ideologies are analysed in the form of a debate on asylum seekers in the British House of Commons. Parliamentary debates are particularly revealing for these purposes because their text and content exhibit the social cognitions of political parties and their members. An analysis of this particular debate shows how political discourse in general, and parliamentary debates in particular, are replete with ideological expressions and rhetorical tropes at all levels.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
2510
Views
|
898
Downloads
|
|
3408
Total
|
|
References
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (l 999). Social identity theory and social cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Atkinson, J. M. (19 84). Our masters voices: the language and body language of politics. London: Methuen.
Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (Eds.). (1998). Political linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Chilton, P. (1988). Orwellian language and the media. London: Pluto Press.
Chilton, P. (1995). Security metaphors. Cold war discourse from containment to common house. New York: Lang.
Chilton, P. (Ed.) (1985). Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate: Nukespeak Today. London and Dover, New Hampshire: Frances Printer.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk al work. lnteraction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P., & Wootton, A. J. (Eds.). (1988). Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Farr, R. M., & Moscovici, S. (Eds.). (1984). Social representations. Cambridge (Cambridgeshire New York Paris: Cambridge University Press Editions de lo Maison des Sciences de l' Homme.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Geis, M. L. (1987). The language of politics. New York: Springer.
Geison, G. L. (Ed.). (l983). Professions ond professional ideologies in America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mentol models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Oostendorp, H., & Goldman, S. R. (Eds.). (1999). The construction of mentol representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (l 986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Co..
Van Dijk,T. A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Pork, CA: Sage Publications, lnc.
Van Dijk, T. A (199 3). Elite discourse ond racism. Newbury Park , CA , USA: Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A (1 9980). ldeology: A multidisciplinary approach. London, England UK: Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A (1986). What is political discourse analysis? In: Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (Eds.), Political linguistics. (pp. 11-52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1 999). Context models in discourse processing. In: van Oostendorp, Herre, & Goldman, Susan R. (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading. (pp. 123-148). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
Van Dijk, T. A {2000 ). Parliomentary Debates. In R. Wodak & T. A van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the Top. Parliomentary Discourses on Ethnic lssues in Six European States. (pp. 45-78). Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag.
Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction . 2 vols. London (England: Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Wodak, R., & Menz, f. (Eds.). 1199 0 ). Sprache in der Politik - Politik in der Sprache. Analysen zum " ffentlichen Sprachgebrauch. (Language in politics - politics in language . Analyses of public language use). Klagenfurt: Drava.
Wodak, R., & Van Dijk, T. A (Eds.). Racism al the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic lssues in Six European States. Klagenfurl, Austria : Drava Verlag .
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2003 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License, Attribution-NonCommercial, International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). The scientific community is free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon that material under the following terms: Proper credit must be given (journal, authors, URL/DOI), and it is not used for commercial purposes.



















