Family and socio-emotional relations in advertising of toys in the Christmas period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n28a08Keywords:
Advertising, family, toys, children, socioemotional relationshipAbstract
This study analyses toy advertising broadcast in Spain over the 2014/15 Christmas period. The goal is to begin a quantitative review of how family is represented in commercials. Initially, it reviews the concepts of childhood, relates them to the concept of socialisation and offers a short analysis of the advertising phenomenon. The results evaluate the presence of types of emotions, values and actions associated with the gender of the characters featured, and the frequency of parent– and grandparent–character appearances in toy ads targeting children is quantified. The limited presence of these characters establishes a basis for discussion about the role of said characters as necessary figures of reference and authority in child development. A final reflection is also proposed regarding the homogeneity of the representations of gender associated with the characters’ roles, for both adults and children. Lastly, this paper justifies interest in widening the study to international level, to make it possible to check the degree of similarity and of contrast in said representations as a way to contribute to understanding and viewing the family in advertising discourses.
Downloads
Global Statistics ℹ️
|
839
Views
|
629
Downloads
|
|
1468
Total
|
|
References
Arconada, M. A. (1998). “La publicidad en familia”, Comunicar, 10, pp. 83-95.
Bradbard, M. (1985). “Sex Differences in Adults´gifts and Children´s Toy Request, at Christmas”, Psychological Reports, 56, pp. 691- 696. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1985.56.3.969.
Bradbard, M. y Parkman, S. (1985). “Gender Differences in Preschool Children Toy Request”, Journal of Genetic Psychology, 145, pp. 283-284. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1984.10532277.
Berger, P. y Luckmann, T. (1984). La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrotu.
Carter, D. y Levy, G, (1988). “Cognitive Aspects of Early Sex-role Development: The Influence of Gender Schemas on
Preschoolers´memories and Preferences for Sex-typed Toys and Activities”, Child Development, 59, 3, pp. 782-792. DOI: 10.2307/1130576.
Chacón, F. y Bestard, J, (2011). Familias. Historia de la sociedad española (del final de la Edad Media a nuestros días), Madrid: Cátedra.
Cherney, I. (2005). “Children´s and Adults Recall of Sex-stereotyped Toy Pictures: Effects of Presentation and Memory Task”, Infant and Children Development, 4, 1, pp. 11-27.
DeMause, L. (1982). Historia de la infancia. Madrid: Alianza.
Eisenberg, N. et al., (1985). “Parental Socialization of Young Children’s Play: A Short-Term Longitudinal Study”, Child Development, 56, 6, pp. 1506.
Ferrés, J. (2000). Educar en una cultura del espectáculo. Barcelona: Paidós.
Ferrés, J. (2010). Televisión subliminal. Socialización mediante comunicaciones inadvertidas. Barcelona: Paidós.
Foucault, M. (2005). Historia de la sexualidad I: la voluntad del saber. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Gaitán, L. (2006). Sociología de la infancia. Madrid: Síntesis.
Garrido, P. (2014). Inmigración y diversidad cultural en España. Madrid: Editorial Fundamentos.
Gómez Espino, J. M. y Blanco López, J. (2005). “Los niños en la publicidad. Una propuesta de categorización de las representaciones sociales sobre la infancia en los anuncios televisivos”, ZER, 19, pp. 53-76.
Illouz, E. (2007). Intimidades congeladas. Las emociones en el capitalismo. Barcelona: Katz.
Martín-Alegre, S. (2011). Desafíos a la heterosexualidad obligatoria, Barcelona: UOC.
Martin, C. L., Eisenbud, L. y Rose, H. (1995). “Children´s Gender based Reasoning about Toys”, Child Development, 66, pp. 1.457-1.458. DOI: 10.2307/1131657.
Martínez, E., Nicolás, M. y Salas, Á. (2013). “Gender Representation in Advertising of Toys in the Christmas Period (2009-12)”, Comunicar, 41, pp. 187-194. DOI: 10.3916/C41-2013-18.
Millei, Z. y Lee, L. (2007). “Smarten up the parents: whose agendas are we serving? Governing parents and children through the Smart Population Foundation in Australia”, Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8.3, pp. 208-221.
Miller, C. (1987). “Qualitative Differences among Gender-sterotyped Toys: Implications for Cognitive and Social Development in Girls andBoys”, Sex Roles, 16, 473-487. DOI: 10.1007/BF002924 82.
Moscoso, M. (2008). “Nuevos sujetos, nuevas voces: ¿hay lugar para la infancia en el pensamiento transnacional?”, Enrique Santamaría (ed.): Retos epistemológicos de las migraciones transnacionales, Barcelona: Anthropos, pp. 261-281.
Moyer-Gusé, E. y Riddle, K. (2010). El impacto de los medios de comunicación en la infancia: Guía para padres y educadores. Barcelona: UOC.
Nash, M. (ed.). (2014). Feminidades y masculinidades. Arquetipos y prácticas de género. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Owen, J. y Centers, R. (2005). “Characteristics of Boys’ and Girls’ Toys”, Sex Roles, 53, pp. 619-633.
Pichardo, J. (2009). Entender la diversidad familiar. Relaciones homosexuales y nuevos modelos de familia, Barcelona: Bellaterra.
Pine, K. y Nash, A. (2002). “Dear Santa: The effects of television advertising on young children”, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 6, pp. 529-539.
Rice, P. (1997). Desarrollo humano: estudio del ciclo vital, Madrid: Prentice-Hall.
Schaffer, H. R. (1989). Interacción y socialización, Madrid: Ed. Visor.
Nichols, S., Nixon, H. y Rowsell, J. (2009). “The ‘good’ parent in relation to early childhood literacy: symbolic terrain and lived practice”, Literacy, 43, 2, pp. 65-75.
Sunderland, J. (2000). “Baby entertainer, bumbling assistant and line manager: discourses of fatherhood in parent craft texts”, Discourse and Society, 11, 2, pp. 249-274.
Vásquez Bronfman, A. y Martínez, I. (2005). La socialización en la escuela. Una perspectiva etnográfica. Barcelona: Paidós.
Wallerstein, I. (2012). El capitalismo histórico. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons License, Attribution-NonCommercial, International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). The scientific community is free to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and to remix, transform, and build upon that material under the following terms: Proper credit must be given (journal, authors, URL/DOI), and it is not used for commercial purposes.



















