Anger, social polarization, and middle class in Las Mañaneras of López Obrador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n35a1505Keywords:
Populism, hate discourse, López Obrador, middle class, Mexico, mass mediaAbstract
Hate has become an important element used in populist politicians’ discourse to support their agenda. This is the case of the Mexican president, Lopez Obrador (AMLO). He has used official channels and social media to verbally harass his critics and the opposition. One distinctive element in AMLO’s media strategy is “La Mañanera,” a daily morning conference where he informs about his national agenda. However, this space has served to exculpate his relatives and party members from the misuse of public money and to openly criticize journalists, social organizations, opponents and, since June 2021, the Mexican middle class. This article uses the Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA) framework to study the discursive construction of “middle class” under the scope of López Obrador’s speech in Las Mañaneras. To analyze how AMLO uses social resentment to attack the members of this social sector, and what are the main rhetorical elements employed towards the middle class under López Obrador discourse. As final outcomes will show, what is remarkable about AMLO’s speeches towards the middle class is the ability of populist governments to use traditional stereotypes, collective resentment, and a partial interpretation of national history to harass dissents and preserve public approval.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
5276
Views
|
3456
Downloads
|
|
8732
Total
|
|
References
Agren, D. (2021, abril 1). Mexican press freedom dispute erupts as Amlo attacks US and domestic critics. The Guardian. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3EJtomQ
Alexa. (2021). The top 500 sites on the web. Alexa-Amazon. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3sc2SyC
Assimakopoulos, S., Baider, F., & Millar, S. (2017). Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Burch, L. (2018). You are a parasite on the productive classes: Online disablist hate speech in austere times. Disability & Society, 33(3), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1411250
Carlson, C. (2021). Hate Speech. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press.
Chiluwa, I., Taiwo, R., & Ajiboye, E. (2020). Hate speech and political media discourse in Nigeria: The case of the Indigenous People of Biafra. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 16(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1386/macp_00024_1
Cohen, J. L. (2019). Populism and the Politics of Resentment. Jus Cogens, 1(1), 5–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-019-00009-7
Cota, I. (2021, junio 7). Resultados en Ciudad de México: Morena se desploma. País. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3AzNCgb
Enarsson, T., & Lindgren, S. (2019). Free speech or hate speech? A legal analysis of the discourse about Roma on Twitter. Information & Communications Technology Law, 28(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2018.1494415
Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2017). Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (Edición: 2nd ed.). London: Pearson Education.
Foa, R., & Wilmot, J. (2019, septiembre 18). The West Has a Resentment Epidemic. Foreign Policy. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3AA1jvA
Forbes Staff. (2020, enero 27). AMLO plantea hacer “mañaneras” también sábados y domingos. Forbes. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3yTdPXd
Forbes Staff. (2021, septiembre 1). AMLO mintió más de 61,000 veces en mañaneras: Consultora SPIN. Forbes México. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3FATl7U
Grigera, J. (2017). Populism in Latin America: Old and new populisms in Argentina and Brazil. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117701510
Guerrero, C., & Baranda, A. (2021, June 12). Ataca AMLO a clase media. Reforma. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3hXfML3
Hakoköngäs, E., Halmesvaara, O., & Sakki, I. (2020). Persuasion Through Bitter Humor: Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Rhetoric in Internet Memes of Two Far-Right Groups in Finland. Social Media + Society, 6(2), 2056305120921575. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575
ITU. (2021). Accelerating digital transformation in challenging times. Advocacy toolkit. Geneva, Switzerland: International Tele-communication Union.
Johnson, J. (2021). Internet users in the world 2021. Statista. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3hWNXlW
Kellner, D. (2016). American Nightmare: Donald Trump, Media Spectacle, and Authoritarian Populism. Boston: Sense Publishers.
