Innovations using Generative AI for media literacy and fact-checking in the European Union
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n41a2874Keywords:
Generative artificial intelligence, disinformation, media literacy, gamification, fact-checkingAbstract
This study analyses the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and other emerging innovations in European projects funded by the European Media and Information Fund (EMIF), focused on combatting disinformation. A questionnaire sent to the heads of those initiatives identified specific cases of integration of GenAI in fact-checking, automation, and media literacy tasks. The results shine a light on emerging trends, such as the application of AI to automated fact-checking processes, educational gamification, and the development of tailor-made tools. The study is important in that it represents an exercise in accountability by analysing publicly-funded projects and underscores the importance of driving forward policies for regulation, training, and the ethical use of AI. Although the number of responses was limited —due to the nascent nature of the technology during the period studied (2022-2023)—the study provides a pioneering snapshot of GenAI’s role in the European counter-disinformation ecosystem.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
782
Views
|
1724
Downloads
|
|
2506
Total
|
|
References
Allyn, B. (11 de octubre de 2024). TikTok executives know about app’s effect on teens, lawsuit documents allege. NPR. https://bit.ly/3Fxz48A
Adair, B. (23 de febrero de 2020). Squash report card: Improvements during State of the Union ... and how humans will make our AI smarter. Duke Reporters’ Lab. https://bit.ly/4kKSnu5
Bharti, I., Chauhan, K., & Aggarwal, P. (2025). Generative AI: Next frontier for competitive advantage. En A. Natarajan, M. Galety, C. Iwendi, D. Das, & A. Shankar (Eds.), Enhancing communication and decision-making with AI (pp. 1-36). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9246-1.ch001
Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x
Bontridder, N., & Poullet, Y. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in disinformation. Data & Policy, 3 (32). https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.20
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. (s. f.). European Media and Information Fund at a glance. European Media and Information Fund. Recuperado el 19 de diciembre de 2024, de https://gulbenkian.pt/emifund/emif-at-a-glance/
Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. (s. f.). FAST: Fact-checkers acting to stop early-detected disinformation campaigns. European Media and Information Fund. Recuperado el 19 de diciembre de 2024, de https://bit.ly/43IJavD
Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. (s. f.). The disinformation laundromat: An OSINT tool to detect disinformation and amplification networks. European Media and Information Fund. Recuperado el 19 de diciembre de 2024, de https://bit.ly/4kj3XN6
de Cock Buning, M. (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation: Report of the independent high level group on fake news and online disinformation. Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission. Directorate-General for Communication Networks, Content, & Technology. (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation : Report of the independent High Level group on fake news and online disinformation. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/739290
European media and information fund. (4 de octubre de 2021). European Media and Information Fund. https://gulbenkian.pt/emifund/
Gamito, M. C. (2023). The European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) as meta-regulation. Computer Law & Security Review, 48, 105799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105799
Garriga, M., Ruiz-Incertis , R., & Magallón-Rosa, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence, disinformation and media literacy proposals around deepfakes. Observatorio (OBS*), 18(5). https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS18520242445
Gonzalo, M. (8 de febrero de 2023). El cierre de la API de Twitter amenaza la lucha contra la desinformación, el acoso y los contenidos tóxicos. Newtral. https://bit.ly/3HvMna8
Gutiérrez Caneda, B., & Vázquez-Herrero, J. (2024). Redibujando las líneas contra la desinformación: Cómo la IA está modificando el presente y futuro del fact-checking. Tripodos, (55), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2024.55.04
Haggart, B., Tusikov, N., & Scholte, J. A. (Eds.). (2021). Power and Authority in Internet Governance: Return of the State? (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008309
Herke, C. (2023). Deepfake. Pro Futuro. https://doi.org/10.26521/profuturo/2023/1/13334
Hetler, A. (2024, julio 31). What is ChatGPT? Everything you need to know. WhatIs; TechTarget. https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/ChatGPT
Lampropoulos, G., & Kinshuk. (2024). Virtual reality and gamification in education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 1691–1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10351-3
Machiraju, S., Modi, R. (2018). Natural Language Processing. En Developing Bots with Microsoft Bots Framework. Apress, Berkeley, CA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-3312-2_9
Maldita.es. (2023, 8 de febrero). Maldita.es y Servimedia recibirán una beca del EMIF para detectar y combatir la desinformación. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/43ju4xy
