Perceptions of university students regarding apologies from Spanish politicians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n27a3Abstract
This paper analyzes the perception of University Students about the Apologies of Spanish politicians whose objective, in most cases, responds to Image Restoration Strategies. The research focuses on knowing if this type of discourse meets its objective, evaluating the effectiveness of the apology speech and knowing which wrongful events are more likely to be forgiven by the audience. We’ve used a quantitative methodology with online surveys. It has been established for a representative sample of 385 cases extracted, stratified by regions and segmented by sex, of a universe of 1,329,109 university students in Spain, with a margin of error of 5 % and a confidence level of 95%. Among the main conclusions, we found the effectiveness and the positive impact of Apologies as a strategy to restore the image of politicians. Despite of this, discourse is not enough, rather, it requires complementary actions to achieve full effectiveness of the Apologies with distinction in independent variables such as sex,
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
501
Views
|
390
Downloads
|
|
891
Total
|
|
References
Arendt , C., LaFleche, M., & Limperopulos, M. (2017). A qualitative meta-analysis of apologia, image repair, and crisis communication: Implications for theory and practice. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 517-526 .
Bachman, G., & Guerrero, L. (2007). Forgiveness, Apology, and Communicative Responses to Hurtful Events. Communication Reports, 19(1), 46-56.
Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.
Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review, 23(2), 177-186.
Canel , M., & Sanders, K. (2005). El poder de los medios en los escándalos políticos: la fuerza simbólica de la noticia icono. Anàlisi, 32, 163-178.
Canel, M. J. (2006). La Comunicación Política una guía para su estudio y práctica. Madrid: Tecnos.
Cervi, L., & Roca, N. (2017). La modernización de la campaña electoral para las elecciones generales de España en 2015. ¿Hacia la americanización? Comunicación y Hombre(13), 133-150.
Felstiner, W., Abel, R., & Sarat, A. (1980-1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, Blaming, claming... Law and society Review, 15(3-4).
García Jiménez, A., Tur-Viñes, V., & Yolanda, P. (2018). Consumo mediático de adolescentes y jóvenes. Noticias, contenidos audiovisuales y medición de audiencias. Icono14, 16(1), 260-284.
Gonzales, M., Manning, D., & Haugen, J. (1992). Explaining our sins: Factors influencing offender accounts and anticipated victim responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 958-971.
Haley , J. (1998). Apology and pardon: Learning from Japan. The American Behavioral Scientist, 41(6), 842-867.
Hansson, S. (2015). Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis. Discourse & Society, 26(3), 297-322.
Herrero Díez, F., Grossi Queipo, J., Rodríguez Diaz, F., & Fernández Alonso, J. (2000). Conducta de voto en los jóvenes. Psicothema, 12(2), 255-259.
Herrero, J., & Marfil, J. (2016). La comunicación de crisis en política: el perdón como herramienta de restauración de imagen. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 22(1), 361-373.
Hood, C. (2011). The Blame Game. Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Hornsey, M., Schumann, K., Bain, P., Blumen, S., Chen, S., Gómez, Á., . . . Wohl, M. (2017). Conservatives Are More Reluctant to Give and Receive Apologies Than Liberals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(7), 827-835.
Lazare, A. (2005). On apology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marfil, J. P. (2017). El impacto en prensa de las disculpas de la ministra Mª Dolores de Cospedal por el Yak-42. En M. González Peláez, & M. Valderrama Santomé, Discursos comunicativos persuasivos hoy (págs. 297-310 ). Madrid: Tecnos.
Martín Cortés, I. (2007). La participación política de los estudiantes universitarios dentro y fuera de la Universidad. Panorama Social(6), 119-132.
Mazzoleni, G. (2004). La Comunicación Política. Madrid: Alianza.
McCombs, M. (2006). Estableciendo la agenda: el impacto de los medios en la opinión pública y en el conocimiento. Barcelona: Paidós.
McGraw, K. (1990). Avoiding Blame: An Experimental Investigation of Political Excuses and Justifications. British Journal of Political Science, 20(1), 119-131.
McQuail, D. (2000). Mass Communication Theory. Londres: Sage.
MECD. (21 de mayo de 2018). Ministerio de educación y formación política. Recuperado el 2018, de Estadística de Estudiantes 2016/2017: https://www.mecd.gob.es/servicios-al-ciudadano-mecd/estadisticas/educacion/universitaria/estadisticas/alumnado/2016-2017_Rend/Grado-y-Ciclo.html
Mills, N. (2001). The new culture of apology. Dissent, 48, 113-116.
Pasquino, G. (1988). Participación política, grupos y movimientos. En S.
Bartolini, M. Cotta, L. Morlino, A. Panebianco, & G. Pasquino, Manual de ciencia política. Madrid: Alianza.
Smith, N. (2008). I was wrong. The meanings of apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Syed, M. (2016). Black Box Thinking: Marginal Gains and the Secrets of High Performance. Londres: John Murray.
Thompson, J. (1995). Media and Modernity: A social theory of the media. Stanford University Press.
Tucker, S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Reid, E., & Elving, C. (2006). Apologies and Transformational Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(2), 195-207.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License, Attribution-NonCommercial, International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). The scientific community is free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon that material under the following terms: Proper credit must be given (journal, authors, URL/DOI), and it is not used for commercial purposes.



