KhosraviNik, M., & Esposito, E. (2018). Online hate, digital discourse and critique: Exploring digitally-mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 14(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2018-0003
Krotofil, J., & Motak, D. (2018). Between Traditionalism, Fundamentalism, and Populism: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Media Coverage of the Migration Crisis in Poland. In U. Schmiedel & G. Smith (Eds.), Religion in the European Refugee Crisis (pp. 61–85). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67961-7_4
La Otra Opinión. (2020, octubre 30). Ahora el “pueblo bueno y sabio” es el protector contra los conservadores de AMLO. La Otra Opinión. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3CDooOy
Lazaridis, G., Campani, G., & Benveniste, A. (Eds.). (2016). The Rise of the Far Right in Europe: Populist Shifts and “Othering” (1st ed. 2016 edition). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188
López Obrador, A. (AMLO). (2019, abril15). Versión estenográfica de la conferencia de prensa matutina del presidente. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3ABvQsU
Lopez-Chau, A., Valle-Cruz, D., & Sandoval-Almazan, R. (junio 18-20, 2019). Analyzing Polarization through Social Media with Artificial Intelligence: The Mexican Presidential Election in 2018. The 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Miller-Idriss, C. (2020). Hate in the Homeland: The New Global Far Right. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Miró-Llinares, F., & Aguerri, J. C. (2021). Misinformation about fake news: A systematic critical review of empirical studies on the phenomenon and its status as a ‘threat.’ European Journal of Criminology, 1477370821994059. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370821994059
Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press
Mourão, R. R., & Robertson, C. T. (2019). Fake News as Discursive Integration: An Analysis of Sites That Publish False, Misleading, Hyper-partisan and Sensational Information. Journalism Studies, 20(14), 2077–2095. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1566871
Mudde, C. (2017). Populism an Ideational Approach. In C. Kaltwasser, P. A. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism (pp. 27–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mylonas, Y. (2018). The Greek crisis as a middle-class morality tale: Frames of ridicule, pity and resentment in the German and the Danish press. Continuum, 32(6), 770–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2018.1525924
Oré, D. (2020, octubre 14). Mexican president’s anti-corruption drive buffeted by scandals. Reuters. Disponible en https://reut.rs/3AxwojL
Paz, M. A., Montero-Díaz, J., & Moreno-Delgado, A. (2020). Hate Speech: A Systematized Review. SAGE Open, 10(4), 215824402097302. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020973022
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2000). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
Ron, A., & Nadesan, M. (Eds.). (2020). Mapping Populism: Approaches and Methods. London: Routledge.
Sengul, K. (2019). Critical discourse analysis in political communication research: A case study of right-wing populist discourse in Australia. Communication Research and Practice, 5(4), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1695082
Statista Research Department. (2021). Facebook: Daily active users worldwide. Statista. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3lIUUIm
Steenvoorden, E., & Harteveld, E. (2018). The appeal of nostalgia: The influence of societal pessimism on support for populist radical right parties. West European Politics, 41(1), 28–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1334138
Tooze, A. (2020, marzo 18). The Coronavirus Crash Isn’t the 2008 Financial Crisis. It’s Worse. Foreign Policy. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3hWOkgk
Torreblanca, C., Muñoz, M., & Merino, J. (2018, June 7). ¿Cómo ganó AMLO? Breve historia gráfica de la migración electoral más grande en la historia democrática de México. Nexos. Disponible en https://bit.ly/3o1ksmK
Ulfgard, R. V., & Villanueva, C. (2020). The power to transform? Mexico’s ‘Fourth Transformation’ under President Andrés Manuel López Obrador. Globalizations, 17(6), 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1718846
Van Dijk, T. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., p. 466–485). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Waisbord, S. (2020). Mob Censorship: Online Harassment of US Journalists in Times of Digital Hate and Populism. Digital Journalism, 8(8), 1030–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1818111
Web Foundation. (2020, octubre 28). It’s time to recognise internet access as a human right. World Wide Web Foundation. Disponible en https://bit.ly/2W5s7oE
Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 David Ramírez Plascencia, Rosa María Alonzo González, Alejandra Ochoa Amezquita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License, Attribution-NonCommercial, International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). The scientific community is free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon that material under the following terms: Proper credit must be given (journal, authors, URL/DOI), and it is not used for commercial purposes.



