Miranda, S., Vlachos, A., Nogueira, D., Secker, A., Mendes, A., Garrett, R., Mitchell, J. J., & Marinho, Z. (2019). Automated fact checking in the news room. The Web Conference 2019: Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2019, 3579–3583. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3314135
Montoro-Montarroso, A., Cantón-Correa, J., Rosso, P., Chulvi, B., Panizo-Lledot, Á., Huertas-Tato, J., Calvo-Figueras, B., Rementeria, M. J., & Gómez-Romero, J. (2023). Fighting disinformation with artificial intelligence: Fundamentals, advances and challenges. Profesional de la Información, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.may.22
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316286937
Park, K., & Culloty, E. (2023). Beyond performative transparency: lessons learned from the EU Code of Practice on Disinformation. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2022i0.13067
Pecini, C., Della Rocca, S., y Scrocco, A. (2024). Critical Reading of Digital Texts: The Emile Project Empowering Schools in Self-Regulation of Media and Information Literacy Processes. https://bit.ly/43niv8w
Prodigioso Volcán (2023). IA para periodistas. Una herramienta por explotar. https://bit.ly/4kHhopW
Rzabayeva, D., Kassymova, G., & Pratama, H. (2024). The Role of Gamification in Promoting Digital Literacy: Bridging the Gap between Fun and Learning. Materials of International Scientific-Practical Internet Conference “Challenges of Science” https://doi.org/10.31643/2024.20
Sádaba, C. & Salaverría, R. (2023). Combatir la desinformación con alfabetización mediática: análisis de las tendencias en la Unión Europea. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 81, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2023-1552
Sánchez, H. M. (2022). Transformación digital y audiencia. Tendencias y uso de la inteligencia artificial en medios verificadores. Ámbitos, 56, 9-20. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2022.i56.01
Sánchez, H. M. ; Sánchez, M, & Martos, J. (2024). The methodology used by fact-checkers. An in-depth analysis of commonly used strategies. Journalism Practice, 1-24, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2340522
Sánchez, M. & Sánchez, H. M., (2022). Fact-checkers como formadores: iniciativas de los iberoamericanos de IFCN en Escandón, P. Tejedor, S. (ed.). Escenarios digitales de la comunicación (pp.19-36). Gedisa.
Sánchez, M., Sánchez, H. M., & Martínez, S. (2022). Inteligencia artificial en verificadores hispanos de la red IFCN: proyectos innovadores y percepción de expertos y profesionales. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 28(4), 867-879.https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.82735
Santos, F. C. C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Automated Detection of Disinformation: A Thematic Analysis. Journalism and Media, 4(2), 679-687. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4020043
Scharrer, E., & Zhou, Y. (2022, May 18). Media Literacy and Communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.1304
Science Feedback. (s. f.). SCENT: Predicting domain credibility on the basis of backlink networks. Recuperado el 19 de diciembre de 2024, de https://bit.ly/3Fg1QdZ
Scott, J. C. (2018). Lobbying and society: A political sociology of interest groups. Polity.
Sedelmeier, U. (2012). Is Europeanisation through conditionality sustainable? Lock-in of institutional change after EU accession. West European Politics, 35(1), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.631311
Singh, J. N., Gautam, A., & Tomar, H. (2023). Deep Fake in picture using Convolutional Neural Network. En Proceedings of the 2023 5th International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICAC3N). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC3N60023.2023.10541758
The Information Laundromat. (s. f.). The Information Laundromat. Recuperado el 19 de diciembre de 2024, de https://informationlaundromat.com/
Tiernan, P., Costello, E., Donlon, E., Parysz, M., & Scriney, M. (2023). Information and media literacy in the age of AI: Options for the future. Education Sciences, 13(9), 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090906
UC3M. (2023). Un proyecto científico europeo estudia cómo regular la desinformación generada por IA. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
Waterson, J. (2019, mayo 24). Facebook refuses to delete fake Pelosi video spread by Trump supporters. The guardian. https://bit.ly/4kNGgwx
Wetzel, D. A., & Kani, J. (2024). Enhancing information literacy through generative AI in the library classroom. Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.5195/palrap.2024.302
Woolley, J. (2024). Generative AI and Business: A Review and Research Agenda. Oxford Research Encyclopedia Of Business And Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.434
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ana Zafra Arroyo, María Sánchez González, Hada M. Sánchez Gonzales

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License, Attribution-NonCommercial, International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). The scientific community is free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon that material under the following terms: Proper credit must be given (journal, authors, URL/DOI), and it is not used for commercial purposes.
How to Cite
Funding data
-
Junta de Andalucía
Grant numbers Proyecto de Excelencia, Plan Andaluz de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (PAIDI 2020): “Impacto de la desinformación en Andalucía: análisis transversal de las audiencias y las rutinas y agendas periodísticas. Desinfoand Ref: ProyExc00143. 2022-2025



















